Keywords:
Blockchain Technology
Financial Market Efficiency
Decentralized Finance (DeFi)
Bibliometric Analysis

  • Abstract

    Blockchain technology has emerged as a revolutionary force in modern finance, significantly impacting financial market efficiency by enhancing transparency, reducing transaction costs, and eliminating intermediaries. However, its overall effect on market efficiency remains a subject of academic debate. This study conducts a bibliometric and network analysis to systematically assess the evolution of blockchain research in financial markets, highlighting key publication trends, influential authors, leading institutions, and dominant research themes. Using Scopus as the primary database, a structured search strategy identified 3,054 high-quality articles published between 2005 and 2025, focusing on Business, Management, and Accounting (BUSI) and Economics, Econometrics, and Finance (ECON). VOSviewer was employed to map research collaborations, co-authorship structures, and keyword co-occurrences, providing a comprehensive understanding of the intellectual development in this field. Findings reveal a sharp increase in blockchain-related financial research, particularly post-2016, driven by the expansion of decentralized finance (DeFi) and institutional interest in digital assets. The study identifies Corbet, S., and Yarovaya, L., among the most influential authors, while leading institutions include Dublin City University and Lebanese American University. China, the United States, and India dominate research output, reflecting global interest in blockchain's financial implications. The analysis further uncovers key thematic clusters, including market efficiency, liquidity, and regulatory challenges, while also highlighting blockchain’s emerging applications in sustainable finance and artificial intelligence-driven investment strategies. Despite significant academic contributions, gaps persist, particularly in empirical assessments of blockchain’s long-term impact on market stability, regulatory alignment, and integration with traditional financial systems. Future research should focus on addressing these gaps by exploring cross-border regulatory frameworks, expanding studies beyond cryptocurrencies to tokenized assets, and investigating the role of artificial intelligence in blockchain-based financial solutions. By advancing these research directions, scholars and policymakers can develop a structured approach to blockchain adoption, ensuring its long-term sustainability and effectiveness in global financial markets.

  • References

    1. Abualhamayl, A., Almalki, M., Al-Doghman, F., Alyoubi, A., & Hussain, F. K. (2024). Blockchain for real estate provenance: an infrastructural step toward secure transactions in real estate E-Business. Service Oriented Computing and Applications, 18(4), 333–347. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11761-024-00403-0
    2. Adamyk, B., Benson, V., Adamyk, O., & Liashenko, O. (2025). Risk Management in DeFi: Analyses of the Innovative Tools and Platforms for Tracking DeFi Transactions. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 18(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm18010038
    3. Ahmed, W. M. A. (2024). On the robust drivers of cryptocurrency liquidity: the case of Bitcoin. Financial Innovation, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40854-023-00598-9
    4. Alon, I., Klemetsen, H. S., Šilenskytė, A., & Gildin, I. (2025). New pathways for international business governance via blockchain-based decentralized autonomous organizations. Multinational Business Review. https://doi.org/10.1108/MBR-07-2024-0132
    5. Amjad, M. S., & Diaz-Elsayed, N. (2024). Smart and sustainable urban manufacturing for a circular economy. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 26(12), 31789–31815. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-024-04671-w
    6. Anas, M., Shahzad, S. J. H., & Yarovaya, L. (2024). The use of high-frequency data in cryptocurrency research: a meta-review of literature with bibliometric analysis. Financial Innovation, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40854-023-00595-y
    7. Bhullar, P. S., Joshi, M., Sharma, S., Phan, D. H. T., & Nguyen, A. L. (2025). Global taxation issues in cryptocurrencies – a synthesis of literature and future research agenda. Journal of Accounting Literature. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAL-10-2024-0314
    8. Bland, E., Changchit, C., Cutshall, R., & Pham, L. (2024). Behavioral and Psychological Determinants of Cryptocurrency Investment: Expanding UTAUT with Perceived Enjoyment and Risk Factors. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 17(10). https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm17100447
    9. Chopra, M., Mehta, C., Lal, P., & Srivastava, A. (2023). Does the big boss of coins—Bitcoin—protect a portfolio of new-generation cryptos? Evidence from meme-coins, stablecoins, NFTs and DeFi. China Finance Review International, November 2021. https://doi.org/10.1108/CFRI-03-2023-0076
    10. Fama, E. F. (1970). American Finance Association Efficient Capital Markets : A Review of Theory and Empirical Work Author ( s ): Eugene F . Fama Source : The Journal of Finance , Vol . 25 , No . 2 , Papers and Proceedings of the Twenty- Eighth Annual Meeting of the American. The Journal of Finance, 25(2), 383–417.
    11. Gandal, N., Hamrick, J. T., Moore, T., & Oberman, T. (2018). Price manipulation in the Bitcoin ecosystem. Journal of Monetary Economics, 95, 86–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmoneco.2017.12.004
    12. Ghaemi Asl, M., & Roubaud, D. (2024). Asymmetric interactions among cutting-edge technologies and pioneering conventional and Islamic cryptocurrencies: fresh evidence from intra-day-based good and bad volatilities. In Financial Innovation (Vol. 10, Issue 1). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40854-024-00623-5
    13. Gramlich, V., Jelito, D., & Sedlmeir, J. (2024). Maximal extractable value: Current understanding, categorization, and open research questions. Electronic Markets, 34(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-024-00727-x
    14. Hakami, T., Sabri, O., Al-Shargabi, B., Rahmat, M. M., & Nashat Attia, O. (2023). A critical review of auditing at the time of blockchain technology – a bibliometric analysis. EuroMed Journal of Business, 19(4), 1173–1201. https://doi.org/10.1108/EMJB-01-2023-0010
    15. Kakinuma, Y. (2023). ESG equities and Bitcoin: responsible investment and risk management perspective. International Journal of Ethics and Systems, 40(4), 759–775. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOES-03-2023-0049
    16. Kayani, U. N. (2023). Exploring prospects of blockchain and fintech: using SLR approach. Journal of Science and Technology Policy Management, 16(1), 5–41. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSTPM-01-2023-0005
    17. Khalegi, F., Kadyraliev, A., Tursunalieva, D., Orozbekov, A., & Bigali, A. (2024). Blockchain and sustainable finance: Enhancing transparency and efficiency in green investments. Scientific Bulletin of Mukachevo State University. Series Economics, 11(3), 125–137. https://doi.org/10.52566/msu-econ3.2024.125
    18. Kirste, D., Poddey, A., Kannengießer, N., & Sunyaev, A. (2024). On the influence of conventional and automated market makers on market quality in cryptoeconomic systems. Electronic Markets, 34(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-024-00723-1
    19. Kumar, J., Rani, G., Rani, M., & Rani, V. (2024). Blockchain technology adoption and its impact on SME performance: insights for entrepreneurs and policymakers. Journal of Enterprising Communities, 18(5), 1147–1169. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEC-02-2024-0034
    20. Kumar, R., & Kumar, D. (2023). Blockchain-based smart dairy supply chain: catching the momentum for digital transformation. Journal of Agribusiness in Developing and Emerging Economies, 15(2), 225–248. https://doi.org/10.1108/JADEE-07-2022-0141
    21. Liaras, E., Nerantzidis, M., & Alexandridis, A. (2024). Machine learning in accounting and finance research: a literature review. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11156-024-01306-z
    22. Liu, W., Long, S., & Wang, J. (2024). Impacts of blockchain cooperation project announcements on corporate stock market values: a loose coupling theory perspective. Industrial Management and Data Systems, 124(10), 2817–2846. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-03-2024-0166
    23. Liu, Y., Zhang, Y., & Zheng, D. (2025). A blockchain and internet of things-based information infrastructure for the Chinese automotive sector carbon-credit market. Financial Innovation, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40854-024-00737-w
    24. Nakamoto, S. (2008). [국문] Whitepaper 비트코인.
    25. Pavlov, R., Zarutska, O., Pavlova, T., Grynko, T., Levkovich, O., & Hordieieva-Herasymova, L. (2024). Blockchain As a Management Technology: Institutionalization of Crypto-Assets and Transformation of Entrepreneurial Models Using the Example of Ethereum. Financial and Credit Activity: Problems of Theory and Practice, 6(59), 151–166. https://doi.org/10.55643/fcaptp.6.59.2024.4529
    26. Rabhi, A., & Soujaa, I. (2024). Macro Determinants of Cryptocurrency Ownership: A Case Study of Bitcoin. International Advances in Economic Research, 361–377. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11294-024-09921-1
    27. Radanliev, P. (2024). The rise and fall of cryptocurrencies: defining the economic and social values of blockchain technologies, assessing the opportunities, and defining the financial and cybersecurity risks of the Metaverse. Financial Innovation, 10(1), 1–34. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40854-023-00537-8
    28. Rejeb, A., Rejeb, K., Appolloni, A., Zailani, S., & Iranmanesh, M. (2025). Mapping the research landscape of blockchain and crowdfunding. Financial Innovation, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40854-024-00705-4
    29. Rötheli, T. (2024). Who wants cryptocurrency? The effects of expectations and conjectures. Foresight, 26(6), 1030–1039. https://doi.org/10.1108/FS-01-2024-0023
    30. Singh, S., Pratap, S., Dwivedi, A., & Lakshay. (2024). An empirical study on driving blockchain adoption in Maritime freight: an Asian business perspective. Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing, 11(May), 2347–2363. https://doi.org/10.1108/JBIM-11-2023-0691
    31. Snene Manzli, Y., & Jeribi, A. (2024). Assessing Bitcoin, gold and gold-backed cryptocurrencies as safe havens for energy and agricultural commodities: insights from COVID-19, Russia–Ukraine conflict and SVB collapse. Journal of Financial Economic Policy. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFEP-12-2023-0386
    32. Spiga, G., Ahmad, S. Z., & Yeoh, W. (2024). Blockchain adoption impact on real estate performance: the mediating role of real estate and blockchain transparency. Business Process Management Journal, 30(6), 1874–1894. https://doi.org/10.1108/BPMJ-09-2023-0701
    33. Trozze, A., Kleinberg, B., & Davies, T. (2024). Detecting DeFi securities violations from token smart contract code. In Financial Innovation (Vol. 10, Issue 1). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40854-023-00572-5
    34. van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523–538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3
    35. Wei, J., Zhang, X., Liu, Y., & Jiang, Y. (2024). Blockchain-based information sharing and supply and demand matching cloud platform for automotive manufacturing supply chain. Industrial Management and Data Systems, 125(2), 687–710. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-07-2024-0641
    36. Xu, L., & Tian, T. (2023). Blockchain-enabled enterprise bleaching green regulation banking evolution game analysis. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 26(11), 27457–27483. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-023-03768-y
    37. Zeiß, C., Schaschek, M., Straub, L., Tomitza, C., & Winkelmann, A. (2024). Re-intermediation of the crypto asset ecosystem by banks: An empirical study on acceptance drivers among the populace. Electronic Markets, 34(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-024-00720-4
    38. Zhuo, X., Irresberger, F., & Bostandzic, D. (2024). How are texts analyzed in blockchain research? A systematic literature review. Financial Innovation, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40854-023-00501-6
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

How to cite

Ismail Mahmoud, M., & Surwanti, A. (2025). Blockchain and financial market efficiency: A bibliometric and network analysis of research evolution. Multidisciplinary Reviews, (| Accepted Articles). Retrieved from https://malque.pub/ojs/index.php/mr/article/view/8627
  • Article viewed - 109