• Abstract

    This study evaluated how sustainable entrepreneurship and various dynamic capabilities have affected the livelihood of family-based handicraft businesses, especially the "Moonj craft and Pattal(Leaf plate)" in India. This is a sustainable and traditional business where women or family members carry out maximum business and economic activity in India's handmade Moonj craft  and Pattal industry. The research used an online poll of 410 family members working for female-owned Indian handicraft businesses such as Moonj Craft, Pattal making, and traditional cot making in India. PLS-SEM for factor loading and SPSS-26, a statistical software, have been used for data analysis to determine how pandemic and sustainable entrepreneurship affect India's family-based handicraft business (Moonj Craft). The model demonstrated that independent constructs such as Sustainable entrepreneurship and other factors significantly influence the livelihood of the family-based craft industry, particularly Moonj art, in some states of India. The advancement of digital technology, social media, and AI use for marketing handmade products has increased the productivity and attraction of female artisans to start new businesses for sustainable development. Because of these issues, sustainable entrepreneurship, has become increasingly important. Sustainable entrepreneurial technology is essential in transforming toward a more flexible eco-friendly environment and future greening and thus has a vital role in connecting economic, social, and ecological aims. This study explores the impact of sustainable entrepreneurship on the Moonj craft and Pattal industry, as this product is entirely sustainable, naturally obtained, and easily degradable. Thus, this research focuses on how Sustainable entrepreneurship using digital social media after the pandemic has affected family-based businesses such as Moonj Craft, women's roles and concerns in the craft sector. This study also suggested some innovative strategies for developing a family-based craft industry. It will also help academicians, policymakers, managers, and researchers explore their ideas globally in other family-based handicraft industries.

  • References

    1. Abdullah, A., Thomas, B., Murphy, L., & Plant, E. (2018). An investigation of the benefits and barriers of e‐business adoption activities in Yemeni SMEs. Strategic Change, 27(3), 195–208.
    2. Al Hakmani, Al Rashdi, A., Al Shabibi, A. B., & Al Harthi, S. (2022). Mental health wellbeing of school-age children is matter: A study. Journal of Contemporary Management Science, 8(1), 27–30.
    3. Al-Hattami, H. M. (2021). Validation of the D&M IS success model in the context of the accounting information system of the banking sector in the least developed countries. Journal of Management Control, 32(1), 127–153. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00187-020-00310-3
    4. Ali, M. A. (2021). Systematic literature review of sustainable entrepreneurship with thematic analysis. World Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Sustainable Development, 17(1), 742–764.
    5. Amatucci, F. M., Pascale, A. M., & Serluca, M. C. (2015). Green economy and social responsibility in the Italian agri-food sector: The focus on the wine sector. International Journal of Global and Small Business, 7(2), 234–246.
    6. Anbarasan, P., & Sushil, P. (2018). Stakeholder engagement in sustainable enterprise: Evolving a conceptual framework, and a case study of ITC. Business Strategy and the Environment, 27(2), 282–299.
    7. Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108
    8. Belz, F. M., & Binder, J. K. (2017). Sustainable entrepreneurship: A convergent process model. Business Strategy and the Environment, 26(2), 1–17.
    9. Bhatti, S. H., Kiyani, S. K., Dust, S. B., & Zakariya, R. (2021). The impact of ethical leadership on project success: The mediating role of trust and knowledge sharing. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 14(1), 982–998. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJMPB-05-2020-0159
    10. Bouey, J. (2020). Assessment of COVID-19's impact on small and medium-sized enterprises: Implications from China. RAND Corporation.
    11. Campopiano, G., Alfredo, D., & Rinaldi, F. R. (2017). Women's involvement in family firms: Progress and challenges for future research. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 8(4), 212–230.
    12. Chatterjee, I., Shepherd, D. A., & Wincent, J. (2022). Women's entrepreneurship and well-being at the base of the pyramid. Journal of Business Venturing, 37(4), 23–42.
    13. Check, J., & Schutt, R. K. (2012). Survey research. In J. Check & R. K. Schutt (Eds.), Research methods in education (pp. 159–185). Thousand Oaks, CA: FIIB Business Review, 11(2).
    14. Chinembiri, T. (2011). Exploring the role of small and medium enterprises in economic development: Some policy considerations for Zimbabwe (Working Paper Series). Zimbabwe Economic Policy Analysis and Research Unit (ZEPARU).
    15. Chivasa, S. (2014). Entrepreneurship culture among SMEs in Zimbabwe: A case of Bulawayo SMEs. International Journal of Economics, Commerce and Management, 11(9), 1–13.
    16. Chrisman, J. J., Chua, J. H., Pearson, A. W., & Barnett, T. (2012). Family involvement, family influence, and family-centred non-economic goals in small firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 36(2), 267–293.
    17. Craig, J. B., & Newbert, S. L. (2022). Exploring the future of family enterprise research through a social science lens. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 13(2), 34–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfbs.2022.100504
    18. Damayanti, E., Djollong, A. F., Asfahani, A., Sitopu, J. W., & Yadav, U. S. (2024). Dynamics of early childhood education in Taiwan: A comparative study of traditional and innovative approaches. Absorbent Mind, 4(1), 65–75.
    19. Daubie, M., & Meskens, N. (2002). Business failure prediction: A review and analysis of the literature. In C. Zopounidis (Ed.), New trends in banking management. Contributions to management science (pp. 71–86). Heidelberg: Physica.
    20. Dohale, V., Ambilkar, P., Gunasekaran, A., & C, V. (2022). A multi-product and multi-period aggregate production plan: A case of automobile component manufacturing firm. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 29(10), 3396–3425.
    21. Dubey, R., Bryde, D. J., Foropon, C., Tiwari, M., & Gunasekaran, A. (2022). How frugal innovation shapes global sustainable supply chains during the pandemic crisis: Lessons from the COVID-19. Supply Chain Management, 27(2), 295–311.
    22. Dubey, R., Gunasekaran, A., Childe, S. J., Fosso Wamba, S., Roubaud, D., & Foropon, C. (2021). Empirical investigation of data analytics capability and organizational flexibility as complements to supply chain resilience. International Journal of Production Research, 59(1), 110–128.
    23. Eddleston, K. A., Kellermanns, F. W., & Sarathy, R. (2008). Resource configuration in family firms: Linking resources, strategic planning and technological opportunities to performance. Journal of Management Studies, 45(1), 26–50. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2007.00717.x
    24. Engelen, A., Kube, H., Schmidt, S., & Flatten, T. C. (2014). Entrepreneurial orientation in turbulent environments: The moderating role of absorptive capacity. Research Policy, 43(8), 1353–1369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2014.03.002
    25. Ergun, E., Bulut, Ç., Alpkan, L., & Demircan, N. (2004). Connecting the link between corporate entrepreneurship and innovative performance. Global Business and Technology Association, 23(4), 259–265.
    26. Fellnhofer, K., Kraus, S., & Bouncken, R. B. (2014). The current state of research on sustainable entrepreneurship. International Journal of Business Research, 14(1), 163–172.
    27. Frank, H., Kessler, A., & Fink, M. (2010). Entrepreneurial orientation and business performance—a replication study. Schmalenbach Business Review, 62(2), 175–198. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03396804
    28. Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2014). Multivariate data analysis: A global perspective (7th ed.). New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
    29. Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2019). Multivariate data analysis. Upper Saddle River: Pearson Education.
    30. He, X., Zhang, Y., & Xiao, W. (2022). Structure of local political power and family firms' concentration of wealth. Family Business Review, 34(1), 23–51.
    31. International Council for Small Business. (2019). ICSB annual global micro-, small and medium-sized enterprises report. Washington, DC: International Council for Small Business. https://icsb.org/ (Accessed on February 4, 2024)
    32. International Labour Organisation. (2020). COVID-19 and the world of work: Impact and policy responses. Geneva: International Labour Organisation.
    33. International Trade Centre. (2020). COVID-19: The great lockdown and its impact on small business. Geneva: International Trade Centre, 145(1), 756–782.
    34. Jakhar, R., Verma, D., Rathore, A. P. S., & Kumar, D. (2020). Prioritization of dimensions of visual merchandising for apparel retailers using FAHP. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 27(10), 2759–2784.
    35. Kaur, H., Sodhi, D., Aggarwal, R., & Yadav, U. S. (2023a). Managing human resources in digital marketing. In Digital transformation, strategic resilience, cyber security and risk management (pp. 155–162). Emerald Publishing Limited.
    36. Kaur, H., Sood, K., Yadav, U. S., & Grima, S. (2023b). Sustainable solutions for insurance and risk management. In The impact of climate change and sustainability standards on the insurance market (pp. 359–372). https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/9781394167944.ch23 (Accessed on July 14, 2023)
    37. Kelleci, R., Lambrechts, F., Voordeckers, W., & Huybrechts, J. (2019). CEO personality: A different perspective on the nonfamily versus family CEO debate. Family Business Review, 32(1), 31–57.
    38. Kumar, A., Mandal, M., & Yadav, U. S. (2022a). Motivation and challenges in career choice and well-being of women entrepreneurs: Experiences of small businesses of Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh. Journal of Positive School Psychology, 6(4), 10890–10906.
    39. Kumar, A., Mandal, M., & Yadav, U. S. (2022b). Business and entrepreneurial strategies for developing Indian crafts industries (MSME) during post-pandemic COVID-19: Indian artisans as entrepreneurs. Empirical Economics Letters, 21(4), 153–162.
    40. Kumar, A., Yadav, U. S., Mandal, M., & Yadav, S. K. (2024). Impact of corporate innovation, technological innovation and ESG on environmental performance: Moderation test of entrepreneurial orientation and technological innovation as mediator using Sobel test. International Journal of Sustainable Development & Planning, 19(7), 34–53.
    41. Kumar, A., Yadav, U. S., Yadav, G. P., & Tripathi, R. (2023). New sustainable ideas for materialistic solutions of a smart city in India: A review from Allahabad city. Materials Today: Proceedings, 34(3), 23–31.
    42. Lemeshow, S., Teres, J. S., Avrunin, J. J., & Pastides, H. (1988). Predicting the outcome of intensive care unit patients. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 83(4), 348–356.
    43. Lumpkin, G. T., & Dess, G. G. (2001). Linking two dimensions of entrepreneurial orientation to firm performance: The moderating role of environment and industry life cycle. Journal of Business Venturing, 16(5), 429–451. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-9026(00)00048-3
    44. Miller, D. (1983). The correlates of entrepreneurship in three types of firms. Management Science, 29(7), 770–791. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.29.7.770
    45. Moore, D. S., & Spruill, M. C. (1975). Unified large sample theory of general chi squared statistics for tests of fit. The Annals of Statistics, 3(1), 599–616.
    46. Moore, M. L., & Westley, F. (2011). Surmountable chasms: Networks and social innovation for resilient systems. Ecology and Society, 16(1), Article 1.
    47. Morris, C. N., Lopes, K., Gallagher, M. C., Ashraf, S., & Ibrahim, S. (2019). When political solutions for acute conflict in Yemen seem distant, demand for reproductive health services is immediate: A programme model for resilient family planning and post abortion care services. Sexual and Reproductive Health Matters, 27(2), 100–111. https://doi.org/10.1080/26410397.2019.1610279
    48. Muñoz, P., & Cohen, B. (2018). Sustainable entrepreneurship research: Taking stock and looking ahead. Business Strategy and the Environment, 27(1), 300–322.
    49. OECD. (2020). Coronavirus (COVID 19): SME policy responses. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/04440101 en
    50. OECD. (2020). Tackling Coronavirus (COVID 19): Contributing to a global effort: The COVID 19 crisis in Montenegro. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/04443211 en
    51. Rena, R., & Yadav, U. S. (2025a). Impact of entrepreneurial leadership, talent management, social media, artificial intelligence and digital technology on business performance in handicraft industry: An analysis of innovation as moderating construct. FIIB Business Review, 11(3), 23–42.
    52. Rena, R., & Yadav, U. S. (2025b). Analyzing the factors of business digitalization and their impact on the entrepreneurial growth of the handmade toy industry. The Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries, 91(3), 1–34.
    53. Rodgers, C. (2021). Sustainable entrepreneurship in SMEs: A case study analysis. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 17(1), 125–132. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2084
    54. Rosário, A. T., Raimundo, R. J., & Cruz, S. P. (2022). Sustainable entrepreneurship: A literature review. Sustainability, 14(9), Article 5556. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14095556
    55. Rushita, D., Sood, K., & Yadav, U. S. (2023). Cryptocurrency and digital money in the new era. In S. Grima, E. Thalassinos, G. G. Noja, T. V. Stamataopoulos, T. Vasiljeva, & T. Volkova (Eds.), Digital Transformation, Strategic Resilience, Cyber Security and Risk Management (Contemporary Studies in Economic and Financial Analysis, Vol. 111B, pp. 179–190). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1569 37592023000111B013
    56. Saxena, G., & Yadav, U. S. (2025). Examining the socioeconomic impact of digital integration on handicraft entrepreneurs. In L. P. Dana & N. Sharma (Eds.), Entrepreneurship in India’s Unorganized Sector (pp. 23–41). India Studies in Business and Economics. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978 981 96 4313 4_7
    57. Saxena, G., Vadhawani, S., Srivastava, J., & Yadav, U. S. (2025). Examining the paradox of AI/robotic automation awareness on automobile manufacturing employees’ work performance: The roles of emotional intelligence, job crafting and job insecurity. Academy of Marketing Studies Journal, 29(3), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3350/su14095566
    58. Schaltegger, S., & Wagner, M. (2011). Sustainable entrepreneurship and sustainability innovation: Categories and interactions. Business Strategy and the Environment, 20(2), 222–237.
    59. Schaltegger, S., Lüdeke Freund, F., & Hansen, E. G. (2016). Business models for sustainability: A co evolutionary analysis of sustainable entrepreneurship, innovation, and transformation. Organization & Environment, 29(2), 264–289.
    60. Shankar, U. S., Tripathi, R., Tripathi, M. A., & Gyan, P. Y. (2022a). Indian small industries (terracotta of Gorakhpur and Bankura) and women artisans in digital and COVID 19 era: A case study on the traditional handicraft in Uttar Pradesh. Gospodarka i Innowacje, 22, 358–370.
    61. Shankar, U. S., Tripathi, R., Tripathi, M. A., Rawat, R., & Kushwaha, J. (2022b). Performance of women artisans as entrepreneurs in ODOP in Uttar Pradesh to boost economy: Strategies and a way towards Global Handicraft Index for small business. Academy of Marketing Studies Journal, 26(1), 1–19.
    62. Shepherd, D. A., & Patzelt, H. (2011). The new field of sustainable entrepreneurship: Studying entrepreneurial action linking “what is to be sustained” with “what is to be developed.” Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 35(2), 137–163.
    63. Singla, N., Sood, K., Grima, S., & Yadav, U. S. (2023). Target 8.8: Protect labour rights and promote a safe working environment. In The Impact of Climate Change and Sustainability Standards on the Insurance Market (pp. …). https://doi.org/10.1108/S1569 37592023000111B
    64. Stute, W., & Zhu, L. X. (2002). Model checks for generalized linear models. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, 29(2), 535–545.
    65. Surjanovic, N., & Loughin, T. M. (2023). Improving the Hosmer Lemeshow goodness of fit test in large models with replicated Bernoulli trials. Journal of Applied Statistics, 9(11), 1–13.
    66. Teece, D. J. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28(13), 1319–1350. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.640
    67. Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509–533. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199708)18:7<509::AID-SMJ882>3.0.CO;2-Z
    68. Tripathi, M. A., Tripathi, R., & Yadav, G. P. (2022c). Gig economy: Reshaping strategic HRM in the era of industry 4.0 and artificial intelligence. Journal of Positive School Psychology, 6(4), 3569–3579.
    69. Tripathi, M. A., Tripathi, R., & Yadav, U. S. (2022a). Prospects of impending digital platform economy: Rise of gig work. International Journal of Early Childhood Special Education, 14(3), 23–34.
    70. Tripathi, M. A., Tripathi, R., Yadav, U. S., & Shastri, R. K. (2022b). Gig economy: A paradigm shift towards digital HRM practices. Journal of Positive School Psychology, 6(2), 5609–5617.
    71. Tsiatis, A. A. (1980). A note on a goodness of fit test for the logistic regression model. Biometrika, 67(2), 250–251.
    72. Vallaster, C., Kraus, S., Kailer, N., & Baldwin, B. (2019). Responsible entrepreneurship: Outlining the contingencies. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 25(2), 538–553.
    73. Wang, Y., & Shi, X. (2011). Thrive, not just survive: Enhance dynamic capabilities of SMEs through IS competence. Journal of Systems and Information Technology, 13(2), 200–222. https://doi.org/10.1108/13287261111136016
    74. Xiao, Y., & Watson, M. (2019). Guidance on conducting a systematic literature review. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 39(2), 93–112.
    75. Yadav, U. S., & Rena, R. (2025). Impact of entrepreneurial leadership, talent management, social media, artificial intelligence and digital technology on business performance in the handicraft industry: An analysis of innovation as moderating construct. FIIB Business Review, 15(3), 32–41. https://doi.org/10.1177/23197145241305678
    76. Yadav, U. S., Ghosal, I., Pareek, A., et al. (2024c). Impact of entrepreneurial orientation and ESG on environmental performance: Moderating impact of digital transformation and technological innovation as a mediating construct using the Sobel test. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 13(4), 86–108. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13731-024-00443-y
    77. Yadav, U. S., Sood, K., Tripathi, R., Grima, S., & Yadav, N. (2023b). Entrepreneurship in India’s handicraft industry, with the support of digital technology and innovation during natural calamities. International Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning, 18(5), 1777–1791. https://doi.org/10.18280/ijsdp.180613
    78. Yadav, U. S., Tripathi, R., & Tripathi, M. A. (2022a). Adverse impact of lockdown during the COVID 19 pandemic on micro small and medium enterprises (Indian handicraft sector): A study highlighting exit strategies and important determinants. Future Business Journal, 8(1), 52–65. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43093 022 00166
    79. Yadav, U. S., Tripathi, R., & Tripathi, M. A. (2022b). Digital analysis of the transformation of institutions in the knowledge and innovation system of the handmade carpet industry. Small Enterprises Development Management and Extension Journal, 49(1), 107–124. https://doi.org/10.1177/09708464221096
    80. Yadav, U. S., Tripathi, R., Kumar, A., & Shastri, R. K. (2024a). Evaluation of factors affecting women artisans as entrepreneurs in the handicraft sector: A study on financial, digital technology factors and developmental strategies about ODOP in Uttar Pradesh to boost the economy. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 14(3), 1–54. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-024-01837-9
    81. Yadav, U. S., Tripathi, R., Tripathi, M. A., Ghosal, I., Kumar, A., Mandal, M., & Singh, A. (2023a). Digital and innovative entrepreneurship in the Indian handicraft sector after the COVID 19 pandemic: Challenges and opportunities. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 12(1), 69–74. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13731-023-00337-5
    82. Yadav, U. S., Tripathi, R., Tripathi, M. A., Kumar, A., & Mandal, M. (2023c). Evaluation of factors affecting entrepreneurship: A case of Indian women in the handicraft industry. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 10(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-01882-w
    83. Yadav, U. S., Tripathi, R., Yadav, G. P., & Tripathi, M. A. (2022c). Proposal of a global handicraft index for sustainable development: A visionary approach for small industry and developing strategies for handicraft (rural industry). European Journal of Sustainable Development Research, 6(2), 1–9.
    84. Yadav, U. S., Vyas, S., Kanchan, Ghosal, I., & Yadav, A. K. (2024b). Impact of entrepreneurial leadership, social media, digital technology, entrepreneurial orientation and innovation on business performance in the handicraft sector: Talent management as mediating construct. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 13(1), 72–85. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13731-024-00434-z
    85. Ye, F., Ke, M., Ouyang, Y., Li, Y., Li, L., Zhan, Y., & Zhang, M. (2024). Impact of digital technology usage on firm resilience: A dynamic capability perspective. Supply Chain Management, 29(1), 162–175. https://doi.org/10.1108/SCM-12-2022-0480
    86. Yu, W., Zhao, G., Liu, Q., & Song, Y. (2021). Role of big data analytics capability in developing integrated hospital supply chains and operational flexibility: An organisational information processing theory perspective. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 163(1), Article 32. https://doi.org/10.1108/SCM-12-2022-0481-W
    87. Yuen, K., et al. (2020). SARS CoV 2 and COVID 19: The most critical research questions. BMC Cell & Bioscience, 10(4), Article 1.
    88. Zahra, S. (2022). International entrepreneurship by family firms post COVID. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 13(2), 756–764.
    89. Zhou, J., Hu, L., Yu, Y., Zhang, J. Z., & Zheng, L. J. (2022). Impacts of IT capability and supply chain collaboration on supply chain resilience: Empirical evidence from China in the COVID 19 pandemic. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 30(3), 34–56. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEIM 03 2022 0091
    90. Zhou, K. Z., Yim, C. K., & Tse, D. K. (2005). The effects of strategic orientations on technology and market based breakthrough innovations. Journal of Marketing, 69(2), 42–60. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.69.2.42.60756
    91. Zindiye, S., Chiliya, N., & Masocha, R. (2012). The impact of government and other institutions' support on the performance of small and medium enterprises in the manufacturing sector in Harare, Zimbabwe. International Journal of Business Management and Economics Research, 3(6), 655–667.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2025 The Authors

How to cite

Yadav, U. . S., Vyas, S., Singh, A., Yadav, A. K., & Ghosal, I. (2025). Analysing the effect of sustainable entrepreneurship on the family-based moonj craft and pattal (leaf plate) industry in the handicraft sector in India. Multidisciplinary Reviews, 9(4), 2026148. https://doi.org/10.31893/multirev.2026148
  • Article viewed - 1463
  • PDF downloaded - 310