Keywords:
intangible cultural heritage (ICH)
religious sound practices
cultural transmission
cultural policy
heritage safeguarding

  • Abstract

    Buddhist music has played a central role in traditional Chinese music since the Han Dynasty. Over time, societal changes have placed much of this musical heritage at risk of disappearing. In response, the Chinese government has actively strengthened efforts to safeguard and preserve Buddhist music as Intangible Cultural Heritage (ICH). The study of heritagization has recently gained attention in China due to its potential to influence the preservation, transmission, and development of Buddhist music. Heritagization is considered a key factor in ensuring the continuity and evolution of this musical tradition. To investigate this process, a systematic review of twenty relevant studies was conducted using SCOPUS, Web of Science, and CNKI (China National Knowledge Infrastructure). Strict inclusion and exclusion criteria, guided by the PRISMA framework, ensured a rigorous and reliable methodology. The findings indicate that heritagization has had a significant and transformative impact on Chinese Buddhist music. It supports conservation initiatives, facilitates ongoing transmission, and emphasizes the cultural value of the music through its recognition as ICH. Additionally, heritagization has contributed to the internationalization of Chinese Buddhist music, enhancing its global recognition and appreciation. This study highlights the important roles of ICH gatekeepers and practitioners in sustaining Chinese Buddhist music. Drawing on academic literature addressing ICH, heritagization, Buddhist rituals, and musical practices, the review synthesizes prior research to provide a comprehensive overview of the current state of knowledge and identify areas for further study. The findings are relevant to historians, musicologists, religious practitioners, and others engaged in the study and preservation of religious music, offering theoretical and practical insights for safeguarding this culturally significant tradition.

  • References

    1. Aikawa-Faure, N. (2022). Modalities for community participation in implementing the UNESCO 2003 convention: The case of jazz in France. In H. Schippers & A. Seeger (Eds.), Music, communities, sustainability: Developing policies and practices (pp. 52–70). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197609101.003.0003
    2. Ambroise, R., Claude, A., & Olivesi, S. (2017). Du patrimoine à la patrimonialisation. Perspectives critiques. Diogène, 258–259–260(2), 265–279. https://doi.org/10.3917/dio.258.0265
    3. Baird, M. F. (2017). Critical theory and the anthropology of heritage landscapes. University Press of Florida. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvx072j2
    4. Banaszkiewicz, M. (2022). Tourism and heritage in the Chornobyl Exclusion Zone. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003189596
    5. Bendix, R. (2008). Heritage between economy and politics: An assessment from the perspective of cultural anthropology. In L. Smith & N. Akagawa (Eds.), Intangible heritage (pp. 253–269). Routledge Falmer. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203884973-20
    6. Bian, Y. (2020). On the subject-object approach in safeguarding intangible cultural heritage. Jiangxi Social Sciences, 40(7), 239–245.
    7. Brandellero, A., Janssen, S., Cohen, S., & Roberts, L. (2014). Popular music heritage, cultural memory and cultural identity. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 20(3), 219–223. https://doi.org/10.1080/13527258.2013.821624
    8. Bruntz, C. (2020). Taking tourism into their own hands: Monastic communities and temple transformations in China. In C. Bruntz & B. Schedneck (Eds.), Buddhist tourism in Asia (pp. 144–160). University of Hawaiʻi Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvgs09c4.12
    9. Caballero, G. V. (2017). Crossing boundaries: Linking intangible heritage, cultural landscapes, and identity. In Proceedings of the UP Visayas International Conference on Intangible Heritage (p. 24). Iloilo City, Philippines. https://openarchive.icomos.org/id/eprint/1814/
    10. Cawley, K. N. (2023). East Asian Buddhism and Korea’s transnational interactions and influences. Religions, 14(10), Article 1291. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel14101291
    11. Chami, M. F., & Kajiru, E. J. (2023). Assessment of 12 years (2011–2023) implementation of the 2003 UNESCO convention on safeguarding intangible cultural heritage (ICH) in Tanzania. Cogent Arts & Humanities, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2023.2254044
    12. Chen, B. (2018). Venerable Master Hsing Yun’s humanistic Buddhism: New dawn of true Dharma. In H. Yu (Ed.), Studies on humanistic Buddhism (Vol. 1, Foundational thoughts, pp. 84–151). Fo Guang Shan Institute of Humanistic Buddhism.
    13. Chen, Y., Xue, K., & Dai, M. (2020). The academics of intangible cultural heritage: Knowledge map analysis based on CiteSpace (2003–2019). International Journal of Intangible Heritage, 15, 182–196. https://www.ijih.org/volumes/article/951
    14. Chocano, R. (2022). Musical sustainability vis-à-vis intangible cultural heritage: Safeguarding and incentives in the Feast of the Virgin of Candelaria, Puno, Perú. Ethnomusicology Forum, 31(2), 283–303. https://doi.org/10.1080/17411912.2022.2093764
    15. Chung, F. M. Y. (2022). Safeguarding traditional theatre amid trauma: Career shock among cultural heritage professionals in Cantonese opera. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 28(10), 1091–1106. https://doi.org/10.1080/13527258.2022.2131878
    16. D’Evelyn, C. (2021). Khöömii, Chooryn duu, and dissonant heritage in Inner Mongolia, China. Asian Music, 52(2), 139–169. https://doi.org/10.1353/amu.2021.0017
    17. Di, Q. A. (2019). Dharma function with sound, dharma propagation with music: A study of Buddhist chants and Buddhist songs of Fo Guang Chan. In G. R. Cheng & F. Miao (Eds.), Studies on humanistic Buddhism (Vol. 2, Practical applications: Venerable Master Hsing Yun on humanistic Buddhism, pp. 65–97). Fo Guang Shan Institute of Humanistic Buddhism. https://www.fgsihb.org/export/sites/fgsihb/publications/.galleries/downloads/ihb/theory/2016theory/2017_9789574574353_1IZFaQ2Lgx02.pdf
    18. Dong, B. (2023). On the influence of the “Maritime Silk Road” on the formation of Buddhist music in South China. Studies in World Religions, (6), 48–55.
    19. Dong, Y. (2022). Review on the study of inheritors of intangible cultural heritage. Guizhou Ethnic Studies, 43(3), 89–95. https://doi.org/10.13965/j.cnki.gzmzyj10026959.2022.03.014
    20. Du, P., & Lv, M. (2019). The sound of Brahma music in Daxiangguo Temple is clear and elegant and has a long rhyme. China Religion, (12), 62–63.
    21. Du, Y. (2023). The ancient Maritime Silk Road: An important channel for the transmission of Chinese religious music culture in other parts of the world. China Religion, (11), 86–87.
    22. Gao, Y., Li, M., Li, Q., Huang, K., & Shen, S. (2022). Inheritors’ happiness and its relevant factors in intangible cultural heritage. Sustainability, 14(21), Article 14084. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142114084
    23. Guo, C., Hua, H., & Geng, X. (2021). Incorporating folk belief into national heritage: The interaction between ritual practice and theatrical performance in Xiud Yax Lus Qim (Yalu Wang) of the Miao (Hmong) ethnic group. Religions, 12(10), Article 899. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel12100899
    24. Gwerevende, S., & Mthombeni, Z. M. (2023). Safeguarding intangible cultural heritage: Exploring the synergies in the transmission of Indigenous languages, dance and music practices in Southern Africa. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 29(5), 398–412. https://doi.org/10.1080/13527258.2023.2193902
    25. Hammou, I., Aboudou, S., & Makloul, Y. (2020). Social media and intangible cultural heritage for digital marketing communication: Case of Marrakech crafts. Marketing and Management of Innovations, (1), 121–127. https://doi.org/10.21272/mmi.2020.1-09
    26. Harvey, D. C. (2016). The history of heritage. In B. Graham & P. Howard (Eds.), The Routledge research companion to heritage and identity (pp. 19–36). Routledge.
    27. Hetmanczyk, P. (2015). Party ideology and the changing role of religion: From “United Front” to “Intangible Cultural Heritage”. Asiatische Studien – Études Asiatiques, 69(1), 165–184. https://doi.org/10.1515/asia-2015-0017
    28. Huang, Y., & Li, Y. (2023). The development logic and future orientation of China’s ICH protection policy since the new century. Folklore Studies, 1, 5–17. https://doi.org/10.13370/j.cnki.fs.2023.01.005
    29. Ishida, T., Iyobe, M., Miyakawa, A., Sugita, K., & Shibata, Y. (2019). Implementation of an AR traditional Japanese craft presentation system: Presentation of traditional crafts using the Kansei retrieval method. Artificial Life and Robotics, 24(3), 430–437. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10015-018-0522-2
    30. Jiang, J., Zang, T., Xing, J., & Ikebe, K. (2023). Spatial distribution of urban heritage and landscape approach to urban contextual continuity: The case of Suzhou. Land, 12(1), Article 150. https://doi.org/10.3390/land12010150
    31. Kidd, J. (2011). Challenging history: Reviewing debate within the heritage sector on the “challenge” of history. Museum and Society, 9(3), 244–248. https://core.ac.uk/outputs/267012686
    32. Kitchenham, B., & Charters, S. (2007). Guidelines for performing systematic literature reviews in software engineering (Version 2.3, EBSE Technical Report). EBSE.
    33. Koo, S. (2021). From Korea to Japan: A transnational perspective on South Korea’s important intangible cultural properties and Zainichi Korean artists. Korean Studies, 45, 89–116. https://doi.org/10.1353/ks.2021.0005
    34. Lázaro Ortiz, S., & Jiménez de Madariaga, C. (2022). The UNESCO convention for the safeguarding of the intangible cultural heritage: A critical analysis. International Journal of Cultural Policy, 28(3), 327–341. https://doi.org/10.1080/10286632.2021.1941914
    35. Lenzerini, F. (2011). Intangible cultural heritage: The living culture of peoples. European Journal of International Law, 22(1), 101–120. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/chr006
    36. Li, N. (2023). The inheritance and development of Buddhist music in the context of the Belt and Road Initiative. China Religion, (6), 76–77.
    37. Liu, M. (2022). The living inheritance of religious intangible cultural heritage from the perspective of communication studies. China Religion, (11), 60–61.
    38. Liu, W. (2016). Legal protection for China’s traditional religious knowledge. Religions, 7(9), Article 116. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel7090116
    39. Lixinski, L. (2011). Selecting heritage: The interplay of art, politics and identity. European Journal of International Law, 22(1), 81–100. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/chr001
    40. Ma, Z., & Liu, Z. (2019). Dilemmas of inheritance of intangible cultural heritage in the perspective of three models of figurative culture and possible solutions. Journal of Yunnan Normal University (Humanities and Social Sciences Edition), 51(6), 63–70.
    41. Maags, C. (2021). Cultural heritage politics in China. In C. Shei & W. X. Wei (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of Chinese studies (pp. 177–190). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429059704-15
    42. Maags, C. (2023). State institutions as building blocks of China’s infrastructures of memory: The case of intangible heritage. Journal of Current Chinese Affairs, 52(2), 163–184. https://doi.org/10.1177/18681026221145950
    43. MacLachlan, H. (2022). Burmese Buddhist monks, the seventh precept, and cognitive dissonance. Asian Music, 53(1), 34–55. https://doi.org/10.1353/amu.2022.0002
    44. Mai Le, Q. (2021). Tales of heritagization: Networks, flows and community involvement at World Heritage sites in Vietnam (Doctoral dissertation, University of Bonn). Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn. https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:hbz:5-64776
    45. Mead, M. (1970). Culture and commitment: A study of the generation gap. Natural History Press.
    46. Melis, C., & Chambers, D. (2021). The construction of intangible cultural heritage: A Foucauldian critique. Annals of Tourism Research, 89, Article 103206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2021.103206
    47. Meng, D., & Gong, Y. (2022). Yushan Sanskrit chant (Beompae): The beginning of contextualized Buddhist music in China. China Religion, (2), 70–71.
    48. Moisala, P. (2019). Heritagization of Tamu music: From lived culture to heritage to be safeguarded. AlterNative: An International Journal of Indigenous Peoples, 15(4), 321–329. https://doi.org/10.1177/1177180119890135
    49. Nichols, B. J. (2020). Interrogating religious tourism at Buddhist monasteries in China. In C. Bruntz & B. Schedneck (Eds.), Buddhist tourism in Asia (pp. 183–205). University of Hawaiʻi Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvgs09c4.14
    50. Norton, B., & Matsumoto, N. (2018). Music as heritage: Historical and ethnographic perspectives. Routledge.
    51. Ogino, M. (2021). Buddhism and tourism in Asia: An East Asian perspective. Routledge.
    52. Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., … Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Systematic Reviews, 10(1), Article 89. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-021-01626-4
    53. Popova, A., & Fomenko, E. (2022). The place of intangible cultural heritage in the state policy of China. Culture and Art, (11), 42–53. https://doi.org/10.7256/2454-0625.2022.11.38835
    54. Profico, A., Bellucci, L., Buzi, C., Di Vincenzo, F., Micarelli, I., Strani, F., Tafuri, M. A., & Manzi, G. (2019). Virtual anthropology and its application in cultural heritage studies. Studies in Conservation, 64(6), 323–336. https://doi.org/10.1080/00393630.2018.1507705
    55. Rashid, A. G. (2018). Religious tourism: A review of the literature. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Insights, 1(2), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1108/JHTI-10-2017-0007
    56. Rowley, J., & Slack, F. (2004). Conducting a literature review. Management Research News, 27(6), 31–39. https://doi.org/10.1108/01409170410784185
    57. Salemink, O. (2012). Appropriating culture: The politics of intangible cultural heritage in Vietnam. In K. Nielsen & N. C. Turner (Eds.), State, society and the market in contemporary Vietnam (pp. 158–180). Routledge.
    58. Salemink, O. (2021). Introduction: Heritagizing Asian cities: Space, memory, and vernacular heritage practices. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 27(8), 769–776. https://doi.org/10.1080/13527258.2021.1890186
    59. Saluja, O. B., Singh, P., & Kumar, H. (2023). Barriers and interventions on the way to empower women through financial inclusion: A two-decades systematic review (2000–2020). Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 10(1), Article 148. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-01640-y
    60. Sárközi, I. G. (2021). The story of an unborn book: A case study on the heritagization of the Chinese Sibe genealogy writing tradition. Asian Ethnicity, 22(1), 77–89. https://doi.org/10.1080/14631369.2020.1793101
    61. Shi, H., Li, J., Xue, L., & Song, Y. (2023). OperAR: Using an augmented reality agent to enhance children’s interactive intangible cultural heritage experience of the Peking Opera. In Proceedings of the 36th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology Adjunct (UIST ’23 Adjunct, pp. 1–4). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3586182.3616690
    62. Si, D., & Liu, D. (2020). An introduction of foreign “heritagization” research: As implications for domestic heritage cognition and heritage practice. Research on Architectural Heritage Conservation, 4, 109–115.
    63. Singh, R. P. (2022). Heritage value of religious sites of Hinduism: Asian linkages and reuse for cultural regeneration. In S. K. Chattopadhyay & A. K. Nandy (Eds.), Regenerating cultural religious heritage: Interventions of places of religion and rituals (pp. 55–79). Springer.
    64. Smith, L., & Waterton, E. (2012). Constrained by commonsense: The authorized heritage discourse in contemporary debates. In R. Skeates, C. McDavid, & J. Carman (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of public archaeology (pp. 153–171). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199237821.013.0009
    65. Song, J. (2022). Why we can identify representative inheritance group of intangible cultural heritage. Cultural Heritage, (4), 1–8.
    66. Sousa, F. (2018). The participation in the safeguarding of the intangible cultural heritage. Memória Imaterial. https://www.memoriamedia.net
    67. Su, J. (2019). Understanding the changing intangible cultural heritage in tourism commodification: The music players’ perspective from Lijiang, China. Journal of Tourism and Cultural Change, 17(3), 247–268. https://doi.org/10.1080/14766825.2018.1427102
    68. Su, X., Li, X., Wu, Y., & Yao, L. (2020). How is intangible cultural heritage valued in the eyes of inheritors? Scale development and validation. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research, 44(5), 806–834. https://doi.org/10.1177/1096348020914691
    69. Sun, Y. (2019). Scripture chanting, Pathaka singing and instrumental music entertainment: The new discourse on Buddhist music sound classification exemplifying the examination and identification of Mount Wutai Buddhist music sound categories. People’s Music, (1), 48–53.
    70. Szczepanski, B. (2012). Wutaishan and its Buddhist music today. In R. W. Davis & J. E. Myers (Eds.), The instrumental music of Wutaishan’s Buddhist monasteries: Social and ritual contexts (Vol. 1, pp. 25–36). Routledge.
    71. Tan, H., & Wang, J. (2009, March 29). It is of great significance to protect and inherit Buddhism’s intangible cultural heritage. Xinhua News Agency. http://news.sohu.com/20090329/n263077960.shtml
    72. Taylor, K. (2020). Cultural sustainability and notions of cultural heritage: A review with some reference to an Asian perspective. In M. G. Acuto & R. Inkinen (Eds.), The Elgar companion to geography, transdisciplinarity and sustainability (pp. 320–341). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781786430106.00029
    73. Thouki, A. (2022). Heritagization of religious sites: In search of visitor agency and the dialectics underlying heritage planning assemblages. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 28(9), 1036–1065. https://doi.org/10.1080/13527258.2022.2122535
    74. Tian, Q. (1994). Recent trends in Buddhist music research in China. British Journal of Ethnomusicology, 3(1), 63–72. https://doi.org/10.1080/09681229408567226
    75. UNESCO. (1972). Convention concerning the protection of the world cultural and natural heritage. https://whc.unesco.org/en/conventiontext/
    76. UNESCO. (2003). Convention for the safeguarding of the intangible cultural heritage. https://www.unesco.org/culture/ich/index.php?pg=00006
    77. UNESCO. (2003). Living human treasures: A former programme of UNESCO. https://ich.unesco.org/en/living-human-treasures
    78. UNESCO. (2003). The States Parties to the Convention for the Safeguarding of the Intangible Cultural Heritage (2003). https://ich.unesco.org/en/states-parties-00024
    79. UNESCO. (2005). Convention on the protection and promotion of the diversity of cultural expressions. https://www.unesco.org/en/legal-affairs/convention-protection-and-promotion-diversity-cultural-expressions
    80. UNESCO. (2007). Intangible heritage – The mirror of cultural diversity. https://ich.unesco.org/doc/src/00073-EN.pdf
    81. UNESCO. (2015). Ethical principles for safeguarding intangible cultural heritage. https://ich.unesco.org/en/ethics-and-ich-00866
    82. UNESCO. (2018). Basic texts of the 2003 Convention for the Safeguarding of the Intangible Cultural Heritage. https://ich.unesco.org/doc/src/2003_Convention_Basic_Texts-_2022_version-EN_.pdf
    83. UNESCO. (2023). Browse the lists of intangible cultural heritage and the register of good safeguarding practices. https://ich.unesco.org/en/lists
    84. Van der Zeijden, A. (2014, April 22). Spiritual renewal and the safeguarding of religious traditions in the Netherlands. The ICH NGO Forum. https://www.ichngoforum.org/heritage-alive-news/spiritual-renewal-and-the-safeguarding-of-religious-traditions-in-the-netherlands/
    85. Vieira, E. S., & Gomes, J. A. N. F. (2009). A comparison of Scopus and Web of Science for a typical university. Scientometrics, 81(2), 587–600. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-2178-0
    86. Wang, B. (2022). The evolution of Chinese Buddhist music and its value. China Religion, (4), 66–67.
    87. Wang, J. (2023). Barriers to sustainable development in digital communication of intangible cultural heritage: Emotion drain under the technology dominance. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Social Development and Media Communication (p. 60). https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202315501008
    88. Wang, J. (2023). The influence of temple economy on modern Japanese Buddhist music. Communications in Humanities Research, 14, 80–86. https://doi.org/10.54254/2753-7064/14/20230411
    89. Wang, X., & Sun, Y. (2020). The dual-function in Buddhist convention of offering and ritual-music. Chinese Music, (6), 77–85. https://doi.org/10.13812/j.cnki.cn11-1379/j.2020.06.009
    90. Wu, X. (2020). The inheritance of intangible cultural heritage from the perspective of speculative heritage researches. Southeast Academic Research, (2), 119–124. https://doi.org/10.13658/j.cnki.sar.20200302.002
    91. Xiao, M., & Yang, X. (2022). The “ICH movement” in China: The status of traditional musics after ICH certification. In H. Schippers & A. Seeger (Eds.), Music, communities, sustainability: Developing policies and practices (pp. 101–117). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197609101.003.0006
    92. Xiao, Y., & Watson, M. (2019). Guidance on conducting a systematic literature review. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 39(1), 93–112. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X17723971
    93. Xinhuanet. (2012, November). Famen Temple scenic spot “borrowing Buddha to enrich” more than chaos. Xinhua News Agency. http://www.xinhuanet.com/politics/2012-11/05/c_123915021.htm
    94. Xu, Y., & Tao, Y. (2022). Religion-related intangible cultural heritage safeguarding practices and initiatives of the contemporary Chinese state. Religions, 13(8), Article 687. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel13080687
    95. Xu, Y., Tao, Y., & Smith, B. (2022). China’s emerging legislative and policy framework for safeguarding intangible cultural heritage. International Journal of Cultural Policy, 28(5), 566–580. https://doi.org/10.1080/10286632.2021.1993838
    96. Yan, H., Wang, Y., Xiong, H., & Zhang, X. (2021). Research on spatial distribution characteristics and influencing factors of national folk intangible cultural heritage. Journal of Northwest Normal University (Natural Science), 57(4), 101–109. https://doi.org/10.16783/j.cnki.nwnuz.2021.04.014
    97. Yan, W. (2023). Ethical principles for safeguarding intangible cultural heritage: How to protect intangible cultural heritage of minority ethnic groups in China. Advances in Historical Studies, 12(1), 32–45. https://doi.org/10.4236/ahs.2023.121003
    98. Yan, W.-J., & Chiou, S.-C. (2021). The safeguarding of intangible cultural heritage from the perspective of civic participation: The informal education of Chinese embroidery handicrafts. Sustainability, 13(9), Article 4958. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13094958
    99. Yang, D., & Zhou, L. (2021). Buddhist music from the perspective of intangible cultural heritage. China Religion, (9), 58–59.
    100. Yang, M. B. (2020). From wild songs to intangible cultural heritage: The heritagization of Hua’er in China. International Communication of Chinese Culture, 7, 215–230. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40636-020-00182-1
    101. Yao, H. (2021). Consensus reconstruction of intangible cultural heritage protection in heritage process. National Arts, (5), 85–95. https://doi.org/10.16564/j.cnki.1003-2568.2021.05.013
    102. Yi, L., Xiao, Z., & Xu, Q. (2021). Intangible cultural heritage protection in the past 30 years: Achievement, problems and implications. Administration Reform, (11), 65–73. https://doi.org/10.14150/j.cnki.1674-7453.2021.11.004
    103. Yin, F. (2022). A brief analysis on the process of contextualizing Buddhist music in China. China Religion, (10), 68–69.
    104. Yu, L. (2020). Buddhist music dissemination and national presence: The example of Yoga Flame ceremony music. Journal of the Northern Music, (8), 77–78.
    105. Yuan, J. (2017). The status and protection of national-level Buddhist intangible cultural heritage. China Religion, (6), 57–59.
    106. Zhai, F. (2022). On the protection and transmission of Buddhist music as intangible cultural heritage. China Religion, (5), 72–73.
    107. Zhang, C., Qu, C., & Jin, Y. (2018). Heritage identity: Concept connotation and research approaches. Human Geography, 33(4), 20–25. https://doi.org/10.13959/j.issn.1003-2398.2018.04.004
    108. Zhang, N. (2023). The evolution of Chinese elements in Buddhist music and its implications. China Religion, (8), 62–63.
    109. Zhang, S., & Wu, C. (2023). Revitalizing endangered traditions: Innovative approaches to safeguarding Yunnan's ethnic minority music as intangible cultural heritage. Herança – History, Heritage and Culture Journal, 6(1), 101–128. https://doi.org/10.52152/heranca.v6i1.787
    110. Zhou, Y. (2021). Textual research on Tianning Fanbai. Journal of Nanjing Arts Institute (Music & Performance), (3), 51–55.
    111. Zhu, K. (2022). Reflections on the development of contemporary Buddhist music. China Religion, (7), 76–77.
    112. Zhu, Y. (2020). Heritage and religion in China. In S. Feuchtwang (Ed.), Handbook on religion in China (pp. 96–108). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781786437969.00011
    113. Zhuang, H. (2014). Review of the present and prospects on Buddhist music in recent five years. Journal of Weinan Normal University, 29(9), 92–97. https://doi.org/10.15924/j.cnki.1009-5128.2014.09.008
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2026 The Authors

How to cite

Lim, C. K.-N., & Wu, T. (2026). Heritagization of Buddhist music in China: A systematic literature review. Multidisciplinary Reviews, 9(8), 2026410. https://doi.org/10.31893/multirev.2026410
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC
  • Article viewed - 298
  • PDF downloaded - 138