• Abstract

    The present technology provides multifaceted aid in education through teaching and learning. Synchronous and asynchronous teaching-learning became popular with regular add-on updates with the required amendments, as f2f teaching has restrictions. One such advancement is extended reality (XR) technology in language learning, which has accelerated since the pandemic. Despite the increased use of technology in teaching and learning, few studies concerning sociocultural cognitive development (SCCD) are available. Therefore, this study is concerned with the possibility of Vygotsky’s sociocultural grounds in extended reality (XR) being used as an enriched resource in English language learning (ELL). On this occasion, the study reviews recent scholarly articles on XR tools in language learning to determine how the sociocultural components of XR contribute to potential learning in achieving its outcomes.

  • References

    1. Aldossari, S., & Alsuhaibani, Z. (2021). Using Augmented Reality in Language Classrooms: The Case of EFL Elementary Students. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 12(6), 1-8. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1339045.pdf
    2. Askell-Williams, H., et al., (2012). Scaffolding cognitive and metacognitive strategy instruction in regular class lessons. Instructional Science. 40(2), 413-443. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/14947237.pdf
    3. Asquith, S., & Frazier, E. (2022). Using augmented reality for collaborative multimodal storytelling. Intelligent CALL, granular systems, and learner data: short papers from EUROCALL 7-11. Research-publishing.net. https://doi.org/10.14705/rpnet.2022.61.1426
    4. Beder, P. (2012). Language learning via an android augmented reality system. School of Computing Blekinge Institute of Technology. https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:833398/FULLTEXT01.pdf
    5. Belda-Medina J., (2022). Using augmented reality (ar) as an authoring tool in EFL through mobile computer-supported collaborative learning. Teaching English with Technology. 22(2), 115-135, http://www.tewtjournal.org
    6. Belda-Medina, J.; Marrahi-Gomez, V. (2023). The Impact of Augmented Reality (AR) on Vocabulary Acquisition and Student Motivation. Electronics, 12, 749. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics12030749
    7. Ben Williamson, (2024). Digitalization of education in the era of algorithms, automation and artificial intelligence. UN-library. University of Edinburgh, UK.
    8. Bernard Marr, (2021), Extended reality in practice, Wiley publishers.
    9. Berti, M., Maranzana, S., & Monzingo, J. (2020). Fostering cultural understanding with virtual reality. International Journal of Computer-Assisted Language Learning and Teaching, 10(1), 47-59. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijcallt.2020010104
    10. Binhomran, K., & Altalhab, S. (2021). The impact of implementing augmented reality to enhance the vocabulary of young EFL learners. The JALT CALL Journal, 17(1), 23–44. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1313360.pdf
    11. Chen, H. I., & Sevilla-Pavón, A. (2023). Negotiation of meaning via virtual exchange in immersive virtual reality environments. Language Learning & Technology, 27(2), 118–154. https://hdl.handle.net/10125/73506
    12. Dengel, A., Iqbal, M. Z., Grafe, S., & Mangina, E. E. (2022). A review on augmented reality authoring toolkits for education. Frontiers Virtual Real, 3, 798032. https://doi.org/10.3389/frvir.2022.798032
    13. Fernyhough, C., & Fradley, E. (2005). Private speech on an executive task: Relations with task difficulty and task performance. Cognitive Development, 20(1), 103-120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2004.11.002
    14. Gu, X.; Yu, T.; Huang, J.; Wang, F.; Zheng, X.; Sun, M.; Ye, Z.; Li, Q. (2023). Virtual-Agent-Based Language Learning: A Scoping Review of Journal Publications from 2012 to 2022. Sustainability. 15, 13479. https://doi.org/10.3390/ su151813479
    15. Houser, M., How to Engage in a Coaching Kick-Off Meeting. Inspiring & encouraging instructional coaches with tips and resources. https://www.mshouser.com/
    16. Hu, L., Yuan, Y., Chen, Q., Kang, X., Zhu, Y. (2022). The practice and application of AR games to assist children’s English pronunciation teaching. Occupational Therapy International, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/3966740
    17. Jakub Flotynski, (2020). Knowledge-Based Explorable Extended Reality Environments, Springer Nature Switzerland AG. www.books.google.com.sa
    18. Jérémy Picot-Clémente (01 September 2023). XR unmasked- Exploring the complexities of design and simulation in extended reality. Photonics views. 20 (4). 30-33. https://doi-org.sdl.idm.oclc.org/10.1002/phvs.202300032
    19. Karacan C.G., and Akoğlu K., (2021). Educational Augmented Reality Technology for Language Learning and Teaching: A Comprehensive Review. Shanlax International Journal of Education. 9(2), 68-79. DOI: https://doi.org/10.34293/education.v9i2.3715
    20. Khoshnevisan, B. (2020). The effects of augmented Reality (AR)-infused idiom material on Iranian Students’ idiom achievements, motivation, and perceptions. The University of South Florida.
    21. Kim, J., Zhao, H., & Diskin-Holdaway, C. (2022). Willingness to communicate and second language fluency: Korean-speaking short-term sojourners in Australia. Languages, 7(2). https:// doi.org/10.3390/languages7020112
    22. Kluge, M. G., Maltby, S., Keynes, A., Nalivaiko, E., Evans, D. J. R., & Walker, F. R. (2022). Current State and General Perceptions of the Use of Extended Reality (XR) Technology at the University of Newcastle: Interviews and Surveys from Staff and Students. SAGE Open, 12(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440221093348
    23. Kluge, M.G., Maltby, S., Kuhne, C. et al. Comparing approaches for selection, development, and deployment of extended reality (XR) teaching applications: A case study at The University of Newcastle Australia. Educ Inf Technol 28, 4531–4562 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11364-2
    24. Koç, Ö., Altun, E., & Yüksel, H.G. (2022). Writing an expository text using augmented Reality: Students’ performance and perceptions. Education Information Technology, 27, 845-866. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021 10438-x
    25. Kramsch, C. (2004). Language, thought, and culture. In A. Davies & C. Elder (Eds.), The Handbook of Applied Linguistics (pp. 235 261). Blackwell Publishing Ltd. https:// doi.org/10.1002/9780470757000.ch9
    26. Kruiper, S., et al., (2022). Using scaffolding strategies to improve formative assessment practice in higher education. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. 47(3). 458-476. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2021.1927981
    27. Lai, J.-Y., & Chang, L.-T. (2021). Impacts of Augmented Reality Apps on First Graders’ Motivation and Performance in English Vocabulary Learning. SAGE Open, 11(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440211047549
    28. Marrahí-Gómez, V., & Belda-Medina, J. (2022). The Application of Augmented Reality (AR) to Language Learning and its Impact on Student Motivation. International Journal of Linguistics Studies, 2(2), 07–14. https://doi.org/10.32996/ijls.2022.2.2.2
    29. Matthews, B., See, Z. S., & Day, J. (2021). Crisis and extended realities: remote presence in the time of COVID-19. Media International Australia, 178(1), 198-209. https://doi.org/10.1177/1329878X20967165
    30. Mcleod. S. (Jan, 2024). Vygotsky’s Theory of Cognitive Development. Child Psychology, Psychology. Vygotsky’s Sociocultural Theory Of Cognitive Development (simplypsychology.org)
    31. Microsoft (2023). What is mixed reality? https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/mixed-reality/discover/mixed-reality as of 21/2/2024
    32. Mills, K. A., Scholes, L., & Brown, A. (2022). Virtual Reality and Embodiment in Multimodal Meaning Making. Written Communication, 39(3), 335-369. https://doi.org/10.1177/07410883221083517
    33. Mourtzis, D., Angelopoulos, J., & Panopoulos, N. (2022). Operator 5.0: A survey on enabling technologies and a framework for digital manufacturing based on extended reality. Journal of Machine Engineering, 22(1), 43–69. https://doi.org/10.36897/jme/147160.
    34. Mills, N., Courtney, M., Dede, C., Dressen, A., & Gant, R. (2020). Culture and vision in virtual reality narratives. Foreign Language Annals, 53(4), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12494
    35. Ness, I.J. (2020). Zone of Proximal Development. In: The Palgrave Encyclopedia of the Possible. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98390-5_60-1
    36. Norouzifard. A., et al., (2023). The Effects of Gender, Age, and Educational Level on Language Achievement in AR-integrated Language Learning. Research in English Language Pedagogy. 11(2). 169-191. DOI: 10.30486/RELP.2022.1957463.1376
    37. Pack, A., Barrett, A., Liang, H., & Monteiro, D. V. (2020). University EAP students’ perceptions of using a prototype virtual reality learning environment to learn writing structure. International Journal of Computer-Assisted Language Learning and Teaching (IJCALLT), 10(1), 27-46. http://doi.org/10.4018/IJCALLT.2020010103
    38. Panagiotis & Panagiotidis, (December 2022). Augmented and Mixed Reality in Language Learning. European Journal of Education. 4 (2). https://eric.ed.gov/?id=E11337455
    39. Parmaxi, A. (2020). Virtual reality in language learning: A systematic review and implications for research and practice. Interactive Learning Environments, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1 080/10494820.2020.1765392
    40. Pegrum, M. (2021). Augmented reality learning: education in real-world contexts. Innovative language pedagogy report. 115-120. Research-publishing.net.
    41. https://doi.org/10.14705/rpnet.2021.50.1245
    42. Peixoto, B., Pinto, R., Melo, M., Cabral, L., & Bessa, M. (2021). Immersive virtual reality for foreign language education: A PRISMA systematic review. IEEE Access, 9, 48952-48962. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2021.3068858
    43. Rahmat. Hawa., et al., (2020). Innovative Educational Practice for Impactful Teaching Strategies through Scaffolding Method. Asian Journal of University Education. 16(4), 53-60. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1288063
    44. Reinders, H., Lai, C., & Sundqvist, P. (Eds.). (2022). The Routledge handbook of language learning and teaching beyond the classroom. Routledge.
    45. Restall, G., Yao, Y., & Niu, X. (2023). Exploring the experience of Year 10 South Korean students’ English language learning in immersive virtual reality. TESOL in Context, 31(2). https://doi.org/10.21153/tesol2023vol31no2art1731
    46. sci-fi comedy series Red Dwarf, black mirror
    47. https://eragon.einfochips.com/blog/post/future-of-xr-technology-and-application/
    48. Shafer. N (2020). Augmented Reality in Education, Springer Nature, Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-42156-4_20387
    49. Taguchi, N. (2023). Using immersive virtual reality for the assessment of intercultural conflict mediation. Language Learning & Technology, 27(3), 108–128. https://hdl.handle.net/10125/73534
    50. Tai, T.-Y. (2022). Impact of mobile virtual reality on EFL learners’ listening comprehension. Language Learning & Technology, 26(1), 1–23. https://hdl.handle.net/10125/73491
    51. Tzuriel, D. (2021). The Sociocultural Theory of Vygotsky. In: Mediated Learning and Cognitive Modifiability. Social Interaction in Learning and Development. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-75692-5_3
    52. Wang, T., Zhang, X., & Wang-Bramlett, D. (2022). Engage students in Chinese language learning: Insights from teacher and student perspectives in a Chinese language study abroad program. International Journal of Chinese Education, 11(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/2212585x221117579
    53. Wang, X., Young, G.W., Iqbal, M.Z. et al. (2023). The potential of extended reality in rural education’s future – perspectives from rural educators. Educ Inf Technol https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12169-7
    54. Wu H.K., et al., (2013). Current status, opportunities and challenges of augmented reality in education. Computer Education. 62. 41–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.10.024
    55. Wen, Y., Li, J., Xu, H., & Hu, H. (2023). Restructuring multimodal corrective feedback through Augmented Reality (AR)-enabled videoconferencing in L2 pronunciation teaching. Language Learning & Technology, 27(3), 83–107. https://hdl.handle.net/10125/73533
    56. Westin T. et al., (2022). Inclusive AR-games for Education of Deaf Children: Challenges and Opportunities. Proceedings of the 16th European conference on game-based learning. ProQuest. https://www.proquest.com/openview/010824e94a3e49449f73ced6507ec6bc/1.pdf?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=396495
    57. Yangın Ersanlı, C. (2023). The effect of using augmented reality with storytelling on young learners’ vocabulary learning and retention. Novitas-ROYAL (Research on Youth and Language), 17(1), 62–72. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1389077.pdf
    58. Yeh, H.-C. & Tseng, S.-S., (2020). Enhancing multimodal literacy using augmented reality. Language Learning & Technology, 24 (1), 27–37. https://doi.org/10125/44706
    59. Yengui, M. H., & Stechert, C. (2021). On the activation of students through augmented reality experiences. Proceedings of the Design Society, 1, 2307-2316. DOI: 10.1017/pds.2021.492
    60. Young, G. W., O’Dwyer, N. C., & Smolic, A. (2023). A Case Study on Student Experiences of Social VR in a Remote STEM Classroom Extended Abstracts of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Hamburg, Germany. https://doi.org/10.1145/3544549.3573852.
    61. Yuying. Z, Lihuan. W, (2023). Extended reality in language learning: A cognitive-affective model of immersive learning perspective. Frontiers in Psychology. 14. DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1109025.
    62. https://www.rosettastone.com/
    63. https://www.mondly.com/

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2024 Multidisciplinary Reviews

How to cite

Cheeli, B. (2024). The Sociocultural cognitive development (SCCD) of language learning in an extended reality environment. Multidisciplinary Reviews, (| Accepted Articles). Retrieved from https://malque.pub/ojs/index.php/mr/article/view/2871
  • Article viewed - 29