Keywords:
circular economy
AHP
ANP
TOPSIS
DEMATEL
ELECTRE

  • Abstract

    This review article explores the pivotal role of multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) in optimizing circular supply chains (CSC). MCDM methodologies are vital for navigating the complex decision-making scenarios inherent in CSC, where multiple conflicting criteria must be simultaneously addressed. This comprehensive review highlights the commonly employed MCDM methodologies and their applications within CSC, underscoring their potential to enhance sustainability and efficiency. The increasing academic interest in MCDM within supply chain management (SCM) is evident from the publication trends, which show a significant rise from 2000 to 2024. This review focuses into the specific challenges faced by CSCs, such as resource scarcity, waste management, and environmental impact. By integrating MCDM approaches, organizations can better prioritize and balance these competing demands, leading to more resilient and adaptive supply chains. The review emphasizes the importance of a holistic approach, considering economic, environmental, and social dimensions to achieve truly sustainable supply chains.Moreover, the article explores various MCDM methodologies where each methodology’s application in CSC is examined, demonstrating their effectiveness in addressing sustainability, efficiency, and risk management challenges. The review concludes that MCDM methodologies are crucial for achieving balanced and sustainable outcomes in CSC. With ongoing technological advancements and a deeper understanding of CSC dynamics, the future of MCDM research in this field appears promising. Overall, this comprehensive review provides valuable insights into the current state and future prospects of MCDM in CSC, highlighting its critical role in driving sustainable development. Overall, this comprehensive review provides valuable insights into the current state and future prospects of MCDM in CSC, highlighting its critical role in driving sustainable development.

  • References

    1. Agnusdei, L., Krstić, M., Palmi, P., & Miglietta, P. P. (2023). Digitalization as driver to achieve circularity in the agroindustry: A SWOT-ANP-ADAM approach. Science of The Total Environment, 882, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.163441
    2. Akmal, S., & Azizah, N. Q. E. (2024). Selection of the best coffee bean supplier by using technique method for order preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS) at CV. ORO coffee GAYO. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1356(1), 012064. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1356/1/012064
    3. Ali, S. M., Paul, S. K., Chowdhury, P., Agarwal, R., Fathollahi-Fard, A. M., Jabbour, C. J. C., & Luthra, S. (2021). Modelling of supply chain disruption analytics using an integrated approach: An emerging economy example. Expert Systems with Applications, 173, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2021.114690
    4. AlKheder, S., Al Otaibi, H., Al Baghli, Z., Al Ajmi, S., & Alkhedher, M. (2023). Analytic hierarchy process (AHP) assessment of Kuwait mega construction projects' complexity. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 32(3), 1903–1946. https://doi.org/10.1108/ecam-10-2021-0933
    5. Bizhan, N., & Asia, M. H. (2016). Ranking the factors affecting the green supply chain with economics-based approach using ELECTRE (Case study: Waste management in Shiraz). International Journal of Resistive Economics, 4(4), 28–43.
    6. Brunelli, M. (2014). Introduction to the Analytic Hierarchy Process. SpringerBriefs in Operations Research. Springer Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-12502-2
    7. Bui, T. D., Tseng, J. W., Tran, T. P. T., Ha, H. M., Lim, M. K., & Tseng, M. L. (2023). Circular supply chain strategy in Industry 4.0: The canned food industry in Vietnam. Business Strategy and the Environment, 32(8), 6047–6073. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3472
    8. Chaouni Benabdellah, A., Zekhnini, K., Cherrafi, A., Garza-Reyes, J. A., Kumar, A., & El Baz, J. (2023). Blockchain technology for viable circular digital supply chains: An integrated approach for evaluating the implementation barriers. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 30(10), 4397–4424. https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-04-2022-0240
    9. Ciptomulyono, U., Mustajib, M. I., Karningsih, P. D., Anggrahini, D., & Basuki, S. S. A. (2022). A new multi-criteria method based on DEMATEL, ANP and grey clustering for quality sorting of incoming cores in remanufacturing systems under epistemic uncertainty: A case study of heavy-duty equipment. Cogent Engineering, 9(1), 2099056. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311916.2022.2099056
    10. da Silva, E. R., Lohmer, J., Rohla, M., & Angelis, J. (2023). Unleashing the circular economy in the electric vehicle battery supply chain: A case study on data sharing and blockchain potential. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 193, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2023.106969
    11. Del Giudice, M., Chierici, R., Mazzucchelli, A., & Fiano, F. (2021). Supply chain management in the era of circular economy: The moderating effect of big data. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 32(2), 337–356. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLM-03-2020-0119
    12. dos Santos Gonçalves, P. V., & Campos, L. M. S. (2022). A systemic review for measuring circular economy with multi-criteria methods. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(21), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-18580-w
    13. Dwivedi, A., Chowdhury, P., Agrawal, D., Paul, S. K., & Shi, Y. (2023). Antecedents of digital supply chains for a circular economy: A sustainability perspective. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 123(6), 1690–1716. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-05-2022-0273
    14. Dwivedi, A., Chowdhury, P., Paul, S. K., & Agrawal, D. (2023). Sustaining circular economy practices in supply chains during a global disruption. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 34(3), 644–673. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLM-04-2022-0154
    15. Elhidaoui, S., & Kota, S. (2023). Towards a green Agri-food supply chain through ANP and ELECTRE I. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal, 34(5), 1352–1374. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEQ-12-2022-0344
    16. Erdinç, P., Buduneli, Z., Gerşil, Ç., Erton, C., Paldrak, M., & Staiou, E. (2024). Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and goal programming approach for a real-life supplier selection problem. In Durakbasa, N. M., & Gençyılmaz, M. G. (Eds.), Industrial Engineering in the Industry 4.0 Era. ISPR 2023. Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering (pp. xxx–xxx). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-53991-6_53
    17. Farooque, M., Zhang, A., Thürer, M., Qu, T., & Huisingh, D. (2019). Circular supply chain management: A definition and structured literature review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 228(Suppl. C), 882–900. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.303
    18. Farughi, H., & Mostafayi, S. (2017). A hybrid approach based on ANP, ELECTRE and SIMANP metaheuristic method for outsourcing manufacturing procedures according to supply chain risks—Case study: A medical equipment manufacturer company in Iran. Decision Science Letters, 6(1), 77–94. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.dsl.2016.6.003
    19. Foroozesh, N., Karimi, B., Mousavi, S. M., & Mojtahedi, M. (2023). A hybrid decision-making method using robust programming and interval-valued fuzzy sets for sustainable-resilient supply chain network design considering circular economy and technology levels. Journal of Industrial Information Integration, 33, 100440. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jii.2023.100440
    20. Gholian-Jouybari, F., Hajiaghaei-Keshteli, M., Bavar, A., Bavar, A., & Mosallanezhad, B. (2023). A design of a circular closed-loop agri-food supply chain network—A case study of the soybean industry. Journal of Industrial Information Integration, 36(3), 100530. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jii.2023.100530
    21. Godinho Filho, M., Monteiro, L., de Oliveira Mota, R., dos Santos Leite Gonella, J., & de Souza Campos, L. M. (2022). The relationship between circular economy, Industry 4.0 and supply chain performance: A combined ISM/Fuzzy MICMAC approach. Sustainability, 14(5), 2772. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14052772
    22. Gonçalves, A. T. P., Araújo, M. V. P. D., Mól, A. L. R., & Rocha, F. A. F. D. (2021). Application of the ELECTRE Tri method for supplier classification in supply chains. Pesquisa Operacional, 41, 1–44. https://doi.org/10.1590/0101-7438.2021.041.00229708
    23. Gonzalez-Urango, H., Mu, E., Ujwary-Gil, A., & Florek-Paszkowska, A. (2024). Analytic network process in economics, finance and management: Contingency factors, current trends and further research. Expert Systems with Applications, 237(Part A), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2023.121415
    24. Gunasekara, L., Robb, D. J., & Zhang, A. (2023). Used product acquisition, sorting and disposition for CSC: Literature review and research directions. International Journal of Production Economics, 260(6), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2023.108844
    25. Haq, A. N., & Boddu, V. (2015). An integrated fuzzy QFD and TOPSIS approach to enhance leanness in supply chain. International Journal of Business Performance and Supply Chain Modelling, 7(2), 171–188. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJBPSCM.2015.069924
    26. Hosseinzadeh Lotfi, F., Allahviranloo, T., Pedrycz, W., Shahriari, M., Sharafi, H., & Razipour GhalehJough, S. (2023). Elimination choice translating reality (ELECTRE) in uncertainty environment. In Fuzzy Decision Analysis: Multi Attribute Decision Making Approach. Studies in Computational Intelligence, 1121, 179–214. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-44742-6_7
    27. Hu, K. H. (2023). An exploration of the key determinants for the application of AI-enabled higher education based on a hybrid soft-computing technique and a DEMATEL approach. Expert Systems with Applications, 212(2), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2022.118762
    28. Kacprzak, D. (2021). A novel extension of the technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution method with objective criteria weights for group decision making with interval numbers. Entropy, 23(11), 1460. https://doi.org/10.3390/e23111460
    29. Khan, S., Haleem, A., & Khan, M. I. (2024). Enablers to implement circular initiatives in the supply chain: A grey DEMATEL method. Global Business Review, 25(1), 68–84. https://doi.org/10.1177/0972150920929484
    30. Kirchherr, J., Reike, D., & Hekkert, M. (2017). Conceptualizing the circular economy: An analysis of 114 definitions. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 127, 221–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.09.005
    31. Kumar, N., Tyagi, M., & Sachdeva, A. (2022). Estimation of best possible solutions for environmental trade offs in cold supply chain using BWM based ELECTRE I approach. International Journal of Six Sigma and Competitive Advantage, 14(1), 152–169. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSSCA.2022.124296
    32. Kumar, S., Raut, R. D., Nayal, K., Kraus, S., Yadav, V. S., & Narkhede, B. E. (2021). To identify Industry 4.0 and circular economy adoption barriers in the agriculture supply chain by using ISM ANP. Journal of Cleaner Production, 293, 126023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126023
    33. Lahane, S., & Kant, R. (2021). Evaluating the circular supply chain implementation barriers using Pythagorean fuzzy AHP DEMATEL approach. Cleaner Logistics and Supply Chain, 2(6), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clscn.2021.100014
    34. Lahane, S., & Kant, R. (2023). Investigating the circular supply chain implementation challenges using Pythagorean fuzzy AHP approach. Materials Today: Proceedings, 72(3), 1158–1163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2022.09.189
    35. Laura, X. X., Ma, B., & Lim, R. (2007). AHP based supply chain performance measurement system. In 2007 IEEE Conference on Emerging Technologies and Factory Automation (EFTA 2007) (pp. 1308–1315). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/EFTA.2007.4416932
    36. MacArthur, E. (2013). Towards the circular economy: Economic and business rationale for an accelerated transition. Ellen MacArthur Foundation. http://emf.s3.amazonaws.com/downloads/Towards_A_Circular_Economy.pdf
    37. MacArthur, E. (2019). Completing the picture: How the circular economy tackles climate change. Ellen MacArthur Foundation, 1(1), 1–71.
    38. Matteo, B., & Pereyra Rojas, M. (2017). Understanding the Analytic Hierarchy Process. In Practical Decision Making (pp. 7–15). SpringerBriefs in Operations Research. Springer Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33861-3_2
    39. Mohamed Noor, A. Z., Md Fauadi, M. H. F., & Jafar, F. A. (2019). Fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (FAHP) for better selection during implementation of design for remanufacturing in economy indicator. Journal of Mechanical Engineering (JMechE), 16(1), 99–120.
    40. Montague, L. (2023). Circular economy and supply chains: Definitions, conceptualizations, and research agenda of the circular supply chain framework. Circular Economy and Sustainability, 3(1), 35–75. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43615-022-00172-y
    41. Moslem, S., Solieman, H., Oubahman, L., Duleba, S., Senapati, T., & Pilla, F. (2023). Assessing public transport supply quality: A comparative analysis of analytical network process and analytical hierarchy process. Journal of Soft Computing and Decision Analytics, 1(1), 124–138. https://doi.org/10.31181/jscda11202311
    42. Moula, M. E., Sorvari, J., & Oinas, P. (2017). Constructing a green circular society. University of Helsinki. https://researchportal.helsinki.fi/en/publications/constructing-a green circular society
    43. Mu, E., & Pereyra Rojas, M. (2017). Understanding the Analytic Hierarchy Process. In Practical Decision Making (pp. 7–22). SpringerBriefs in Operations Research. Springer Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33861-3_2
    44. Mukherjee, S., De, A., & Roy, S. (2024). Supply chain risk prioritization: A multi criteria based intuitionistic fuzzy TOPSIS approach. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 41(6), 1693–1725. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJQRM-07-2023-0214
    45. Orji, I. J., & Ojadi, F. (2022). The circular supply chain: Basic principles and techniques. CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003252016
    46. Otay, I., & Kahraman, C. (2022). A novel circular intuitionistic fuzzy AHP & VIKOR methodology: An application to a multi expert supplier evaluation problem. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi, 28(1), 194–207. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/2276778
    47. Petrillo, A., & Karpak, B. (2021). Theory and applications of AHP/ANP in supply chain management session at INFORMS 2021. International Journal of the Analytic Hierarchy Process, 13(3), 548–551. https://doi.org/10.13033/ijahp.v13i3.955
    48. Purwani, A., Fauzia, S., Linarti, U., Fauadi, M. M., & Haryoko, A. (2024). Multi criteria evaluation of temporary waste collection facilities based on the level of community interest using analytical hierarchy process. Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology (JAMT), 18(2), 155–170.
    49. Qu, G., Zhang, Z., Qu, W., & Xu, Z. (2020). Green supplier selection based on green practices evaluated using fuzzy approaches of TOPSIS and ELECTRE with a case study in a Chinese internet company. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(9), 3268. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17093268
    50. Quayson, M., Bai, C., Sun, L., & Sarkis, J. (2023). Building blockchain driven dynamic capabilities for developing circular supply chain: Rethinking the role of sensing, seizing, and reconfiguring. Business Strategy and the Environment, 32(7), 4821–4840. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3395
    51. Rahardjo, B., Wang, F. K., Lo, S. C., & Chou, J. H. (2023). A hybrid multi criteria decision making model combining DANP with VIKOR for sustainable supplier selection in the electronics industry. Sustainability, 15(5), 4588. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15054588
    52. Ramanathan, R., Abdullah, L., Fauadi, M. H. F. M., Mohamed, M. S. S., & Kamaludin, K. N. (2023). A hybrid of Kansei Engineering (KE) and analytical hierarchy process (AHP) to develop conceptual designs of a portable oil spill skimmer. IIUM Engineering Journal, 24(1), 183–198. https://doi.org/10.31436/iiumej.v24i1.2426
    53. Ren, Y., Li, R., Wu, K. J., & Tseng, M. L. (2023). Discovering the systematic interlinkages among the circular economy, supply chain, industry 4.0, and technology transfer: A bibliometric analysis. Cleaner and Responsible Consumption, 9, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clrc.2023.100123
    54. Rodrigue, J. P. (2024). The geography of transport systems (6th ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003343196
    55. Roghanian, E., Sheykhan, A., & Abendankashi, E. (2014). An application of fuzzy TOPSIS to improve the process of supply chain management in the food industries: A case study of protein products manufacturing company. Decision Science Letters, 3(1), 17–26.
    56. Romagnoli, S., Tarabu’, C., Maleki Vishkaei, B., & De Giovanni, P. (2023). The impact of digital technologies and sustainable practices on circular supply chain management. Logistics, 7(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.3390/logistics7010001
    57. Saaty, T. L. (2001). Fundamentals of the Analytic Hierarchy Process. In Schmoldt, D. L., Kangas, J., Mendoza, G. A., & Pesonen, M. (Eds.), The Analytic Hierarchy Process in Natural Resource and Environmental Decision Making (pp. 15–35). Managing Forest Ecosystems. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9799-9_2
    58. Sarkis, J. (2023). The circular economy and green supply chains. In Merkert, R., & Hoberg, K. (Eds.), Global Logistics and Supply Chain Strategies for the 2020s (pp. …). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-95764-3_5
    59. Sharma, H., Sohani, N., & Yadav, A. (2022). Comparative analysis of ranking the lean supply chain enablers: An AHP, BWM and fuzzy SWARA based approach. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 39(9), 2252–2271. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJQRM-04-2021-0114
    60. Solomon, N. O., Simpa, P., Adenekan, O. A., & Obasi, S. C. (2024). Circular economy principles and their integration into global supply chain strategies. Finance & Accounting Research Journal, 6(5), 747–762. https://doi.org/10.51594/farj.v6i5.1133
    61. Tanveer, U., Kremantzis, M. D., Roussinos, N., Ishaq, S., Kyrgiakos, L. S., & Vlontzos, G. (2023). A fuzzy TOPSIS model for selecting digital technologies in CSC. Supply Chain Analytics, 4(6), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sca.2023.100038
    62. Tavana, M., Sorooshian, S., & Mina, H. (2023). An integrated group fuzzy inference and best–worst method for supplier selection in intelligent CSC. Annals of Operations Research, 342(1), 803–844. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-023-05680-0
    63. Thakkar, J. J. (2021). Decision Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory (DEMATEL). In Multi Criteria Decision Making. Studies in Systems, Decision and Control (pp. 139–159). Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-33-4745-8_9
    64. Toffel, M. W. (2004). Strategic management of product recovery. California Management Review, 46(2), 120–141. https://doi.org/10.2307/41166214
    65. Tseng, M. L., Ha, H. M., Wu, K. J., & Xue, B. (2022). Healthcare industry circular supply chain collaboration in Vietnam: Vision and learning influences on connection in a circular supply chain and circularity business model. International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications, 25(4–5), 743–768. https://doi.org/10.1080/13675567.2021.1923671
    66. Tushar, Z. N., Bari, A. M., & Khan, M. A. (2022). Circular supplier selection in the construction industry: A sustainability perspective for the emerging economies. Sustainable Manufacturing and Service Economics, 1(2), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smse.2022.100005
    67. Vegter, D., van Hillegersberg, J., & Olthaar, M. (2020). Supply chains in circular business models: Processes and performance objectives. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 162, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.105046
    68. Vyas, M., & Yadav, G. (2024). Leveraging enablers and performance metrics for building industrial circular supply chain: A hybrid multi criteria decision making approach. Circular Economy and Sustainability, 5, 209–230. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43615-024-00409-y
    69. Yazdi, M., Khan, F., Abbassi, R., & Rusli, R. (2020). Improved DEMATEL methodology for effective safety management decision making. Safety Science, 127, 104705. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2020.104705
    70. Yontar, E. (2023). Critical success factor analysis of blockchain technology in agri food supply chain management: A circular economy perspective. Journal of Environmental Management, 330, 117173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.117173
    71. Zaman, S. I., Khan, S., Zaman, S. A. A., & Khan, S. A. (2023). A grey decision making trial and evaluation laboratory model for digital warehouse management in supply chain networks. Decision Analytics Journal, 8(73), 100293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dajour.2023.100293
    72. Zekhnini, K., Cherrafi, A., Bouhaddou, I., & Benghabrit, Y. (2021). Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) for Supply Chain 4.0 risks management. In Masrour, T., Cherrafi, A., & El Hassani, I. (Eds.), Artificial Intelligence and Industrial Applications. A2IA 2020. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing (pp. 89–102). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-51186-9_7
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2025 The Authors

How to cite

Fauadi, M. H. F. M., Anuar, N. I., Kurniawati, D. A., Rosyidi, C. N., Abdullah, L., Damanhuri, A. A. M., & Tay, S. J. (2025). Recent advances in multi-criteria decision-making approaches for circular supply chains: A comprehensive review. Multidisciplinary Reviews, 9(2), 2026087. https://doi.org/10.31893/multirev.2026087
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC
  • Article viewed - 929
  • PDF downloaded - 375