Keywords:
computational empathy
digital communication behavior
technology-mediated interaction
family digital dynamics
affective computing
extended reality (XR)

  • Abstract

    The digital age has a significant impact on the nature of human communication, contributing to a shift away from the immediacy of face-to-face interpersonal interaction toward human‒machine interaction. The research employs a contemporary engineering framework for investigating the influence of technology use on family communication while carefully attending to the ideals that must support humanity against what is a rising tide of technology. The researchers selected family units inhabiting distinct local council development zones. It utilized a literature-based research approach to investigate how digital interactions impact emotional connection and communication patterns with family situations. The research aimed to examine family experiences with digital technology, perspectives on interpersonal communication, and perceived changes in relationship dynamics. By employing appropriate statistical strategies to derive useful data, the research noted a decrease in family members' interest in face-to-face interpersonal communication in conjunction with an increase in the family's use of technology. The data also suggested that information that was absent or limited self-disclosure and limited signalling typically leads to family members more likely drifting away from each other instead of coming together. Consequently, the research revealed that fostering and nurturing successful family relationships is more complex than simply learning skillsets, tools, and engineering technology related to digital devices. The research promotes frequent connection with communication technologies by outlining core criteria while keeping the essential features that characterize humanity. Despite developments in digital communication tools, the research emphasizes the significance of developing meaningful human relationships with families, particulary in the environment of the digital engineering systems.

  • References

    1. Abou Hashish, E. A. (2025). Compassion through technology: Digital empathy concept analysis and implications in nursing. Digital Health, 11, 20552076251326221.https://doi.org/10.1177/20552076251326221
    2. Braune Krickau, A., Kostić, T., Merkaš, M., Tammisalo, N., & McDaniel, B. T. (2021). Effects of parents’ smartphone use on children’s emotions, behavior, and subjective well being.Education Sciences, 15(1), 8. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15010008
    3. Braune‐Krickau, K., Schneebeli, L., Pehlke‐Milde, J., Gemperle, M., Koch, R., & von Wyl, A. (2021). Smartphones in the nursery: Parental smartphone use and parental sensitivity and responsiveness within parent–child interaction in early childhood (0–5 years): A scoping review. Infant Mental Health Journal, 42(2), 161-175. https://doi.org/10.1002/imhj.21908
    4. Cánovas, L.; Carrascosa, A.J.; García, M.; Fernández, M.; Calvo, A.; Monsalve, V.; Soriano, J.F.; Group, E.S. (2018) Impact of empathy in the patient-doctor relationship on chronic pain relief and quality of life: A prospective study in Spanish pain clinics. Pain Med. 19, 1304–1314.10.1093/pm/pnx160
    5. Chen, Y., & Xu, Y. (2021). Exploring the effect of social support and empathy on user engagement in online mental health communities. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(13), 6855. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18136855
    6. Duarte, A., Surugiu, R., Moraru, M., &Marinescu, V. (2023). Digital Empathy in Online Education: A Comparison Study between Portugal and Romania. Comunicar: Media Education Research Journal, 31(76), 105-115.10.3916/C76-2023-09
    7. Grondin, F., Lomanowska, A. M., & Jackson, P. L. (2019). Empathy in computer-mediated interactions: a conceptual framework for research and clinical practice. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 26(4), e12298.https://doi.org/10.1111/cpsp.12298
    8. Hu, T., Zheng, X., & Huang, M. (2020). Absence and presence of human interaction: the relationship between loneliness and empathy. Frontiers in psychology, 11, 768. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00768
    9. Jiang, L., & Gao, J. (2020). Fostering EFL learners’ digital empathy through multimodal composing. RELC Journal, 51(1), 70−85. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688219898565
    10. Johnson, P.(2022).Navigating Ethical Communication with Empathy in Social Networks. Cyber Psychology & Behaviour,15 (5), 388-401. https://doi.org/10.1089/cpb.2022.234566
    11. Lee, H.-E., Chang, W.-P., & Sun, J. (2023). Family dynamics and digital distractions: A survey-based study on how co-parenting and parental phubbing shape preschoolers’ media use.Behavioral Sciences, 15(6), 752. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs150600752
    12. Lee, Y., Shin, H., & Gil, Y. H. (2024). Measurement of empathy in virtual reality with head-mounted displays: A systematic review. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics. https://doi.org/10.1109/tvcg.2024.33720763
    13. Marín-López, I.; Zych, I.; Monks, C.P.; Ortega-Ruiz, R. (2019) Empathy, morality and social and emotional competencies in interpersonal interactions online. In Thriving in Digital Workspaces; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, pp. 217–233. https://doi.org/10.1007/9
    14. Marwick, A.E., & Boyd, D. (2019). Understanding empathy in digital youth culture: A review. Journal of Youth Studies, 22(2), 115–132.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-024-10034-x
    15. Mun, I. B., & Lee, S. (2023). The impact of parental depression on children’s smartphone addiction: A serial mediation model with parental neglect and children’s self-esteem.Journal of Educational Computing Research, 61(5), 1432–1455. https://doi.org/10.1177/08944393211037579
    16. Paananen, V., Kiarostami, M. S., Lik-Hang, L., Braud, T., & Hosio, S. (2023). From digital media to empathic spaces: a systematic review of empathy research in extended reality environments. ACM Computing Surveys, 56(5), 1-40. https://doi.org/10.1145/3626518
    17. Pawiak, A. (2024). New Technologies in the Development of Empathy: Benefits and Threats. Horyzonty Wychowania, 23(68), 161-170.https://doi.org/10.35765/hw.2024.2368.15
    18. Pittelkow, M. M., Aan Het Rot, M., Seidel, L. J., Feyel, N., & Roest, A. M. (2021). Social anxiety and empathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 78, 102357. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.janxdis.2021.102357
    19. Qin, X., Yang, F., Jiang, Z., & Zhong, B. (2022). Empathy not quarantined: Social support via social media helps maintain empathy during the COVID-19 pandemic. Social Media+ Society, 8(1), 20563051221086234. https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051221086234
    20. Raamkumar, A. S., & Yang, Y. (2022). Empathetic conversational systems: A review of current advances, gaps, and opportunities. IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing, 14(4), 2722-2739.10.1109/TAFFC.2022.3226693
    21. Ranchordas, S., 2021. Empathy in the digital administrative state. Duke LJ, 71, p.1341. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12093819
    22. Rao, S., Alavi, H., & Good, J. (2023, April). Towards Empathic Buildings: Exploring How Smart Buildings May Be Designed to Address Occupants’ Subjective Needs. In Proceedings of the 2nd Empathy-Centric Design Workshop (pp. 1-4). https://doi.org/10.1145/3588967.3588974
    23. Riva, G., Wiederhold, B. K., Di Lernia, D., Chirico, A., Riva, E. F. M., Mantovani, F., ... & Gaggioli, A. (2019). Virtual reality meets artificial intelligence: the emergence of advanced digital therapeutics and digital biomarkers. Annual Review of CyberTherapy and Telemedicine, 17, 3-7.
    24. Salazar Kämpf, M., Adam, L., Rohr, M. K., Exner, C., & Wieck, C. (2023). A meta-analysis of the relationship between emotion regulation and social affect and cognition. Clinical psychological science, 11(6), 1159-1189. https://doi.org/10.1177/21677026221149953
    25. Sanjeewa, R., Iyer, R., Apputhurai, P., Wickramasinghe, N., & Meyer, D. (2024). Empathic Conversational Agent Platform Designs and Their Evaluation in the Context of Mental Health: Systematic Review. JMIR Mental Health, 11, e58974. https://doi.org/10.2196/58974
    26. Saykılı, A. (2019). Higher education in the digital age: The impact of digital connective technologies.Journal of Educational Technology and Online Learning, 2(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.31681/jetol.516971
    27. Shamsie, K. (2024). Interpersonal Communication in the Age of Digital Technology. Research Consortium Archive, 2(3), 112-122.
    28. Shao, T., Zhu, C., Lei, H., Jiang, Y., Wang, H., & Zhang, C. (2024). The relationship of parent–child technoference and child problematic smartphone use: The roles of parent–child relationship, negative parenting styles, and children’s gender.Psychology Research and Behavior Management, 17, 2067–2081. https://doi.org/10.2147/PRBM.S456411
    29. Sharma, A., Miner, A. S., Atkins, D. C., & Althoff, T. (2020). A computational approach to understanding empathy expressed in text-based mental health support. arXiv preprint arXiv:2009.08441 5263–5276.10.18653/v1/2020.emnlp-main.425
    30. Speicher, M., & Brian, D. Hall, and Michael Nebeling. 2019. What is Mixed Reality?.Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–15.https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300767
    31. Stevens, F., & Taber, K. (2021). The neuroscience of empathy and compassion in pro-social behavior. Neuropsychologia, 159, 107925. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2021.1 07925
    32. Suliantoro, B. W., & Syakhrani, A. W. (2025). COMMUNICATING WITH EMPATHY: ETHICAL PRACTICES IN SOCIAL MEDIA. International Journal Of Humanities, Social Sciences And Business (INJOSS), 4(2), 99-107.
    33. Sutton, T. (2020). Digital harm and addiction: An anthropological view. Anthropology Today, 36(1), 17-22. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8322.12553
    34. Thompson, N. M., Van Reekum, C. M., & Chakrabarti, B. (2022). Cognitive and affective empathy relate differentially to emotion regulation. Affective Science, 3(1), 118-134. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42761-021-00062-w
    35. Tracy Packiam Alloway and Rachel Carpenter. (2021). Gotta catch ‘em all: Exploring the use of Pokémon Go to enhance cognition and affect. Psychology of Popular Media 10, 2 (2021), 178–186. https://doi.org/10.1037/ppm0000283
    36. Tran, T., Ho, M. T., Pham, T. H., Nguyen, M. H., Nguyen, K. L. P., Vuong, T. T., ... & Vuong, Q. H. (2020). How digital natives learn and thrive in the digital age: Evidence from an emerging economy. Sustainability, 12(9), 3819. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12093819
    37. Walker, G., & Venker Weidenbenner, J. (2019). Social and Emotional Learning in the age of virtual play: technology, empathy, and learning. Journal of Research in Innovative Teaching & Learning, 12(2), 116-132. https://doi.org/10.1108/JRIT-03-2019-0046
    38. Wang, X., Gao, L., Yang, J., Zhao, F., & Wang, P. (2020). Parental phubbing and adolescents’ depressive symptoms: Self-esteem and perceived social support as moderators. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 49(2), 427–437. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-019-01185-x
    39. Wiederhold, B.K., & Riva, G. (2019). Virtual reality therapy: Emerging topics and future challenges. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 22(1), 3–6. http://doi.org/10.1089/ cyber.2018.29136.bkw
    40. Xie, X., & Xie, J. (2020). Parental phubbing accelerates depression in late childhood and adolescence: A two-path model. Journal of Adolescence, 78, 43–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2019.12.004
    41. Ye, S., Ho, K. K., & Zerbe, A. (2021). The effects of social media usage on loneliness and well-being: analysing friendship connections of Facebook, Twitter and Instagram. Information Discovery and Delivery, 49(2), 136-150. https://doi.org/10.1108/IDD-08-2020-0091
    42. Zhou, S., Yang, H., Ye, M., Ding, N., & Liu, T. (2024). Inferring human vision in a human-like way: Key factors influencing the cognitive processing of level-1 visual perspective-taking. Communication Research, 00936502241302569. https://doi.org/10.1177/00936502241302569
    43. Zych, I., Baldry, A. C., Farrington, D. P., & Llorent, V. J. (2019). Are children involved in cyberbullying low on empathy? A systematic review and meta-analysis of research on empathy versus different cyberbullying roles. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 45, 83- 97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2018.03.004
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2025 The Authors

How to cite

Kansal, A., Pandre, K., Sharma, N., Sahu, B. N., Jebaraj, S., Velumoni, D., & Sinha, V. K. (2025). Empathy in the digital age: Navigating virtual connections and maintaining human connection. Multidisciplinary Reviews, 8, 2025ss0112. https://doi.org/10.31893/multirev.2025ss0112
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC
  • Article viewed - 422
  • PDF downloaded - 439