• Abstract

    This review focused on learning space design guidelines and users’ well-being. Design guidelines can provide valuable assistance and direction to both designers and users in creating and using effective spaces. Nevertheless, learning spaces frequently overlook real user needs, which results in conflicts and contradictions between the space provided and users’ requirements. Furthermore, given the evolution of learning content and 21st century experiences and technological integration in learning environments, specific learning space guideline aspects might unintentionally limit learning. The narrative literature review method was used to identify existing issues in current design space guidelines. Areas for improvement and suggestions were presented to improve guideline alignment with users’ needs, which would ultimately enhance their well-being and learning outcomes.

  • References

    1. ACOT2. (2008). Apple Classrooms of Tomorrow—Today https://www.apple.com/ca/education/docs/Apple-ACOT2Whitepaper.pdf
    2. Ahmad, C. N. C., Shaharim, S. A., & Abdullah, M. F. N. L. (2017). Teacher-student interactions, learning commitment, learning environment and their relationship with student learning comfort. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 14(1), 57-72.
    3. Attai, S. L., Reyes, J. C., Davis, J. L., York, J., Ranney, K., & Hyde, T. W. (2020). Investigating the impact of flexible furniture in the elementary classroom. Learning Environments Research, 1-15 %@ 1573-1855. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-020-09322-1
    4. Barrett, P., Davies, F., Zhang, Y., & Barrett, L. (2015). The impact of classroom design on pupils' learning: Final results of a holistic, multi-level analysis. Building and Environment, 89, 118-133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2015.02.013
    5. Binlin, Z. (2019). The PISA test, What do we need to focus on? http://www.moe.gov.cn/jyb_xwfb/moe_2082/zl_2019n/2019_zl94/201912/t20191204_410708.html
    6. Brown, M. B., & Lippincott, J. K. (2003). Learning spaces: More than meets the eye. EDUCAUSE quarterly, 26(1), 14-17.
    7. Bucholz Ed D, J. L., & Sheffler, J. L. (2009). Creating a warm and inclusive classroom environment: Planning for all children to feel welcome. Electronic Journal for Inclusive Education, 2(4), 4.
    8. Carvalho, L., & Yeoman, P. (2018). Framing learning entanglement in innovative learning spaces: Connecting theory, design and practice. British Educational Research Journal, 44(6), 1120-1137.
    9. Charteris, J., Smardon, D., & Nelson, E. (2017). Innovative learning environments and new materialism: A conjunctural analysis of pedagogic spaces. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 49(8), 808-821. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2017.1298035
    10. Che Ahmad, C. N., Osman, K., & Halim, L. (2014). The establishment of physical aspects of science laboratory environment inventory (PSLEI). Journal of Turkish Science Education, 11, 123-136. https://doi.org/10.12973/tused.10112a
    11. Che Ahmad, C. N., Shaharim, S. A., & Abdullah, M. F. N. L. (2017). Teacher-Student Interactions, Learning Commitment, Learning Environment and Their Relationship with Student Learning Comfort. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 14(1), 57-72. https://doi.org/10.12973/tused.10190a
    12. Cleveland, B. (2009). Engaging spaces: An investigation into middle school educational opportunities provided by innovative built environments. A new approach to understanding the relationship between learning and space [Article]. International Journal of Learning, 16(5), 385-398. https://doi.org/10.18848/1447-9494/cgp/v16i05/46321
    13. Cleveland, B., Soccio, P., & Love, P. (2016). Learning Environment Evaluation and the Development of School Facility Design Guidelines. Australian Association for Research in Education.
    14. Cleveland, B. S., P. (2015). Evaluating the pedagogical effectiveness of learning spaces. http://hdl.handle.net/11343/191728
    15. Craig-Hare, J., Ault, M., & Niileksela, C. (2009). Technology Rich Classrooms: Effect of the Kansas Model.
    16. Dovey, K., & Fisher, K. (2014). Designing for adaptation: the school as socio-spatial assemblage. The Journal of Architecture, 19(1), 43-63. https://doi.org/10.1080/13602365.2014.882376
    17. Earthman, G. (2004). Prioritization of 31 criteria for school building adequacy.
    18. French, R., Imms, W., & Mahat, M. (2020). Case studies on the transition from traditional classrooms to innovative learning environments: Emerging strategies for success. Improving Schools, 23(2), 175-189.
    19. Galičič, A., Rožanec, J., Kukec, A., Carli, T., Medved, S., & Eržen, I. (2023). Identification of Indoor Air Quality Factors in Slovenian Schools: National Cross-Sectional Study. Processes, 11(3), 841. https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9717/11/3/841
    20. Gifford, R. (2007). Environmental psychology: Principles and practice.
    21. Grannäs, J., & Stavem, S. M. (2021). Transitions through remodelling teaching and learning environments. Education Inquiry, 12(3), 266-281. https://doi.org/10.1080/20004508.2020.1856564
    22. Habermas, J. (2015). Knowledge and human interests. John Wiley & Sons.
    23. Higgs, J., Crisp, G., & Letts, W. (2019). Education for Employability (Volume 1): The Employability Agenda. Brill. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004400832
    24. Hui, J. (2019). Successful exploration of primary and secondary school design and the contradiction between the current norms. . Building materials and decoration. https://doi.org/CNKI:SUN:JCYS.0.2019-30-080
    25. Jian, C. (2019). First in three categories! The latest PISA results are released. http://www.moe.gov.cn/jyb_xwfb/s5147/201912/t20191205_410921.html
    26. JISC. (2009). Designing spaces for effective learning: A guide to 21st century learning space design https://www.d41.org/cms/lib/IL01904672/Centricity/Domain/422/learningspaces.pdf
    27. Junfeng, Y., Ronghuai, H., & Bin, L. (2013). Review of study space research abroad. China audio-visual Education(06), 15-20.
    28. Kidger, J., Araya, R., Donovan, J., & Gunnell, D. (2012). The effect of the school environment on the emotional health of adolescents: A systematic review [Review]. Pediatrics, 129(5), 925-949. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2011-2248
    29. Korsavi, S. S., Montazami, A., & Mumovic, D. (2020). Indoor air quality (IAQ) in naturally-ventilated primary schools in the UK: Occupant-related factors. Building and Environment, 180, 106992. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2020.106992
    30. Lab, F. C. (2017). Guidelines on Exploring and Adapting LEARNING SPACES IN SCHOOLS https://files.eun.org/fcl/Learning_spaces_guidelines_Final.pdf
    31. Leijon, M., Nordmo, I., Tieva, Å., & Troelsen, R. (2022). Formal learning spaces in Higher Education – a systematic review. Teaching in Higher Education, 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2022.2066469
    32. Llinares, C., Higuera-Trujillo, J. L., & Serra, J. (2021). Cold and warm coloured classrooms. Effects on students’ attention and memory measured through psychological and neurophysiological responses. Building and Environment, 196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2021.107726
    33. Manca, S., Cerina, V., Tobia, V., Sacchi, S., & Fornara, F. (2020). The effect of school design on users' responses: A systematic review (2008-2017) [Review]. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(8), Article 3453. https://doi.org/10.3390/SU12083453
    34. Meng, X., Zhang, M., & Wang, M. (2023). Effects of school indoor visual environment on children's health outcomes: A systematic review. Health & Place, 83, 103021. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2023.103021
    35. SDG4, (2023).
    36. Neill, S. R. (1982). Preschool design and child behaviour. J Child Psychol Psychiatry, 23(3), 309-318. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.1982.tb00075.x
    37. Oblinger, D. (2006). Learning spaces (Vol. 444). Educause Washington, DC.
    38. OECD. (2023). What is PISA? https://www.oecd.org/pisa/
    39. Pautasso, M. (2019). The Structure and Conduct of a Narrative Literature Review. In A Guide to the Scientific Career (pp. 299-310). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118907283.ch31
    40. Sciences, N. I. E., & NIES, F. S. L. (2016). White Paper on Future schools in China https://wenku.baidu.com/view/135ff5f180c758f5f61fb7360b4c2e3f572725f7?aggId=66db52afd3d233d4b14e852458fb770bf78a3b27&fr=catalogMain_text_ernie_recall_backup_new%3Awk_recommend_main1&_wkts_=1702546486334&bdQuery
    41. Sigurdardottir, A. K., & Hjartarson, T. (2011). School buildings for the 21st century. Some features of new school buildings in Iceland. ceps Journal, 1(2), 25-43.
    42. Starkey, L., Leggett, V., Anslow, C., & Ackley, A. (2021). The Use of Furniture in a Student-Centred Primary School Learning Environment [Article]. New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies, 56, 61-79. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40841-020-00187-9
    43. Teresa, M., & Moreno Alcázar, M. T. (2015). An innovative model for basic education in Peru.
    44. Vaughan., E. L., Associates., S. W., & Marks, J. (2017). Elementary School. https://www.wbdg.org/building-types/education-facilities/elementary-school
    45. Vijapur, D., Candido, C., Göçer, Ö., & Wyver, S. (2021). A Ten-Year Review of Primary School Flexible Learning Environments: Interior Design and IEQ Performance. Buildings, 11(5), 183. https://www.mdpi.com/2075-5309/11/5/183
    46. WEF. (2020). Schools of the Future: Defining New Models of Education for the Fourth Industrial Revolution https://www.weforum.org/publications/schools-of-the-future-defining-new-models-of-education-for-the-fourth-industrial-revolution/
    47. Weinstein, C. S. (1977). Modifying Student Behavior in an Open Classroom Through Changes in the Physical Design. American Educational Research Journal, 14(3), 249-262. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312014003249
    48. WHO. (2023). Depressive disorder (depression) https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/depression
    49. Woolner, P., Thomas, U., & Charteris, J. (2022). The risks of standardised school building design: Beyond aligning the parts of a learning environment [Article]. European Educational Research Journal, 21(4), 627-644. https://doi.org/10.1177/14749041211021262
    50. Xianjun, L. Y., He. (2023). The development process and enlightenment of modern American elementary and secondary school architectural space design. Journal of comparative education(02), 79-91. https://doi.org/doi:CNKI:SUN:JYBX.0.2023-02-006.
    51. Yalan, C., & Zhimin, L. (2017). Development history and difficulties of architectural space environment in primary and secondary schools in China. Urbanism and Architecture. https://doi.org/CNKI:SUN:JZCS.0.2017-18-022
    52. Yunyan, W., Yongjun, Z., & Lin, Q. (2023). Learning for the Green Transition:An Analysis of Policy for Education for Sustainable Development in the European Union International and Comparative Education. https://doi.org/11-2878/G4
    53. Zhiyong, Z. (2019). Confidence and Reflection: The education management of four provinces and cities in China from the perspective of PISA2018. http://www.moe.gov.cn/jyb_xwfb/moe_2082/zl_2019n/2019_zl94/201912/t20191204_410712.html

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2024 Malque Publishing

How to cite

Sun, R., & Aziz, M. F. B. A. (2024). Design guidelines for formal learning spaces: A narrative review. Multidisciplinary Reviews, 7(4), 2024070. https://doi.org/10.31893/multirev.2024070
  • Article viewed - 187
  • PDF downloaded - 95