• Abstract

    This study attempts to systematically review the incorporation of Web 2.0 tools into the English Language Learning (ELL) context. It explores the impacts, methodological decisions, and focus areas that distinguish this developing subject through a comprehensive review of research papers spanning many dimensions. From the Eric database, papers on Web 2.0 use in English language education that were published between 2018 and 2022 were chosen. In this context, sixty-two pieces reviewed a rigorous evaluation based on a set of standards. The research results reveal a wide range of benefits connected to technological integration, including improved motivation and teamwork. The results of the systematic analysis highlight the need for a flexible and nuanced approach to technology integration in ELL and offer insightful recommendations for practitioners, academics, and learners.

  • References

    1. Ajjan, H., & Hartshorne, R. (2008). Investigating faculty decisions to adopt Web 2.0 technologies: Theory and empirical tests. The Internet and Higher Education, 11(2), 71–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2008.05.002
    2. Alghammas, A. (2020). Advancing Grammatical Accuracy of EFL Students in Web-Based Writing. TESOL International Journal, 15(3), 83-110.
    3. Alharbi, A. S. (2020). Wikis in language learning: merits and limitations. Journal of English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics, 2(4), 79-88.
    4. Al-Johali, K. Y. E. (2019). Teaching Vocabulary through Wiki to First Secondary Graders. English Language Teaching, 12(5), 42-53.
    5. Alsmari, N. A. (2019). Fostering EFL Students’ Paragraph Writing Using Edmodo. English Language Teaching, 12(10), 44. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v12n10p44
    6. Arabaci, I. B., & Akilli, C. (2021). English Teachers' Views on the Use of Web 2.0 Tools in Educational Environments. Asian Journal of Education and Training, 7(2), 115-125.
    7. Aşıksoy, G. (2018). ELT students’ attitudes and awareness towards the use of Web 2.0 technologies for language learning. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 14(2), 240–251.
    8. Ataeifar, F., Sadighi, F., Bagheri, M. S., & Behjat, F. (2019). Iranian female students’ perceptions of the impact of mobile-assisted instruction on their English speaking skill. Cogent Education, 6(1), 1662594.
    9. Awada, G., & Diab, H. B. (2018). The Effect of Google Earth and Wiki Models on Oral Presentation Skills of University EFL Learners. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 30(1), 36-46.
    10. Bakla, A. (2020). Extensive reading and web 2.0 tools in tandem: A mixed-methods study. Education and Information Technologies, 25(4), 3131–3160.
    11. Ballıdağ, S., & Dikilitaş, K. (2021). Preparatory school teachers’ self-directed online professional development. Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research, 9(3), 25-38.
    12. Barbara N., & Linda B., (2013). Changing academic teaching with Web 2.0 technologies. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 51(3), 315-325.
    13. Barrot, J. S. (2021). Effects of Facebook-based e-portfolio on ESL learners’ writing performance. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 34(1), 95-111.
    14. Bataineh, R. F., Migdadi, A. S., & Al-Alawneh, M. K. (2020). Does Web 2.0-Supported Project-Based Instruction Improve Jordanian Efl Learners'speaking Performance?. Teaching English with Technology, 20(3), 25-39.
    15. Bayar, A., & Karaduman, H. A. (2021). Views of High School Students on The Effectiveness of “English” Course by Means of a Distance Education. Shanlax International Journal of Education, 9(4), 359–373.
    16. Baytekin, M. E., & Su-Bergil, A. (2021). The Role of Web2.0 and Social Media Tools in Foreign Language Learning. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET, 20(2), 104-115.
    17. Bener, E., & Yıldız, S. (2019). The Use of Blog Activities to Promote Reflection in an ELT Practicum. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 44(8), 38–56.
    18. Bower, M., Hedberg, J. G., & Kuswara, A. (2010). A framework for Web 2.0 learning design. Educational Media International, 47(3), 177-198.
    19. Brodahl, C., Hadjerrouit, S., & Hansen, N. K. (2011). Collaborative Writing with Web 2.0 Technologies: Education Students’ Perceptions. JITE:IIP, (10), 073-103. https://doi.org/10.28945/1384
    20. Cascante, L. P., Salinas, J., & Marín, V. (2016). Use of an Institutional Personal Learning Environment to support learning actions in Higher Education. AtoZ: novas práticas em informação e conhecimento, 5(1), 53-63.
    21. Chagas, L., & Pedro, N. (2021). Faculty and Student Perceptions of the Use of Web 2.0 Tools to Develop Communication Skills in English. The EuroCALL Review, 29(2), 2-10.
    22. Chiablaem, P. (2021). Enhancing English Communication Skills of Thai University Students through Google Apps for Education (GAFE) in a Digital Era during COVID-19 Pandemic. Shanlax International Journal of Education, 9(3), 91-98.
    23. Cochrane, T. D. (2014). Critical success factors for transforming pedagogy with mobile Web 2.0. British Journal of Educational Technology, 45(1), 65-82.
    24. Dania, R., & Adha, A. D. (2021). Students’ Strategies in Reading Online Authentic Materials: Eighth International Conference on English Language and Teaching (ICOELT-8 2020), Padang, Indonesia. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.210914.028
    25. Ebadi, S. (2021). The effects of online learner-driven feedback on IELTS writing skills via Google Docs. Teaching English with Technology, 21(3), 42-66.
    26. Elverici, S. E. (2021). Mobile Technologies For Education: Attitudes To Social Media. European Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 5(3). https://doi.org/10.46827/ejfl.v5i3.3519
    27. Faizi, R. (2018). Teachers’ perceptions towards using Web 2.0 in language learning and teaching. Education and Information Technologies, 23(3), 1219–1230. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-017-9661-7
    28. Flynn, S. (2021). Education, Digital Natives, and Inequality. Irish Journal of Sociology, 2(29), 248–253. https://doi.org/10.1177/07916035211004815
    29. Gedik Bal, N., & Savas, P. (2021). Enhancing Authenticity in College Level English Classrooms via Instructional Technology. The Electronic Journal for English as a Second Language, 25(3).
    30. Genç, G., & Köksal, D. (2021). Foreign Language Learning Effort and Use of Digital Media among Digital Natives: A Case Study from an Urban Secondary School. Novitas-ROYAL (Research on Youth and Language), 15(1), 17–37.
    31. Güler, S., & Özkan, Y. (2018). Podcast Applications in Pre-service Language Teacher Education from a Constructivist Perspective. World Journal on Educational Technology: Current Issues, 10(3), 131–141.
    32. Hafour, M. F., & Al-Rashidy, A. S. M. (2020). Storyboarding-Based Collaborative Narratives on Google Docs: Fostering EFL Learners' Writing Fluency, Syntactic Complexity, and Overall Performance. Jalt Call Journal, 16(3), 123-145.
    33. Hsu, H. C. (2019). Wiki-mediated collaboration and its association with L2 writing development: An exploratory study. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 32(8), 945-967.
    34. Jarrah, M. A., & Alzubi, A. A. F. (2021). Arab Postgraduates' Readiness Towards and Effectiveness of Utilizing Web 2.0 in Language Learning. International Journal of Instruction, 14(1), 673–690. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2021.14141a
    35. Jin, T., Su, Y., & Lei, J. (2020). Exploring the blended learning design for argumentative writing. Language Learning & Technology, 24(2), 23–34.
    36. Jong, B., & Tan, K. H. (2021). Using Padlet as a Technological Tool for Assessment of Students' Writing Skills in Online Classroom Settings. International Journal of Education and Practice, 9(2), 411-423.
    37. Kaniadewi, N. (2022). Students' Perceptions in The Utilization of Zoom Video Conferencing on Speaking Ability in Distance Learning. Journal of English Language Teaching and Linguistics, 7(3), 453-465.
    38. Karakaş, A., & Kartal, G. (2020). Pre-Service Language Teachers’ Autonomous Language Learning with Web 2.0 Tools and Mobile Applications. International Journal of Curriculum and Instruction, 12(1), 51–79.
    39. Kimav, A. U., & Aydın, B. (2020). A Blueprint for In-Service Teacher Training Program in Technology Integration. Journal of Educational Technology and Online Learning. 3(3), 224-244.
    40. Koumachi, B. (2019). The Digital Turn in Higher Education: A Try to Demystify the Myth of the "Digital Natives." IJREE, 4(1), 69–79. https://doi.org/10.29252/ijree.4.1.69
    41. Kung, F. W. (2018). Assessing an innovative advanced academic writing course through blog-assisted language learning: Issues and resolutions. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 55(3), 348–356. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2015.1108213
    42. Liu, P. L., Ginting, A. M. G., Chen, C. J., & Yeh, H. C. (2022). Students’ Performance and Perceptions of Wiki-based Collaborative Writing for Learners of English as a Foreign Language. SAGE Open, 12(4), 21582440221144953.
    43. Malinee, V. V., & Senthamarai, T. (2020). The use of Web 2.0 tools in English for a specific purpose: a blended learning approach in English language teaching. Article in Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University, 16(8), 703–716. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/344156761
    44. Mbatha, B. (2014). Global transition in higher education: From the traditional model of learning to a new socially mediated model. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 15(3). https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v15i3.1823
    45. Najjemba, J. L., & Cronjé, J. (2020). Engagement with and participation in online role play collaborative arguments: A sociocultural perspective. Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 18(5), pp436-448.
    46. Najmi, A. H. (2020). The Effectiveness of Flipped Classroom Approach on Students’ Achievement in English Language in Saudi Arabian Southern Border Schools. International Education Studies, 13(9), 66.
    47. Nayman, H., & Bavlı, B. (2022). Online teaching of productive language skills (PLS) during emergency remote teaching (ERT) in EFL classrooms: a phenomenological inquiry. International Journal of Education and Literacy Studies, 10(1), 179-187.
    48. Nikiforou, E. (2019). Facilitating the development of collaborative online dictionaries in the ESP field. In S. Papadima-Sophocleous, E. Kakoulli Constantinou, & C. N. Giannikas, ESP teaching and teacher education: Current theories and practices (1st ed., pp. 131–146). Research-publishing.net. https://doi.org/10.14705/rpnet.2019.33.930
    49. OpenAI. (2023). ChatGPT (September 25 Version) [Large language model]. https://chat.openai.com
    50. Özgür Küfi, E. (2022). A retrospective evaluation of pre-pandemic online teacher learning experiences. SAGE Open, 12(1), 21582440221079907.
    51. Peeters, W., & Pretorius, M. (2020). Facebook or fail-book: Exploring “community” in a virtual community of practice. ReCALL, 32(3), 291–306.
    52. Plunkett, K. N. (2019). A Simple and Practical Method for Incorporating Augmented Reality into the Classroom and Laboratory. Journal of Chemical Education, 96(11), 2628–2631. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.9b00607
    53. Pop, A., Tomuletiu, E. A., & David, D. (2011). EFL speaking communication with asynchronous voice tools for adult students. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15, 1199-1203.
    54. Puzanov, V., Volynets, G., Lesiuk, O., Kharamurza, D., Vashyst, K., & Sadivnycha, M. (2022). Social Media as a Development Tool English Communicative Competence. Journal of Curriculum and Teaching, 11(1), 101. https://doi.org/10.5430/jct.v11n1p101
    55. Rosen, D., & Nelson, C. (2008). Web 2.0: A new generation of learners and education. Computers in the Schools, 25(3–4), 211–225.
    56. Sari, M. I. (2019). The Use of Web 2.0 Tools for Learning in EFL Context Pre-service Teachers’ Voice.pdf. Journal of Foreign Language Teaching & Learning, 4(2), 135–149. https://doi.org/8196/ftl.4243
    57. Seifert, T., & Har-Paz, C. (2020). The effects of mobile learning in an EFL class on self-regulated learning and school achievement. International Journal of Mobile and Blended Learning (IJMBL), 12(3), 49-65.
    58. Shen, J. (2018). Flipping the classroom for information literacy instruction. Journal of Information Literacy, 12(1), 48. https://doi.org/10.11645/12.1.2274
    59. Sim, M. S., & Rahmat, N. H. (2022). Online Group Interactions in Online Classrooms: Does Experience Matter? International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 12(8), Pages 323-339. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v12-i8/13185
    60. Stefancik, R., & Stradiotová, E. (2020). Using Web 2.0 tool podcast in teaching foreign languages. Advanced Education, 14, 46-55.
    61. Such, B. (2021). Scaffolding English language learners for online collaborative writing activities. Interactive Learning Environments, 29(3), 473-481.
    62. Sun, Y. C., & Yang, F. Y. (2015). I help, therefore, I learn: service learning on Web 2.0 in an EFL speaking class. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 28(3), 202-219.
    63. Sundrarajun, C. (2020). Voices from EFL Thai Learners towards English Writing. Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences, 15(6), 1495-1507.
    64. Tredinnick, L. (2006). Web 2.0 and Business: A pointer to the intranets of the future?. Business information review, 23(4), 228-234.
    65. Wang, S., & Vásquez, C. (2012). Web 2.0 and second language learning: What does the research tell us?. CALICO journal, 29(3), 412-430.
    66. Yeh, S. F. (2021). Collaborative Writing on Google Docs: Taiwanese Students’ Participation, Behaviors, and Writing Trajectories with Real-work Online Tasks. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 12(3), 73–81. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.alls.v.12n.3.p.73
    67. Yousefifard, S., & Fathi, J. (2021). Exploring the Impact of Blogging in English Classrooms: Focus on the Ideal Writing Self of EFL Learners. International Journal of Instruction, 14(4), 913-932.
    68. Yüksel, İ., & Eren, E. (2016). Elt Pre-service Teachers’ Perceptions and Opinions on How to Integrate ICT in Language Classes. Anatolian Journal of Education, 1(1).
    69. Warschauer, M., Yim, S., Lee, H., & Zheng, B. (2019). Recent contributions of data mining to language learning research. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 39, 93-1

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2024 Malque Publishing

How to cite

Genç, G., & Kırmızıbayrak, Özge. (2024). The use of Web 2.0 tools in English language learning: A systematic review. Multidisciplinary Reviews, 7(5), 2024102. https://doi.org/10.31893/multirev.2024102
  • Article viewed - 345
  • PDF downloaded - 188