• Abstract

    Welfare is said to be the main goal of economic development in every country, and it is almost believed that the development goal of all existing development concepts is toward prosperity. the concept and measurement of the level of community welfare have very various complex problems. Various researchers have made attempts to measure the welfare of society. The measurement method has also undergone an evolutionary process, from simple to very complex. Measuring sustainable welfare has recently become an alternative measure of welfare, considering the target of achieving the Sustainable Development Goals. This study will review thirteen articles related to measuring sustainable welfare and propose how to measure sustainable welfare in Indonesia. The results of this study found that researchers in various countries have made various modifications to Index of Sustainable Economic Welfare (ISEW) to suit the conditions in their respective countries. However, apart from Putra & Arini (2018), no one has included a digital dimension as a response to current technological developments. Therefore, this study proposes measuring sustainable welfare by adding aspects that can increase or decrease sustainable welfare, namely, the dimensions of digitalization and religiosity.

  • References

    1. Aleksandrov, I. N., and Fedorova, M. Y. (2019). Digital economy and green economy: Rural unemployment and territorial self-development in Russia. E3S Web of Conferences, 110, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/201911002019
    2. Armiento, M. (2018). The Sustainable Welfare Index: Towards a Threshold Effect for Italy. Ecological Economics, 152(June), 296–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.06.014
    3. Aydin, N. (2016). Islamic versus conventional human development index : empirical evi- dence from ten Muslim countries. International Journal of Social Economics, 44(12), 1562–1583. https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/IJSE-03-2016-0091/full/html
    4. Beça, P., and Santos, R. (2010). Measuring sustainable welfare: A new approach to the ISEW. Ecological Economics, 69(4), 810–819. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.11.031
    5. Bleys, B. (2013). The regional index of sustainable economic welfare for flanders, Belgium. Sustainability (Switzerland), 5(2), 496–523. https://doi.org/10.3390/su5020496
    6. Bleys, B., and Whitby, A. (2015). Barriers and opportunities for alternative measures of economic welfare. Ecological Economics, 117, 162–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.06.021
    7. Brynjolfsson, E., Collis, A., Diewert, E. W., Eggers, F., and Fox, K. J. (2018). The Digital Economy, GDP and Consumer Welfare: Theory and Evidence. ESCoE Conference on Economic Measurement, Bank of England, Oct, 1–39.
    8. Butnariu, A., and Luca, F. A. (2019). An index of sustainable economic welfare for Romania. New Trends and Issues Proceedings on Humanities and Social Sciences, 6(8), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.18844/prosoc.v6i8.4543
    9. CIOCOIU, C. N. (2019). Integrating Digital Economy and Green Economy: Opportunities for Sustainable Development. Theoretical and Empirical Research in Urban Management, 6(1), 33–43. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004
    10. Dreher, A. (2006). Does globalization affect growth? Evidence from a new index of globalization. Applied Economics, 38(10), 1091–1110. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00036840500392078
    11. Dyatlov, S., and Lobanov, O. (2018). SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT AND GREEN ECONOMY IN DIGITAL AGE. Section Environmental Economics, 5593.
    12. Elseoud, M. S. . (2014). Electronic commerce and economic growth in Saudi Arabia. International Journal of Economics, Commerce and Management, 2(5), 1–16.
    13. Eum, W. (2011). Religion and Economic Development -A study on Religious variables influencing GDP growth over countries. University of California, Berkeley. https://www.econ.berkeley.edu/sites/default/files/eum_wonsub.pdf
    14. Fauzi, A., and Oxtavianus, A. (2014). The Measurement of Sustainable Development in Indonesia. Jurnal Ekonomi Pembangunan: Kajian Masalah Ekonomi Dan Pembangunan, 15(1), 68. https://doi.org/10.23917/jep.v15i1.124
    15. Fox, M. J. V., and Erickson, J. D. (2020). Design and meaning of the genuine progress indicator: A statistical analysis of the U.S. fifty-state model. Ecological Economics, 167(February 2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.106441
    16. French, S., and Joseph, S. (1999). Religiosity and its association with happiness, purpose in life, and self-actualisation. Mental Health, Religion & Culture, 2(2), 117–120.
    17. Freund, C. L., and Weinhold, D. (2004). The effect of the Internet on international trade. Journal of International Economics, 62(1), 171–189. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S002219960300059X
    18. Furqani, H. (2015). The discipline in the making: Appraising the progress of islamic economics. Journal of Islamic Monetary Economics and Finance, 1(1), 1–23.
    19. Gigliarano, C., Balducci, F., Ciommi, M., and Chelli, F. (2014). Going regional: An index of sustainable economic welfare for Italy. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 45, 63–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2014.02.007
    20. Held, B., Rodenhäuser, D., Diefenbacher, H., and Zieschank, R. (2018). The National and Regional Welfare Index (NWI/RWI): Redefining Progress in Germany. Ecological Economics, 145(August 2016), 391–400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.11.026
    21. Jahangard, E., and Pourahmadi, Z. (2013). The Effects of Broadband Infrastructure on Economic Growth in Developing Countries. Iranian Journal of Economic Studies, 2(2), 1–23. http://ijes.shirazu.ac.ir/article_2717_63d42b1a8ddda7f430df609c3f9b0632.pdf
    22. Jitmaneeroj, B. (2017). Beyond the equal-weight framework of the Social Progress Index: Identifying causal relationships for policy reforms. International Journal of Social Economics, 44(12), 2336–2350. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSE-01-2016-0011
    23. Kalimeris, P., Bithas, K., Richardson, C., and Nijkamp, P. (2020). Hidden linkages between resources and economy: A “Beyond-GDP” approach using alternative welfare indicators. Ecological Economics, 169(November 2018), 106508. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.106508
    24. Katuva, J., Hope, R., Foster, T., Koehler, J., and Thomson, P. (2020). Modelling welfare transitions to prioritise sustainable development interventions in coastal Kenya. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(17). https://doi.org/10.3390/SU12176943
    25. Koch, M., Gullberg, A. T., Schoyen, M. A., and Hvinden, B. (2016). Sustainable welfare in the EU: Promoting synergies between climate and social policies. Critical Social Policy, 36(4), 704–715. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261018316654614
    26. Koronakos, G., Smirlis, Y., Sotiros, D., and Despotis, D. K. (2020). Assessment of OECD Better Life Index by incorporating public opinion. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 70(March). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seps.2019.03.005
    27. Kubiszewski, I. (2018). The genuine progress indicator: A measure of net economic welfare. Encyclopedia of Ecology, 327–335. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-409548-9.10609-8
    28. Kumlin, S., and Rothstein, B. (2005). Making and Breaking Social Capital: The Impact of Welfare-State Institutions. Comparative Political Studies, 38(4), 339–365. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0010414004273203
    29. Kusuma, K. A., and Ryandono, M. N. H. (2016). Zakah index : Islamic economics’ welfare measurement. Indonesian Journal of Islam and Muslim Societies, 6(2), 273–301. https://doi.org/10.18326/ijims.v6i2.273-301
    30. Liu, S. (2013). An empirical study on e-commerce’s effects on economic growth. Proceedings of the 2013 Conference on Education Technology and Management Science (ICETMS 2013), 81–84. https://doi.org/10.1109/nces.2012.6543371
    31. Mangaraj, B. K., and Aparajita, U. (2020). Constructing a generalized model of the human development index. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 70(100778). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seps.2019.100778
    32. McCleary, R. M., and Barro, R. J. (2006). Religion and economy. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 20(2), 49–72. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.20.2.49
    33. Menegaki, A. (2018). The basic, the solid, the site-specific and the full or total index of sustainable economic welfare (ISEW) for Turkey. Economies, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/economies6020024
    34. Menegaki, A. N., and Tsagarakis, K. P. (2015). More indebted than we know? Informing fiscal policy with an index of sustainable welfare for Greece. Ecological Indicators, 57, 159–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.04.037
    35. Menegaki, A. N., and Tugcu, C. T. (2016). Rethinking the energy-growth nexus: Proposing an index of sustainable economic welfare for Sub-Saharan Africa. Energy Research and Social Science, 17, 147–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2016.04.009
    36. Nath, S. (2007). Religion & Economic Growth and Development. In SSRN. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1029285
    37. Putra, R. A. A., and Arini, S. (2018). Indonesia Sustainable Welfare Index (ISWI) Measuring Sustainable Economic Welfare at Digital Era. The Sixth IMF Statistical Forum: Measuring Economic Welfare in the Digital Age: What and How?, Nov 19-20,2018 | Washington, D.C | IMF HQ2 Conference Halls, 1–39.
    38. Qu, L., and Chen, Y. (2014). The Impact of e-commerce on China ’ s Economic Growth. WHICEB 2014 Proceedings, June, 66–72.
    39. Rama, A., and Yusuf, B. (2019). Construction of Islamic human development index. Journal of King Abdulaziz University, Islamic Economics, 32(1), 43–64. https://doi.org/10.4197/Islec.32-1.3
    40. Rukiah, Nuruddin, A., and Siregar, S. (2019). Islamic human development index di indonesia (suatu pendekatan maqhasid syariah ). Istinbath, 18(2), 307–327.
    41. Salim, Z. (2014). Indonesia ’ S Ways To Sustainable Economic Growth and. In Handbook of Emerging Economies (Issue January 2014).
    42. Sánchez, M., Ochoa M, W. S., Toledo, E., and Ordóñez, J. (2020). The relevance of Index of Sustainable Economic Wellbeing. Case study of Ecuador. Environmental and Sustainability Indicators, 6(April), 100037. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indic.2020.100037
    43. Sayer, A. (2018). Welfare and Moral Economy. Ethics and Social Welfare, 12(1), 20–33. https://doi.org/10.1080/17496535.2017.1377273
    44. Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104(March), 333–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039
    45. Souter, D., Maclean, D., Akoh, B., and Creech, H. (2010). ICTs, the Internet and Sustainable Development: Towards a new paradigm. In International Institute for Sustainable Development.
    46. Stiglitz, J. E., Sen, A., and Fitoussi, J.-P. (2009). Report by the Commission on the Measurement of Economic Performance and Social Progress.
    47. Suhendar. (2014). Religiusitas dan Kesejahteraan pada Masyarakat Miskin. Jom Fisip, 1(2), 1–15.
    48. Suliswanto, M. S. W., Muhajirin, M., Yuli, S. B. C., and Abdullah, M. F. (2020). Analysing the Impact of Religiousity towards Human Welfare among Employee of University of Muhammadiyah Malang. Falah: Jurnal Ekonomi Syariah, 5(1), 33. https://doi.org/10.22219/jes.v5i1.11662
    49. Suliswanto, M. S. W., and Rofik, M. (2019). DIGITALIZATION OF MICRO, SMALL & MEDIUM ENTERPRISES (MSMEs) IN EAST JAVA, INDONESIA. Muhammadiyah International Journal of Economics and Business, 2(1), 34–43. https://doi.org/10.23917/mijeb.v2i1.9380
    50. Summers, J. K., Smith, L. M., Harwell, L. C., Case, J. L., Wade, C. M., Straub, K. R., and Smith, H. M. (2014). An index of human well-being for the U.S.: A TRIO approach. Sustainability (Switzerland), 6(6), 3915–3935. https://doi.org/10.3390/su6063915
    51. Thiry, G. (2015). Beyond GDP: Conceptual Grounds of Quantification. The Case of the Index of Economic Well-Being (IEWB). Social Indicators Research, 121(2), 313–343. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-014-0650-6
    52. Tofallis, C. (2020). Which formula for national happiness? Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 70(100688). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seps.2019.02.003
    53. Torraco, R. J. (2016). Writing Integrative Literature Reviews: Using the Past and Present to Explore the Future. Human Resource Development Review, 15(4), 404–428. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484316671606
    54. Tu, Q., Bulte, E., and Tan, S. (2011). Religiosity and economic performance: Micro-econometric evidence from Tibetan area. China Economic Review, 22(1), 55–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chieco.2010.09.008
    55. Wong, C. (2015). A framework for “City Prosperity Index”: Linking indicators, analysis and policy. Habitat International, 45, 3–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2014.06.018
    56. World Health Organization. (2015). Health in 2015: from MDGs, Millennium Development Goals to SDGs, Sustainable Development Goals. World Health Organization. https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/200009/9789241565110_eng.pdf

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2024 Multidisciplinary Reviews

How to cite

Suliswanto, M. S. W. (2024). A Proposed sustainable welfare measurement for Indonesia. Multidisciplinary Reviews, (| Accepted Articles). Retrieved from https://malque.pub/ojs/index.php/mr/article/view/2928
  • Article viewed - 18