• Abstract

    Continuous education is characterized by a constantly evolving complex of innovative pedagogical knowledge presented in the context of modernizing higher education in Ukraine. It has determined the relevance of the proposed research. The article aims to establish the effectiveness of introducing a range of educational components of continuous design education into pedagogical courses, perceived as innovations in education, to identify the problems of motivation and integration of the idea of continuous design education into the professional activities of educators. Several planning aspects of education modernization have been identified (attitude of educators towards innovation, anxious use of innovation in design education, external difficulties in introducing innovation in continuous education, innovative pedagogical practices, and readiness for modernization of design education in the higher education space). The study conducted comprehensive research, applying the method of pedagogical experiment. Surveys, observation, and experimental methods were used to diagnose the effectiveness of modernizing design education among educators in this field. The central hypothesis is that continuous courses in design education and self-education activities related to innovations in university education actively contribute to the popularization of continuous education in creative sectors of the national economy and anticipate their integration into the teaching activities of higher education staff. This research proves that programs of continuous training of specialists in design education and educational courses associated with innovation are effective and make it possible to use innovation in their professional practice. Further perspective is to investigate the development of continuous education in the territory of Ukrainian higher education.

  • References

    1. Boghian I (2018) Methodological Guidelines for Elaborating the Curriculum of Intercultural Education with a Focus on the Values of Tolerance. Revista Romaneasca pentru Educatie Multidimensionala 10:249-264. DOI: 10.18662/rrem/86
    2. Brovchenko A (2022) Formuvannya natsionalʹnoyi neperervnoyi systemy dyzayn-osvity – aktualʹne zavdannya sʹohodennya. Naukovyy chasopys NPU imeni M. P. Drahomanova 88:38-41. DOI: 10.31392/NPU-nc.series5.2022.88.07 (in Ukrainian)
    3. Čuhlová R (2019) Intercultural Adaptation Process and Its Determinants. International Journal of Economics, Finance and Management Sciences 7:215-221. Available in: http://www.sciencepublishinggroup.com/journal/paperinfo?journalid=173&doi=111648/j.ijefm.20190706.16
    4. Dussel I (2020) Educational Technology as School Reform: Using Actor-Network Theory to Understand Recent Latin American Educational Policies. In: Fan G, Popkewitz TS (eds) Handbook of Education Policy Studies. Springer, Singapore. DOI: 10.1007/978-981-13-8343-4_2
    5. Dzvinchuk D, Radchenko O, Kachmar O, Myskiv I, Dolinska N (2020) Analysis of Platforms and Tools of Open Study in the Conditions of Postmodern Education. Revista Romaneasca Pentru Educatie Multidimensionala 12:125-143. DOI: 10.18662/rrem/12.3/313
    6. Geitz G, de Geus J (2019) Design-based education, sustainable teaching, and learning, Cogent Education 6. DOI:10.1080/2331186X.2019.1647919
    7. Hattie JA, Donoghue GM (2016) Learning strategies: A synthesis and conceptual model. NPJ Science of Learning 1:16013. DOI: 10.1038/npjscilearn.2016.13
    8. Heikkilä A, Lonka K, Nieminen J, Niemivirta M (2012) Relations between teacher student’s approaches to learning, cognitive and attributional strategies, well-being, and study success. Higher Education 64:455–471. DOI: 10.1007/s10734-012-9504-9
    9. Ivanova I, Mosenkis I, Strokal O (2020) Modern media pedagogy: Ways of forming public journalism in Ukraine. Asia Life Sciences 22:357-370.
    10. Jayashree R (2017) A Study on Innovative Teaching Learning Methods for Undergraduate Students. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science Invention 6:32-34. Available in: http://www.ijhssi.org/papers/v6(11)/Version-2/E0611023234.pdf
    11. Kiki-Papadakis K, Chaimala F (2016) The Embedment of Responsible Research and Innovation Aspects in European Science Curricula. Revista Romaneasca pentru Educatie Multidimensionala 8:71-87. DOI: 10.18662/rrem/2016.0802.06
    12. Lindblom-Ylänne S, Parpala A, Postaref L (2018) What constitutes the surface approach to learning in the light of new empirical evidence? Studies in Higher Education 1-13. DOI: 10.1080/03075079.2018.1482267
    13. Loyens SM, Gijbels D, Coertjens L, Côté DJ (2013) Students’ approaches to learning in problem-based learning: Taking into account professional behavior in the tutorial groups, self-study time, and different assessment aspects. Studies in Educational Evaluation 39:23–32. DOI: 10.1016/j.stueduc.2012.10.004
    14. Norman D (2016) When You Come to a Fork in the Road, Take It: The Future of Design. The Journal of Design, Economics, and Innovation 2(4): 343–348. DOI: 10.1016/j.sheji.2017.07.003.
    15. Oruzha L (2018) Development of design education in the world. Available in: http://enpuir.npu.edu.ua/ bitstream/handle/123456789/18418/%D0%9Eruzh%D0%B0.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y.
    16. Partnership for 21st century learning. (2020). Available in: http://www.p21.org/our-work/p21-framework.
    17. Prusak V (2017) Formation and development of design-education in Ukraine. Lviv: Lviv National Academy of Arts: 71.
    18. Pu L, Sui YF (2016) The Retreat and Advance of Higher China journal of social sciences. Education Internationalization, China Journal of Social Sciences, September 8, 2016.
    19. Puranik S (2020) Innovative teaching methods in higher education. BSSS Journal of Education 9:67-75.
    20. Senthilkumar V, Kannappa R (2017) Impact of Innovative Teaching and Learning Methodologies for Higher Educational Institutions with reference to Trichirappalli District. IOSR Journal of Business and Management (IOSR-JBM) 19:88-92. DOI: 10.9790/487X-1907028892.
    21. Soto C, Gutiérrez de Blume A, Jacovina M, McNamara D, Benson N, Riffo B (2019) Reading comprehension and metacognition: The importance of inferential skills, Cogent Education 6:1-20. DOI: 10.1080/2331186X.2019.1565067
    22. Sui Y (2020) The Modernization of Higher Education. Handbook of Education Policy Studies. Springer, Singapore. DOI: 10.1007/978-981-13-8343-4_6.
    23. The Open University (2020) Available in: https://www.open.ac.uk/
    24. UNESKO (2015) Available in: https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000244834
    25. Zhernova A (2018) Information and Communication Technologies in Higher Education: Toward the Preparedness of the Subjects of Education for Innovation. Scientific Research in Social and Political Psychology 33:172-179.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2023 Multidisciplinary Science Journal

How to cite

Brovchenko, A., Shaura, A., Shevchenko, A., Kyriienko, M., & Kutsenko, A. (2023). The system of continuous design education in Ukraine in the context of higher education modernization. Multidisciplinary Science Journal, 5, 2023ss0508. https://doi.org/10.31893/multiscience.2023ss0508
  • Article viewed - 806
  • PDF downloaded - 377