• Abstract

    This study examines legal restructuring, aiming to identify influential factors and assess its societal impacts. The research aims to examine the theoretical basis of legal restructuring, analyse the political, social, and economic factors that shape its development, evaluate the challenges and outcomes, and suggest strategies to improve the effectiveness of restructuring initiatives in Ukraine and beyond. To achieve the objectives, various research methods and resources are used. These encompass an extensive examination of current literature, detailed case studies, qualitative interviews with influential individuals, quantitative analysis of socio-political and economic data, and comparative examinations of legal reform patterns across various settings. This varied approach guarantees a thorough investigation of legal reform processes and their effects on society. The research findings illuminate the complex landscape of legal transformation, revealing how political institutions and actors play a pivotal role in shaping legislative initiatives. It underscores the vital importance of elements like social cohesion, philosophical orientations, and the existence of societal resolve in assessing the practicality and effectiveness of legal transformations. Additionally, the study underscores the pivotal influence of social dynamics, such as public awareness, the engagement of civil society, and cultural values, in shaping the direction and focal points of legal reform endeavours. Economic considerations are also intricately intertwined with legal reform, with factors such as economic development, safeguarding of property rights, and tackling economic inequalities crucial in determining the consequences of legal adjustments. Moreover, the study reveals the diverse obstacles embedded in legislative restructuring, underlining the crucial need for intra-governmental coordination, bolstering institutional capabilities, and addressing risks and consequences. This study highlights the complex and ever-evolving dynamics of legal restructuring, where political, societal, and economic factors intersect. The findings propose enhancing the effectiveness of legal reforms.

  • References

    1. Adams, M. S., & Dorensplit, R. (2019). Legal reform and democratization: A crossnational analysis of regime outcomes. Comparative Political Studies, 52(12), 1801-1831.
    2. Adedoyin, F. F., Alola, A. A., & Bekun, F. V. (2020). An assessment of environmental sustainability corridor: The role of economic expansion and research and development in EU countries. Science of the Total Environment, 713, 136726.
    3. Akimova L., Litvinova, I., Ilchenko, H., Pomaza-Ponomarenko A., & Yemets, O. (2020). The negative impact of corruption on the economic security of states. International Journal of Management, 11 (5), 1058-1071. https://doi.org/10.34218/IJM.11.5.2020.097
    4. Appel, G., Grewal, L., Hadi, R., & Stephen, A. T. (2020). The future of social media in marketing. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 48(1), 79-95.
    5. Bayev, V. V., Bakhov, I. S., Mirzodaieva, T. V., Rozmetova, O., & Boretskaya, N. (2022). Theoretical and methodological fundamentals of the modern paradigm of quality management in the field of tourism. Journal of Environmental Management and Tourism, 13(2), 338-345. https://doi.org/10.14505/jemt.v13.2(58).04
    6. Belov, D. M. (2012). Constitutional reform as a consequence of forming a new paradigm of constitutionalism. Viche, 18, 17-20.
    7. Bielińska, K., Chowaniec, A., Doričić, R., & et al. (2022). Equal access to healthcare in national legislations: how do Croatia, Germany, Poland, and Slovenia counteract discrimination in healthcare? BMC Health Services Research, 22, 100. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-07453-6
    8. Bondarenko, S., Makeieva, O., Usachenko, O., Veklych, V., Arifkhodzhaieva, T., & Lernyk, S. (2022). The legal mechanisms for information security in the context of digitalization. Journal of Information Technology Management, 14, 25-58. https://doi.org/10.22059/jitm.2022.88868
    9. Burchardt, D. (2018). The Functions of Law and Their Challenges: The Differentiated Functionality of International Law. KFG Working Paper Series,17, Berlin Potsdam Research Group “The International Rule of Law – Rise or Decline?”, Berlin, June 2018.
    10. Carothers, T. (2002). The end of the transition period paradigm. Journal of Democracy, 13(1), 5-21.
    11. Chabanenko, M., Korniakova, T., Lushpiienko, Yu., Pomaza-Ponomarenko, A., & Muzyka, M. (2020). Legal regime of the land resources usage in conditions of modern economic development. Journal of Legal, Ethical and Regulatory Issues. Special Issue, 5. Available at: https://www.abacademies.org/articles/Legal-regime-of-the-land-resourcesusage-in-conditions-of-modern-economic-development-1544-0044-25-SI-541.pdf Accessed: April 5, 2024.
    12. Chebotaryov, V., & De Vos, M. (2012). Legal reform in post-Soviet countries: Political perspective. Routledge.
    13. Colombo, C. M., & Groenleer, M. L. P. (2020). How Domestic Legal Systems Respond to International Local Government Law: Between Accommodation, Resistance and Transformation (September 10, 2020). Research Handbook on International Law and Cities, Forthcoming. http://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3690232
    14. Da Silva, M. (2018) Compensation awards in international environmental law: two recent developments. New York Univ J Int Law Polit, 50(4), 1417-1430.
    15. Dent, G. W., (2011) Straight Is Better: Why Law and Society May Legitimately Prefer Heterosexuality. Faculty Publications, 506. Available at: https://scholarlycommons.law.case.edu/faculty_publications/506 Accessed: April 5, 2024.
    16. Dhirani, L. L., Mukhtiar, N., Chowdhry, B. S., & Newe, T. (2023). Ethical Dilemmas and Privacy Issues in Emerging Technologies: A Review. Sensors 23, 1151. https://doi.org/10.3390/s23031151
    17. Drabble, L. A., Mericle, A. A., Wootton, A. R., Munroe C., Li, L., Trocki K. F., & Hughes, T. (2021). Measuring the impact of legal recognition of same-sex marriage among sexual minority women. J GLBT Fam Stud.,17(4), 371-392. https://doi.org/10.1080/1550428x.2021.1935382
    18. Elkins, Z., Ginsburg, T., & Melton, D. (2009). Durability of national constitutions. Cambridge University Press.
    19. Filkins, B. L., Kim, J. Y., Roberts, B., Armstrong, W., Miller, M. A., Hultner, M. L., Castillo, A. P., Ducom, J. C., Topol, E. & J, Steinhubl, S. R. (2016). Privacy and security in the era of digital health: what should translational researchers know and do about it? Am J Transl Res.,15;8(3), 1560-1580.
    20. Finkel, E. J., Perez-Lignan, A., & Seligson, M. A. (2007). Resistance to Democracy Promotion: Strategy, Structure, and Politics of Hybrid Regimes. Johns Hopkins University Press.
    21. Handl, M., Seck, S., & Simons, P. (2022). Gender and Intersectionality in Business and Human Rights Scholarship. Business and Human Rights Journal, 7(2), 201-225. https://doi.org/10.1017/bhj.2022.12
    22. Hinteregger, M. (2017) Civil liability and the challenges of climate change: a functional analysis. J Eur Tort Law 8(2),238-259.
    23. Hubanova, T., Shchokin, R., Hubanov, O., Antonov, V., Slobodianiuk, P., & Podolyaka, S. (2021). Information technologies in improving crime prevention mechanisms in the border regions of southern ukraine. Journal of Information Technology Management, 13, 75-90. https://doi.org/10.22059/JITM.2021.80738
    24. Janse, R. (2015). Europeanization of legal reforms in Ukraine: Study of the impact of the EU acquis on the Ukrainian legal system. TMC Asser Press.
    25. Kahraman, F., Kalyanpur, N., & Newman, A. L. (2020). Domestic courts, transnational law, and international order. European Journal of International Relations, 26(1_suppl), 184-208. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066120938843
    26. Khristenko, V., & Yefimenko, A. (2018). Legal reform in Ukraine: Moving towards a more efficient and transparent legal system. East European Economics, 56(3), 261-283.
    27. Klaasen, A. (2020). The quest for socio-economic rights: The rule of law and violent protest in South Africa. Sustainable Development, 28(3), 478-484.
    28. Kozyubra, M. I., & Meleshevich, A. (2013). Legal understanding: pluralism of approaches to the possibility of their combination. General theoretical jurisprudence, the rule of law and Ukraine: coll. of science articles. Kyiv: Dukh and Litera, 187-211, 191.
    29. Kravtsova, O., & Marchenko, E. (2014). Legal reforms and property rights in Ukraine: Micro-level evidence. Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 47(4), 413-424.
    30. Kromm, J. N., Frattaroli, S., Vernick, J. S, & Teret, S. P. (2009). Public health advocacy in the courts: opportunities for public health professionals. Public Health Rep. Nov-Dec;124(6), 889-94. https://doi.org/10.1177/003335490912400618
    31. Kryvytskyi, Yu. V. (2018). Ideology of legal reform: general theoretical aspect. Modern problems of the state's legal, economic, and social development: theses add. International Science and Practice conf. Ministry of Internal Affairs of Ukraine, Kharkiv. National University of Internal Affairs cases, Consultant, mission of the European Union, Kharkiv, 321-323.
    32. Kryzhanovsky, A. F. (2009). The legal order of sovereign Ukraine: formation and development trends (general theoretical study): diss. doctor of law Sciences: 12.00.01, Odesa, 469, 137.
    33. Kuzio, T. (2018). Post-Soviet constitutions and challenges of regional integration: Adaptation to European and Eurasian integration projects. Routledge.
    34. Langer, Y. I. (2007). Reforming the legal system of Ukraine as a means of increasing its efficiency: dissertation. Candidate of Juridical Sciences: 12.00.01, Kyiv, 215, 5-6.
    35. Lomazzi, V.; Israel, S.; Crespi, I. (2019). Gender Equality in Europe and the Effect of Work-Family Balance Policies on Gender-Role Attitudes. Soc. Sci. 8, 5. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci8010005
    36. Lytvyn, N., Andrushchenko, H., Zozulya, Y. V., Nikanorova, O. V., & Rusal, L. M. (2022). Enforcement of court decisions as a social guarantee of protection of citizens rights and freedoms. Prawo i Wiez, 2022(39), 80-102. https://doi.org/10.36128/priw.vi39.351
    37. Meskys, E., Kalpokiene, J., P., & Liaudanskas, A. (2020). Regulating Deep Fakes: Legal and Ethical Considerations (December 2, 2019). Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 15(1), 24-31.
    38. Mulska, O., Vasyltsiv, T., Shushkova, Y., Kloba, L., & Parfenyuk, Y. (2022). Assessment of the Population's Social Resilience Environment (The Case of the Carpathian Region оf Ukraine). Problems and Perspectives in Management, 20(1), 407-421. https://doi.org/10.21511/ppm.20(1).2022.33
    39. Mykhnenko, A. M., Makarenko, E. M., & Kravchenko, S. O. (2009). Management of the quality of social reforms: teacher. Manual. Kyiv, NADU, 192, 4, 101.
    40. Naidyonova, Yu., & Taylor, V. (2019). Legal reforms in Ukraine: Fighting corruption through European integration. Europe-Asia, 71(2), 313-338.
    41. Nazarchuk, O. (2023). Legal aspects of remote work in modern realities. Actual problems of jurisprudence, 1, 60-64. Available at: https://appj.wunu.edu.ua/index.php/appj/article/view/1561 Accessed: April 5, 2024.
    42. Ozarov, D., & Retel, L. (2015). Corruption and neoliberalism in post-socialist countries: A comparative analysis. Routledge.
    43. Parkhomenko, N. M., & Shumila, M. M. (2017). Conceptual principles of legal reform (separate aspects). Legal reform: concept, purpose, implementation: coll. of science works Mater. VIII International science and practice conf., Kyiv, Nika-Center, 329-333, 330.
    44. Pau de, V., & Annalisa, S. (2021). The Right to a Healthy Environment and Climate Litigation: A Game Changer? Yearbook of International Environmental Law, 32(1), 3-19. https://doi.org/10.1093/yiel/yvac064
    45. Pavlovsky, M. (1998). Ideology of progressive reforms for Ukraine. Kyiv: Technika.
    46. Peel, J., & Lin, J. (2019). Transnational Climate Litigation: The Contribution of the Global South. American Journal of International Law, 113(4), 679-726. https://doi.org/10.1017/ajil.2019.48
    47. Phuong, T. T., Tan, N. Q., Hai, N. T., & Ngu, N. H. (2023). Reframing Climate Change Resilience: An Intersectional Perspective of Ethnicity and Gender from Vietnam. Climate, 11, 85. https://doi.org/10.3390/cli11040085
    48. Pomaza-Ponomarenko, A., Hren, L., Durman, O., Bondarchuk, N., & Vorobets, V. (2020). Management mechanisms in the context of digitalization of all spheres of society. Revista San Gregorio. Special edition-2020, 42. Available at: http://surl.li/rumcg Accessed: April 5, 2024.
    49. Pomaza-Ponomarenko, A., Leonenko, N., Cherniahivska, V., Lehan, I., & Puzanova, G. (2023). Legal Reform and Change: Research on Legal Reform Processes and their Impact on Society. Analysis of Factors that Facilitate or Hinder Legal Change, Including Political, Social, and Economic Factors, 22.
    50. Preston, B. J. (2018). The Evolving Role of Environmental Rights in Climate Change Litigation. Chinese Journal of Environmental Law, 2(2), 131-164. https://doi.org/10.1163/24686042-12340030
    51. Rimmer, M. (2019). Beyond the Paris Agreement: Intellectual Property, Innovation Policy, and Climate Justice. Laws, 8, 7. https://doi.org/10.3390/laws8010007
    52. Saiger, A. (2020). Domestic Courts and the Paris Agreement's Climate Goals: The Need for a Comparative Approach. Transnational Environmental Law, 9(1), 37-54. https://doi.org/10.1017/S2047102519000256
    53. Santos, F. D., Ferreira, P.L., & Pedersen, J. S. T. (2022). The Climate Change Challenge: A Review of the Barriers and Solutions to Deliver a Paris Solution. Climate, 10, 75. https://doi.org/10.3390/cli10050075
    54. Sarapin, V. O. (2005). Ideology of systemic reforms in the context of stabilization of Ukraine's socioeconomic and political development at the turn of the century (political analysis): author's abstract. Thesis of Candidate of Political Sciences: 23.00.03, Kyiv, 20 p.
    55. Selivanov, V. M. (1998). Legal reform and research methodology of fundamental problems of legal science. Bulletin of the Academy of Legal Sciences of Ukraine, Kharkiv, 4(15), 3-17.
    56. Selivanov, V. M. (2002). Law and power of sovereign Ukraine: methodological aspects: monograph. Kyiv: In Yure, 724 p., 363.
    57. Serdyuk, V. O. (2013). Judicial and legal reform in Ukraine and globalization processes. Bulletin of Zaporizhzhya National University. Ser.: Legal Sciences, 3, 24-29.
    58. Skjærseth, J. B., Andresen, S., Bang, G., & Heggelund, G. M. (2021). The Paris agreement and key actors' domestic climate policy mixes: comparative patterns. Int Environ Agreem., 21(1), 59-73. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10784-021-09531-w
    59. Snyder, F. (2008). Legal reform and development of the rule of law in Ukraine. Studies in Europe and Asia, 60(1), 71-92.
    60. Sotiropoulos, D. A. & Radaelli, K. M. (2016). Law and democracy in the empire of power. Routledge.
    61. Tushnet, M., & Fleming, J. E. (2018). How to save constitutional democracy. University of Chicago Press.
    62. Versteeg, M., & Ginzburg, T. (2016). Measuring the Rule of Law: A Comparison of Indicators. Law and Social Research, 41(1), 1-37.
    63. Walden, S. (2016). Legal reform in Ukraine: Obstacles and the way forward. Analytical note. Swedish Institute of International Relations.
    64. Wilding, D., Fray, P., Molitorisz, S., & McKewon, E. (2018). The Impact of Digital Platforms on News and Journalistic Content. University of Technology Sydney, NSW.
    65. Wootton, A. R, Drabble, L. A, Riggle, E. D. B., Veldhuis, C. B., Bitcon, C., Trocki, K. F., & Hughes, T. L. (2019). Impacts of Marriage Legalization on the Experiences of Sexual Minority Women in Work and Community Contexts. J GLBT Fam Stud., 15(3), 211-234. https://doi.org/10.1080/1550428X.2018.1474829
    66. Yushchyk, O. I. (1997). Legal reform: general concept, implementation problems in Ukraine: monograph. Kyiv: Legislation Institute of The Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2024 The Authors

How to cite

Pomaza-Ponomarenko, A., Leonenko, N., Cherniahivska, V., Lehan, I., & Puzanova, G. (2024). Dynamics of legal transformatins: Assessment of impact on society and analysis of determinations of changes in the legislative sphere. Multidisciplinary Reviews, 7, 2024spe037. https://doi.org/10.31893/multirev.2024spe037
  • Article viewed - 39
  • PDF downloaded - 16