Bioceramic material in endodontics

Shubhani Kharkate; Shweta Sedani

Keywords:

Abstract

Hydroxyapatite, bioactive glass, alumina, resorbable calcium phosphates, and zirconia are examples of bioceramics. They've also been employed in dentistry as bone defect fillers, endodontic sealants, apical fill materials, perforations capping, root repair materials, and regenerative aids. They offer several benefits, including dimensional stability, non-toxicity, biocompatibility, and bio-inertness in therapeutic applications. They are comparable to Hydroxyapatite and have an inherent osteoconductive activity and the capacity to stimulate regenerating activities in the human body. Bioceramics are ceramic components that may be produced in situ and in vivo through a variety of chemical methods. Due to their closeness to biomaterials like hydroxyapatite, bioceramics have great biocompatibility. Bioceramics and multi-substituted hydroxyapatite and related substances can stimulate the individual's regeneration mechanism. Humans employ bioceramics for repair or replacement, and they claim to be have incredible conductive and bioinductive qualities. Those materials have been created to be biocompatible with living tissue and having a wide range of applications in repair and replacement. This article concentrated on a comprehensive introduction of bioceramics, their categorization, and their benefits. It also provides a comprehensive overview of the various bio-ceramic materials now employed in endodontics, as well as their features and uses. This article examines the application of bioceramic and composite materials in practical restorative dentistry, as well as the factual evidence for their selection, use, or performance in a variety of treatment scenarios.
References
1. Tomer, A. K., Kumari, S., Rastogi, D., Cecilia, L. L., Singh, S., & Tyagi, A. (2020). Bioceramics in Endodontics-A Review. Int Journal of Applied Dental Sciences, 6(3).
2. Shenoy, A., & Shenoy, N. (2010). Dental ceramics: An update. Journal of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, 13(4), 195-203.
3. Cheng, L., Ye, F., Yang, R., Lu, X., Shi, Y., Li, L., ... & Bu, H. (2010). Osteoinduction of hydroxyapatite/β-tricalcium phosphate bioceramics in mice with a fractured fibula. Acta biomaterialia, 6(4), 1569-1574.
4. Motwani, N., Ikhar, A., Nikhade, P., Chandak, M., Rathi, S., Dugar, M., & Rajnekar, R. (2021). Premixed bioceramics: A novel pulp capping agent. Journal of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, 24(2), 124-129.
5. Nasseh, A. (2009). The rise of bioceramics. Endodontic practice, 2(1), 17-22.
6. Funteas, U. R., Wallace, J. A., & Fochtman, F. W. (2003). A comparative analysis of mineral trioxide aggregate and Portland cement. Australian Endodontic Journal, 29(1), 43-44.
7. Porter, M. L., Bertó, A., Primus, C. M., & Watanabe, I. (2010). Physical and chemical properties of new-generation endodontic materials. Journal of endodontics, 36(3), 524-528.
8. Jitaru, S., Hodisan, I., Timis, L., Lucian, A., & Bud, M. (2016). The use of bioceramics in endodontics-literature review. Clujul medical, 89(4), 470.
9. Rubinstein, R. A., & Kim, S. (2002). Long-term follow-up of cases considered healed one year after apical microsurgery. Journal of endodontics, 28(5), 378-383.
10. Nakata, T. T., Bae, K. S., & Baumgartner, J. C. (1998). Perforation repair comparing mineral trioxide aggregate and amalgam using an anaerobic bacterial leakage model. Journal of endodontics, 24(3), 184-186.
11. Koh, E. T., Torabinejad, M., Pitt Ford, T. R., Brady, K., & McDonald, F. (1997). Mineral trioxide aggregate stimulates a biological response in human osteoblasts. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research: An Official Journal of The Society for Biomaterials and The Japanese Society for Biomaterials, 37(3), 432-439.
12. Baek, S. H., Plenk Jr, H., & Kim, S. (2005). Periapical tissue responses and cementum regeneration with amalgam, SuperEBA, and MTA as root-end filling materials. Journal of endodontics, 31(6), 444-449.
13. Nekoofar, M. H., Davies, T. E., Stone, D., Basturk, F. B., & Dummer, P. M. H. (2011). Microstructure and chemical analysis of blood‐contaminated mineral trioxide aggregate. International endodontic journal, 44(11), 1011-1018.
14. Keskin, C., Demiryurek, E. O., & Ozyurek, T. (2015). Color stabilities of calcium silicate–based materials in contact with different irrigation solutions. Journal of endodontics, 41(3), 409-411.
15. Singh, H., Kaur, M., Markan, S., & Kapoor, P. (2014). Biodentine: A promising dentin substitute. J Interdiscipl Med Dent Sci, 2(140), 2.
16. Arora, V., Nikhil, V., Sharma, N., & Arora, P. (2013). Bioactive dentin replacement. J Dent Med Sci, 12(4), 51-7.
17. Ranjan, M. Review on Biodentine-A Bioactive Dentin Substitute.
18. Zhu, L., Yang, J., Zhang, J., & Peng, B. (2014). A comparative study of BioAggregate and ProRoot MTA on adhesion, migration, and attachment of human dental pulp cells. Journal of endodontics, 40(8), 1118-1123.
19. Ribeiro, C. S., Kuteken, F. A., Hirata Júnior, R., & Scelza, M. F. Z. (2006). Comparative evaluation of antimicrobial action of MTA, calcium hydroxide and Portland cement. Journal of Applied Oral Science, 14, 330-333.
20. Parirokh, M., & Torabinejad, M. (2014). Calcium silicate–based cements in mineral trioxide aggregate: Properties and clinical applications. Hoboken.
21. Camilleri, J., Sorrentino, F., & Damidot, D. (2015). Characterization of un-hydrated and hydrated BioAggregate™ and MTA Angelus™. Clinical oral investigations, 19, 689-698.
22. Tuloglu, N., & Bayrak, S. (2016). Comparative evaluation of mineral trioxide aggregate and bioaggregate as apical barrier material in traumatized nonvital, immature teeth: A clinical pilot study. Nigerian Journal of Clinical Practice, 19(1), 52-57.
23. Hench, L. L. (1991). Bioceramics: from concept to clinic. Journal of the american ceramic society, 74(7), 1487-1510.
24. Asgary, S., Shahabi, S., Jafarzadeh, T., Amini, S., & Kheirieh, S. (2008). The properties of a new endodontic material. Journal of endodontics, 34(8), 990-993.
25. Leal, F., De‐Deus, G., Brandão, C., Luna, A. S., Fidel, S. R., & Souza, E. M. (2011). Comparison of the root‐end seal provided by bioceramic repair cements and White MTA. International endodontic journal, 44(7), 662-668.
26. Ehsani, M., Dehghani, A., Abesi, F., Khafri, S., & Dehkordi, S. G. (2014). Evaluation of apical micro-leakage of different endodontic sealers in the presence and absence of moisture. Journal of dental research, dental clinics, dental prospects, 8(3), 125.
27. Zhang, W., Li, Z., & Peng, B. (2009). Assessment of a new root canal sealer's apical sealing ability. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, and Endodontology, 107(6), e79-e82.
28. Topçuoğlu, H. S., Tuncay, Ö., Karataş, E., Arslan, H., & Yeter, K. (2013). In vitro fracture resistance of roots obturated with epoxy resin–based, mineral trioxide aggregate–based, and bioceramic root canal sealers. Journal of endodontics, 39(12), 1630-1633.
29. Madani, Z. S., Sefidgar, S. A., Zabihi, E., Mesgarani, A., Bijani, A., & Miri, S. S. (2014). Comparative evaluation of antimicrobial activity of two root canal sealers: MTA Fillapex and AH 26. Minerva Stomatologica, 63(7-8), 267-272.
30. Sipert, C. R., Hussne, R. P., Nishiyama, C. K., & Torres, S. A. (2005). In vitro antimicrobial activity of fill canal, sealapex, mineral trioxide aggregate, Portland cement and endorez. International Endodontic Journal, 38(8), 539-543.
31. Ribeiro, C. S., Kuteken, F. A., Hirata Júnior, R., & Scelza, M. F. Z. (2006). Comparative evaluation of antimicrobial action of MTA, calcium hydroxide and Portland cement. Journal of Applied Oral Science, 14, 330-333.
32. Duarte, M. A. H., Marciano, M. A., Vivan, R. R., Tanomaru Filho, M., Tanomaru, J. M. G., & Camilleri, J. (2018). Tricalcium silicate-based cements: properties and modifications. Brazilian oral research, 32(suppl 1), e70.
33. De Deus, G., Ximenes, R., Gurgel‐Filho, E. D., Plotkowski, M. C., & Coutinho‐Filho, T. (2005). Cytotoxicity of MTA and Portland cement on human ECV 304 endothelial cells. International endodontic journal, 38(9), 604-609.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

How to cite

Kharkate, S., & Sedani, S. (2024). Bioceramic material in endodontics. Multidisciplinary Reviews, (| Accepted Articles). Retrieved from https://malque.pub/ojs/index.php/mr/article/view/5473

[1] Tomer, A. K., Kumari, S., Rastogi, D., Cecilia, L. L., Singh, S., & Tyagi, A. (2020). Bioceramics in Endodontics-A Review. Int Journal of Applied Dental Sciences, 6(3).

[2] Shenoy, A., & Shenoy, N. (2010). Dental ceramics: An update. Journal of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, 13(4), 195-203.

[3] Cheng, L., Ye, F., Yang, R., Lu, X., Shi, Y., Li, L., ... & Bu, H. (2010). Osteoinduction of hydroxyapatite/β-tricalcium phosphate bioceramics in mice with a fractured fibula. Acta biomaterialia, 6(4), 1569-1574.

[4] Motwani, N., Ikhar, A., Nikhade, P., Chandak, M., Rathi, S., Dugar, M., & Rajnekar, R. (2021). Premixed bioceramics: A novel pulp capping agent. Journal of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, 24(2), 124-129.

[5] Nasseh, A. (2009). The rise of bioceramics. Endodontic practice, 2(1), 17-22.

[6] Funteas, U. R., Wallace, J. A., & Fochtman, F. W. (2003). A comparative analysis of mineral trioxide aggregate and Portland cement. Australian Endodontic Journal, 29(1), 43-44.

[7] Porter, M. L., Bertó, A., Primus, C. M., & Watanabe, I. (2010). Physical and chemical properties of new-generation endodontic materials. Journal of endodontics, 36(3), 524-528.

[8] Jitaru, S., Hodisan, I., Timis, L., Lucian, A., & Bud, M. (2016). The use of bioceramics in endodontics-literature review. Clujul medical, 89(4), 470.

[9] Rubinstein, R. A., & Kim, S. (2002). Long-term follow-up of cases considered healed one year after apical microsurgery. Journal of endodontics, 28(5), 378-383.

[10] Nakata, T. T., Bae, K. S., & Baumgartner, J. C. (1998). Perforation repair comparing mineral trioxide aggregate and amalgam using an anaerobic bacterial leakage model. Journal of endodontics, 24(3), 184-186.

[11] Koh, E. T., Torabinejad, M., Pitt Ford, T. R., Brady, K., & McDonald, F. (1997). Mineral trioxide aggregate stimulates a biological response in human osteoblasts. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research: An Official Journal of The Society for Biomaterials and The Japanese Society for Biomaterials, 37(3), 432-439.

[12] Baek, S. H., Plenk Jr, H., & Kim, S. (2005). Periapical tissue responses and cementum regeneration with amalgam, SuperEBA, and MTA as root-end filling materials. Journal of endodontics, 31(6), 444-449.

[13] Nekoofar, M. H., Davies, T. E., Stone, D., Basturk, F. B., & Dummer, P. M. H. (2011). Microstructure and chemical analysis of blood‐contaminated mineral trioxide aggregate. International endodontic journal, 44(11), 1011-1018.

[14] Keskin, C., Demiryurek, E. O., & Ozyurek, T. (2015). Color stabilities of calcium silicate–based materials in contact with different irrigation solutions. Journal of endodontics, 41(3), 409-411.

[15] Singh, H., Kaur, M., Markan, S., & Kapoor, P. (2014). Biodentine: A promising dentin substitute. J Interdiscipl Med Dent Sci, 2(140), 2.

[16] Arora, V., Nikhil, V., Sharma, N., & Arora, P. (2013). Bioactive dentin replacement. J Dent Med Sci, 12(4), 51-7.

[17] Ranjan, M. Review on Biodentine-A Bioactive Dentin Substitute.

[18] Zhu, L., Yang, J., Zhang, J., & Peng, B. (2014). A comparative study of BioAggregate and ProRoot MTA on adhesion, migration, and attachment of human dental pulp cells. Journal of endodontics, 40(8), 1118-1123.

[19] Ribeiro, C. S., Kuteken, F. A., Hirata Júnior, R., & Scelza, M. F. Z. (2006). Comparative evaluation of antimicrobial action of MTA, calcium hydroxide and Portland cement. Journal of Applied Oral Science, 14, 330-333.

[20] Parirokh, M., & Torabinejad, M. (2014). Calcium silicate–based cements in mineral trioxide aggregate: Properties and clinical applications. Hoboken.

[21] Camilleri, J., Sorrentino, F., & Damidot, D. (2015). Characterization of un-hydrated and hydrated BioAggregate™ and MTA Angelus™. Clinical oral investigations, 19, 689-698.

[22] Tuloglu, N., & Bayrak, S. (2016). Comparative evaluation of mineral trioxide aggregate and bioaggregate as apical barrier material in traumatized nonvital, immature teeth: A clinical pilot study. Nigerian Journal of Clinical Practice, 19(1), 52-57.

[23] Hench, L. L. (1991). Bioceramics: from concept to clinic. Journal of the american ceramic society, 74(7), 1487-1510.

[24] Asgary, S., Shahabi, S., Jafarzadeh, T., Amini, S., & Kheirieh, S. (2008). The properties of a new endodontic material. Journal of endodontics, 34(8), 990-993.

[25] Leal, F., De‐Deus, G., Brandão, C., Luna, A. S., Fidel, S. R., & Souza, E. M. (2011). Comparison of the root‐end seal provided by bioceramic repair cements and White MTA. International endodontic journal, 44(7), 662-668.

[26] Ehsani, M., Dehghani, A., Abesi, F., Khafri, S., & Dehkordi, S. G. (2014). Evaluation of apical micro-leakage of different endodontic sealers in the presence and absence of moisture. Journal of dental research, dental clinics, dental prospects, 8(3), 125.

[27] Zhang, W., Li, Z., & Peng, B. (2009). Assessment of a new root canal sealer's apical sealing ability. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, and Endodontology, 107(6), e79-e82.

[28] Topçuoğlu, H. S., Tuncay, Ö., Karataş, E., Arslan, H., & Yeter, K. (2013). In vitro fracture resistance of roots obturated with epoxy resin–based, mineral trioxide aggregate–based, and bioceramic root canal sealers. Journal of endodontics, 39(12), 1630-1633.

[29] Madani, Z. S., Sefidgar, S. A., Zabihi, E., Mesgarani, A., Bijani, A., & Miri, S. S. (2014). Comparative evaluation of antimicrobial activity of two root canal sealers: MTA Fillapex and AH 26. Minerva Stomatologica, 63(7-8), 267-272.

[30] Sipert, C. R., Hussne, R. P., Nishiyama, C. K., & Torres, S. A. (2005). In vitro antimicrobial activity of fill canal, sealapex, mineral trioxide aggregate, Portland cement and endorez. International Endodontic Journal, 38(8), 539-543.

[31] Ribeiro, C. S., Kuteken, F. A., Hirata Júnior, R., & Scelza, M. F. Z. (2006). Comparative evaluation of antimicrobial action of MTA, calcium hydroxide and Portland cement. Journal of Applied Oral Science, 14, 330-333.

[32] Duarte, M. A. H., Marciano, M. A., Vivan, R. R., Tanomaru Filho, M., Tanomaru, J. M. G., & Camilleri, J. (2018). Tricalcium silicate-based cements: properties and modifications. Brazilian oral research, 32(suppl 1), e70.

[33] De Deus, G., Ximenes, R., Gurgel‐Filho, E. D., Plotkowski, M. C., & Coutinho‐Filho, T. (2005). Cytotoxicity of MTA and Portland cement on human ECV 304 endothelial cells. International endodontic journal, 38(9), 604-609.

Abstract

References

How to cite