Keywords:
robotics in surgery
healthcare accessibility
surgical training
remote interventions
healthcare technology

  • Abstract

    The growing global demand for surgical care contrasts sharply with the limited access to high-quality services in resource-limited regions, driving innovations like tele-surgery and remote surgical techniques. Tele-surgery employs robotic systems, high-resolution imaging, and advanced telecommunications to perform intricate procedures across vast distances. Since its inception with the landmark "Lindbergh Operation" in 2001, tele-surgery has benefited from significant technological advancements, including AI-powered platforms and robotic systems such as the da Vinci Surgical System. These technologies enable minimally invasive procedures, reduce recovery times, and enhance patient outcomes. Tele-surgery offers transformative potential in addressing healthcare inequities, particularly in underserved or conflict-affected regions, and during global emergencies like pandemics. It also provides substantial educational opportunities by enabling real-time observation of surgeries and fostering knowledge exchange through virtual and augmented reality tools. Despite its promise, tele-surgery faces challenges that hinder its widespread adoption. These include technological constraints like latency, inadequate infrastructure in low-income areas, cybersecurity risks, and the high costs of robotic systems. Ethical and legal considerations, including liability for errors and data privacy concerns, further complicate its implementation. Nevertheless, advancements in AI, machine learning, and 5G technology are expected to enhance tele-surgery’s efficiency and affordability, paving the way for its integration into global healthcare systems. With the potential to bridge healthcare access gaps and revolutionize surgical care delivery, tele-surgery represents a pivotal step toward equitable healthcare. However, overcoming current technological, financial, and legal barriers remains essential to realizing its full potential.

     

     

  • References

    1. Atallah, S., Martin-Perez, B., Keller, D. S., Burke, J. P., & Larach, S. (2015). Robotic surgery: State of the art, present and future directions. Annals of Laparoscopic and Endoscopic Surgery, 3(8), 225-231. https://doi.org/10.21037/ales.2015.11.02
    2. Bogen, E. M., & Crandall, M. (2019). Telemedicine: A guide to assessing telecommunications for health care. American Journal of Surgery, 218(4), 730-733. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2019.05.016
    3. Byrne, J., Davids, J., & Schultz, P. (2018). The evolving role of artificial intelligence in robotic surgery. Surgical Endoscopy, 32(10), 3155-3165. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-018-6201-5
    4. Cavallo, C., & Formisano, C. (2020). Tele-surgery: The impact of technology on the surgical field. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare, 26(7), 425-431. https://doi.org/10.1177/1357633X19856722
    5. Desai, A., Aron, M., & Gill, I. (2018). Remote robotic surgery: The dream is becoming a reality. Journal of Robotic Surgery, 12(2), 77-82. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-017-0731-1
    6. Feilzer, M., & Triantafyllidis, A. (2021). Telemedicine and tele-surgery in global health: Bridging the healthcare divide. Global Health Action, 14(1), 190-199. https://doi.org/10.1080/16549716.2021.1913577
    7. Hameed, S. M., & Kelly, D. (2019). The impact of robotic-assisted surgery on global health outcomes. Global Health Science and Practice, 7(4), 532-539. https://doi.org/10.9745/GHSP-D-19-00230
    8. Lanfranco, A. R., Castellanos, A. E., & Desai, J. P. (2014). Robotic surgery: A current perspective. Annals of Surgery, 239(1), 14-21. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sla.0000103020.19595.7d
    9. Marescaux, J., Rubino, F., & Wagner, M. (2002). Transcontinental robot-assisted remote telesurgery: Feasibility and potential applications. Annals of Surgery, 235(4), 487-492. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000658-200204000-00001
    10. Moustris, G. P., Hiridis, S. C., & Deliparaschos, K. M. (2011). Evolution of robotic systems for minimally invasive surgery: A review of the history and current applications. Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques, 21(1), 23-30. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLE.0b013e318208c6ed
    11. Okamura, A. M., Hage, S. E., & Slater, M. (2015). Haptic feedback and teleoperation for telesurgery. Annual Review of Biomedical Engineering, 17(1), 109-139. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-bioeng-071114-040530
    12. Petlenko, Y., & Bazylev, V. (2020). The role of telemedicine in the expansion of surgical care: A review. European Journal of Surgical Oncology, 46(2), 309-314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2019.11.002
    13. Shehata, M., Abdel-Maguid, S., & Taha, A. (2021). Artificial intelligence and robotics in surgery: Impacts and future directions. Journal of Medical Systems, 45(1), 54-60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-021-01719-6
    14. Smith, R., & Dang, W. (2016). The economic impact of tele-surgery in developing countries: A cost-benefit analysis. World Journal of Surgery, 40(5), 1125-1132. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-015-3333-x
    15. Yu, P., & Sarker, S. (2021). Telemedicine in global surgery: Ethical, legal, and practical challenges. Bioethics, 35(3), 246-254. https://doi.org/10.1111/bioe.12865
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2025 The Authors

How to cite

Nagpure, D., & Asutkar, S. (2024). Tele-surgery and remote procedures: The future of global surgical care. Multidisciplinary Reviews, 8(5), 2025147. https://doi.org/10.31893/multirev.2025147
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC
  • Article viewed - 263
  • PDF downloaded - 182