Keywords:
technology-enhanced assessment
digital pedagogy
learner readiness
student engagement
virtual learning environments

  • Abstract

    Online assessments have become increasingly common in education due to technological advancements and the growing demand for flexible, accessible, and scalable evaluation methods. In higher education, the shift towards digital learning has further accelerated the adoption of online assessment tools. However, limited research explores how students’ readiness, engagement, and acceptance influence their academic performance, satisfaction, and overall learning engagement in online settings. This article presents a systematic literature review based on the PRISMA method (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses) in order to examine various dimensions of online assessments in higher education. The review focuses on four major themes: technology integration, pedagogical impact, learning engagement, and students’ acceptance and readiness. A total of eleven peer-reviewed research articles published between 2015 and 2025 were systematically selected from four academic databases: ScienceDirect, ERIC, Taylor & Francis, and SpringerLink. The findings synthesise key insights from each study, revealing both opportunities and challenges in implementing effective online assessment practices. The review highlights the necessity for a unified approach that integrates technological infrastructure, evidence-based pedagogical strategies, and consideration of student-centred variables to ensure successful outcomes. Moreover, the importance of training for both educators and students in the use of digital tools is emphasised. The research contributes to the ongoing development of online assessment frameworks that are reliable, equitable, and pedagogically effective within dynamic digital learning environments. Future research is likely to examine ways to enhance personalisation, reduce cognitive overload, and address issues related to academic integrity and learner motivation in online assessment environments.

  • References

    1. Ahmed, M. R., & Sidiq, M. A. (2023). Evaluating online assessment strategies: A systematic review of reliability and validity in e-learning environments. North American Academic Research, 6(12), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10407361.
    2. Allan, S. (2020). Migration and transformation: a sociomaterial analysis of practitioners’ experiences with online exams. Research in Learning Technology, 28. https://doi.org/10.25304/rlt.v28.2279.
    3. Al-Raimi, M., Mudhsh, B. A., Al-Yafaei, Y., & Al-Maashani, S. (2024). Utilising artificial intelligence tools for improving writing skills: Exploring Omani EFL learners’ perspectives. In Forum for Linguistic Studies (Transferred), 6(2), 1177-1177.
    4. Alshammari, S. H., & Alkhwaldi, A. F. (2025). An integrated approach using social support theory and technology acceptance model to investigate the sustainable use of digital learning technologies. Scientific Reports, 15(1), 342. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-83450-z.
    5. Alzubi, A. A. F., & Nazim, M. (2025). Unlocking the Power of Online Assessments in EFL Education: Teachers’ and Students’ Perceptions. SAGE Open, 15(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440241311785.
    6. Amrane-Cooper, L., Hatzipanagos, S., Marr, L., & Tait, A. (2024). Online assessment and artificial intelligence: Beyond the false dilemma of heaven or hell. Open Praxis, 16(4), 687-695. https://doi.org/10.59400/fls.v6i2.1177.
    7. Anthony, J., B., & Noel, S. (2021). Examining the adoption of emergency remote teaching and virtual learning during and after COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Educational Management, 35(6), 1136-1150. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-08-2020-0370.
    8. Babbar, M., & Gupta, T. (2022). Response of educational institutions to COVID-19 pandemic: An intercountry comparison. Policy Futures in Education, 20(4), 469-491. https://doi.org/10.1177/147821032110219.
    9. Banerjee, M. (2020). An Exploratory Study of Online Equity: Differential Levels of Technological Access and Technological Efficacy Among Underserved and Underrepresented Student Populations in Higher Education. Interdisciplinary Journal of e-Skills and Lifelong Learning, 16, 93-122. link.gale.com/apps/doc/A654302749/AONE?u=anon~3f6fcba&sid=googleScholar&xid=9d9ba1c3. Accessed 23 Feb. 2025.
    10. Baticulon, R. E., Sy, J. J., Alberto, N. R. I., Baron, M. B. C., Mabulay, R. E. C., Rizada, L. G. T., ... & Reyes, J. C. B. (2021). Barriers to online learning in the time of COVID-19: A national survey of medical students in the Philippines. Medical science educator, 31, 615-626. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-021-01231-z.
    11. Chikwe, C. F., Dagunduro, A. O., Ajuwon, O. A., & Ediae, A. A. (2024). Sociological barriers to equitable digital learning: A data-driven approach. Research and Reviews in Multidisciplinary Studies, 2(1), 027-034. https://doi.org/10.57219/crrms.2024.2.1.0038.
    12. Clark, C., & Gorski, P. (2002). Multicultural education and the digital divide: Focus on socioeconomic class background. Multicultural perspectives, 4(3), 25-36. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327892MCP0403_6.
    13. Cole, E. J., & Doherty, J. H. (2025). Student perceptions of the usefulness of core concepts when reasoning in physiology. Advances in Physiology Education, 49(1), 166-176. https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00198.2024.
    14. Cram, A., Harris, L., Raduescu, C., Huber, E., Zeivots, S., Brodzeli, A., ... & White, A. (2022). Online assessment in australian university business schools: A snapshot of usage and challenges. ASCILITE Publications. Accessed on February 23, 2024. Available online at https://ses.library.usyd.edu.au/handle/2123/29599.
    15. Dang, VTT. (2021). A Mixed Methods Investigation of Breadth and Intensity of Extracurricular Activity Participation and Students’ Academic Performance. In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Education Technology and Computers (pp. 394-400). https://doi.org/10.1145/3498765.3498827.
    16. Dritsas, E., & Trigka, M. (2025). Methodological and Technological Advancements in E-Learning. Information, 16(1), 1-28. https://doi.org/10.3390/info16010056.
    17. Elen, J., & Depaepe, F. (2024). Education and technology: elements of a relevant, comprehensive, and cumulative research agenda. Educational technology research and development, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-024-10420-7.
    18. Elzainy, A., El Sadik, A., & Al Abdulmonem, W. (2020). Experience of e-learning and online assessment during the COVID-19 pandemic at the College of Medicine, Qassim University. Journal of Taibah University Medical Sciences, 15(6), 456-462. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtumed.2020.09.005.
    19. Eshet, Y. (2024). Academic Integrity Crisis: Exploring Undergraduates’ Learning Motivation and Personality Traits over Five Years. Education Sciences, 14(9), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14090986.
    20. Forughi, S. (2024). Designing Effective Online Assessment. In Teaching and Learning in the Digital Era: Issues and Studies (pp. 165-192). https://doi.org/10.1142/9789811285622_0006.
    21. Getenet, S., Haeusler, C., Redmond, P., Cantle, R., & Crouch, V. (2024). First-year preservice teachers’ understanding of digital technologies and their digital literacy, efficacy, attitude, and online learning engagement: Implication for course design. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 29(3), 1359-1383. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-023-09724-z.
    22. Ghanem, S. I., & El-Shoafy, N. A. (2024). A Comparative Analysis of Digital Technologies in Electronic Exam Management. In International Conference on Advanced Intelligent Systems and Informatics (pp. 32-41). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-71619-5_4.
    23. Gupta, T., Shree, A., Chanda, P., & Banerjee, A. (2023). Online assessment techniques adopted by the university teachers amidst COVID-19 pandemic: A case study. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 8(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2023.100579.
    24. Hill, A. J., & LoPalo, M. (2024). The effects of online vs in-class testing in moderate-stakes college environments. Economics of Education Review, 98, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2023.102505.
    25. Huang, Y. (2022). The role of digital readiness innovative teaching methods in music art e-learning students’ satisfaction with entrepreneur psychological capital as a mediator: Evidence from music entrepreneur training institutes. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.979628.
    26. Jackson, H. A., & Rosenblatt, K. (2024). UDL and technology integration models: Addressing technological determinism. In Unlocking learning potential with universal design in online learning environments (pp. 98-125). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-1269-8.ch006.
    27. Jubaedah, Y., Yulia, C., Muktiarni, M., & Maosul, A. (2020). Usability testing electronic rubric of performance assessment. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1456, No. 1, p. 012016). IOP Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1456/1/012016.
    28. Kaushik, M. K., & Agrawal, D. (2021). Influence of technology readiness in adoption of e-learning. International Journal of Educational Management, 35(2), 483-495. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-04-2020-0216.
    29. Liu, Z. (2024). Effects of nonlinear dynamic online assessment model on language learners’ learning outcomes and cognitive load. Education and Information Technologies, 1-30. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12816-7.
    30. Liu, Z., Sailin, S. N., & Yeap, S. B. (2025). Exploring UTAUT2 factors affecting the acceptance of the Chaoxing network teaching platform by higher vocational students. Edelweiss Applied Science and Technology, 9(3), 2457-2469. https://doi.org/10.55214/25768484.v9i3.5819.
    31. Mahlangu, G., & Makwasha, L. (2023). Factors affecting the adoption and use of online assessment for learning at Polytechnics in Zimbabwe. Cogent Education, 10(1), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2023.2177475.
    32. Maleki, A. (2024). Towards a more equitable education: a lens into EFL teachers’ pedagogical barriers in online assessments. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1080/02601370.2024.2438127.
    33. Mostafa, L. (2023). Evaluating university E-assessment in Egypt: A teachers’ perspective. Journal of Education for Business, 98(7), 395-403. https://doi.org/10.1080/08832323.2023.2208813.
    34. Mukherjee, S., Rohles, B., Distler, V., Lenzini, G., & Koenig, V. (2023). The effects of privacy-non-invasive interventions on cheating prevention and user experience in unproctored online assessments: An empirical study. Computers & Education, 207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2023.104925.
    35. Ndibalema, P. (2021). Online Assessment in the Era of Digital Natives in Higher Education Institutions. International Journal of Technology in Education, 4(3), 443-463. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijte.89.
    36. Ngema, D. (2024). A Critical Review of the Purposes and Authenticity of E-Assessment Policies and Practices. Open Books and Proceedings, 134-153. https://doi.org/10.38140/obp2-2024-10.
    37. Nguyen, N. T., Clark, C., Joyce, C., Parsons, C., & Juriansz, J. (2023). Student experience of online exams in professional programs: current issues and future trends. In Digital Teaching, Learning and Assessment (pp. 161-178). Chandos Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-95500-3.00009-2.
    38. Nurhasanah, F., Nugraheni, A. S. C., Kusharjanta, B., Ardiansyah, R., Widono, S., & Saddhono, K. (2024, May). A Design of Virtual Classrooms Through AI, ML and DL to Improve the Level of Learning. In 2024 4th International Conference on Advance Computing and Innovative Technologies in Engineering (ICACITE) (pp. 940-945). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICACITE60783.2024.10616641.
    39. Oyetade, K., Harmse, A., & Zuva, T. (2024). Evaluating students’ willingness to use digital technologies. International Journal of Education and Practice, 12(3), 1027-1039. https://doi.org/10.18488/61.v12i3.3820.
    40. Özyer, K. K. (2024). Online Assessment in Turkish Universities: Challenges, Strategies, and Self-Efficacy Dynamics. Journal of Social Studies Education Research, 15(1), 1-37. Retrieved February 23, 2025, from https://www.learntechlib.org/p/224851/.
    41. Pantiwati, Y., Sari, T. N. I., Aldya, R. F., & Arifin, A. A. S. (2023). Higher Education Student Responses to the Use of Online Assessments on Biology Material. Journal of Biological Education Indonesia (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia), 9(2), 122-133. https://doi.org/10.22219/jpbi.v9i2.26167.
    42. Rafiee, M., & Abbasian-Naghneh, S. (2021). E-learning: development of a model to assess the acceptance and readiness of technology among language learners. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 34(5-6), 730-750. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2019.1640255.
    43. Rautela, S., Panackal, N., & Sharma, A. (2022). Modeling and analysis of barriers to ethics in online assessment by TISM and fuzzy MICMAC analysis. Asian Journal of Business Ethics, 11, 111-138. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13520-022-00158-x.
    44. Rehan, H. (2023). Shaping the Future of Education with Cloud and AI Technologies: Enhancing Personalised Learning and Securing Data Integrity in the Evolving EdTech Landscape. Australian Journal of Machine Learning Research & Applications, 3(1), 359-395. Accessed: February 23, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://thelifescience.org/index.php/jdlgda/article/view/21.
    45. Sannicandro, K., De Santis, A., Bellini, C., & Minerva, T. (2024). Academic integrity in online assessment: towards the development of a proposal for guidelines and education resources. In Proceedings of the Italian Symposium on Digital Education, ISYDE2023 (pp. 96-107). Pearson. Accessed on February 23, 2024. Available online at https://hdl.handle.net/11380/1341846.
    46. Shivshankar, S. (2024). Assessment Integrity and Assessment Security in the Digital Era. In Teaching and Learning in the Digital Era: Issues and Studies, 12(1), 137-163. https://doi.org/10.1142/13658.
    47. Slade, M. L., Westerman, P., & Harrington, A. J. (2025). The Use of Digital Technologies to Enhance Student-Engagement Pedagogies in Higher Education Distance Learning. In Cases on Enhancing P-16 Student Engagement With Digital Technologies (pp. 233-258). IGI Global Scientific Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-5633-3.ch009.
    48. Sotardi, V. A., & Brogt, E. (2020). Influences of learning strategies on assessment experiences and outcomes during the transition to university. Studies in Higher Education, 45(9), 1973-1985. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2019.1647411.
    49. Spangler, J. (2016). Impacts of online education on existing education models: Empirical evidence from Taiwan. Chinese education models in a global age, 177-192. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0330-1_13.
    50. Stradiotová, E., Némethová, I., & Štefancík, R. (2022). What We Know after the Pandemic. Online and Face-to-Face Testing in Comparative Perspective. Advanced education, 21, 4-21. https://doi.org/10.20535/2410-8286.270182.
    51. Sullivan, D. P. (2016). An integrated approach to preempt cheating on asynchronous, objective, online assessments in graduate business classes. Online Learning, 20(3), 195-209. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v20i3.650.
    52. Sun, Y., Shi, W., & Fu, L. (2025). Improving Chinese EFL learners’ engagement in online classes: the role of teacher scaffolding and teacher respect. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 46(2), 334-349. https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2023.2180009.
    53. Tang, Y. M., Chen, P. C., Law, K. M., Wu, C. H., Lau, Y. Y., Guan, J., ... & Ho, G. T. (2021). Comparative analysis of Student’s live online learning readiness during the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic in the higher education sector. Computers & education, 168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104211.
    54. Tate, T., & Warschauer, M. (2022). Equity in online learning. Educational Psychologist, 57(3), 192-206. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2022.2062597.
    55. Terblanche, E. A. J., van Rooyen, A. A., & Enwereji, P. C. (2024). Auditing students’ perceptions of online assessments and e-proctoring systems. Discover Education, 3(1), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-024-00306-4.
    56. Topuz, A. C., & Kinshuk. (2024). Students’ acceptance of and preferences regarding online exams: a systematic literature review. Educational technology research and development, 72(2), 1111-1151. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-023-10333-x.
    57. Ursu, A. S., Panisoara, I. O., & Chirca, R. C. (2021). The changes brought by digital technology to cognitive learning. In Handbook of Research on User Experience in Web 2.0 Technologies and Its Impact on Universities and Businesses (pp. 161-182). IGI Global Scientific Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-3756-5.ch010.
    58. Yadav, S. (2024). Navigating Online Teaching and Assessment During a Pandemic. In Navigating Teaching in an Era of Social Distancing and Global Conflict (pp. 155-180). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-3382-2.ch007.
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2025 The Authors

How to cite

Tahir, M. H. M., Saputra, S., Othman, S., Shah, D. S. M., Sulaiman , S. H., Azhari, M. A., & Mohandas, E. S. (2025). Online assessment in higher education: A systematic literature review. Multidisciplinary Reviews, 9(1), 2026024. https://doi.org/10.31893/multirev.2026024
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC
  • Article viewed - 1202
  • PDF downloaded - 477