• Abstract

    A phenomenon that often occurs in an organization is groupthink. Groupthink is a concept that describes the habit of seeking consensus in organizations or groups; most of the results of this process are a terrible final decision and fatal to the organization. Research Objective To analyze groupthink in the organization. The method used in this study is qualitative research with a literature study approach. The data source in this study was taken from the Scopus database by entering the keyword "Groupthink AND organization" with the number of articles, namely, 63 documents. This study found that the global groupthink study from 1982 to 2022 was only 63 articles; this shows that groupthink studies within the organization have not been studied much. At the same time, groupthink is often found in an organization. The group think tank began to be widely studied from 2005 to 2022, although it is understood that it is not significantly experiencing a development trend. Next, during the time bracket from 1982 to 2022, groupthink was studied in terms of behavior, political group dynamics in organizations, decision-making, communication and legal cases in an organization and was widely encountered in the United States of America.

  • References

    1. Aria, M., & Cuccurullo, C. (2017). bibliometrix: an R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. J Informet, 11(4), 959–975.
    2. Asniar, D. A., & Sarwoprasodjo, S. (2019). Hubungan Fenomena Groupthink Dengan Gaya Kepemimpinan Ketua Rt Di Desa Cikarawang. Jurnal Komunikasi Pembangunan, 17(1), 28–37. https://doi.org/10.29244/jurnalkmp.17.1.28-37
    3. Baron, R. S. (2005). So right it’s wrong: Groupthink and the ubiquitous nature of polarized group decision making.
    4. Barr, K., & Mintz, A. (2018). Public Policy Perspective on Group Decision‐Making Dynamics in Foreign Policy. Policy Studies Journal, 46, S69–S90.
    5. Charles C. manz, Henry P.Sims, J. (1982). The Potential for “Groupthink” ini Autonomous Work Groups. Human Relations, 35(9), 773–784.
    6. Cleary, M., Lees, D., & Sayers, J. (2019). Leadership, Thought Diversity, and the Influence of Groupthink. Issues in Mental Health Nursing, 40(8), 731–733. https://doi.org/10.1080/01612840.2019.1604050
    7. Ernst, M. D., & Chapin, J. (2005). The Groupthink specification exercise. Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Software Engineering, 617–618.
    8. Friedman, S. (2004). Learning to make more effective decisions: changing beliefs as a prelude to action. The Learning Organization, 11(2), 110–128. https://doi.org/10.1108/09696470410521583
    9. Hällgren, M. (2010). Groupthink in temporary organizations. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 3(1), 94–110. https://doi.org/10.1108/17538371011014044
    10. Huang, J.-H., Duan, X.-Y., He, F.-F., Wang, G.-J., & Hu, X.-Y. (2021). A historical review and Bibliometric analysis of research on Weak measurement research over the past decades based on Biblioshiny. 1–19. http://arxiv.org/abs/2108.11375
    11. Janis, I. L. (2008). Groupthink. IEEE Engineering Management Review, 36(1), 36.
    12. Kamau, C., & Harorimana, D. (2008). Does knowledge sharing and withholding of information in organizational committees affect quality of group decision making? Proceedings of the 9th European Conference on Knowledge Management, 341–348.
    13. Kelman, S., Sanders, R., & Pandit, G. (2017). “Tell It Like It Is”: Decision Making, Groupthink, and Decisiveness among U.S. Federal Subcabinet Executives. Governance, 30(2), 245–261. https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12200
    14. Kelman, S., Sanders, R., Taylor, S., & Pandit, G. (2023). “ Tell It Like It Is”: Groupthink, Decisiveness, and Decision-Making Among US Federal Subcabinet Executives.
    15. Ko, A. S. O. (2005). Organizational communications in Hong Kong: a cultural approach to groupthink. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 10(4), 351–357. https://doi.org/10.1108/CCIJ-02-2015-0009
    16. Lunenburg, F. C. (2010). Group decision making: The potential for groupthink. International Journal of Management, Business, and Administration, 13(1), 1–6.
    17. Matusitz, J., & Breen, G. M. (2012). An Examination of Pack Journalism as a Form of Groupthink: A Theoretical and Qualitative Analysis. Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment, 22(7), 896–915. https://doi.org/10.1080/10911359.2012.707933
    18. Mok, A., & Morris, M. W. (2010). An upside to bicultural identity conflict: Resisting groupthink in cultural ingroups. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46(6), 1114–1117.
    19. Moorhead, G., Neck, C. P., & West, M. S. (1998). The tendency toward defective decision making within self-managing teams: The relevance of groupthink for the 21st century. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 73(2–3), 327–351. https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1998.2765
    20. Neck, C. P., & Moorhead, G. (1995). Groupthink remodeled: The importance of leadership, time pressure, and methodical decision-making procedures. Human Relations, 48(5), 537–557.
    21. Őnday, Ő. (2016). Human resource theory: From Hawthorne experiments of Mayo to groupthink of Janis. Global Journal of Human Resource Management, 4(1), 95–110.
    22. Polley, D., Vora, J., & Subbanarasimha, P. N. (2005). Paying the devil his due: Limits and liabilities of workplace spirituality. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 13(1), 50–62. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb028997
    23. Riordan, M. P., Riordan, D. A., & Kent St. Pierre, E. (2008). Groupthink in accounting education. In Advances in Accounting Education (pp. 189–204). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
    24. Rosander, M., Stiwne, D., & Granström, K. (1998). “Bipolar groupthink”: Assessing groupthink tendencies in authentic work groups. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 39(2), 81–92. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9450.00060
    25. Sai On Ko, A. (2005). Organizational communications in Hong Kong: A cultural approach to groupthink. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 10(4), 351–357.
    26. Scharff, M. M. (2005). Understanding WorldCom’s accounting fraud: Did groupthink play a role? Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 11(3), 109–118.
    27. Schiano, W., & Weiss, J. W. (2006). Y2K all over again: How groupthink permeates IS and compromises security. Business Horizons, 49(2), 115–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2005.07.002
    28. Sims, R. R. (1992). Linking groupthink to unethical behavior in organizations. Journal of Business Ethics, 11(9), 651–662. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01686345
    29. Sims, R. R., & Sauser, W. I. (2013). Toward a better understanding of the relationships among received wisdom, groupthink, and organizational ethical culture. Journal of Management Policy and Practice, 14(4), 75–90.
    30. Sommestad, T. (2017). Information & Computer Security 1 Introduction.
    31. Suardi, W., Nurmandi, A., Mutiarin, D., Purnomo, E. P., Pribadi, U., Purwaningsih, T., Misran, M., Zulkifli, Z., & Younus, M. (2023). A Historical Review for City Branding: Hyper Competition, Challenges, and Improvement Opportunities. Jurnal Bina Praja, 15(1), 85–99. https://doi.org/10.21787/jbp.15.2023.85-99
    32. Sudaryati, E., & Kusuma, T. A. (2018). The impact of framing and groupthink to the career selection decision of accounting major students. Asian Journal of Accounting Research, 3(2), 181–189. https://doi.org/10.1108/AJAR-06-2018-0011
    33. Tetlock, P. E., Peterson, R. S., McGuire, C., Chang, S. jie, & Feld, P. (1992). Assessing Political Group Dynamics: A Test of the Groupthink Model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63(3), 403–425. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.63.3.403
    34. Turner, M. E., & Pratkanis, A. R. (1994). Social identity maintenance prescriptions for preventing groupthink: Reducing identity protection and enhancing intellectual conflict. International Journal of Conflict Management.
    35. Turner, M. E., & Pratkanis, A. R. (1998). Twenty-five years of groupthink theory and research: Lessons from the evaluation of a theory. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 73(2–3), 105–115.
    36. Warfield, J. N. (1995). Spreadthink: Explaining ineffective groups. Systems Research, 12(1), 5–14. https://doi.org/10.1002/sres.3850120104

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2023 Malque Publishing

How to cite

Rhayu, S., Nuryakin, & Udin. (2023). Bibliometric analysis of groupthink in organization: Cases study in the world. Multidisciplinary Reviews, 7(1), 2024018. https://doi.org/10.31893/multirev.2024018
  • Article viewed - 303
  • PDF downloaded - 173