Investigating the impact of the flipped classroom model on higher order thinking skills: A meta-analysis study

References

1. Abeysekera, L., & Dawson, P. (2015). Motivation and cognitive load in the FC: definition, rationale and a call for research’. Higher Education Research & Development, 34(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2014.934336
2. Albalawi, A. S. (2018). The effect of using FC in teaching calculus on students’ achievements at university of Tabuk. International Journal of Research in Education and Science, 4(1), 198–207. https://doi.org/10.21890/ijres.383137
3. Al-Samarraie, H., Shamsuddin, A., & Alzahrani, A. I. (2020). A flipped classroom model in higher education: a review of the evidence across disciplines. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(3), 1017-1051.
4. Alsowat, H. (2016). An EFL flipped classroom teaching model: Effects on English language higher-order thinking skills, student engagement and satisfaction. Journal of Education and Practice, 7(9), 108-121.
5. Altakhayneh, B. H. (2022). Impact of Using FC Strategy in Developing the Mathematical Thinking of Pre-Service Teachers in Open Education Systems in Jordan. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 17(03), 228–244. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v17i03.24973
6. Anderson, L., & Brennan, J. P. (2015). An experiment in “Flipped” teaching in freshman calculus. Primus, 25(9), 861–875. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511970.2015.1059916
7. Andriani, D. (2019). The Effect of the FC Model on the Ability of Mathematical Representation Reviewed from the Curiosity of Learning Mathematics Students. Thesis. Lampung” Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Intan Lampung.
8. Ardiana, N. A., Pardimin, Z. W., & Wijayanto, Z. (2020). The Effectiveness of the FC Learning Model Judging from the Mathematical Disposition of Grade VIII Junior High School Students. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika, 8(2), 193-203.
9. Ario, M., & Asra, A. (2018). The Effect of FC Learning on Integral Calculus Learning Outcomes of Mathematics Education Students. ANARGYA: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika, 1(2), 82–88. https://doi.org/10.24176/anargya.v1i2.2477
10. Arnawa, I. N., & Setiawan, I. M. D. (2021). The effect of Google Classroom-assisted FC on math learning outcomes based on the level of computer self-efficacy. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Pengembangan Pendidikan, 5(1), 34–42. http://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v11-i11/11527
11. Arnold-Gaza, S. (2014). The FC: A survey of the research. Communications In Information Literacy, 8(1), 8-22. https://doi.org/10.15760/comminfolit.2014.8.1.161
12. Bergman, J., & Sams, A. (2012). Flip your classroom: Reach every student in every class every day. ISTE.
13. Bergmann, J., & Sams, A. (2014). Turn your class upside down. Bring your class to every student, anytime, anywhere. Fundación Santa María-Ediciones SM.
14. Bishop, J. L. (2013). A controlled study of the FC with numerical methods for engineers”, Unpublished doctoral dissertation., Utah State University.
15. Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P., & Rothstein, H. R. (2021). Introduction to meta-analysis. John Wiley & Sons.
16. Bradley, K. (2016). Evaluating The Effects of Mastery Learning in Postsecondary Developmental Mathematics. Doctor of Education. University of Louisiana. Louisiana.
17. Brewer, R., & Movahedazarhouligh, S. (2018). Successful stories and conflicts: A literature review on the effectiveness of flipped learning in higher education. J. Comput. Assist. Learn, 34(4), 409–416. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12250
18. Brezavšcek, A., Jerebic, J., Rus, G., & Žnidarši, A. (2020). Factors Influencing Mathematics Achievement of University Students of Social Sciences. MDPI., 8, 2134. https://doi.org/10.3390/math8122134
19. Carey, E., Hill, F., Devine, A., & Szűcs, D. (2017). The modified abbreviated math anxiety scale: A valid and reliable instrument for use with children. Frontiers in psychology, 8(11), https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00011
20. Casem, R. Q. (2016). Effects of flipped instruction on the performance and attitude of high school students in mathematics. European Journal of STEM Education, 1(2), 37–44. https://doi.org/10.20897/lectito.201620
21. Chaney, T. A. (2016). The Effect of Blended Learning on Math and Reading Achievement in a Charter School Context. Doctor of Education. Liberty University. Liberty.
22. Cilli-Turner, E. (2015). Measuring learning outcomes and attitudes in a flipped introductory statistics course. Primus, 25(9), 833–846. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511970.2015.1046004
23. Clark, K. R. (2013). Examining the effects of the flipped model of instruction on student engagement and performance in the secondary mathematics classroom: An action research study. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Capella University
24. Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2018). Research Methods in Education (8th ed.). Routledge Taylor & Francis Group.
25. Comfort, J. (2016). An Exploratory Study of the Relationship Between a Blended Learning Approach to İnstruction and 5 st Grade Student Performance in a Kansas Public School District. Doctor of Education. Studies and the Graduate Faculty of the University. Kansas.
26. Crawford, T. H. (2017). Flipped learning influence on active learning and assessments in the postsecondary hospitality classroom: An action research study. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Capella University.
27. Crowley, K. (2018). The Impact of Adaptive Learning on Mathematics Achievement. Doctor of Education. New Jersey.
28. Davies, P. (2000). The relevance of systematic reviews to educational policy and practice. Oxford Review of Education, 26(3-4), 365-378. https://doi.org/10.1080/713688543
29. Day, P. A. (2017). Effectiveness of the Career and College Promise Program in Increasing College Readiness at a Rural North Carolina Community College. Doctor of Education. The Gardner-Webb University School of Education. Gardner.
30. DePietro, D. M. (2020) Medical Student Education During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Ini-tial Experiences Implementing a Virtual Interventional Radiology Elective Course. Acad. Radiol, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2020.10.005146http://www.i-jet.org
31. Dixon, K. L. (2017). The effect of the FC on urban high school students’ motivation and academic achievement in a high school science. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Liberty University, Lynchburg, VA
32. Elian, S. A., & Hamaidi, D. A. (2018). The Effect of Using FC Strategy on the Academic Achievement of Fourth Grade Students in Jordan. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 13(2), 110-125. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v13i02.7816
33. Enfield, J. (2013). Looking at the impact of the FC model of instruction on undergraduate multimedia students at CSUN. TechTrends., 57(6), 14-27.
34. Esperanza, P., Fabian, K., & Toto, C. (2016). FC model: Effects on performance, attitudes and perceptions in high school algebra. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Including Subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 9891 LNCS(September), 85–97. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45153-4_7
35. Flick, A. (2019). The effects of flipped learning in the sixth-grade mathematics classroom. Unpublished doctoral thesis, Missouri Baptist University, ABD.
36. Ghanizadeh, A., et al. (2020). Higher-order thinking skills. Springer International Publishing.
37. Ha, A. S., O’Reilly, J., Ng, J. Y., & Zhang, J. H. (2019). Evaluating the FC approach in Asian higher education: Perspectives from students and teachers. Cogent Education, 6(1), 1638147.
38. Hamzah, H., Hamzah, M. I., & Zulkifli, H. (2022). Systematic Literature review on the elements of metacognition-based Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) teaching and learning modules. Sustainability, 14(2), 813. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14020813
39. Harun., Kartowagiran, B., & Manaf, A. (2021). Student attitude and mathematics learning success: A meta-analysis. International Journal of Instruction, 14(4), 209-222. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2021.14413a
40. Holton, W. H. A., Farkas, G., & Warschauer, M. The effects of flipped instruction on out-of-class study time, exam performance, and student perceptions. Learn. Instr., 45, 61–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.07.001
41. Hsb, Rukiyahtul Hasanah. (2021). The influence of the FC learning model on student mathematics learning outcomes on opportunity material in Class VIII of State Junior High School (SMP) 01 Barumun. Undergraduate thesis, IAIN Padangsidimpuan.
42. Hunter, J. E., & Schmidt, F. L. (2004). Methods of meta-analysis: Correcting error and bias in research findings. Sage.
43. Jackson, N. (2019). Beneficial or Not: Flipped Learning in an Elementary Mathematics Classroom" Capstone Projects and Master's Theses. 641. https://digitalcommons.csumb.edu/caps_thes_all/641
44. Jarrah, A. M., & Diab, K. (2019). The Effect of FC Model on Students’ Achievement in the New 2016 Scholastic Assessment Test Mathematics Skills. The Journal of Social Sciences Research, 5(3), 769-777. https://doi.org/10.32861/jssr.53.769.777
45. Jdaitawi, M. (2020). Does Flipped Learning Promote Positive Emotions in Science Education? A Comparison between Traditional and FC Approaches. Electronic Journal of e-learning, 18(6), 516-524. http://dx.doi.org/10.34190/JEL.18.6.004
46. Juandi, D., Kusumah, Y. S., Tamur, M., & Perbowo, K. S. (2021). A meta-analysis of Geogebra software decade of assisted mathematics learning: what to learn and where to go?. Heliyon, 7, 1-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06953
47. Juniantari, M., Pujawan, I. G. N., & Widhiasih, I. D. A. G. (2018). The Influence of the FC Approach on the Understanding of Mathematics Concepts of SMA I Dewa Ayu Gede Widhiasih Students. Journal of Education Technology, 2(4), 197–204. https://doi.org/10.23887/jet.v2i4.17855
48. Karagöl, İ., & Esen, E. (2019). The effect of flipped learning approach on academic achievement: A meta-analysis study. Hacettepe University Journal of Education Faculty, 34(3), 708-727. https://doi/10.16986/HUJE.2018046755
49. Khadijah, K., Suciati, I., Khaerani., Manaf., & Sutarmin, S. (2021). Schools’ character education values and students’ mathematics learning achievement: A meta-analysis. Cakrawala Pendidikan, 40(3), 670-683. https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v40i3.39924
50. Khofifah, L., Supriadi, N., & Syazali, M. (2021). FC and Discovery Learning Model on Concept Understanding and Mathematical Problem Solving Skills. Prisma, 10(1), 17. https://doi.org/10.35194/jp.v10i1.1098
51. Kiptiyah, S. M., Purwati, P. D., & Khasanah, U. (2021). The implementation of FC with ethnomathematical nuances to improve learning independence and mathematical literacy skills. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Universitas Lampung, 9(3), 318–332. https://doi.org/10.23960/mtk/v9i3.pp318-332
52. Kvashnina, O. S., & Martynko, E. A. (2016). Analyzing the Potential of FC in ESL Teaching. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 11(03), 71–73. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v11i03.5309
53. Li, Y. Bin, Zheng, W. Z., & Yang, F. (2017). Cooperation learning of flip teaching style on the MBA mathematics education efficiency. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(10), 6963–6972. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/76878
54. Limaymanta, C. H., Apaza-Tapia, L., Vidal, E., & Gregorio-Chaviano, O. (2021). FC in Higher Education: A Bibliometric Analysis and Proposal of a Framework for its Implementation. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 16(09), 133–149. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v16i09.21267
55. Limniou, M., Schermbrucker, I., & Lyons, M. (2018). Traditional and FC approaches delivered by two different teachers: the student perspective. Education and Information Technologies, 23, 797-817. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10639-017-9636-8
56. Lo, C. K., & Hew, K. F. (2020). A comparison of flipped learning with gamification, traditional learning, and online independent study: the effects on students’ mathematics achievement and cognitive engagement. Interactive Learning Environments, 28(4), 464–481. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2018.1541910
57. Long, T., Cummins, J., & Waugh, M. (2017). Use of the flipped classroom instructional model in higher education: instructors’ perspectives. Journal of computing in higher education, 29, 179-200.
58. Maciejewski, W. (2016). Flipping the calculus classroom: An evaluative study. Teaching Mathematics and Its Applications, 35(4), 187–201. https://doi.org/10.1093/teamat/hrv019
59. Makinde, S. O. (2020). Impact of FC on Mathematics Learning Outcome of Senior Secondary School Students in Lagos, Nigeria. African Journal of Teacher Education, 9(2), 23–42. https://doi.org/10.21083/ajote.v9i2.6182
60. Miri, B., David, B. C., & Uri, Z. (2007). Purposely teaching for the promotion of higher-order thinking skills: A case of critical thinking. Research in Science Education, 37, 29-34. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11165-006-9029-2
61. Mirlanda, E. P., Nindiasari, H., & Syamsuri, S. (2019). The influence of FC learning on student learning independence is seen from the cognitive style of students. Symmetry: Pasundan Journal of Research in Mathematics Learning and Education, 4, 38–49. https://doi.org/10.23969/symmetry.v4i1.1638
62. Mirlanda, E. P., Nindiasari, H., & Syamsuri, S. (2020). The effect of FC learning on mathematical reasoning ability is seen from the cognitive style of students. Prima: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 4(1), 11. https://doi.org/10.31000/prima.v4i1.2081
63. Montgomery, J. (2015). The effects of flipped learning on middle school students' achievement with common core mathematics. Unpublished master thesis. California State University, San Marcos.
64. Mullen, B., Muellerleile, P., & Bryant, B. (2001). Cumulative metaanalysis: A consideration of indicators of sufficiency and stability. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27(11), 1450– 1462. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672012711006
65. Murray, E. C. (2011). Implementing higher-order thinking in middle school mathematics classrooms. Dissertation Submitted to Graduate Faculty of The University of Georgia, Georgia.
66. Nurtamam, M. E., Santosa, T. A., Ilwandri, I., & Rahman, A. (2023). Meta-analysis: The Effectiveness of Iot-Based Flipped Learning to Improve Students' Problem Solving Abilities. Edumaspul: Jurnal Pendidikan, 7(1), 1491-1501.
67. Offer, J., & Bos, B. The Design and application of technology-based courses in the mathematics classroom. Computers & Education, 53(4), 1133-1137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.05.020
68. Ojeda-Castro, A. M., Murray-Finley, P., & Sánchez-Villafañe, J. (2017). Learning Management System Use to Increase Mathematics Knowledge and Skills in Puerto Rico. International Journal of Technology and Human Interaction, 13(2), 89–100. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijthi.2017040106
69. Orhan, A. (2019). The Effect of Flipped Learning on Students’ Academic Achievement: A Meta-Analysis Study. Cukurova University Faculty of Education Journal, 48(1), 368-396. https://doi.org/10.14812/cuefd.400919
70. Osborne, S. F. (2020). Using Online Interventions to Address Summer Learning Loss in Rising Sixth-Graders. Doctor of Education. University of Missouri-St. Louis. Columbia.
71. Overmyer, G. R. (2015). The FC Model For College Algebra: Effects On Student Achievement. Doctor of Education. Colorado State University.
72. Ozdamli, F., & Asiksoy, G. (2016). Flipped classroom approach. World Journal on Educational Technology: Current Issues, 8(2), 98-105.
73. Peterson, D. J. (2016). The FC Improves Student Achievement and Course Satisfaction in a Statistics Course: A Quasi-Experimental Study. Teaching of Psychology, 43(1), 10–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/0098628315620063
74. Petrillo, J. (2016). On flipping first-semester calculus: A case study. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 47(4), 573–582. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2015.1106014
75. Pierce, R., & Fox, J. (2012). Vodcasts and active-learning exercises in a “FC” model of a renal pharmacotherapy module. American journal of pharmaceutical education, 76(10), 196. https://doi.org/10.5688/ajpe7610196
76. Pinontoan, K. F., & Walean, M. (2020). The Effect of FC Using Google Classroom Teaching Video Tutorials on Calculus Courses. Edcomtech, 5(10), 51–60. http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/um039v5i12020p051
77. Prananda, M. R., Proboningrum, D. I., Pratama, E. R., & Laksono, P. (2020). Improving higher order thinking skills (HOTS) with project-based learning (pjbl) model assisted by geogebra. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1467(1), 012027. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1467/1/012027
78. Pratama, G. S., & Retnawati, H. (2018, September). Urgency of higher order thinking skills (HOTS) content analysis in mathematics textbook. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1097(1), 012147). http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1097/1/012147
79. Pratiwi, K. A. M. (2021). The Effectiveness of FC Learning on Improving Mathematics Learning Outcomes of Junior High School Students. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Undiksha, 12(2), 73-82. https://doi.org/10.23887/jjpm.v12i2.37320
80. Rajghatta, C. (2014). Math teaching in India is robotic, make it creative: Manjul Bhargava. The Times of India, 26(1), 5-17.
81. Ramadhani, R., Umam, R., Abdurrahman, A., & Syazali, M. (2019). The effect of flipped-problem based learning model integrated with LMS-google classroom for senior high school students. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 7(2), 137–158. https://doi.org/10.17478/jegys.548350
82. Retnawati, H., Apino, E., Djidu, H., & Kartianom. (2018). Introduction to Meta Analysis. Paroma Publishing
83. Retnawati, H., Djidu, H., Kartianom, A., & Anazifa, R. D. (2018). Teachers’ knowledge about higher-order thinking skills and its learning strategy. Problems of Education in the 21st Century, 76(2), 215. http://dx.doi.org/10.33225/pec/18.76.215
84. Safitri, N. (2022). The Effect of the Application of the FC Learning Model Using Learning Videos on Learning Outcomes in Class VII MTs PPKP Sampit on Number Material. Undergraduate thesis. Banjarmasin: UIN Antasari Banjarmasin.
85. Sappaile, B. I., Purnomo, M. P., & Asdar, A. (2020). The Effect of Using Google Classroom-Assisted FC Model on Mathematics Learning Outcomes (Pseudo-Experimental Research on Class X Public High School Students in Makassar City). Undergraduate thesis, Universitas Negeri Makassar.
86. Saputra, M. E. A., & Mujib, M. (2018). The Effectiveness of the FC Model Using Mathematics Learning Videos on Understanding Concepts. Desimal: Jurnal Matematika, 1(2), 173-179. https://doi.org/10.24042/djm.v1i2.2389
87. Saygili, H., & Cetin, H. (2021). The Effects of Learning Management Systems (LMS) on Mathematics Achievement: A Meta-Analysis Study. Necatibey Faculty of Education Electronic Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 15(2), 341-362. https://doi.org/10.17522/balikesirnef.1026534
88. Schroeder, L. B., McGivney-Burelle, J., & Xue, F. (2015). To flip or not to flip? An exploratory study comparing student performance in calculus. Primus, 25(9), 876–885. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511970.2015.1050617
89. Scott, C. E., Green, L. E., & Etheridge, D. L. (2016). A comparison between flipped and lecture-based instruction in the calculus classroom. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 8(2), 252–264. https://doi.org/10.1108/JARHE-04-2015-0024
90. Sergis, S., Sampson, D. G., & Pelliccione, L. (2018). Investigating the impact of FC on students’ learning experiences: A Self-Determination Theory approach. Computers in Human Behavior, 78(8), 368–378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.08.011
91. Setiawan, A. A., Muhtadi, A., & Hukom, J. (2022). Blended learning and student mathematics ability in Indonesia: A meta-analysis study. International Journal of Instruction, 15(2), 905-916. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2022.15249a
92. Spotts, J. D., & Blume, A. P. G. de. (2020). A Pilot Study on the Effect of the FC Model on Pre-Calculus Performance. SAGE Open. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244020982604
93. Tan, C. K., & Tan, C. P. (2014). Effects of the handheld technology instructional approach on performances of students of different achievement levels. Computers & Education, 82, 306-314. https://org.doi/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.11.011
94. Tune, J. D., Sturek, M., Basile, D. P. (2013). FC model improves graduate student performance in cardiovascular, respiratory, and renal physiology. Advances in Physiology Education, 37, 316–320. https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00091.2013
95. Utami, S. (2017). The Effect of the FC Learning Model of Flipped Peer Instruction Type on Students' Mathematical Problem Solving Ability. Undergraduate thesis. Jakarta: Universitas Islam Negeri Syarif Hidayatullah.
96. Wasserman, N. H., Quint, C., Norris, S. A., & Carr, T. (2017). Exploring FC Instruction in Calculus III. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 15(3), 545–568. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-015-9704-8
97. Wei, X., Cheng, I. L., Chen, N. S., Yang, X., Liu, Y., Dong, Y., Zhai, X., & Kinshuk. (2020). Effect of the FC on the mathematics performance of middle school students. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(3), 1461–1484. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09752-x
98. William J. Heuett (2017): Flipping the Math Classroom for Non-Math Majors to Enrich Their Learning Experience, PRIMUS. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511970.2016.1256925
99. Yakar, Z. Y. (2021). The Effect of Flipped Learning Model on Primary and Secondary School Students' Mathematics Achievement: A Meta-Analysis Study. Çukurova Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 50(2), 1329-1366. https://doi.org/10.14812/cuefd.865337
100. Yuliati, S. R., & Lestari, I. (2018). Higher-order thinking skills (HOTS) analysis of students in solving HOTS question in higher education. Perspektif Ilmu Pendidikan, 32(2), 181-188. https://doi.org/10.21009/PIP.322.10
101. Yulietri, F., Mulyoto, & S, L. A. (2015). The FC model and discovery learning influence on mathematics learning achievement in terms of learning independence. Jurnal Teknodika, 13(2), 5–17. http://dx.doi.org/10.35194/jp.v10i1.1098
102. Zatalini, N. F., Minggi, I., & Rusli, R. (2017). The effect of FC learning strategies using classroom e-learning on student mathematics learning outcomes. Issues in Mathematics Education (IMED), 1(2), 107–114. https://doi.org/10.35580/imed9470
103. Zebidi, A. B. A. (2021). The impact of FC Strategy of Teaching Mathematics on Students’ Achievements at Umm Al-Qura University. Egyptian Journals, 81, 50-69. https://dx.doi.org/10.21608/edusohag.2021.130232
104. Zeineddine, D. (2018). Investigate the Effects of Flipped Learning on Understanding of Mathematics for Secondary Students. Journal of Mathematics Education, 11(1), 62–80. https://doi.org/10.26711/007577152790021