• Abstract

    Effective writing involves more than just grammatical correctness and vocabulary choice. A deeper understanding of one’s thinking processes while writing, coupled with clear writing goals, is crucial for producing high-quality text. Thus, this study explores the correlation between students' metacognitive awareness, their orientation towards learning and performance goals, and their performance in English Academic Writing (EAW). Specifically, it investigates participants’ current metacognitive awareness and goal orientation in relation to their English Academic Writing. By examining participants’ understanding of their writing processes and goal they set, this research seeks to establish baseline for exploring potential connection between metacognition, goal orientation, and writing outcomes. The research employed a qualitative design using a survey involving 252 non-English major students across three universities in Indonesia. Participants completed two inventories; the Metacognitive Awareness Inventory (MAI) and the Goal Inventory (GI), along with summative assessments of their writing performance. Their English Academic Writing proficiency was evaluated through standardized assessment. As a result, multiple linear regression analysis indicated a significant positive impact of metacognitive awareness on EAW performance, explaining 73.5% of the variance with a regression coefficient of 1.171 (p < .001). However, learning and performance goals did not significantly affect EAW performance, as evidenced by a regression coefficient of 0.026 (p = .343). These results underscore the pivotal role of metacognitive awareness in enhancing EAW performance among non-English majors, suggesting that further research is needed to explore the influence of goal orientation, and to explore its potential moderating effects on the relationship between metacognitve awareness and EAW performance. Understanding the complex interplay of these factors is essential for developing effective pedagogical interventions to enchance EAW abilities among non-English major students.

  • References

    1. Almulla, M. A., & Al-Rahmi, W. M. (2023). Integrated Social Cognitive Theory with Learning Input Factors: The Effects of Problem-Solving Skills and Critical Thinking Skills on Learning Performance Sustainability. Sustainability, 15(5), 3978. https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/5/3978
    2. Anderson, J. R. (2013). Cognitive skills and their acquisition. Psychology Press.
    3. Azizi, M., Nemati, A., & Estahbanati, N. (2017). Meta-cognitive awareness of writing strategy use among Iranian EFL learners and its impact on their writing performance. International Journal of English Language & Translation Studies, 5(1), 42-51.
    4. Biber, D., & Gray, B. (2010). Challenging stereotypes about academic writing: Complexity, elaboration, explicitness. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 9(1), 2-20. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2010.01.001
    5. Brown, A. L. (1978). Knowing when, where, and how to remember; a problem of metacognition. Advances in instructional psychology.
    6. Bussey, K. (2023). The contribution of social cognitive theory to school bullying research and practice. Theory Into Practice, 62(3), 293-305. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2023.2226549
    7. Dillon, C., & Greene, B. (2003). Learner differences in distance learning: Finding differences that matter. Handbook of distance education, 235-244.
    8. Elliott, E. S., & Dweck, C. S. (1988). Goals: an approach to motivation and achievement. J Pers Soc Psychol, 54(1), 5-12. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.54.1.5
    9. Fisher, R. (1998). Thinking About Thinking: Developing Metacognition in Children. Early Child Development and Care, 141(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1080/0300443981410101
    10. Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive–developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34(10), 906-911. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.34.10.906
    11. Hwang, G.-J., Wang, S.-Y., & Lai, C.-L. (2021). Effects of a social regulation-based online learning framework on students’ learning achievements and behaviors in mathematics. Computers & Education, 160, 104031. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104031
    12. Karatas, K., & Arpaci, I. (2021). The Role of Self-directed Learning, Metacognition, and 21st Century Skills Predicting the Readiness for Online Learning. Contemporary Educational Technology, 13(3). https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/10786
    13. Martínez-López, Z., Moran, V. E., Mayo, M. E., Villar, E., & Tinajero, C. (2023). Perceived social support and its relationship with self-regulated learning, goal orientation self-management, and academic achievement. European Journal of Psychology of Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-023-00752-y
    14. Mitsea, E., Drigas, A., & Mantas, P. (2021). Soft Skills & Metacognition as Inclusion Amplifiers in the 21st Century. International Journal of Online and Biomedical Engineering (iJOE), 17(04). https://doi.org/10.3991/ijoe.v17i04.20567
    15. Mouros, N. J. (2003, 5-8 Nov. 2003). Defining, teaching and assessing lifelong learning skills. 33rd Annual Frontiers in Education, 2003. FIE 2003.,
    16. Paris, S. G., & Newman, R. S. (1990). Development Aspects of Self-Regulated Learning. Educational Psychologist, 25(1), 87-102. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep2501_7
    17. Ridley, D. S., Schutz, P. A., Glanz, R. S., & Weinstein, C. E. (1992). Self-Regulated Learning: The Interactive Influence of Metacognitive Awareness and Goal-Setting. The Journal of Experimental Education, 60(4), 293-306. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.1992.9943867
    18. Rivas, S. F., Saiz, C., & Ossa, C. (2022). Metacognitive Strategies and Development of Critical Thinking in Higher Education. Front Psychol, 13, 913219. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.913219
    19. Roedel, T. D., Schraw, G., & Plake, B. S. (1994). Validation of a Measure of Learning and Performance Goal Orientations. Educational and psychological measurement, 54(4), 1013-1021. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164494054004018
    20. Schraw, G. (1998). Promoting general metacognitive awareness. Instructional science, 26(1/2), 113-125. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1003044231033
    21. Schraw, G., & Dennison, R. S. (1994). Assessing Metacognitive Awareness. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 19(4), 460-475. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1994.1033
    22. Schunk, D. H., & DiBenedetto, M. K. (2020). Motivation and social cognitive theory. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 60, 101832. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2019.101832
    23. Teng, F. (2019). The role of metacognitive knowledge and regulation in mediating university EFL learners’ writing performance. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 14(5), 436-450. https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2019.1615493
    24. Teng, M. F. (2022). Effects of cooperative–metacognitive instruction on EFL learners’ writing and metacognitive awareness. Asia pacific journal of education, 42(2), 179-195. https://doi.org/10.1080/02188791.2020.1835606
    25. Teng, M. F., Qin, C., & Wang, C. (2022). Validation of metacognitive academic writing strategies and the predictive effects on academic writing performance in a foreign language context. Metacognition and Learning, 17(1), 167-190. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-021-09278-4
    26. Valle, A., Cabanach, R. G., Núnez, J. C., González-Pienda, J., Rodríguez, S., & Piñeiro, I. (2003). Multiple goals, motivation and academic learning. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 73(1), 71-87. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1348/000709903762869923
    27. Vandergrift, L. (2005). Relationships among motivation orientations, metacognitive awareness and proficiency in L2 listening (Vol. 26). https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amh039
    28. Wu, D., Gu, H., Gu, S., & You, H. (2021). Individual motivation and social influence: a study of telemedicine adoption in China based on social cognitive theory. Health Policy and Technology, 10(3), 100525. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hlpt.2021.100525
    29. Xu, J., Wang, M., & Dong, M. (2022). Relationship Between Test-Taking Motivation and Listening Metacognitive Awareness in EFL Listening Context. European Journal of Psychology Open, 81(1), 13-23. https://doi.org/10.1024/2673-8627/a000020
    30. Yin, H., Tam, W. W. Y., & Lau, E. (2022). Examining the relationships between teachers’ affective states, self-efficacy, and teacher-child relationships in kindergartens: An integration of social cognitive theory and positive psychology. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 74, 101188. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2022.101188
    31. Zaheer, M., & Munir, S. (2020). Research supervision in distance learning: issues and challenges. Asian Association of Open Universities Journal, 15(1), 131-143. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAOUJ-01-2020-0003
    32. Zhao, C. G., & Liao, L. (2021). Metacognitive strategy use in L2 writing assessment. System, 98, 102472. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2021.102472

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2024 The Authors

How to cite

Rahman, A. A., Setyarini, S., & Purnawarman, P. (2024). Metacognitive awareness and learning and performance goals as key predictors of writing performance. Multidisciplinary Reviews, 7(12), 2024302. https://doi.org/10.31893/multirev.2024302
  • Article viewed - 311
  • PDF downloaded - 351