Keywords:
children's online education
interactive design
interaction theory
emotionalization
gamification ast

  • Abstract

    With the rapid advancement of global information technology, the integration of online course resources with traditional classroom teaching has become an increasingly popular trend. This transformation not only demands that learners improve their self-directed learning abilities but also significantly raises users' expectations for the functionality and learning experience of online learning platforms. Consequently, optimizing the interactive design of online learning platforms has emerged as a crucial topic in contemporary educational technology research. This study draws on theories of educational engagement, gamification design, interaction design, and relevant studies in children's online education. First, this research analyzes the interactive design of existing online education platforms for children, identifying deficiencies in user interaction, content presentation, and learning experience. Building on these findings, it explores how innovative design concepts can enhance the interactivity and user experience of such platforms. Specifically, this study focuses on two dimensions: gamification and emotional design, investigating how these concepts can be effectively applied to children's online education. By analyzing children's psychological needs and behavioral patterns during the learning process, the study finds that gamified interactive designs can significantly improve learners' sense of engagement and immersion, thereby enhancing their motivation and capacity for self-directed learning. Moreover, the study emphasizes the diversified application of digital tools and platforms, proposing that, in the context of big data, interactive design for children's online education should prioritize data-driven approaches and personalized recommendations. By analyzing learners' behavioral data, online platforms can dynamically adjust learning content, difficulty levels, and interaction methods to provide each learner with the most tailored learning experience. This not only improves learning outcomes but also helps educators better understand students' learning needs and behavioral characteristics, thereby supporting the realization of personalized education.

  • References

    1. Al-Adwan, A. S., Albelbisi, N. A., Hujran, O., Al-Rahmi, W. M., & Alkhalifah, A. (2021). Developing a holistic success model for sustainable e-learning: A structural equation modeling approach. Sustainability, 13(16), 9453. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13169453
    2. Alamri, H., Lowell, V., Watson, W., & Watson, S. L. (2020). Using personalized learning as an instructional approach to motivate learners in online higher education: Learner self-determination and intrinsic motivation. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 52(3), 322-352. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2020.1728449
    3. Alenezi, M. (2023). Digital learning and digital institution in higher education. Education Sciences, 13(1), 88. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13010088
    4. Amaefule, C. O., Breitwieser, J., Biedermann, D., Nobbe, L., Drachsler, H., & Brod, G. (2023). Fostering children's acceptance of educational apps: The importance of designing enjoyable learning activities. British Journal of Educational Technology, 54(5), 1351-1372.
    5. Asghar, M. Z., Afzaal, M. N., Iqbal, J., & Sadia, H. A. (2022). Analyzing an appropriate blend of face-to-face, offline and online learning approaches for the in-service vocational teacher’s training program. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(17), 10668. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191710668
    6. Bai, X., & Li, J. (2021). Intelligent platform for real-time page view statistics using educational big data digital resource sharing. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, 40(2), 2851-2860. https://doi.org/10.3233/JIFS-189325
    7. Bartlett, K. A., & Dorribo Camba, J. (2023). The role of a graphical interpretation factor in the assessment of spatial visualization: A critical analysis. Spatial Cognition & Computation, 23(1), 1-30. https://doi.org/10.1080/13875868.2021.2019260
    8. Barua, L., & Lockee, B. B. (2024). A Review of Strategies to Incorporate Flexibility in Course Designs.
    9. Battiston, F., Cencetti, G., Iacopini, I., Latora, V., Lucas, M., Patania, A., Young, J.-G., & Petri, G. (2020). Networks beyond pairwise interactions: Structure and dynamics. Physics reports, 874, 1-92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2020.05.004
    10. Bloomberg, L. D. (2021). Designing and delivering effective online instruction: How to engage adult learners. Teachers College Press. https://doi.org/10.1177/10451595211069079
    11. Boettcher, J. V., & Conrad, R.-M. (2021). The online teaching survival guide: Simple and practical pedagogical tips. John Wiley & Sons.
    12. Borodo, A., Dębicka, O., Galik, A., Markiewicz, M., Reszka, L., & Reszka, M. (2022). Technical Platform Booklet: review of available IT solutions for on-line education.
    13. Bouhnik, D., & Marcus, T. (2006). Interaction in distance‐learning courses. Journal of the American society for information science and technology, 57(3), 299-305. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20277
    14. Cavinato, A. G., Hunter, R. A., Ott, L. S., & Robinson, J. K. (2021). Promoting student interaction, engagement, and success in an online environment. In: Springer.
    15. Diederich, S., Brendel, A. B., Morana, S., & Kolbe, L. (2022). On the design of and interaction with conversational agents: An organizing and assessing review of human-computer interaction research. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 23(1), 96-138. https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00724
    16. Gloria, A. M., & Uttal, L. (2020). Conceptual considerations in moving from face-to-face to online teaching. International Journal on E-Learning,
    17. Goh, H.-A., Ho, C.-K., & Abas, F. S. (2023). Front-end deep learning web apps development and deployment: a review. Applied Intelligence, 53(12), 15923-15945. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-022-04278-6
    18. Haleem, A., Javaid, M., Qadri, M. A., & Suman, R. (2022). Understanding the role of digital technologies in education: A review. Sustainable operations and computers, 3, 275-285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.susoc.2022.05.004
    19. Hassan, A. (2023). Design and development of an augmented reality-based application to facilitate STEM education Itä-Suomen yliopisto].
    20. Hennekeuser, D., Vaziri, D. D., Golchinfar, D., Schreiber, D., & Stevens, G. (2024). Enlarged Education–Exploring the Use of Generative AI to Support Lecturing in Higher Education. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 1-33.
    21. Hsiao, P.-W., & Su, C.-H. (2021). A study on the impact of STEAM education for sustainable development courses and its effects on student motivation and learning. Sustainability, 13(7), 3772. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13073772
    22. Kazu, I. Y., & Kuvvetli, M. (2024). Improve Speaking Skills with Duolingo's Mobile Game-Based Language Learning. Asian Journal of Education and Training, 10(1), 62-75. https://doi.org/10.20448/edu.v10i1.5488
    23. Khalil, R., Mansour, A. E., Fadda, W. A., Almisnid, K., Aldamegh, M., Al-Nafeesah, A., Alkhalifah, A., & Al-Wutayd, O. (2020). The sudden transition to synchronized online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic in Saudi Arabia: a qualitative study exploring medical students’ perspectives. BMC medical education, 20, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-020-02208-z
    24. Khosrawi-Rad, B., Grogorick, L., & Robra-Bissantz, S. (2023). Game-inspired pedagogical conversational agents: A systematic literature review. AIS Transactions on Human-Computer Interaction, 15(2), 146-192. https://doi.org/10.17705/1thci.00187
    25. Kryvorot, T., & Pryhodii, M. (2020). Using network-based educational and methodological complexes in professional training of future lecturers. Professional Pedagogics, 1(20), 109-118. https://doi.org/10.32835/2707-3092.2020.20.109-117
    26. Li, D., & Begalieva, S. (2022). Using Video Materials for Teaching Chinese Students the Russian Language in Distance Learning During the Period of the COVID-19Pandemic. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 98(98), 302-317. https://doi.org/10.32835/2707-3092.2020.20.109-117
    27. Linkiewich, D., Martinovich, V. V., Rinaldi, C. M., Howe, N., & Gokiert, R. (2021). Parental autonomy support in relation to preschool aged children’s behavior: Examining positive guidance, negative control, and responsiveness. Clinical child psychology and psychiatry, 26(3), 810-822. https://doi.org/10.1177/1359104521999762
    28. Maiya, A. K., & Aithal, P. (2023). A Review-based Research Topic Identification on How to Improve the Quality Services of Higher Education Institutions in Academic, Administrative, and Research Areas. Maiya, AK, & Aithal, PS,(2023). A Review based Research Topic Identification on How to Improve the Quality Services of Higher Education Institutions in Academic, Administrative, and Research Areas. International Journal of Management, Technology, and Social Sciences (IJMTS), 8(3), 103-153. https://doi.org/10.47992/IJMTS.2581.6012.0292
    29. Marcus, A. (2024). Design, User Experience, and Usability: 13th International Conference, DUXU 2024, Held as Part of the 26th HCI International Conference, HCII 2024, Washington, DC, USA, June 29–July 4, 2024, Proceedings, Part V. Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-61351-7
    30. Miraz, M. H., Ali, M., & Excell, P. S. (2021). Adaptive user interfaces and universal usability through plasticity of user interface design. Computer Science Review, 40, 100363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosrev.2021.100363
    31. Moore, J. L., Dickson-Deane, C., & Galyen, K. (2011). e-Learning, online learning, and distance learning environments: Are they the same? The Internet and higher education, 14(2), 129-135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2010.10.001
    32. Mystakidis, S., Berki, E., & Valtanen, J.-P. (2021). Deep and meaningful e-learning with social virtual reality environments in higher education: A systematic literature review. Applied Sciences, 11(5), 2412. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11052412
    33. Ortega, M. (2021). Computer-human interaction and collaboration: challenges and prospects. Electronics, 10(5), 616. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics10050616
    34. Owens, D. C., Sadler, T. D., Barlow, A. T., & Smith-Walters, C. (2020). Student motivation from and resistance to active learning rooted in essential science practices. Research in Science Education, 50, 253-277. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-017-9688-1
    35. Pauly, R., Heindrich, L., Amo, V., & Lieder, F. (2022). What to learn next? aligning gamification rewards to long-term goals using reinforcement learning. Proceedings of the Multi-disciplinary Conference on Reinforcement Learning and Decision Making,
    36. Prati, E., Peruzzini, M., Pellicciari, M., & Raffaeli, R. (2021). How to include User eXperience in the design of Human-Robot Interaction. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, 68, 102072. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcim.2020.102072
    37. Sammer, M., Seong, K., Olvera, N., Gronseth, S. L., Anderson-Fletcher, E., Jiao, J., Reese, A., & Kakadiaris, I. A. (2024). AI-FEED: Prototyping an AI-Powered Platform for the Food Charity Ecosystem. International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems, 17(1), 259. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44196-024-00656-9
    38. Sun, Y., Luo, B., Wang, S., & Fang, W. (2021). What you see is meaningful: Does green advertising change the intentions of consumers to purchase eco‐labeled products? Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(1), 694-704. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2648
    39. Wang, Y., Cao, Y., Gong, S., Wang, Z., Li, N., & Ai, L. (2022). Interaction and learning engagement in online learning: The mediating roles of online learning self-efficacy and academic emotions. Learning and Individual Differences, 94, 102128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2022.102128
    40. Wekerle, C., Daumiller, M., & Kollar, I. (2022). Using digital technology to promote higher education learning: The importance of different learning activities and their relations to learning outcomes. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 54(1), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2020.1799455
    41. Yang, Y., Yu, A., Li, J., Shafi, M., & Fauzi, M. A. (2024). Exploring the impact of gamified elements on college students' learning in virtual learning communities. Kybernetes. https://doi.org/10.1108/K-01-2024-0017
    42. Yong, F. Y., Neo, M., & Hew, S. H. (2020). Enhancing Students’ Collaborative Learning Experiences with Laurillard’s Conversational Framework. International Journal of Creative Multimedia, 1(SI 1), 151-166. https://doi.org/10.33093/ijcm.2020.1.X1.13
    43. Zhang, H., Chen, S., & Zheng, S. (2024). Proactive personality, interaction, and teaching strategy alignment: A conceptual-level analysis of interaction in distance learning. Education and Information Technologies, 1-40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12893-8
    44. Zhang, N., Liu, Q., Zheng, X., Luo, L., & Cheng, Y. (2022). Analysis of social interaction and behavior patterns in the process of online to offline lesson study: A case study of chemistry teaching design based on augmented reality. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 42(4), 815-836. https://doi.org/10.1080/02188791.2020.1866493
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2025 The Authors

How to cite

Zhang, M., & Hashim, A. M. (2025). Research on gamification and perceptual improvement of online course interaction design in children’s online education. Multidisciplinary Science Journal, 7(10), 2025477. https://doi.org/10.31893/multiscience.2025477
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC
  • Article viewed - 890
  • PDF downloaded - 525