Keywords:
analysis
assessment
enterprises of critical infrastructure
public significance enterprises
social importance

  • Abstract

    The relevance of this study is due to the increasing complexity and interdependence of enterprises in terms of critical infrastructure and social importance, which play pivotal roles in ensuring societal well-being, economic stability, and environmental sustainability. As technology evolves and new threats emerge, the need for a comprehensive, regularly updated evaluation becomes imperative. This article aims to identify and disclose the key aspects of a systematic comparative assessment of enterprises in terms of critical infrastructure and social importance. The leading approach to the study employs a combination of general scientific and specialized methods, drawing on modern economic theory and concepts from renowned scholars. This article examines the main aspects of conducting a comparative assessment of the activities of enterprises of critical infrastructure and social importance. The main characteristics of enterprises with critical infrastructure and social importance, which are important in the system of comparative assessment, are determined. General aspects that can be taken into account when evaluating these enterprises are reflected. The stages of comparative assessment of the activities of enterprises of critical infrastructure and public importance are presented, and the challenges and advantages of conducting a comparative assessment of these enterprises are also defined. The materials presented in the article hold practical value for policymakers, businesses, and academics, as they offer insights into improving the efficiency, sustainability, and impact of critical infrastructure and socially important enterprises.

  • References

    1. Bernier, L. (2014). Public enterprises as policy instruments: the importance of public entrepreneurship. Journal of Economic Policy Reform, 17(3), 253-266. https://doi.org/10.1080/17487870.2014.909312
    2. Bernier, L., & Reeves, E. (2018). The continuing importance of state-owned enterprise in the twenty-first century: challenges for public policy. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 89(3), 453-457. https://doi.org/10.1111/apce.12213
    3. Cadete, G., & da Silva, M. (2018). Using an enterprise architecture model for assessing the resilience of critical infrastructure. 28th Annual International European Safety and Reliability Conference (ESREL), https://doi.org/1459-1466. 10.1201/9781351174664-185
    4. Fayvishenko, D., & Sidielnikov, D. (2023). Media transformation of socially responsible projects. Scientia·Fructuosa, 148(2), 48-58. https://doi.org/10.31617/1.2023(148)05
    5. Funko, I. S., Vlačić, B., & Dabić, M. (2023). Corporate entrepreneurship in public sector: A systematic literature review and research agenda. Journal of Innovation and Knowledge, 8(21), 100343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2023.100343
    6. Gerasymenko, A., & Mazaraki, N. (2023). The “New Normal” in competition—filling the gaps of Ukrainian competition law in the digital economy age. In: Richter, H. (Ed.) Competition and Intellectual Property Law in Ukraine. MPI Studies on Intellectual Property and Competition Law, 31, 147-171. Berlin: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-66101-7_7
    7. Guedhami, O., & Pittman, J. (2011). The choice between private and public capital markets: The importance of disclosure standards and auditor discipline to countries divesting state-owned enterprises. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 30(5), 395-430. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2011.06.004
    8. Jhangiani, T., & Kennis, G. (2021). Protecting the critical of critical: what is systemically important critical infrastructure? Retrieved from https://www.lawfaremedia.org/article/protecting-critical-critical-what-systemically-important-critical-infrastructure
    9. Kalyuzhna, Н. (2023). Methods of forecasting the evolution of the security environment. Foreign·Trade:·Economics,·Finance,·Law, 126(1), 13-30. https://doi.org/10.31617/3.2023(126)02
    10. Katkov, Yu. I., Sierykh, S. O., Shashlov, A. V., & Verhun, D. S. (2019). Cyber-based video surveillance systems to ensure the safety of critical infrastructure facilities. Scientific Notes of the Ukrainian Scientific and Research Institute of Communications, 3, 63-73. https://doi.org/10.31673/2518-7678.2019.0306373
    11. Korneyev, M., Berezhniuk, I., Dzhyndzhoian, V., Kubakh, T., & Horb, K. (2022a). Business marketing activities in Ukraine during wartime. Innovative Marketing, 18(3), 48-58. https://doi.org/10.21511/im.18(3).2022.05
    12. Korneyev, M., Berezhniuk, I., Dzhyndzhoian, V., Nebaba, N., & Voyto, S. (2022b). Efficiency assessment of banking systems’ performance. Banks and Bank Systems, 17(3), 72-88. 1 https://doi.org/0.21511/bbs.17(3).2022.07
    13. Kucheryavenko, M. (2021). The nature of the tax as a construction of counter-negotiation of obligations (on the example of critical infrastructure enterprises). Law of Ukraine, 4, 167-181. https://doi.org/10.33498/louu-2021-04-167
    14. Kyrychenko, O., Nehodchenko, V., Davydiuk, V., Kuzyk, V., & Mishchanynets O. (2022). Ways of reforming the criminal and criminal procedural legislation of Ukraine in the context of European integration. CuestionesPolíticas, 40(75), 114-123. https://doi.org/10.46398/cuestpol.4075.07
    15. Lockhorst, R., & Maydanov, M. (2023). Critical infrastructure, national security and business continuity. https://www.aspistrategist.org.au/critical-infrastructure-national-security-and-business-continuity/
    16. Makohon, V. (2023). State wartime budget: 2022. Scientia·Fructuosa, 148(2), 59-66. https://doi.org/10.31617/1.2023(148)06
    17. Maksymenko, S.D., & Derkach, L.M. (2023). Understanding modern cognitive war in the global dimension, its genesis in the Ukrainian context: a review and directions for future research Cognitive warfare and social impact operations. Obrana a Strategie, 126-148. https://doi.org/10.3849/1802-7199.23.2023.01.126-148
    18. Mazaraki, А., & Volosovych, С. (2023). Donation-based crowdfunding under conditions of counteracting armed aggression. Scientia·Fructuosa, 147(1), 4-16. https://doi.org/10.31617/1.2023(147)01
    19. Montenegro, R. (2018). Importance of the code of ethics in public enterprises. Revista Publicando, 5(14), 27-39.
    20. Myachin, V., & Yudina, O. (2021). Fuzzy-logical approach to constructing an integral indicator in a level estimation model significant market advantage. Baltic Journal of Economic Studies, 7(2), https://doi.org/139-145. 10.30525/2256-0742/2021-7-2-139-145
    21. Nazarova, K., Nezhyva, M., Lositska, T., Miniailo, V., & Novikova, N. (2021). Forensic-audit as an imperative of economic security and development of the company in the conditions of global transformations. Financial and Credit Activity Problems of Theory and Practice, 4(35), 99–106. https://doi.org/10.18371/fcaptp.v4i35.221808
    22. Nezhyva, M., &Mysiuk, V. (2022). Sustainable development goals: a business opportunity. Journal of Environmental Science and Sustainable Development, 5(1), 48-68. https://doi.org/10.7454/jessd.v5i1.1125
    23. Olendiy, O., Nazarova, K., Nezhyva, M., Mysiuk, V., Mishchenko, V., & Rusyn-Hrynyk, Р. (2023). Tax audit to ensure business prosperity: trends and perspectives. Financial and Credit Activity Problems of Theory and Practice, 4(51), 80-90. https://doi.org/10.55643/fcaptp.4.51.2023.4069
    24. Reed, J. (2023). Securing critical infrastructure with the carrot and stick. Retrieved from https://securityintelligence.com/news/securing-critical-infrastructure-with-the-carrot-and-stick/
    25. Strelcová, S., Rehak, D., & Johnson, D. (2015). Influence of critical infrastructure on enterprise economic security. Communications – Scientific Letters of the University of Zilina, 17(1), 105-110. https://doi.org/10.26552/com.C.2015.1.105-110
    26. Stupp, C. (2023). Critical infrastructure companies warned to watch for ongoing cyberattack. Retrieved from https://www.wsj.com/articles/critical-infrastructure-companies-warned-to-watch-for-ongoing-cyberattack-76508d83
    27. Sukhonos, V. V. (2020). Administrative and legal principles of the financial system of Ukraine. Legal Horizons, 20(33), 95-101. http://www.doi.org/10.21272/legalhorizons.2020.i20.p95
    28. Sumets, A., Kniaz, S., Heorhiadi, N., Skrynkovskyy, R., & Matsuk, V. (2022). Methodological toolkit for assessing the level of stability of agricultural enterprises. Agricultural and Resource Economics, 8(1), 235-255. https://doi.org/10.51599/are.2022.08.01.12
    29. Trusova, N., & Hryvkivska, O. (2021). The development of integrated business structures of Ukraine on innovative and investment basis. VUZF Review, 6(1), 87-97. https://doi.org/10.38188/2534-9228.21.6.09
    30. Vitomir, J., Tomas-Miskin, S., & Popovic, S. (2023). The importance of the application of controlling in the management of public enterprises whose founders are local self-government units: the example of Republic of Serbia. LEX Localis-Journal of Local Self-Government, 21(3), 545-565. https://doi.org/10.4335/21.3.545-565(2023)
    31. Vodiannikov, O. (2020). Concept of interest in constitutional law: à propos defining social interest and particular social significance in constitutional complaint proceedings. Ukrainian Journal of Constitutional Law, 4, 9-46. https://doi.org/doi.org/10.30970/jcl.4.2020.1
    32. Zamrii, I.V., Sobchuk, V.V., & Barabash, A.O. (2022). Identification of input elements of information space and restoration of their parameters in the single information space of manufacturing enterprise with critical infrastructure. Collection of Scientific Works of the Military Institute of Taras Shevchenko Kyiv National University, 75, 78-87.
    33. Zhadan, Y., Bondarchuk, O., Hladii, O., Minka, T., & Alforova, T. (2023). The right to an enabling environment in the system of public interests of the territorial community within the implementation of the sustainable development goals. Cuestiones Políticas, 41(76), 162-171. https://doi.org/10.46398/cuestpol.4176.08
    34. Zubko, T., & Danchenko, L. (2023). European integration: challenges for foreign trade. Foreign·Trade:·Economics,·Finance,·Law, 128(3), 4-13. https://doi.org/10.31617/3.2023(128)01
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2024 Malque Publishing

How to cite

Nazarova, K., Hordopolov, V., Lositska, T., Nezhyva, M., & Mysiuk, V. (2024). Comparative analysis of critical infrastructure and public significance enterprises. Multidisciplinary Reviews, 7(6), 2024108. https://doi.org/10.31893/multirev.2024108
  • Article viewed - 161
  • PDF downloaded - 62