• Abstract

    Agricultural Land Use Systems (LUS) contributes to Green Revolution (GR) and sustainable development in Vietnam, however, the GR exerts a dual impact-both positive and negative-on agricultural LUS in suburban regions. Land Quality Indicators (LQI) is integrated into the Pressure-State-Response (PSR) model to assess agricultural LUS across four landscapes in a peri-urban area of Hanoi capital city (Vietnam). The selected 75 indicators are subject to elimination based on the distinct natural and social contexts prevalent in each landscape. The findings indicate that primary pressures impinging upon agricultural LUS are dwindling irrigation water, escalating erosion resulting from cultivation, inadequate agricultural infrastructure, price imbalances, and pollution from industrial parks and craft villages. An amalgamation of traditional and high-tech solutions is recommended to enhance the quality of organic produce and foster stronger connections between suburban and urban. Integrating LQI into the PSR framework supplants conventional assessment methods, paving the way for more effective sustainable land use planning in peri-urban areas in the foreseeable future.

  • References

    1. Abate, E., Shimelis, H., Mark, L., & Fentahun, M. (2017). Soil Acidity under Multiple Land-Uses: Assessment of Perceived Causes and Indicators, and Nutrient Dynamics in Small-Holders’ Mixed-Farming System of Northwest Ethiopia. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica, Section B — Soil & Plant Science 67(2), 134–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/09064710.2016.1230227.
    2. Adriaanse, A. (1993). Environmental Policy Performance Indicators. A Study on the Development of Indicators for Environmental Policy in The Netherlands. Uitgeverij, The Hague: 1- 183
    3. Ayambire, R., Amponsah, O., Charles, P., & Stephen, A. T. (2019). A Review of Practices for Sustaining Urban and Peri-Urban Agriculture: Implications for Land Use Planning in Rapidly Urbanising Ghanaian Cities. Land Use Policy 84(May), 260–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.03.004.
    4. Bockstaller, C., Françoise, L., Sophie, S. D., Séverine, P., Jean, V., Bernard, A., and Sylvain, P. (2011). Assessing Biodiversity in Arable Farmland by Means of Indicators: An Overview. OCL - Oleagineux Corps Gras Lipides 18(May), 137–44. https://doi.org/10.1684/ocl.2011.0381.
    5. Bogoviz, A. V. (2021). The Challenge of Sustainability in Agricultural Systems: Volume 1. Vol. 205. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems. Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-73097-0.
    6. Bouma, J. (2002). Land Quality Indicators of Sustainable Land Management across Scales. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, Soil Health as an Indicator of Sustainable Management, 88(2), 129–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-8809(01)00248-1.
    7. Brinkley, C., and Marjory, A. V. (2022). Socioeconomic and Environmental Indicators for Rural Communities: Bridging the Scholarly and Practice Gap. Economic Development Quarterly 36(2), 75–91. https://doi.org/10.1177/08912424221083023.
    8. Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient Alpha and the Internal Structure of Tests. Psychometrika 16(3), 297–334. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02310555.
    9. Dan, N. N., Lei, G. P., and Le P. C. L. (2018). Land Unit Mapping and Evaluation of Land Suitability for Agro – Forestrye in Thua Thien Hue Province – VietNam as an Example. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science 159(1), 012012. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/159/1/012012.
    10. Danielle, L. (2021). Urban Transition in Hanoi: Huge Challenges Ahead | ISEAS Publishing. https://bookshop.iseas.edu.sg/publication/2471.
    11. Danilo, Ð., Bojan, M., Marija, J., & Ivan, Ð. (2022). Land Productivity and Agri-Environmental Indicators: A Case Study of Western Balkans. Land 2022, 11, 2216. https://doi.org/10.3390/land11122216.
    12. Dera, J., Canisio, M., & Neil, M. Z. (2022). Land Use Systems and Soil Quality Indicators in a Fersiallitic (5e) Soil at Matopos Research Farm in Zimbabwe. In Climate Change Adaptations in Dryland Agriculture in Semi-Arid Areas, edited by Xavier Poshiwa and G. Ravindra Chary, 251–59. Singapore: Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-7861-5_17.
    13. Dumanski, J., & Pieri, C. (2000). Land Quality Indicators: Research Plan. Elsevier 81 (2): 93–102.
    14. FAO. (1976). A Framework for Land Evaluation. Romeo, Italy, FAO.
    15. FAO. (1984). Land Evaluation for Forestry. Romeo, Italy, FAO.
    16. FAO, UNDP, UNEP and World Bank. (1997). Land Quality Indicators and Their Use in Sustainable Agriculture and Rural Development, FAO.
    17. Fei, Z. (2022). Research on Rural Land Planning Based on Traditional Farming Culture. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica, Section B — Soil & Plant Science 72(1), 248–59. https://doi.org/10.1080/09064710.2021.2001041.
    18. Gad, M., Ali H. S., Hend, H., Salah, E., & Mohamed, F. (2023). Water Quality Evaluation and Prediction Using Irrigation Indices, Artificial Neural Networks, and Partial Least Square Regression Models for the Nile River, Egypt. Water 15(12), 2244. https://doi.org/10.3390/w15122244.
    19. Goyal, M., Ashutosh, S., & Rao, S. (2020). Remote Sensing and GIS Applications in Sustainability. Sustainability, 605–26. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119434016.ch28.
    20. Hao, S., & Lai, C. (2013). Analysis of LUCC in Loess Plateau Based on PSR Model-A Case Study in Shanghuang Study Area in Guyuan City. BioTechnology: An Indian Journal 8(January), 1009–14.
    21. Henry, K., & Richard, V. (2009). Comparing Sampling and Estimation Strategies in Establishment Populations. Survey Research Methods 3(March), 27–44. https://doi.org/10.18148/srm/2009.v3i1.72.
    22. Kamaldeen, Y. (2015). Constraints to Farmers Willingness to Pay for Private Irrigation Delivery in Nandom, Ghana. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/322057055_Constraints_to_Farmers_Willingness_to_Pay_for_Private_Irrigation_Delivery_in_Nandom_Ghana. 2015: 5(2):119-124.
    23. Kapur, S., Erhan, A., Claudio, Z., Suha, B., & Somayyeh, R. M. (2019). Anthroscapes: A Robust Basis for Mapping Land Quality and Sustainable Land Use Patterns. In Eastern Mediterranean Port Cities: A Study of Mersin, Turkey—From Antiquity to Modernity, edited by Filiz Yenişehirlioğlu, Eyüp Özveren, and Tülin Selvi Ünlü, 63–77. The Urban Book Series. Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93662-8_5.
    24. Kyeyune, V., & Sarah, T. (2016). Yielding to High Yields? Critiquing Food Security Definitions and Policy Implications for Ethnic Minority Livelihoods in Upland Vietnam. Geoforum 71(May), 33–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2016.03.001.
    25. Lai, S., Jinming, S., Ahmed, E., Xiaomei, L., Jinliang, W., Eldar, K., Zejing, L., Longbin, W., Run, H., & Yung-Chih, S. (2022). Evaluation of Ecological Security and Ecological Maintenance Based on Pressure-State-Response (PSR) Model, Case Study: Fuzhou City, China. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment: An International Journal 28(July), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/10807039.2022.2081835.
    26. Liu, Y., Dongsheng, S., Huijuan, W., Xiaojuan, W., Guiqin, Y., & Xiujuan, Z. (2020). An Evaluation of China’s Agricultural Green Production: 1978–2017. Journal of Cleaner Production 243(January), 118483. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118483.
    27. Liu, Y. (2022). Simulation of Land Use System Performance Dynamics Based on System Dynamics. In International Conference on Cognitive Based Information Processing and Applications (CIPA 2021), edited by Bernard J. Jansen, Haibo Liang, and Jun Ye, 195–207. Lecture Notes on Data Engineering and Communications Technologies. Singapore: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-5857-0_24.
    28. Madalla, N., & Majule, A. (2016). Economic Value of Agricultural Land for Community Livelihoods within the Context of REDD+. Journal of Agriculture and Ecology Research International 2(June), 180–95. https://doi.org/10.9734/JAERI/2015/14132.
    29. MONRE (2015). Regulations on Land Investigation and Assessment Techniques. The Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment, Vietnam.
    30. Nam (2023). The Green Revolution in Vietnam. September 6, 2023. https://vietnamagriculture.nongnghiep.vn/the-green-revolution-in-vietnam-d361285.html.
    31. Nam, P. P., & Yen, T.T. (2022). Determinants of the Lives of Households after Land Loss for Urbanization: Experiences from Vinh City, Nghe An Province. Land Use Policy 119(August), 106216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2022.106216.
    32. Nguyen, A. T., & Luc, H. (2020). Diversified Responses to Contemporary Pressures on Sloping Agricultural Land: Thai Farmer’s Perception of Mountainous Landscapes in Northern Vietnam. Environment, Development and Sustainability 23(4), 5411–29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-020-00822-x.
    33. Nguyen, T.P.L, Nguyen, T.T., Doan, X.H., Tran, M.L., Tran, N.M., & Nguyen, T.D. (2020). A Dataset of Factors Influencing Intentions for Organic Farming in Vietnam. Data in Brief 33 (December): 106605. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2020.106605.
    34. Pham, T. M., Dang, G.T.H., Bora, J., & Nguyen, T.T. (2022). Land Quality Evaluation for Sustainable Development Goals: A Structured Review Using Bibliometric and Social Network Analysis. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 194(9), 603. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-022-10226-1.
    35. Pham, T. G, Nguyen, T.H., & Martin, K. (2018). Assessment of Soil Quality Indicators under Different Agricultural Land Uses and Topographic Aspects in Central Vietnam. International Soil and Water Conservation Research 6(4), 280–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iswcr.2018.08.001.
    36. Prasada, I. Y., & Masyhuri, M. (2020). Factors Affecting Farmers’ Perception toward Agricultural Land Sustainability in Peri-Urban Areas of Pekalongan City. Caraka Tani: Journal of Sustainable Agriculture 35(2), 203–12. https://doi.org/10.20961/carakatani.v35i2.31918.
    37. Quang, D., Pepijn, S., and Thomas, B. (2014). Ex-Ante Assessment of Soil Conservation Methods in the Uplands of Vietnam: An Agent-Based Modeling Approach. Agricultural Systems 123(January), 108–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2013.10.002.
    38. Quoc Oai DPC (District People’s Committee) (2020). Report on Land Use Planning in 2030 with a Vision to 2050. Quoc Oai District People’s Committee.
    39. Ravetz, J., Christian, F., & Thomas, S. N. (2013). The Dynamics of Peri-Urbanization. In Peri-Urban Futures: Scenarios and Models for Land Use Change in Europe, edited by Kjell Nilsson, Stephan Pauleit, Simon Bell, Carmen Aalbers, and Thomas A. Sick Nielsen, 13–44. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-30529-0_2.
    40. Ríos-Touma, B., Paulina, R., Andrés, M., Juan, M. G., Chelsea, C., Santiago, V-C., Alejandro, S-U., Ibon, T., & Francisco, C. (2023). Biodiversity Responses to Land-Use Change in the Equatorial Andes. Ecological Indicators 156(December), 111100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2023.111100.
    41. Sagar, U. S., Yatharth, S., Ashwin, M., & Teja, M. (2022). Future Impacts of Urban and Peri-Urban Agriculture on Carbon Stock and Land Surface Temperatures in India. Urban Climate 45(September), 101267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.uclim.2022.101267.
    42. Saint-Macary, C., Alwin K., Manfred, Z., Franz, H., & Pham, T. M. D. (2010). Land Titling Policy and Soil Conservation in the Northern Uplands of Vietnam. Land Use Policy, Forest transitions, 27(2), 617–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2009.08.004.
    43. Schiefer, J., Georg J. L., & Winfried, E. H. B. (2015). Indicators for the Definition of Land Quality as a Basis for the Sustainable Intensification of Agricultural Production. International Soil and Water Conservation Research 3(1), 42–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iswcr.2015.03.003.
    44. Smith, B., Rawlins, B. G., Ferguson, A. J., Fordyce, F., Hutchins, M. G. F., & Barr, D. M. (2002). Information on Land Quality in Scotland: Sources of Information: Including Background Contaminants. British Geological Survey & LGC.
    45. Song, W., Huizhong, Z., Rui, Z., Kening, W., Xinju, L., Beibei, N., & Junying, L. (2022). Study on Cultivated Land Quality Evaluation from the Perspective of Farmland Ecosystems. Ecological Indicators 139(June), 108959. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.108959.
    46. Tesfahunegn, G., Lulseged, T., Paul, V., & Kirubel, M. (2014). Assessing Farmers’ Knowledge of Weed Species, Crop Type and Soil Management Practices in Relation to Soil Quality Status in Mai-Negus Catchment, Northern Ethiopia. Land Degradation & Development 27,(March). https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.2233.
    47. Teshome, A., Jan, G., Coen, R., & Menale, B. (2014). Farmers’ Perceptions about the Influence of Land Quality, Land Fragmentation and Tenure Systems on Sustainable Land Management in the North Western Ethiopian Highlands. Land Degradation & Development 27(August). https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.2298.
    48. Thilde, B. B., Andreas de N., Maria, L. B., & Catherine, M. H. (2017). Intensification of Upland Agriculture in Thailand: Development or Degradation?: Intensification of Upland Agriculture in Thailand. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/306009128_Intensification_of_Upland_Agriculture_in_Thailand_Development_or_Degradation_Intensification_of_Upland_Agriculture_in_Thailand.
    49. Tombolini, I., Jesús, R-C, & Luca, S. (2022a). Land Quality and Sustainable Urban Forms: Changing Landscapes and Socioeconomic Structures of European Cities. Springer Geography. Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-94732-3.
    50. Tombolini, I., Jesús, R-C., & Luca, S. (2022b). What Type of Soil Was Consumed in the Metropolis of the Mediterranean Area? Land Quality and the Forms of Urbanization. In Land Quality and Sustainable Urban Forms: Changing Landscapes and Socioeconomic Structures of European Cities, edited by Ilaria Tombolini, Jesús Rodrigo-Comino, and Luca Salvati, 105–30. Springer Geography. Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-94732-3_4.
    51. Tsymbarovich, P., German, K., Mikhail, K., Valentin, G., & Olga, A. (2020). Soil Erosion: An Important Indicator for the Assessment of Land Degradation Neutrality in Russia. International Soil and Water Conservation Research, Soil erosion assessment tools and data; creation, consolidation, and harmonization – A special issue from the Global Symposium on Soil Erosion 2019 (Rome, FAO HQ)., 8 (4): 418–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iswcr.2020.06.002.
    52. Tuan, N. T., & Gábor, H. (2022a). Urbanization and Post-Acquisition Livelihood in a Peri-Urban Context in Vietnam: A Geographical Comparison between Hanoi, Danang, and Vinh City. Land 11(10), 1787. https://doi.org/10.3390/land11101787.
    53. Tuan, N.T., & Gábor, H. (2022b). Urbanization and Post-Acquisition Livelihood in a Peri-Urban Context in Vietnam: A Geographical Comparison between Hanoi, Danang, and Vinh City. Land 11(10), 1787. https://doi.org/10.3390/land11101787.
    54. Viana, C. M., Dulce, F., Patrícia, A., Jorge, R., & Paulo, P. (2022). Agricultural Land Systems Importance for Supporting Food Security and Sustainable Development Goals: A Systematic Review. Science of The Total Environment 806(February), 150718. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.150718.
    55. Wang, F., Yao, L., Jin, L., & Juan, N. (2021). Evaluating Environmentally Sustainable Development Based on the PSR Framework and Variable Weigh Analytic Hierarchy Process. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 18(6), 2836. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18062836.
    56. Wang, M., Xingnan, L., Ziwei, L., Fengyan, W., Xiaoyan, L., Guanglei, H., & Shijun, Z. (2023). Evaluation and Driving Force Analysis of Cultivated Land Quality in Black Soil Region of Northeast China. Chinese Geographical Science 33(4), 601–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11769-023-1361-1.
    57. Zhang, G., Chunyan, Z., Yi, W., Yufei, L., & Ying, X. (2015). Soil Organic Carbon and Microbial Community Structure Exhibit Different Responses to Three Land Use Types in the North China Plain. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica, Section B — Soil & Plant Science 65(4), 341–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/09064710.2015.1011223.
    58. Zhang, H., Chunyang, L., Kaidong, Y, & Linyun, D. (2019). Evaluation on Intensive Use of Urban Land Based on PSR Model Taking Henan Province as an Example. Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1419 (December): 012016. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1419/1/012016.
    59. Zhang, L., and Kai, S. (2017). Multifunctional Land-Use Systems for Managing the Nexus of Environmental Resources. Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54957-6.
    60. Zhang, M., Junru, Y., & Xinke, D. (2022). Integrated Quantity, Quality and Ecology of County-Level Arable Land Improvement Potential Comprehensive Zoning: The Example of Tongxu County, China. Journal of Geoscience and Environment Protection 10(4), 287–302. https://doi.org/10.4236/gep.2022.104018.
    61. Zhang, R., Chengli W., & Yachao, X. (2023). Ecological Security Assessment of China Based on the Pressure-State-Response Framework. Ecological Indicators 154(October), 110647. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2023.110647.
    62. Zhao, S., & Yongmu, J. (2022). Heterogeneous Effects of Rural–urban Migration and Migrant Earnings on Land Efficiency: Empirical Evidence from China. Land Use Policy 115(April), 106003. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2022.106003.
    63. Zhou, B., & Yang, H. (2002). PSR model and its application in the evaluation of sustainable land-use in the region. Journal of Natural Resources 17(5), 541–48. https://doi.org/10.11849/zrzyxb.2002.05.003.
    64. Ziadat, F., & Awni, T. (2013). Effect of Rainfall Intensity, Slope, Land Use and Antecedent Soil Moisture on Soil Erosion in an Arid Environment. Land Degradation & Development 24(November). https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.2239.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2024 Malque Publishing

How to cite

Do, T. T. T., Nguyen, C. H., Tran, V. T., Vo, T. T. H., Do, M. T., Pham, S. L., Trinh, T. K. T., Pham, T. P., Vu, K. H., Yasir , M., Dang, K. B., & Nguyen, A. T. (2024). Integrating land quality in peri-urban agriculture for sustainability and green revolution in Vietnam. Multidisciplinary Science Journal, 6(9), 2024196. https://doi.org/10.31893/multiscience.2024196
  • Article viewed - 504
  • SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL downloaded - 122
  • PDF downloaded - 181