• Abstract

    Estima-se que a turfeira da Bacia de Leyte Sab-a (LSBP), nas Filipinas, armazene enormes quantidades de estoques de carbono que podem influenciar a representação global do carbono da turfa tropical. No entanto, esse ecossistema único vem enfrentando ameaças que precisam ser estudadas, daí o estudo. As ameaças ao ecossistema foram analisadas usando a estrutura Driver-Pressão-Estado-Impacto-Resposta (DPSIR). A Entrevista com Informante-Chave (KII) e o QGIS também foram usados para avaliar os outros fatores do ecossistema. O principal fator determinante (D) foram fatores sociodemográficos, científicos e tecnológicos, sociopolíticos, valores religiosos e características biofísicas. Tornou-se claro que a pobreza da comunidade circundante e a demanda por aumento da produtividade da turfeira exerceram enorme pressão sobre o sistema. A degradação da turfeira começou décadas atrás devido à drenagem e à conversão agrícola, que é considerada a pressão significativa (P). O estado (S) dos estoques de carbono tem um valor monetário muito alto de US$ 1,4 bilhão para 3,5 ha de turfa. No entanto, as respostas da comunidade concentram-se na produtividade e não nos impactos da conservação das turfeiras (I). O mais alarmante é que a função das turfeiras como sumidouro de carbono passará a ser uma fonte que poderá gerar maiores emissões de carbono na atmosfera. Dado o estado atual da terra, com seu alto teor de carbono e águas de alto nível, mais ameaças e problemas surgirão no futuro se não forem abordados hoje. Portanto, como parte das respostas (R), a reformulação da gestão por meio de serviços paisagísticos pode equilibrar a produtividade e o armazenamento de carbono. A formulação de políticas de conservação seria útil, e a consideração do uso múltiplo das turfeiras é considerada a melhor opção para considerar tanto as turfeiras quanto a comunidade ao seu redor.

  • References

    1. Ahmad, M., Ahmad, W. S., Ahmad, S. N., Jamal, S., & Saqib, M. (2024). Tracing the roots of wetland degradation in India: a systematic review of anthropogenic drivers, ecological consequences and conservation strategies. GeoJournal, 89(1), 24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-024-10997-9
    2. Amarasinghe SR. (2022). Ancient Tank Cascade Systems in Sri Lanka and DPSIR framework for conceptualizing ecosystem-based management approaches. Rajarata University Journal, 7-2, 1-22.
    3. Asian Development Bank (ADB) (2000). Environmental Evaluation of Swamps and Marshlands Project, Final Report. Philippines: Environmental Evaluation of Swamps and Marshlands.
    4. Balode, L., Bumbiere, K., Sosars, V., Valters, K., & Blumberga, D. (2024). Pros and Cons of Strategies to Reduce Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Peatlands: Review of Possibilities. Applied Sciences, 14(6), 2260. https://doi.org/10.3390/app14062260
    5. Bobon-Carnice PA, Socias GN, Corcilles MYS, Abaño TKB, Espanta UMH. (2025) Effects of biochar amendment on CO2 evolution in four ecotypes of Leyte Sab-A Basin Peatland, Philippines. Environ. Nat. Resour. J. ; 23(2):105-117. https://doi.org/10.32526/ennrj/23/20240274
    6. Bobon-Carnıce, P. A., & Lına, S. (2017). Carbon storage and nutrient stocks distribution of three adjacent land use patterns in Lake Danao National Park, Ormoc, Leyte, Philippines. Journal of Science, Engineering and Technology (JSET), 5(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.61569/3xj10s38
    7. Bobon-Carnice, P. A., & Lina, S. B. (2021). Changes in carbon and nutrient stocks of secondary forest transformations under Ultisol in Leyte Island, Philippines. Mindanao Journal of Science and Technology, 19(1), 116-136.
    8. Bobon-Carnice, P. A., Chanton, J. P., Migo, V. P., & Faustino-Eslava, D. V. (2023). Carbon Storage of Leyte Sab-A Basin Peatland, Philippines. Environment and Natural Resources Journal, 21(5), 402-416. https://doi.org/10.32526/ennrj/21/20230015
    9. Bosma, C., & Hein, L. (2023). The climate and land use change nexus: Implications for designing adaptation and conservation investment strategies in Sub‐Saharan Africa. Sustainable Development, 31(5), 3811-3830. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2627
    10. Cammerino, A. R. B., Ingaramo, M., & Monteleone, M. (2024). Complementary approaches to planning a restored coastal wetland and assessing the role of agriculture and biodiversity: an applied case study in Southern Italy. Water, 16(1), 153. https://doi.org/10.3390/w16010153
    11. Caporali, F., & Caporali, F. (2021). Sustainable Agriculture Through Ecological Intensification. Ethics and Sustainable Agriculture: Bridging the Ecological Gaps, 123-258. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-76683-2
    12. Decena SC, Villacorta-Parilla S, Arribado AO, Macasait DR, Arguelles MS, Salamia SS, Relevo ES. (2022) Impact of land use conversion on carbon stocks and selected peat physico-chemical properties in the leyte sab-a basin peatland, Philippines. Wetlands. 42:1-6. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-723814/v1
    13. Dommain, R., Couwenberg, J., Glaser, P. H., Joosten, H., & Suryadiputra, I. N. N. (2014). Carbon storage and release in Indonesian peatlands since the last deglaciation. Quaternary Science Reviews, 97, 1-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2014.05.002
    14. Dulce, E. D. (2024, June). Path to Net Zero: 2030 Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emission Projections for the Philippine Power Generation. In 2024 6th Global Power, Energy and Communication Conference (GPECOM) (pp. 507-511). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/GPECOM61896.2024.10582729
    15. Fagorite, V. I., Onyekuru, S. O., Opara, A. I., & Oguzie, E. E. (2023). The major techniques, advantages, and pitfalls of various methods used in geological carbon sequestration. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 20(4), 4585-4614. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-022-04351-0
    16. Fallarcuna, B., Ignacio, J. A., Soriaga, R., & Veridiano, R. K. (2023). Forest greenhouse gas emissions estimates in major forest tenure instruments in the Philippines from 2001–2020. Ecosystems and Development Journal, 13(2), 1-16.
    17. García Lino, M. C., Pfanzelt, S., Domic, A. I., Hensen, I., Schittek, K., Meneses, R. I., & Bader, M. Y. (2024). Carbon dynamics in high‐A ndean tropical cushion peatlands: A review of geographic patterns and potential drivers. Ecological Monographs, e1614. https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu24-22008
    18. Gell, P. A., Finlayson, C. M., & Davidson, N. C. (2023). An introduction to the Ramsar Convention on Wetlands. In Ramsar Wetlands (pp. 1-36). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-817803-4.00018-8
    19. Graham, R. E. (2023). The marine litter issue in the Windward Islands-a pathway to responses using the DPSIR framework. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 11, 1150722. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2023.1150722
    20. Hiller, B., & Fisher, J. (2023). A multifunctional ‘scape approach for sustainable management of intact ecosystems—a review of tropical peatlands. Sustainability, 15(3), 2484.
    21. Hooijer, A., Vernimmen, R., Mulyadi, D., Triantomo, V., Hamdani, Lampela, M., ... & Swarup, S. (2024). Benefits of tropical peatland rewetting for subsidence reduction and forest regrowth: results from a large-scale restoration trial. Scientific Reports, 14(1), 10721. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-60462-3
    22. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15032484
    23. Jovani‐Sancho, A. J., O'Reilly, P., Anshari, G., Chong, X. Y., Crout, N., Evans, C. D., ... & Sjögersten, S. (2023). CH4 and N2O emissions from smallholder agricultural systems on tropical peatlands in Southeast Asia. Global Change Biology, 29(15), 4279-4297. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.16747
    24. Kunarso, A., Farquharson, R., Rachmanadi, D., Hearn, K., Blanch, E. W., & Grover, S. (2024). Land use change alters carbon composition and degree of decomposition of tropical peat soils. Mires & Peat, 30. https://doi.org/10.19189/MaP.2023.OMB.Sc.2121334
    25. Lasco, R. D., & Pulhin, F. B. (2009). Carbon budgets of forest ecosystems in the Philippines. Journal of Environmental Science and Management, 12(1), 1-13.
    26. Liu, W., Fritz, C., van Belle, J., & Nonhebel, S. (2023). Production in peatlands: Comparing ecosystem services of different land use options following conventional farming. Science of the Total Environment, 875, 162534. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.162534
    27. Matutes, H., & Densing, L. A. (2022). Avifauna composition and communities in Leyte Sab-a Basin Peatland and its vicinity in Northeastern Leyte, Philippines. Journal of Wildlife and Biodiversity, 6(2), 35-60. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6569636
    28. Merilo, M. G. A. D. 2001. Greenhouse Gas Mitigation Strategies: The Philippine Experience. In Workshop on good practices in policies and measures 8, 10
    29. Miettinen, J., Shi, C., & Liew, S. C. (2012). Two decades of destruction in Southeast Asia's peat swamp forests. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 10(3), 124-128. https://doi.org/10.1890/100236
    30. OECD (1993) OECD Core Set of Indicators for Environmental Performance Reviews. A Synthesis Report by the Group on the State of the Environment. OECD, Paris. 35 pp.
    31. Oenoto, M., Leach, A. W., Kell, L. T., & Mumford, J. (2023). Extending the Driver-Pressure-State-Impact-Response Causal Chain Framework to Include Human Activities, Welfare and Management. Collect. Vol. Sci. Pap. ICCAT, 80(7), 117-130.
    32. Omar, M. S., Ifandi, E., Sukri, R. S., Kalaitzidis, S., Christanis, K., Lai, D. T. C., ... & Tsikouras, B. (2022). Peatlands in Southeast Asia: A comprehensive geological review. Earth-Science Reviews, 232, 104149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2022.104149
    33. Pacoma, A. J., Pearson, L., & Wungaeo, S. (2024). The devil’s in the details: An ecosystem-based adaptation and adaptive governance framework for analyzing governance challenges to addressing peatland restoration problems. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-4175024/v1
    34. Page, S. E., Rieley, J. O., & Banks, C. J. (2011). Global and regional importance of the tropical peatland carbon pool. Global Change Biology, 17(2), 798-818. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2010.02279.x
    35. Page, S., Rieley, J., 2018. Tropical peat swamp forests of Southeast Asia. In: Wetland Book II Distribution, Description, and Conservation, 3, pp. 1753–1761. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4001-3_5
    36. Poczta, P., Urbaniak, M., Sachs, T., Harenda, K. M., Klarzyńska, A., Juszczak, R., ... & Chojnicki, B. H. (2023). A multi-year study of ecosystem production and its relation to biophysical factors over a temperate peatland. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 338, 109529. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2023.109529
    37. Pramudi, M. I., Rosa, H. O., & Aphrodyanti, L. (2024). Overview of predators in shallots plantation in peatland, Landasan ulin South Borneo. Indian Journal of Entomology, 86(1) 33-38. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3390/land13060866
    38. Rakuasa, H., & Latue, P. C. (2023). Spatial Planning and Policy Study of Food Estate Development on Peatland in Pulang Pisau and Kapuas Districts, Kalimantan Tengah, Indonesia. Nusantara Journal of Behavioral and Social Sciences, 2(2), 49-54. https://doi.org/10.47679/202329
    39. Rattan, R., Sharma, B., Kumar, R., Saigal, V., & Shukla, S. (2021). Ramsar Convention: History, Structure, Operations, and Relevance. Wetlands conservation: Current challenges and future strategies, 17-39. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119692621.ch2
    40. Rowland, J. A., Bracey, C., Moore, J. L., Cook, C. N., Bragge, P., & Walsh, J. C. (2021). Effectiveness of conservation interventions globally for degraded peatlands in cool-climate regions. Biological Conservation, 263, 109327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2021.109327
    41. Satama-Bermeo, M., Rudolf, M., & Olschewski, R. (2024). Agroecosystem services: From general assessment to policy implications. People and Nature, 6(3), 1060-1077. https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.10605
    42. Stokes, A., Bocquého, G., Carrère, P., Salazar, R. C., Deconchat, M., Garcia, L., ... & Thomas, M. (2023). Services provided by multifunctional agroecosystems: Questions, obstacles and solutions. Ecological Engineering, 191, 106949. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2023.106949
    43. Termorshuizen, J. W., & Opdam, P. (2009). Landscape services as a bridge between landscape ecology and sustainable development. Landscape Ecology, 24, 1037-1052. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-008-9314-8
    44. Tolunay, D., Kowalchuk, G. A., Erkens, G., & Hefting, M. M. (2024). Aerobic and anaerobic decomposition rates in drained peatlands: Impact of botanical composition. Science of the Total Environment, 930, 172639. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.172639
    45. Tuohy, P., O'Sullivan, L., Bracken, C. J., & Fenton, O. (2023). Drainage status of grassland peat soils in Ireland: extent, efficacy and implications for GHG emissions and rewetting efforts. Journal of Environmental Management, 344, 118391 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.118391
    46. Van Leeah, B. A., & Lasco, R. D. (2012). Carbon storage of Caimpugan peatland in Agusan Marsh, Philippines and its role in greenhouse gas mitigation. Journal of Environmental Science and Management, 15(2).
    47. Wong, F. W. M. H., Foley, A., Del Rio, D. F., Rooney, D., Shariff, S., Dolfi, A., & Srinivasan, G. (2022). Public perception of transitioning to a low-carbon nation: a Malaysian scenario. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, 24(10), 3077-3092. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-022-02345-7
    48. World Bank. (2020). Investment Analysis for Mangrove Ecosystems in the Ayeyarwady Region. World Bank.
    49. Yunus, M., Pagdee, A., & Baral, H. (2024). Economics of Peatland Ecosystem Services: A Study of Use and Non-Use Values and People Interplays in Sumatra, Indonesia. Land, 13(6), 866. https://doi.org/10.3390/land13060866
    50. Zhao, Y., Zhao, X., Fan, D., & Qiu, Y. (2023). A comprehensive method for refining essential SDGs variables for land degradation monitoring based on the DPSIR framework. International Journal of Digital Earth, 16(1), 741-761. https://doi.org/10.1080/17538947.2023.2182375

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2025 The Authors

How to cite

Bobon-Carnice, P. A. (2025). Peatland under pressure: The future of carbon storage in Leyte Sab-a Basin Peatland, Philippines. Multidisciplinary Science Journal, 8(1), 2026007. https://doi.org/10.31893/multiscience.2026007
  • Article viewed - 489
  • PDF downloaded - 156