• Abstract

    It would appear that the negotiating interests of the government and employers are woven into the policy direction of Law Number 11 of 2020 about Job Creation. Consequently, the final legal document satisfies no standards other than problematic and politically motivated ones. Legislatively, Law No. 11 of 2020 Concerning Job Creation is flawed, but there are also a number of problematic items at the level of normative substance. Consider the following: the repeal of Article 59 of the Manpower Law, which dealt with PKWT; the modification of Article 151 that could lead to unilateral layoffs; and the wages governed by Article 88. Law No. 11 of 2020 offers the formation of regulations through the omnibus method to overcome the problem of regulatory obesity, overlapping authority and long bureaucratic flows. The aim is to simplify the business sector and licensing which is expected to attract the interest of domestic and foreign investors. Legal politics surrounding Law No. 11 of 2011 on Job Creation, particularly as it pertains to industrial relations and the law's ramifications, is the issue that this article seeks to address. This study employs a conceptual and statutory approach to research, which is typical of juridical-normative studies. According to this article's conclusions, the Job Creation Law's legal politics in the area of industrial relations just satisfy political regulations, rather than workers' rights and interests. Law 11 of 2020, which deals with employment, has multiple problematic clauses that address issues including pay, layoffs, PKWT, and more. Since faulty standards can hurt workers at the substantive level, the Job Creation Law cannot solve industrial relations difficulties.

  • References

    1. Adhistianto, M. F. (2020). Politik Hukum Pembentukan Rancangan Undang-Undang Cipta Kerja (Studi Klaster Ketenagakerjaan). Pamulang Law Review, 3(1), 1–10.
    2. Asuan, A., & Rizayusmanda, R. (2023). Workers Rights’ Implications Who Have Experienced Termination of Employment According to The Law Number 13 of 2003 Concerning Employment. International Journal of Social Service and Research, 3(1), 129–136.
    3. Chandranegara, I. S. (2020). Kompabilitas Penggunaan Metode Omnibus Dalam Pembentukan Undang-Undang. Ius Quia Iustum, 27(2), 241-263.
    4. Faizal, L. (2017). Produk Hukum Di Indonesia Perspektif Politik Hukum. Asas: Jurnal Hukum Ekonomi Syariah, 9(1).
    5. Fudika, M. Dela, Oktadinata, D. I., Chaidir, E., Susanti, H., & Nor, M. Z. M. (2022). Analysis of Open and Closed Proportional Systems in the 2024 Legislative Elections. Proceeding International Conference on Malay Identity, 3, 206–216.
    6. Husni, L. (2008). Introduction to Employment Law. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers, 42.
    7. Idharulhaq, I., & Fatimah, S. (2022). Undang Undang Cipta Kerja di Sektor Lingkungan Hidup Perspektif Fikih Lingkungan. Jurnal Tana Mana, 3(2), 180–189.
    8. Izziyana, W. V., Matompo, O. S., & Rimbawan, A. Y. (2023). The Development of International and National Sovereignty of the Law of the Sea in the Perspective of Philosophical Analysis. Jurnal Justiciabelen, 6(1), 24–35.
    9. Kurniawan, F., & Dewanto, W. A. (2020). Problematika pembentukan RUU cipta kerja dengan konsep omnibus law pada klaster ketenagakerjaan pasal 89 angka 45 tentang pemberian pesangon kepada pekerja yang di PHK. Jurnal Panorama Hukum, 5(1), 63–76.
    10. Landess, W. M. & Posner, R. A. (1980). Market Power in Antitrust Cases. Havard Law Review, 94, 937-996.
    11. Luthfy, R. M. (2021). Politik Hukum Pengaturan Peraturan Desa Dalam Produk Hukum. Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia, 18(4), 492.
    12. M. D., Moh. Mahfud. (2013). Dekonstruksi dan Gagasan Pemikiran Hukum Progresif. Semarang: Konsorsium Hukum Progresif UNDIP.
    13. Muhammad, A. (2004). Hukum dan penelitian hukum. Bandung: Citra aditya bakti.
    14. Munali, D. S., Rahmawati, N., Kurniawati, N. A., & Rahmadini, A. (2023). Politik Hukum Pembentukan Undang-Undang Cipta Kerja: Menyoal Proses Legislasi Dalam Pembentukannya. Amsir Law Journal, 5(1), 1–12.
    15. Prayogi, I. A. (2019). Media Convergence In Welcoming Industrial Era 4.0. Book of Abstracts, 62.
    16. Rafiqi, I. D. (2021). Criticisms toward the job creation bill and ethical reconstruction of legislators based on prophetic values. Legality: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum, 29(1), 144–160.
    17. REZA, M. D. (2022). Kedudukan Ad/Art Partai Politik Dalam Sistem Ketatanegaraan Dan Urgensi Pengujiannya.
    18. Sajian, A., Perdana, I. T., Yudiantini, N. P. Y., Putra, I. H., & Wilandra, I. K. (2021). Pengaruh Politik Terhadap Pembentukan Rancangan Undang-Undang Cipta Kerja. Jurnal Kompilasi Hukum, 6(2).
    19. Soedarto, H. (1986). Hukum Pidana cet. 4. Alumni, Bandung.
    20. Sugiono. (2012). Metode Penelitian Bisnis. Alfabeta.
    21. Sulaiman, K. F. (2017). Politik Hukum Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Thafa Media.
    22. Susanto, A. F. (2015). Penelitian Hukum Transformatif-Partisipatoris. Malang: Setara Press.
    23. Wahyono, E. (2015). Demokratisasi Pemilihan Kepala Daerah Dan Perwujudan Pemerintahan Daerah Yang Baik. IUS: Jurnal Ilmiah Fakultas Hukum, 2(1), 1–6.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2025 The Authors

How to cite

Wicaksono, M. B. A., & Tristiana, E. (2025). Legal politics of law number 11 Of 2020 concerning job creation in the labor legal aspects. Multidisciplinary Science Journal, 7(8), 2025406. https://doi.org/10.31893/multiscience.2025406
  • Article viewed - 143
  • PDF downloaded - 43