Keywords:
smart education
visual communication design
mixed-methods research
educational technology
student attitudes
teaching strategies

  • Abstract

    This study explores the current state of teaching and learning in the field of visual communication design in China during the era of smart education. By employing a mixed-methods approach, combining quantitative surveys with qualitative teacher interviews, this research comprehensively understands students' attitudes, the challenges and influences they face, and effective teaching strategies. The results indicate that students generally have a positive attitude toward smart education that integrates artificial intelligence and multimedia tools, believing that these technologies can enhance the personalization and interactivity of learning, thereby increasing efficiency and engagement. Teachers emphasize the importance of project-based learning and experiential learning, which enhance students' practical skills and promote innovative thinking development. Additionally, the study identifies some challenges in applying smart education technologies, such as integrating technology with traditional teaching methods.

  • References

    1. Ambele, R., Kaijage, S., Dida, M., Trojer, L., & Kyando, N. (2022). A review of the Development Trend of Personalized Learning Technologies and its Applications. International Journal of Advances in Scientific Research and Engineering. https://doi.org/10.31695/ijasre.2022.8.11.9.
    2. Azman Abu Bakar, Amar-Singh HSS, & Sararaks Sondi. (2008). The Medical Research Handbook. Planning a Research Project. Kuala Lumpur: Institute for Health Systems Research, Malaysia. https://doi.org/10.13140/2.1.4294.3366
    3. Bonanno, P. (2019). SMART LEARNING – AN EMERGING PEDAGOGICAL APPROACH. EDULEARN19 Proceedings. https://doi.org/10.21125/EDULEARN.2019.1715.
    4. Centre for Student Services and Development, Ministry of Education, P.R. China. (2022, December 31). Visual communication design. Yang Guang Gao Kao. https://gaokao.chsi.com.cn/zyk/zybk/detail/421209027
    5. Cevikbas, M., & Kaiser, G. (2022). Promoting Personalized Learning in Flipped Classrooms: A Systematic Review Study. Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141811393
    6. Chen, L., & Yang, Y. (2015). Research on Micro Class Design for Intelligence Education. Educational Research, 3. https://kns.cnki.net/KCMS/detail/detail.aspx?dbcode=CJFD&dbname=CJFDLAST2015&filename=jyyj201503017
    7. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2023). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (Sixth edition). SAGE.
    8. Al Qur’an, H. A. D. (2020). The Role of Talent and Skill in Visual Communication Design Education/Practice: Three Case Studies from Jordan. International Conference on Arts and Humanities, 6(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.17501/23572744.2019.6106
    9. Ding, Z., Yun, H., & Li, E. (2023). A multimedia knowledge discovery-based optimal scheduling approach considering visual behaviour in smart education.. Mathematical biosciences and engineering: MBE, 20 3, 5901-5916. https://doi.org/10.3934/mbe.2023254.
    10. Fan, S., Yu, K., & Lin, K. (2020). A Framework for Implementing an Engineering-Focused STEM Curriculum. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 19, 1523 - 1541. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-020-10129-y
    11. Feng, M., Cao, R., & Chen, Q. (2023). Revolution and Reconstruction of Art Design Education under Impact of AIGC: Opportunities, Paradigms and Countermeasures. Industrial ＆ Engineering Design, 4. https://doi.org/10.19798/j.cnki.2096-6946.2023.04.007
    12. Ferreira, H., Oliveira, G., Araújo, R., Dorça, F., & Cattelan, R. (2019). Technology-enhanced assessment visualization for smart learning environments. Smart Learning Environments, 6, 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-019-0096-z.
    13. Fleischmann, K. (2010). The POOL Model: Foregrounding an alternative learning and teaching approach for digital media design in higher education. Art, Design and Communication in Higher Education, 9, 57-73. https://doi.org/10.1386/ADCH.9.1.57_1
    14. George-Palilonis, J., & Filak, V. (2009). Blended Learning in the Visual Communications Classroom: Student Reflections on a Multimedia Course. Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 7, 247-256.
    15. Gu, X., & Du, H. (2019). Reflection and Dialogue About the Important Issue of “Reconstruction of Pedagogical Theory in the Information Technology Era”. Modern Distance Education Research, 1. https://kns.cnki.net/KCMS/detail/detail.aspx?dbcode=CJFD&dbname=CJFDLAST2019&filename=xdyc201901002
    16. Hao, X. (2022). Innovation in Teaching Method Using Visual Communication under the Background of Big Data and Artificial Intelligence. Mobile Information Systems. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/7315880
    17. Hardman, P. (2022). The Transformative Potential of the Ongoing Digital Revolution for the Studio Model of Design Education. Impact of Digital Transformation in Teacher Training Models. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-9538-1.ch009
    18. Huang, J. W. (2014). Research on the Computer Graphic Design and Visual Communication Design. Advanced Materials Research, 1055, 342–345. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.1055.342
    19. Jamal, I., & Mustaffa, N. (2023). The Impact of Visual Communication on Students’ Learning Experience Towards Memory Recognition and Enhancement. Al-i’lam - Journal of Contemporary Islamic Communication and Media. https://doi.org/10.33102/jcicom.vol3no1.85.
    20. Johnson, R. B., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2004). Mixed methods research: A research paradigm whose time has come. Educational Researcher, 33(7), 14–26. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X033007014
    21. Kiat, L. B., Ali, M., Halim, N. D. A., & Ibrahim, H. (2016). Augmented reality, virtual learning environment, and mobile learning in education. IEEE International Conference on Teaching and Learning. https://doi.org/10.1109/IC3E.2016.8009034
    22. Klett, F. (2002). Visual Communication in Web-based Learning Environments. J. Educ. Technol. Soc., 5.
    23. Krejcie, R.V., & Morgan, D.W., (1970). Determining Sample Size for Research Activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement.
    24. Lall, D. (2021). Mixed-methods research: Why, when and how to use. Indian Journal of Continuing Nursing Education, 22(2), 143. https://doi.org/10.4103/ijcn.ijcn_107_21
    25. Lélis, C. (2020). Smart Visual Identities: A Design Challenge for Smart Learning Environments. , 145–154. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-7383-5_12
    26. Liu, S., Li, J., & Zheng, J. (2023). AI-Based Collaborative Teaching: Strategies and Analysis in Visual Communication Design. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET). https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v18i23.45635.
    27. Ma, S. (2023). Research on the Training Mode of Visual Communication Design Talents Based on the Deep Integration of Production and Education. Art and Performance Letters. https://doi.org/10.23977/artpl.2023.040409.
    28. Majid, K. (2000). Kaedah Penyelidikan Pendidikan. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.
    29. Marican, S. (2005). Kaedah penyelidikan sains sosial. Prentice Hall/Pearson Malaysia.
    30. Marín, V. I., Asensio-Pérez, J. I., Villagrá-Sobrino, S., Hernández-Leo, D., & García-Sastre, S. (2018). Supporting online collaborative design for teacher professional development. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 27(5), 571–587. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2018.1547787
    31. Marshall, C., Rossman, G. B., & Blanco, G. L. (2022). Designing qualitative research (Seventh edition). SAGE Publishing, Inc.
    32. Marshall, L., & Meachem, L. (2007). Direct or directed: orchestrating a more harmonious approach to teaching technology within an Art & Design Higher Education curriculum with special reference to visual communications courses. Learning, Media and Technology, 32, 41–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439880601141195
    33. Moseholm, E., & Fetters, M. D. (2017). Conceptual models to guide integration during analysis in convergent mixed methods studies. Methodological Innovations, 10(2), 205979911770311. https://doi.org/10.1177/2059799117703118
    34. Nirban, V. S., & Chasul. (2014). Learning management system acceptance behavior of students in higher education. IEEE International Conference on MOOCs, Innovation and Technology in Education. https://doi.org/10.1109/MITE.2014.7020251
    35. Omirzak, I., Alzhanov, A., Kartashova, O., & Ananishnev, V. (2022). Integrating mobile technologies in a smart classroom to improve the quality of the educational process: Synergy of technological and pedagogical tools. World Journal on Educational Technology. https://doi.org/10.18844/wjet.v14i3.7194
    36. Öngören, S. Teachers’ use of ICT in the preschool period: A mixed research method. Educ Inf Technol 27, 11115–11136 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11066-9
    37. Onyango, G., Gitonga, R., & Rugar, T. (2017). Technology-integrated lesson plans based on experiential learning. ACM International Conference Proceedings. https://doi.org/10.1145/3160908.3160920
    38. Pedersen, S. K., Platzer, O. J., Rathleff, M. S., & Hoegh, M. (2023). ‘What scientific evidence supports this?’ how do physiotherapists in private practice use evidence-based practice and what are the main challenges? A convergent parallel mixed-methods study. European Journal of Physiotherapy, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1080/21679169.2023.2234404
    39. Peng, H. (2022). Study on the Cross-Curriculum of Visual Communication Design in the Context of "New Engineering". Frontiers in Art Research. https://doi.org/10.25236/far.2022.040309
    40. Qingta Pro. (2022, November 26). Shenzhen needs a university to match its name! [Weixin Official Accounts]. Qingta Pro. http://mp.weixin.qq.com/s?__biz=MzkwMjIwOTYyMQ==&mid=2247498674&idx=1&sn=a16f79a28ece448a9d9e1764ce16e493&chksm=c0abb288f7dc3b9efe2fa720665cb61cfb6c6a1378768f027f8883ac2b3814fcb8c2aa6cf710#rd
    41. Qiu, Y. (2019). Exploring the participatory practice teaching of visual communication design based on an information quality education model. Proceedings of the International Conference on Visual Representation and Interactive System (ICVRIS). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICVRIS.2019.00114
    42. ShanghaiRanking. (2022, July 4). 268 A+! 2022 ShanghaiRanking 's Best Chinese Majors Ranking, really "explosive" professional which is strong? [WeChat public account]. ShanghaiRanking. Section.http://mp.weixin.qq.com/s?__biz=MzAwMDExNDgxNQ==&mid=2650013214&idx=1&sn=4df2072fb75c2d913615c044837b3ee9&chksm=82eab70eb59d3e1815d4bb13347df11945cd5fe985ff2c23ce2026c3874c413182b79d00e66c#rd
    43. Sinfield, D., & Cochrane, T. (2020). Augmenting visual design: Designing the changing classroom. E-Learning and Digital Media, 17, 365–387. https://doi.org/10.1177/2042753018773769.
    44. Siniscalco, M. T., & Auriat, N. (2005). Questionnaire design: Module 8. UNESCO IIEP. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000214555
    45. Song, B. (2021). Virtual reality and augmented reality technologies for art education: The perceptions and responses of undergraduate students. Visual Inquiry. https://doi.org/10.1386/vi_00061_1
    46. Tanudjaja, B. B. (2004). PENTINGNYA LEMBAGA PENELITIAN DAN PENGEMBANGAN PADA PENDIDIKAN DESAIN KOMUNIKASI VISUAL DI INDONESIA. Nirmana. https://doi.org/10.9744/NIRMANA.5.2
    47. Tóth, T., Virágh, R., Hallová, M., Stuchlý, P., & Hennyeyová, K. (2022). Digital Competence of Digital Native Students as Prerequisite for Digital Transformation of Education. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 17(16), pp. 150–166. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v17i16.31791
    48. UNESCO IITE. (2022). Medium-term strategy 2022-2025 [PDF file]. Retrieved from https://iite.unesco.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/UNESCO-IITE-Medium-Term-Strategy-2022-2025.pdf
    49. van Teijlingen, E., & Hundley, V. (2002). The importance of pilot studies. Nursing Standard, 16(40), 33–36. https://doi.org/10.7748/ns2002.06.16.40.33.c3214
    50. Wan, X. (2017). Research of visual communication design education study on the basis of field innovation strategy. Proceedings of the SAEME Conference. https://doi.org/10.2991/SAEME-17.2017.81
    51. Wang, T. (2021). An analysis on the innovation of visual communication design teaching in the digital age. Francis Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.25236/FAR.2021.030106
    52. Wang, W. (2018). Innovation and Development Strategies of Visual Communication Design Education in the Internet Era (1). 524–528. https://doi.org/10.2991/snce-18.2018.106
    53. Wang, X. (2021). Innovative Mode of Visual Communication Design Practice Teaching Based on Big Data. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2074. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2074/1/012084
    54. Wang, X., & Wang, N. (2020). Tang Tao: The ultimate goal of smart education is to realize Personalized Learning: An interview with Tang Tao, Academician of Chinese Academy of Sciences and President of Beijing Normal University-Hong Kong Baptist University Joint International College. Educator, 04, 24-27+3.
    55. Weng, X. (2011, November 15). Wuhan ranks first in the number of university students in the world. Wuhan Evening News. https://www.chinanews.com.cn/edu/2011/11-16/3464179.shtml
    56. Xiong, D., Soikun, T. M., & Wang, J. (2022). Teaching mode design and effect evaluation method of visual communication design course from the perspective of big data. Mathematical Problems in Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/2768336
    57. Yang X. (2014). The connotation and characteristics of smart education in the information age. China Educational Technology, 1. https://kns.cnki.net/KCMS/detail/detail.aspx?dbcode=CJFD&dbname=CJFD2014&filename=zdjy201401006
    58. Yang, Q., Jiang, Z., & He, X. (2019). The Origin, Challenges and Development Direction of Wisdom Education. Forum on Contemporary Education, 6. https://doi.org/10.13694/j.cnki.ddjylt.20191009.002
    59. Yeung, M. W. L., & Yau, A. H. Y. (2022). A thematic analysis of higher education students’ perceptions of online learning in Hong Kong under COVID-19: Challenges, strategies and support. Education and Information Technologies, 27(1), 181–208. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10656-3
    60. Zhang, C. (2010). Technology acceptance in learning settings from a student perspective: A theoretical framework. ACM International Conference Proceedings. https://doi.org/10.1145/1867651.1867663
    61. Zhong, Z. (2023). Research on the Construction and Application of Smart Learning Model Supported by Artificial Intelligence——Taking Primary School Mathematics as an Example (p. 315) [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Northeast Normal University. https://doi.org/10.27011/d.cnki.gdbsu.2023.000004
    62. Zhou J. (2020). Questionnaire Data Analysis (2nd Edition). Electronic Industry Press. https://book.cppinfo.cn/Encyclopedias/home/index?id=3686958
    63. Zhu, X. (2023). The cultivation of middle school students' innovative ability in college visual communication design teaching. Advances in Educational Technology and Psychology. https://doi.org/10.23977/aetp.2023.071705.
    64. Zhu, Z., Lu, L., Wang, X., & Gu, X. (2023). The Development of Smart Education Theory and Practice in China: A Ten-Year Review and Near-Future Prospects. Chinese Journal of Distance Education, 12. https://doi.org/10.13541/j.cnki.chinade.2023.12.006
    65. Zhu, Z., Peng, H., Lei, Y., & Putuo Modern Educational Technology Center In Shanghai. (2018). Intelligence Education: Practical an Approach to Smarter Education. Open Education Research, 4. https://doi.org/10.13966/j.cnki.kfjyyj.2018.04.002
    66. Zukarnain, Z., Husain, W., Hassan, S., Kamaruzaman, N., Zin, N., & Aziz, W. (2020). Examining Students’ Aptitude using Project-Based Learning through University-Industry Collaboration. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1496. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1496/1/012013
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2025 The Authors

How to cite

Tian, Y., & Ahmad Zahari, Z. (2025). Exploring the current state of teaching and learning in visual communication design during the era smart education: A mixed method approach. Multidisciplinary Science Journal, 7(9), 2025442. https://doi.org/10.31893/multiscience.2025442
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC
  • Article viewed - 140
  • PDF downloaded - 0