• Abstract

    The present study scrutinizes the societal implications of constitutions and their significance within both national and international frameworks. The authors undertakes an exploration of the principles underlying constitutional law, delving into the categorization of constitutions based on state structures and political regimes. Additionally, the article explores instances of constitutions from diverse nations, shedding light on their consequential effects on society. Emphasis is placed on a meticulous examination of constitutional structures and their pivotal contribution to the configuration of legal and socio-cultural landscapes. The examination of constituent elements within constitutions enables the illumination of their crucial significance in shaping the legal and socio-cultural fabric of society. Special consideration is directed towards international dimensions, with a specific focus on the impact of preambles in shaping national identity on the global stage. The article systematically investigates the significance of procedures for constitutional amendments, emphasizing their role in fostering stability and facilitating adaptation to prevailing global trends. The purpose of this study is to conduct a comprehensive analysis of the constitution's influence on society, aiming to identify the pivotal components within the constitutional structure that exert the most significant impact on societal development. The primary object of investigation encompasses constitutional documents from diverse countries. This includes a thorough examination of their preambles, core provisions, sections concerning human rights and freedoms, power structures, and an exploration of the international context within which these constitutions operate. The outcomes of this research can function as a crucial resource for human rights organizations, legislative bodies, and constitutional commissions involved in the formulation and amendment of constitutional documents. Moreover, the study creates avenues for additional comparative analyses, facilitating an in-depth exploration of the diverse constituencies across countries and their repercussions on societies within the international sphere.

  • References

    1. Aba-Namay, R. (1993). The recent constitutional reform in Saudi Arabia. International & Comparative Law Quarterly, 42(2), 295-331. https://doi.org/10.1093/iclqaj/42.2.295
    2. Ackerman, B. (2005). The Failure of the Founding Fathers: Jefferson, Marshall and the Rise of Presidential Democracy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press. https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674020054
    3. Akimov, O., Troschinsky, V., Karpa, M., Ventsel, V., Akimova, L. (2020). International experience of public administration in the area of national security. Journal of Legal, Ethical and Regulatory Issues, 23(3), 1-7.
    4. Amar, A. (2012). America's Unwritten Constitution: The Precedents and Principles We Live By. New York: Basic Books. https://books.google.com.ua/books?hl=en&lr=&id=qZRVDgAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PT7&ots=Fd4pr8hOen&sig=vf76_qexCDKljsEWoKUPzIcPMQk&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q&f=false
    5. Arato, A. (2009). Constitution-Making Under Occupation: The Case of Iraq. New York: In the series Columbia Studies in Political Thought. https://doi.org/10.7312/arat14302
    6. Betz, T., Cook, S., & Hollenbach, F. (2018). On the Use and Abuse of Spatial Instruments. Political Analysis, 26(4), 474-479. https://doi:10.1017/pan.2018.10
    7. Billias, G. A. (2020). American Constitutionalism Heard Round the World, 1776-1989: A Global Perspective. New York: NYU Press. https://doi.org/10.18574/nyu/9780814791073.001.0001
    8. Bondarenko, S., Bratko, A., Antonov, V., Kolisnichenko, R., Hubanov, O., & Mysyk, A. (2022). Improving the state system of strategic planning of national security in the context of informatization of society. Journal of Information Technology Management, 14, 1-24. https://doi.org/10.22059/jitm.2022.88861
    9. Breslin, B. (2009). From Words to Worlds: Exploring Constitutional Functionality. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins Univ. Press. https://muse.jhu.edu/book/3392
    10. Brown, N. (2008). Reason, Interest, Rationality, and Passion in Constitution Drafting. Perspectives on Politics, 6(4), 675-689. https://doi:10.1017/S1537592708081851
    11. Cheibub, J., Elkins, Z., & Ginsburg, T. (2014). Beyond Presidentialism and Parliamentarism. British Journal of Political Science, 44(3), 515-544. https://doi:10.1017/S000712341300032X
    12. Chilton, A., Versteeg, M. (2020). How Constitutional Rights Matter. New York online edn, Oxford Academic, 20. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190871451.001.0001
    13. Dippel, H. (2005). Modern constitutionalism, An introduction to a history in need of writing: Tijdschrift voor Rechtsgeschiedenis and Revue d'histoire du droit. The Legal History Review, 73(1-2), 153-170. https://doi.org/10.1163/1571819054088670
    14. Dixon, R., Stone, A. (2018). The Invisible Constitution in Comparative Perspective (Comparative Constitutional Law and Policy). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108277914
    15. Elkins, Z., Ginsburg, T. (2021). What Can We Learn from Written Constitutions? Journal Article. Annual Review of Political Science, 321-343. https://www.annualreviews.org/doi/full/10.1146/annurev-polisci-100720-102911
    16. Elkins, Z., Ginsburg, T., Melton, J. (2009). The Endurance of National Constitutions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi:10.1017/CBO9780511817595
    17. Furman, D., Shchokin, R., Kubitskyi, S., Strochenko, N., Dorosh, I. (2023). Motivation and incentives for employees of domestic enterprises. Journal of Law and Sustainable Development, 11(3), art. no. e0815.
    18. Gargarella, R. (2013). Latin American Constitutionalism, 1810-2010: The Engine Room of the Constitution. Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199937967.001.0001
    19. Jacobsohn, G. J. (2010). Constitutional Identity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvjsf46j
    20. Khatniuk, N., Shestakovska, T., Rovnyi, V., Pobiianska, N., Surzhyk, Y. (2023). Legal principles and features of artificial intelligence use in the provision of legal services. Journal of Law and Sustainable Development, 11(5), art. no. e01173.
    21. Landau, D., & Lerner, H. (Eds.). (2019). Comparative Constitution Making. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781785365263
    22. Melton, J., Elkins, Z., Ginsburg, T., & Leetaru, K. (2013). On the Interpretability of Law: Lessons from the Decoding of National Constitutions. British Journal of Political Science, 43(2), 399-423. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123412000361
    23. Mittal, S., Weingast, B. (2013). Self-Enforcing Constitutions: With an Application to Democratic Stability In America's First Century. The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 29(2), 278-302, https://doi.org/10.1093/jleo/ewr017
    24. Omelchuk, O. M., Haiur, I. Y., Kozytska, O. G., Prysiazhna, A. V., & Khmelevska, N. V. (2022). Analysis of the activities of law enforcement authorities in the field of combating crime and corruption offences. Journal of Money Laundering Control, 25(3), 700-716. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMLC-07-2021-0073
    25. Quigley, H. (1924). The Constitution of China. American Political Science Review, 18(2), 346-350. https://doi.org/10.2307/1943930
    26. Rubenfeld, J. (2001). “The New Unwritten Constitution”. Duke Law Journal, 51(1), 289-305. https://doi.org/10.2307/1373234
    27. Rutherford, A., Lupu, Y., Cebrian, M. (2018). Inferring mechanisms for global constitutional progress. Nat Hum Behav, 2, 592-599. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-018-0382-8
    28. Sartori, G. (1970). Concept Misformation in Comparative Politics. American Political Science Review, 64(4), 1033-1053. https://doi:10.2307/1958356
    29. Siegel, R. (2020). The nineteenth amendment and the democratization of the family. Yale Law J. Forum, 129, 450-495. https://heinonline.org/HOL/LandingPage?handle=hein.journals/yljfor129&div=22&id=&page=
    30. Sobko, G., Loza, D., Svintsytskyi, A., Firman, V., & Shchokin, R. (2022). Criminological and criminal signs of mental violence in crimes against public security under the criminal law of Ukraine. Pakistan Journal of Criminology, 14(4), 69-88.
    31. Strauss, D. A. (2001). “The Irrelevance of Constitutional Amendments.” Harvard Law Review, 114(5), 1457-505. https://doi.org/10.2307/1342685
    32. Voermans, W., Maarten S. (2017). Constitutional preambles: A comparative analysis. Edward Elgar Publishing. https://books.google.com.ua/books?hl=en&lr=&id=7eknDwAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PT8&ots=rs45sLeZzT&sig=DCLckiZXQrwTCyJNiNcNV9zQORw&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q&f=false
    33. Yermachenko, V., Bondarenko, D., Akimova, L., Karpa, M., Akimov, O., Kalashnyk, N. (2023). Theory and Practice of Public Management of Smart Infrastructure in the Conditions of the Digital Society' Development: Socio-economic Aspects. Economic Affairs (New Delhi), 68(1), 617-633. https://doi.org/10.46852/0424-2513.1.2023.29
    34. Young, E. A. (2007). “The Constitution Outside the Constitution.” The Yale Law Journal, 117(3), 408-423. https://doi.org/10.2307/20455798
    35. Yuldashev, O. K., Khomiachenko, S. I., & Yuldashev, S. O. (2022). Organizational and legal model of competency-based education as a means of the transition to innovative economy. Danube, 13(2), 107-118. https://doi.org/10.2478/danb-2022-0007

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2024 Multidisciplinary Reviews

How to cite

Sergiienko, L., Pugachov, M., Ihnatiuk, O., Serohina, N., & Panchyshyn, R. (2024). Constitutional and municipal law: analysing constitutions and their societal implications. Multidisciplinary Reviews, (| Accepted Articles). Retrieved from https://malque.pub/ojs/index.php/mr/article/view/4011
  • Article viewed - 40