Keywords:
polar code
QAM, neural-demapper
5G MIMO communication
antenna variation

  • Abstract

    This paper proposes a Polar-coded neural damapper based 5G multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) system for M transmitting and N receiving antenna, operating in a flat fading environment. MIMO is a spatial diversity scheme to improve channel performance and mitigate troubling fading issues in urban environments. A neural network-based smart demapper is considered instead of traditional demapper to improve the system's performance. Researchers have recently focused on developing complex neural network (NN)-based demapper on generating soft information for each transmitted bit. Neural demapper also increases spectral efficiency, meaning a symbol-to-bit demapper with higher complexity. This work considers a Polar-coded MIMO 5G communication system with 2×3, 2×4, 4×6 and 4×16 transmitting and receiving antennas, respectively, to evaluate the system performance under QAM modulation (4-QAM, 16-QAM, 256-QAM) techniques. It is evident from the simulated result that our proposed system performs better for lower-order modulation techniques with an increase in the number of transmitting and receiving antenna.

  • References

    1. Arıkan E (2009) Channel polarization: A method for constructing capacity achieving codes for symmetric binary-input memory-less channels. IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory. 55:3051-3073.
    2. Chang Z, Wang Y, Li H, Wang Z (2019) Complex CNN-Based Equalization for Communication Signal. IEEE 4th International Conference on Signal and Image Processing (ICSIP):513-517.
    3. Dai J, Niu K, Lin J (2018) Polar-Coded MIMO Systems. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology. 67(7):6170-6184. doi: 10.1109/TVT.2018.2815602
    4. Haykin S, Sellathurai M, Jong YD, Willink T (2004) Turbo-MIMO for wireless communications. IEEE Commun. Mag. 42:48-53.
    5. Hof E, Shamai S (2010) Secrecy-achieving polar-coding. IEEE Information Theory Workshop (ITW):1-5.
    6. Honkala M, Korpi D, Huttunen JMJ (2021) DeepRx: Fully Convolutional Deep Learning Receiver. DOI: 10.48550/arXiv.2005.01494
    7. Hussami N, Korada SB, Urbanke R (2009) Performance of polar codes for channel and source coding. IEEE Int. Symp. Inform. Theory (ISIT):1488-1492.
    8. Jeon J, Lee G, Ibrahim AAI, Yuan J, Xu G, Cho J, Onggosanusi E, Kim Y, Lee J, Zhang JC (2021) MIMO evolution toward 6G: modular massive MIMO in low-frequency bands. IEEE Communication Magazine. 59:52-58.
    9. Korada SB, Urbanke RL (2010) Polar Codes are Optimal for Lossy Source Coding. IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory. 56:1751-1768.
    10. Neumann D, Wiese T, Utschick W (2018) Learning the MMSE Channel Estimator. IEEE Trans. Sig. Process. 66:2905-2917.
    11. Sasoglu E, Tal I (2016) Polar coding for processes with memory. IEEE Int. Symp. Inform. Theory (ISIT):225-229.
    12. Seidl M, Schenk A, Stierstorfer C, Huber JB (2013) Polar-Coded Modulation. IEEE Trans. Commun. 61: 4108-4119.
    13. Shental O, Hoydis J (2020) Machine LLRning. Learning to Softly Demodulate. DOI: 10.48550/arXiv.1907.01512
    14. Shuval B, Tal I (2017) A lower bound on the probability of error of polar codes over BMS channels. IEEE Int. Symp. Inform. Theory (ISIT):854-858.
    15. Tse D, Viswanath P (2005) Fundamentals of wireless communications. Cambridge.
    16. Ueng YL, Yeh CJ, Lin MC, Wang CL (2009) Turbo coded multiple-antenna systems for near-capacity performance. IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 27:954-964.
    17. Vucetic B, Yuan J (2003) Space-time coding.Wiley.
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2023 Multidisciplinary Science Journal

How to cite

Islam, M. M., Islam, M. A., Uddin, M. K., & Roy, S. C. (2023). Performance evaluation of polar coded neural demapper based 5G MIMO communication system by varying antenna size. Multidisciplinary Science Journal, 5(3), 2023028. https://doi.org/10.31893/multiscience.2023028
  • Article viewed - 419
  • PDF downloaded - 86