Unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT) applied in higher education research: A systematic literature review and bibliometric analysis

References

1. Abdallah, N., Abdallah, O., & Bohra, O. (2021). Factors Affecting Mobile Learning Acceptance in Higher Education: An Empirical Study. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 12(4), 664–671. https://doi.org/10.14569/IJACSA.2021.0120482
2. Abdul Razak, F. Z., Dom, M. M., & Baharudin, M. H. (2021). Impact of performance expectancy on continuance intention to use e-campus: An empirical study from Malaysia. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1793(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1793/1/012014
3. Ahmed, R. R., Štreimikienė, D., & Štreimikis, J. (2021). The Extended Utaut Model and Learning Management System During Covid-19: Evidence From Pls-Sem and Conditional Process Modeling. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 23(1), 82–104. https://doi.org/10.3846/jbem.2021.15664
4. Ahmed, T. M., & Seliaman, M. E. (2017). Investigating The Adoption and Impact of E- Learning In KSA: Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University Case Study. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology, 95(11), 2610–2618.
5. Ahmi, A. (2022). Bibliometric Analysis Using R for Non-Coders: A Practical Handbook in Conducting Bibliometric Analysis Studies Using Biblioshiny for Bibliometrix R Package. Google Books. https:%0A//books.google.com.sa/books/about/Bibliometric_Analysis_using_R_for_Non_Co.html?id=kPhiEAAAQBAJ&printsec=
6. Ain, N. U., Kaur, K., & Waheed, M. (2016). The influence of learning value on learning management system use: An extension of UTAUT2. Information Development, 32(5), 1306–1321. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266666915597546
7. Ajzen, I. (2005). Attitudes, Personality and Behavior (Vol. 13, Issue 4). https://doi.org/10.3109/01421599109089905
8. Al-Sharafi, M. A., Al-Emran, M., Arpaci, I., Iahad, N. A., AlQudah, A. A., Iranmanesh, M., & Al-Qaysi, N. (2023). Generation Z use of artificial intelligence products and its impact on environmental sustainability: A cross-cultural comparison. Computers in Human Behavior, 143(July 2022), 107708. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2023.107708
9. Alblooshi, S., & Abdul Hamid, N. A. B. (2021). The role of unified theory of acceptance and use of technology in e-learning adoption in higher education institutions in the UAE. IBIMA Business Review, 2021. https://doi.org/10.5171/2021.730690
10. Alghazi, S. S., Kamsin, A., Almaiah, M. A., Wong, S. Y., & Shuib, L. (2021). For sustainable application of mobile learning: An extended utaut model to examine the effect of technical factors on the usage of mobile devices as a learning tool. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(4), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13041856
11. Almaiah, M. A., Alamri, M. M., & Al-Rahmi, W. (2019). Applying the UTAUT Model to Explain the Students’ Acceptance of Mobile Learning System in Higher Education. IEEE Access, 7, 174673–174686. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2957206
12. Alshehri, A., Rutter, M. J., & Smith, S. (2019). An implementation of the UTAUT model for understanding students’ perceptions of Learning Management Systems: A Study within Tertiary Institutions in Saudi Arabia. International Journal of Distance Education Technologies, 17(3), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJDET.2019070101
13. Altbach, P. G., & De Wit, H. (2020). COVID-19: The internationalization revolution that isn’t. International Higher Education, 102, 16–18.
14. Althunibat, A. (2015). Determining the factors influencing students’ intention to use m-learning in Jordan higher education. Computers in Human Behavior, 52, 65–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.05.046
15. Alyoussef, I. Y. (2021). Factors influencing students’ acceptance of m-learning in higher education: An application and extension of the utaut model. Electronics (Switzerland), 10(24). https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics10243171
16. Andrea Benešováa, J. T. (2017). Requirements for Education and Qualification of People in Industry. 11(June), 2195–2202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2017.07.366
17. Arif, M., Ameen, K., & Rafiq, M. (2018). Factors affecting student use of Web-based services: Application of UTAUT in the Pakistani context. Electronic Library, 36(3), 518–534. https://doi.org/10.1108/EL-06-2016-0129
18. Bagozzi, R. P. (1981). Attitudes, intentions, and behavior: A test of some key hypotheses. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41(4), 607–627. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.41.4.607
19. Başaran, S., & Daganni, A. M. (2020). Learning analytics tool adoption by university students. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 11(7), 304–312. https://doi.org/10.14569/IJACSA.2020.0110740
20. Berger, H., Al Adwan, A., & Al Adwan, A. S. (2018). Solving the mystery of mobile learning adoption in higher education. International Journal of Mobile Communications, 16(1), 24. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijmc.2018.10007779
21. Chan, K., Cheung, G., Wan, K., Brown, I., & Luk, G. (2015). Synthesizing technology adoption and learners’ approaches towards active learning in higher education. Electronic Journal of E-Learning, 13(6), 431–440.
22. Chao, C. M. (2019). Factors determining the behavioral intention to use mobile learning: An application and extension of the UTAUT model. Frontiers in Psychology, 10(JULY). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01652
23. Chavoshi, A., & Hamidi, H. (2019). Social, individual, technological and pedagogical factors influencing mobile learning acceptance in higher education: A case from Iran. Telematics and Informatics, 38, 133–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2018.09.007
24. Chorfi, A., Hedjazi, D., Aouag, S., & Boubiche, D. (2020). Problem-based collaborative learning groupware to improve computer programming skills. Behaviour and Information Technology, 0(0), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2020.1795263
25. Crawford, J., & Cifuentes-Faura, J. (2022). Sustainability in Higher Education during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Systematic Review. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(3), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14031879
26. Daim, T. U., Rueda, G., Martin, H., & Gerdsri, P. (2006). Forecasting emerging technologies: Use of bibliometrics and patent analysis. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 73(8), 981–1012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2006.04.004
27. Dečman, M. (2015). Modeling the acceptance of e-learning in mandatory environments of higher education: The influence of previous education and gender. Computers in Human Behavior, 49, 272–281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.03.022
28. Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., & Lim, W. M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133(May), 285–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070
29. Dulloo, R., & Puri, M. M. (2019). Using Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology in Higher Education through Smartphone. International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering, 8(2 Special Issue 4), 263–267. https://doi.org/10.35940/ijrte.B1049.0782S419
30. Dwivedi, Y. K., Rana, N. P., Janssen, M., Lal, B., Williams, M. D., & Clement, M. (2017). An empirical validation of a unified model of electronic government adoption (UMEGA). Government Information Quarterly, 34(2), 211–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2017.03.001
31. Efiloğlu Kurt, Ö., & Tingöy, Ö. (2017). The acceptance and use of a virtual learning environment in higher education: an empirical study in Turkey, and the UK. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-017-0064-z
32. Ellegaard, O., & Wallin, J. A. (2015). The bibliometric analysis of scholarly production: How great is the impact? Scientometrics, 105(3), 1809–1831. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1645-z
33. Fagan, M. H. (2019). Factors Influencing Student Acceptance of Mobile Learning in Higher Education. Computers in the Schools, 36(2), 105–121. https://doi.org/10.1080/07380569.2019.1603051
34. Falagas, M. E., Pitsouni, E. I., Malietzis, G. A., & Pappas, G. (2008). Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: strengths and weaknesses. The FASEB Journal, 22(2), 338–342. https://doi.org/10.1096/fj.07-9492lsf
35. Fauzi, M. A. (2022). Partial least square structural equation modelling (PLSSEM) in knowledge management studies: Knowledge sharing in virtual communities. Knowledge Management and E-Learning, 14(1), 103–124. https://doi.org/10.34105/j.kmel.2022.14.007
36. Fu, J. S. (2013). ICT in Education: A Critical Literature Review and Its Implications. International Journal of Education and Development Using Information and Communication Technology, 9(1), 112–125. https://doi.org/10.1609/aaai.v32i1.12069
37. Gleason, N. W. (2018). Higher Education in the Era of the Fourth Industrial Revolution. Higher Education in the Era of the Fourth Industrial Revolution, 1–229. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-0194-0
38. Gunasinghe, A., Hamid, J. A., Khatibi, A., & Azam, S. M. F. (2018). Does the lecturer’s innovativeness drive VLE adoption in higher education institutes? (A study based on extended UTAUT). Journal of Information Technology Management, 10(3), 20–42. https://doi.org/10.22059/JITM.2019.285648.2382
39. Haghshenas, H., Chatroudi, E. A., & Njeje, F. A. (2012). Does educational level matter in adopting online education? A Malaysian perspective. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 22(1), 117–151. https://doi.org/10.1080/08841241.2012.705798
40. Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 31(1), 2–24. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203
41. Hashim, N. L., Yusof, N., Hussain, A., & Ibrahim, M. (2022). User Experience Dimensions for E-procurement: A Systematic Review. Journal of Information and Communication Technology. http://jict.uum.edu.my/images/vol.21no.1jan2022/1-25.pdf
42. Hassan, R. (2021). Factors and challenges that influence higher education students’ acceptance of Elearning system after Coronavirus pandemic. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology, 99(11), 2554–2566.
43. Herodotou, C., Maguire, C., McDowell, N., Hlosta, M., & Boroowa, A. (2021). The engagement of university teachers with predictive learning analytics. Computers and Education, 173(January), 104285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104285
44. Hewavitharana, T., Nanayakkara, S., Perera, A., & Perera, P. (2021). Modifying the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT) model for the digital transformation of the construction industry from the user perspective. Informatics, 8(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/informatics8040081
45. Hoi, V. N. (2020). Understanding higher education learners’ acceptance and use of mobile devices for language learning: A Rasch-based path modeling approach. Computers and Education, 146, 103761. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103761
46. Hu, X., & Lai, C. (2019). Comparing factors that influence learning management systems use on computers and on mobile. Information and Learning Science, 120(7–8), 468–488. https://doi.org/10.1108/ILS-12-2018-0127
47. Huang, W. H. D., Hood, D. W., & Yoo, S. J. (2013). Gender divide and acceptance of collaborative Web 2.0 applications for learning in higher education. Internet and Higher Education, 16(1), 57–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.02.001
48. Ikhsan, R. B., Prabowo, H., & Yuniarty. (2021). Drivers of the mobile-learning management system’s actual usage: Applying the utaut model. ICIC Express Letters, Part B: Applications, 12(11), 1067–1074. https://doi.org/10.24507/icicelb.12.11.1067
49. Imna, S., Amin, M., Ngayesah, S., Hamid, A., & Norhisam, N. H. (2022). Faktor Penentu Niat Penggunaan e-Dompet pasca Pandemik COVID-19 di Malaysia: Integrasi Model UTAUT dan MAT. Jurnal Pengurusan, 66, 109–121. https://doi.org/10.17576/pengurusan-2022-66-09
50. Ismail, N., & Yusof, U. K. (2022). Recent Trends of Machine Learning Predictions using Open Data: A Systematic Review. Journal of Information and Communication Technology, 21(3), 337–381. https://doi.org/10.32890/jict2022.21.3.3
51. Israel, D. J., & Velu, R. (2019). The partial test of UTAUT model to explain the influence of variables on the intention to adopt the mobile learning in higher education. International Journal of Innovative Technology and Exploring Engineering, 8(8), 1076–1082.
52. James, M. (2022). International Student Recruitment During the Pandemic: The Unique Perspective of Recruiters from Small to Medium-Sized Higher Education Institutions. Higher Education Policy, 36(3), 510–528. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41307-022-00271-3
53. Karaman Aksentijević, N., Ježić, Z., & Zaninović, P. A. (2021). The effects of information and communication technology (ICT) use on human development—A macroeconomic approach. Economies, 9(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/economies9030128
54. Kaufmann, L., & Gaeckler, J. (2015). A structured review of partial least squares in supply chain management research. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 21(4), 259–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pursup.2015.04.005
55. Khalid, B., Chaveesuk, S., & Chaiyasoonthorn, W. (2021). Moocs Adoption In Higher Education: A Management Perspective. Polish Journal of Management Studies, 23(1), 239–256. https://doi.org/10.17512/pjms.2021.23.1.15
56. Kyriazos, T. A. (2018). Applied Psychometrics: Sample Size and Sample Power Considerations in Factor Analysis (EFA, CFA) and SEM in General. Psychology, 09(08), 2207–2230. https://doi.org/10.4236/psych.2018.98126
57. Lakhal, S., & Khechine, H. (2016). Student intention to use desktop web-conferencing according to course delivery modes in higher education. International Journal of Management Education, 14(2), 146–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2016.04.001
58. Laura Mamuli, C. (2020). Human Capital Development and Higher Education. European Business & Management, 6(4), 61. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ebm.20200604.11
59. Lee, Y., Lee, J., & Lee, Z. (2006). Social Influence on Technology Acceptance Behavior : Theory Perspective. 37, 60–75.
60. Lin, C. (2019). Applying the UTAUT Model to Understand Factors Affecting the Use of E-books in Fujian , China. University of Boras, 87.
61. Lin, S., Zimmer, J. C., & Lee, V. (2013). Podcasting acceptance on campus: The differing perspectives of teachers and students. Computers and Education, 68, 416–428. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.06.003
62. Luo, Y., & Bu, J. (2016). How valuable is information and communication technology? A study of emerging economy enterprises. Journal of World Business, 51(2), 200–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2015.06.001
63. MacCallum, R. C., Widaman, K. F., Zhang, S., & Hong, S. (1999). Sample size in factor analysis. Psychological Methods, 4(1), 84–99. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.4.1.84
64. MacHado, E. A., & Afonso, L. E. (2018). Academic performance of students on the grounds of their satisfaction with distance education. International Journal of Innovation and Learning, 23(2), 196–226. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJIL.2018.089616
65. Maheshwari, D. G., Ramsawak, D. R., & Buertey, D. S. (2024). Educational Leadership : A Fifteen Year Bibliometric Review. Journal Of University Teaching & Learning Practice, 21.
66. Maneejuk, P., & Yamaka, W. (2021). The impact of higher education on economic growth in asean-5 countries. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(2), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13020520
67. Marlina, E., Tjahjadi, B., & Ningsih, S. (2021). Factors Affecting Student Performance in E-Learning: A Case Study of Higher Educational Institutions in Indonesia. Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 8(4), 993–1001. https://doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2021.vol8.no4.0993
68. McKeown, T., & Anderson, M. (2016). UTAUT: capturing differences in undergraduate versus postgraduate learning? Education and Training, 58(9), 945–965. https://doi.org/10.1108/ET-07-2015-0058
69. Michel, R., & Pollard, S. (2020). Higher Education Admissions Practices : An International Perspective ( Educational and Psychological Testing in a Global Context ).
70. Ministry of Education Malaysia, M. (2015). Malaysia Education Blueprint 2015-2025 (Higher Education). Ministry of Education Malaysia, 2025, 40.
71. Ministry of Higher Education Malaysia. (2018). Framing Malaysian Higher Education 4.0: Future-Proof Talents.
72. Mohamed Shaffril, H. A., Samah, A. A., Samsuddin, S. F., & Ali, Z. (2019). Mirror-mirror on the wall, what climate change adaptation strategies are practiced by the Asian’s fishermen of all? Journal of Cleaner Production, 232, 104–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.05.262
73. Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., & Altman, D. G. (2009). Academia and Clinic Annals of Internal Medicine Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses : Annals of Internal Medicine, 151(4), 264–269.
74. Moran, M., Hawkes, M., & El Gayar, O. (2010). Tablet personal computer integration in higher education: Applying the unified theory of acceptance and use technology model to understand supporting factors. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 42(1), 79–101. https://doi.org/10.2190/EC.42.1.d
75. Mukred, M., Yusof, Z. M., Alotaibi, F. M., Mokhtar, U. A., & Fauzi, F. (2019). The Key Factors in Adopting an Electronic Records Management System (ERMS) in the Educational Sector: A UTAUT-Based Framework. IEEE Access, 7, 35963–35980. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2904617
76. Murire, O. T., & Cilliers, L. (2019). Critical success factors to improve the adoption of social media in teaching and learning: A case study at a traditional university. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies, 13(3), 81–94. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v13i03.8485
77. Oye, N. D., Iahad, N. A., & Rahim, N. A. (2014). The history of UTAUT model and its impact on ICT acceptance and usage by academicians. 251–270. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-012-9189-9
78. Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., … Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. https://doi.org/10.21860/medflum2021_264903
79. Pan, M., & Gao, W. (2021). Determinants of the behavioral intention to use a mobile nursing application by nurses in China. BMC Health Services Research, 21(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-06244-3
80. Panigrahy, A., & Verma, A. (2024). 15 Years of application of digital marketing and other technologies in tourism: A bibliometric analysis and systematic literature review. Multidisciplinary Reviews, 7(5). https://doi.org/10.31893/multirev.2024101
81. Puspitasari, N., Firdaus, M. B., Haris, C. A., & Setyadi, H. J. (2019). An application of the UTAUT model for analysis of adoption of integrated license service information system. Procedia Computer Science, 161, 57–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2019.11.099
82. Raffaghelli, J. E., Rodríguez, M. E., Guerrero-Roldán, A. E., & Bañeres, D. (2022). Applying the UTAUT model to explain the students’ acceptance of an early warning system in Higher Education. Computers and Education, 182(November 2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104468
83. Rahmiati, R., & Susanto, P. (2022). The Effects of Social Influence, Hedonic Motivation, and Habit on E-Money Behavioral Intention: The Role of Perceived Risk as a Moderator. Advances in Economics, Business and Management Research, 659, 184–189.
84. Ramly, N., Said, M. F., Chong, C. W., & Rahman, S. A. (2015). Analysing factors that affect E-Syariah adoption by Shar’ie lawyers. Jurnal Pengurusan, 43, 89–96. https://doi.org/10.17576/pengurusan-2015-43-08
85. Raza, S. A., Qazi, W., Khan, K. A., & Salam, J. (2021). Social Isolation and Acceptance of the Learning Management System (LMS) in the time of COVID-19 Pandemic: An Expansion of the UTAUT Model. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 59(2), 183–208. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633120960421
86. Rethlefsen, elissa L., Shona Kirtley, Waffenschmidt, S., Ayala, A. P., Moher, D., Page, M. J., Koffel, J. B., & Group, P.-S. (2021). PRISMA-S: an extension to the PRISMA Statement for Reporting Literature Searches in Systematic Reviews Melissa. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-71213-5_65
87. Rigdon, E. E., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2017). On Comparing Results from CB-SEM and PLS-SEM: Five Perspectives and Five Recommendations. Marketing ZFP, 39(3), 4–16. https://doi.org/10.15358/0344-1369-2017-3-4
88. Romero-Rodríguez, J. M., Alonso-García, S., Marín-Marín, J. A., & Gómez-García, G. (2020). Considerations on the implications of the internet of things in spanish universities: The usefulness perceived by professors. Future Internet, 12(8), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.3390/FI12080123
89. Rosaline, S., & Wesley, J. R. (2017). Factors affecting students’ adoption of ICT tools in higher education institutions: An Indian context. International Journal of Information and Communication Technology Education, 13(2), 82–94. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJICTE.2017040107
90. Schwab, K. (2016). The Fourth Industrial Revolution (4th ed.). World Economic Forum. www.weforum.org
91. Schwab, K. (2017). The Fourth Industrial Revolution. The Crown Publishing Group.
92. Seitebakeng, S. D. (2018). Information and communication technology use in higher education : Perspectives from faculty. International Journal of Education and Development Using Information and Communication Technology, 14(2), 121–166.
93. Sintayehu Kassaye, A. (2018). The meaning, idea and history of university/higher education in Africa: Al brief literature review. FIRE , Forum for International Research in Education, 4(3), 210–227. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1199154.pdf
94. Sitar-Tăut, D. A. (2021). Mobile learning acceptance in social distancing during the COVID-19 outbreak: The mediation effect of hedonic motivation. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 3(3), 366–378. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbe2.261
95. Soliman, M. S. M., Karia, N., Moeinzadeh, S., Islam, M. S., & Mahmud, I. (2019). Modelling intention to use ERP systems among higher education institutions in Egypt: UTAUT perspective. International Journal of Supply Chain Management, 8(2), 429–440.
96. Sweileh, W. M. (2020). Bibliometric analysis of peer-reviewed literature on climate change and human health with an emphasis on infectious diseases. Globalization and Health, 16(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12992-020-00576-1
97. Taat, M. S., & Francis, A. (2020). Factors influencing the students’ acceptance of e-learning at teacher education institute: An exploratory study in Malaysia. International Journal of Higher Education, 9(1), 133–141. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v9n1p133
98. Tarhini, A., Deh, R. M., Al-Busaidi, K. A., Mohammed, A. B., & Maqableh, M. (2017). Factors influencing students’ adoption of e-learning: A structural equation modeling approach. Journal of International Education in Business, 10(2), 164–182. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIEB-09-2016-0032
99. Tubaishat, A. (2017). Perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use of electronic health records among nurses : Application of Technology Acceptance Model Acceptance Model. Informatics for Health and Social Care, 00(00), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/17538157.2017.1363761
100. Valtonen, T., López-Pernas, S., Saqr, M., Vartiainen, H., Sointu, E. T., & Tedre, M. (2022). The nature and building blocks of educational technology research. Computers in Human Behavior, 128(June 2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.107123
101. Van Schaik, P. (2009). Unified theory of acceptance and use for websites used by students in higher education. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 40(2), 229–257. https://doi.org/10.2190/EC.40.2.e
102. Venkatesh, Thong, V., Y.L., J., & Xu, X. (2016). Unified theory of acceptance and use of technology: A synthesis and the road ahead. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 17(5), 328–376. https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00428
103. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward A Unified View. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inoche.2016.03.015
104. Venkatesh, V., Thong, J. Y. L., & Xu, X. (2012a). Consumer Acceptance and Use of Information Technology: Extending the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology. 36(1), 157–178. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2002388
105. Venkatesh, V., Thong, J. Y. L., & Xu, X. (2012b). Consumer Acceptance and Use of Information Technology: Extending The Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology. MIS Quarterly, 36(1), 157–178.
106. Wan Mohd Yunus, W. M. A., Badri, S. K. Z., Panatik, S. A., & Mukhtar, F. (2021). The Unprecedented Movement Control Order (Lockdown) and Factors Associated With the Negative Emotional Symptoms, Happiness, and Work-Life Balance of Malaysian University Students During the Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Pandemic. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 11(February). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2020.566221
107. Wang, H., Tao, D., Yu, N., & Qu, X. (2020). Understanding consumer acceptance of healthcare wearable devices: An integrated model of UTAUT and TTF. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2020.104156
108. Wang, J., Li, X., Wang, P., Liu, Q., Deng, Z., & Wang, J. (2022). Research trend of the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology theory: A bibliometric analysis. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/su14010010
109. Welch, R., Alade, T., & Nichol, L. (2020). Using the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (Utaut) Model To Determine Factors Affecting Mobile Learning Adoption in the Workplace: a Study of the Science Museum Group. Iadis International Journal on Computer Science and Information Systems, 15(1), 85–98. https://doi.org/10.33965/ijcsis_2020150107
110. Williams, M. D., Rana, N. P., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2015). The unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT): a literature review. Journal of Enterprise Information Management.
111. Wolf, E. J., Harrington, K. M., Clark, S. L., & Miller, M. W. (2013). Sample Size Requirements for Structural Equation Models: An Evaluation of Power, Bias, and Solution Propriety. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 73(6), 913–934. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164413495237
112. Wong, K.-T., Russo, S., & Mcdowall, J. (2012). Understanding early childhood student teachers’ acceptance and use of interactive whiteboard. Campus-Wide Information Systems, 30(1), 4–16. https://doi.org/10.1108/10650741311288788
113. Zhang, M., Hassan, H., & Migin, M. W. (2023). Exploring the Consumers’ Purchase Intention on Online Community Group Buying Platform during Pandemic. Sustainability (Switzerland), 15(3), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15032433
114. Zhu, T. T., Peng, H. R., & Zhang, Y. J. (2018). The Influence of Higher Education Development on Economic Growth: Evidence from Central China. Higher Education Policy, 31(2), 139–157. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41307-017-0047-7
115. Zuiderwijk, A., Janssen, M., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2015). Acceptance and use predictors of open data technologies: Drawing upon the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. Government Information Quarterly, 32(4), 429–440. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2015.09.005