Keywords:
bibliometric analysis
science education development
Indonesia
scopus

  • Abstract

    Science education is an important field that drives technological progress. However, science is still perceived by students and society as a complex and abstract field. Therefore, information regarding current trends in science education is needed to adapt to the current situation. This study aims to explore the ongoing trends in the past ten years and post-COVID-19 pandemic based on Scopus data. This research is a bibliometric analysis using the Scopus database. A bibliometric analysis was conducted with the help of specific software (MS Excel, Datawrapper, and VOSviewer). The Scopus database was used to find articles on science education. The articles had to be published between 2015 and 2024. Data collection was obtained by searching based on the TITLE of science education in Scopus and carried out four times by comparing International (all countries) and International (Indonesia) indexed journals in 2015 - 2024 and 2022-2024 (post-COVID). Then, the metadata was saved in the form of CSV and RIS to be analyzed using MS Excel, Datawrapper, and VOSviewer to visualize it. The findings show that the United States dominates research related to science education post-COVID-19 pandemic (2022-2024), while Indonesia is ranked 10th. Meanwhile, AIP Conference Proceedings is the most published publication source (Scopus) related to science education for all countries, including Indonesia. The number of Scopus-indexed article publications at the international level for all countries and Indonesia generally shows an increasing trend from 2015 to 2024. However, Indonesia experienced a decline in 2020, which coincided with the COVID-19 pandemic, and a significant decline in 2022, the first year post-COVID-19 pandemic.

  • References

    1. Abramo, G., D’Angelo, C. A., & Di Costa, F. (2023). Correlating article citedness and journal impact: An empirical investigation by field on a large-scale dataset. Scientometrics, 128(3), 1877–1894. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-022-04622-0
    2. Abu Talib, M., Bettayeb, A. M., & Omer, R. I. (2021). Analytical study on the impact of technology in higher education during the age of COVID-19: Systematic literature review. Education and Information Technologies, 26(6), 6719–6746. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10507-1
    3. Aditomo, A., & Klieme, E. (2020). Forms of inquiry-based science instruction and their relations with learning outcomes: Evidence from high and low-performing education systems. International Journal of Science Education, 42(4), 504–525. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2020.1716093
    4. Afrilyasanti, R., & Basthomi, Y. (2022). A sudden shift: Students’, teachers’, and parents’ adaptation to learning during and after COVID-19 learning. Pegem Journal of Education and Instruction, 12(2), 143–150. https://doi.org/10.47750/pegegog.12.02.14
    5. Aksnes, D. W., & Sivertsen, G. (2019). A criteria-based assessment of the coverage of Scopus and Web of Science. Journal of Data and Information Science, 4(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.2478/jdis-2019-0001
    6. AlGerafi, M. A. M., Zhou, Y., Oubibi, M., & Wijaya, T. T. (2023). Unlocking the potential: A comprehensive evaluation of augmented reality and virtual reality in education. Electronics, 12(18), 3953. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics12183953
    7. Ammar, M., Al-Thani, N. J., & Ahmad, Z. (2024). Role of pedagogical approaches in fostering innovation among K-12 students in STEM education. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 9, 100839. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2024.100839
    8. Arici, F., Yildirim, P., Caliklar, Ş., & Yilmaz, R. M. (2019). Research trends in the use of augmented reality in science education: Content and bibliometric mapping analysis. Computers & Education, 142, 103647. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103647
    9. Aristovnik, A., Keržič, D., Ravšelj, D., Tomaževič, N., & Umek, L. (2020). Impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on life of higher education students: A global perspective. Sustainability, 12(20), 8438. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12208438
    10. Bond, M., Bedenlier, S., Marín, V. I., & Händel, M. (2021). Emergency remote teaching in higher education: Mapping the first global online semester. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 18(1), 50. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-021-00282-x
    11. Bukar, U. A., Sayeed, M. S., Razak, S. F. A., Yogarayan, S., Amodu, O. A., & Mahmood, R. A. R. (2023). A method for analyzing text using VOSviewer. MethodsX, 11, 102339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mex.2023.102339
    12. Burley, S. K., Bhikadiya, C., Bi, C., Bittrich, S., Chen, L., Crichlow, G. V., Christie, C. H., Dalenberg, K., Di Costanzo, L., & Duarte, J. M. (2021). RCSB Protein Data Bank: Powerful new tools for exploring 3D structures of biological macromolecules for basic and applied research and education in fundamental biology, biomedicine, biotechnology, bioengineering and energy sciences. Nucleic Acids Research, 49(D1), D437–D451. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkaa1038
    13. Caboni, F., & Pizzichini, L. (2022). How the COVID-19 pandemic may accelerate millennials’ adoption of augmented reality. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 50(13), 95–115. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJRDM-10-2021-0509
    14. Chang, Y. H., Chang, C. Y., & Tseng, Y. H. (2010). Trends of science education research: An automatic content analysis. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 19(4), 315–331. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-009-9202-2
    15. Chen, J. (2023). A scientometric analysis of information technology in sustainable higher education: Knowledge structure and frontier trends. Discover Sustainability, 4(1), 35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43621-023-00148-4
    16. Chen, L.-H., & Nguyen, H. T. T. (2024). Study trends and core content trends of research on enhancing computational thinking: An incorporated bibliometric and content analysis based on the Scopus database. Computers, 13(4), 91. https://doi.org/10.3390/computers13040091
    17. Chen, X., Zou, D., Xie, H., & Wang, F. L. (2021). Past, present, and future of smart learning: A topic-based bibliometric analysis. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 18(1), 2. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-020-00239-6
    18. Christopoulos, A., & Sprangers, P. (2021). Integration of educational technology during the COVID-19 pandemic: An analysis of teacher and student receptions. Cogent Education, 8(1), 1964690. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2021.1964690
    19. Cooper, G. (2023). Examining science education in ChatGPT: An exploratory study of generative artificial intelligence. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 32(3), 444–452. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-023-10039-y
    20. Cretu, D. M., & Ho, Y.-S. (2023). The impact of COVID-19 on educational research: A bibliometric analysis. Sustainability, 15(6), 5219. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15065219
    21. d’Orville, H. (2020). COVID-19 causes unprecedented educational disruption: Is there a road towards a new normal? Prospects, 49(1), 11–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11125-020-09475-0
    22. da Silva, R. G. L., Chammas, R., & Novaes, H. M. D. (2021). Rethinking approaches of science, technology, and innovation in healthcare during the COVID-19 pandemic: The challenge of translating knowledge infrastructures to public needs. Health Research Policy and Systems, 19, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-021-00760-8
    23. Deeken, A. H., Mukhopadhyay, S., & Jiang, X. (2020). Social media in academics and research: 21st-century tools to turbocharge education, collaboration, and dissemination of research findings. Histopathology, 77(5), 688–699. https://doi.org/10.1111/his.14196
    24. Echchakoui, S. (2020). Why and how to merge Scopus and Web of Science during bibliometric analysis: The case of sales force literature from 1912 to 2019. Journal of Marketing Analytics, 8, 165–184. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41270-020-00081-9
    25. Fajri, N., Sriyati, S., & Rochintaniawati, D. (2024). Global research trends of digital learning media in science education: A bibliometric analysis. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 10(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v10i1.6248
    26. Falk, M. T., & Hagsten, E. (2021). When international academic conferences go virtual. Scientometrics, 126(1), 707–724. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03754-5
    27. Finlay, M. J., Tinnion, D. J., & Simpson, T. (2022). A virtual versus blended learning approach to higher education during the COVID-19 pandemic: The experiences of a sport and exercise science student cohort. Journal of Hospitality, Leisure, Sport & Tourism Education, 30, 100363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhlste.2021.100363
    28. Fortus, D., Lin, J., Neumann, K., & Sadler, T. D. (2022). The role of affect in science literacy for all. International Journal of Science Education, 44(4), 535–555. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2022.2036384
    29. Ghorbani, Z., Kargaran, S., Saberi, A., Haghighinasab, M., Jamali, S. M., & Ale Ebrahim, N. (2021). Trends and patterns in digital marketing research: Bibliometric analysis. Journal of Marketing Analytics, 9(3), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41270-021-00116-9
    30. Hallinger, P., Jayaseelan, S., & Speece, M. W. (2024). The evolution of educating for sustainable development in East Asia: A bibliometric review, 1991–2023. Sustainability, 16(20). https://doi.org/10.3390/su16208900
    31. Harjatanaya, T. Y., Ferary, D., & Sarhindi, I. (2025). Education for sustainable development using participatory methodologies in Indonesian higher education: The case of Satya Terra Bhinneka University. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSHE-09-2024-0657
    32. Hirsh-Pasek, K., Zosh, J. M., Golinkoff, R. M., Gray, J. H., Robb, M. B., & Kaufman, J. (2015). Putting education in “educational” apps: Lessons from the science of learning. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 16(1), 3–34. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100615569721
    33. Irwanto, I., Dianawati, R., & Lukman, I. (2022). Trends of augmented reality applications in science education: A systematic review from 2007 to 2022. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 17(13), 157–175. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v17i13.30587
    34. Jacques, S., Ouahabi, A., & Kanetaki, Z. (2023). Post-COVID-19 education for a sustainable future: Challenges, emerging technologies and trends. Sustainability, 15(8), 6487. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15086487
    35. Jagadeeswari, S., & Das, M. (2024). Mapping the landscape: Bibliometric trends in gender diversity research (2013–2023). Multidisciplinary Reviews, 7(10). https://doi.org/10.31893/multirev.2024236
    36. Jakubowski, M., Gajderowicz, T., & Patrinos, H. A. (2025). COVID-19, school closures, and student learning outcomes: New global evidence from PISA. NPJ Science of Learning, 10(1), 5. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-025-00297-3
    37. Kalogiannakis, M., Papadakis, S., & Zourmpakis, A.-I. (2021). Gamification in science education: A systematic review of the literature. Education Sciences, 11(1), 22. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11010022
    38. Kardoyo, H., Salomo, R. V., Atmoko, A. W., & Hidayat, D. (2025). Integration of Indonesia’s government research and development institutions into single agency: Neo‐Weberian state or not? Australian Journal of Public Administration. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8500.70003
    39. Kipper, L. M., Furstenau, L. B., Hoppe, D., Frozza, R., & Iepsen, S. (2020). Scopus scientific mapping production in Industry 4.0 (2011–2018): A bibliometric analysis. International Journal of Production Research, 58(6), 1605–1627. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2019.1671625
    40. Kurz, D. L., Bedin, E., & Groenwald, C. L. O. (2021). The teaching of natural sciences in the early years of elementary school to educate a scientifically literate individual. Acta Scientiae, 23(1), 53–79. https://doi.org/10.17648/acta.scientiae.6204
    41. Kusmaryono, I., Wijayanti, D., & Maharani, H. R. (2022). Number of response options, reliability, validity, and potential bias in the use of the Likert scale education and social science research: A literature review. International Journal of Educational Methodology, 8(4), 625–637. https://doi.org/10.12973/ijem.8.4.625
    42. Kwiek, M. (2021). What large-scale publication and citation data tell us about international research collaboration in Europe: Changing national patterns in global contexts. Studies in Higher Education, 46(12), 2629–2649. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2020.1749254
    43. Kyvik, S., & Aksnes, D. W. (2015). Explaining the increase in publication productivity among academic staff: A generational perspective. Studies in Higher Education, 40(8), 1438–1453. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2015.1060711
    44. Laksmiwati, P. A., Lavicza, Z., Cahyono, A. N., Yunianto, W., & Houghton, T. (2023). Unveiling the implementation of STE(A)M education: An exploratory case study of Indonesia from experts’ and policymakers’ perspectives. Cogent Education, 10(2), 2267959. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2023.2267959
    45. Leal Filho, W., Lange Salvia, A., Beynaghi, A., Fritzen, B., Ulisses, A., Avila, L. V., Shulla, K., Vasconcelos, C. R. P., Moggi, S., & Mifsud, M. (2024). Digital transformation and sustainable development in higher education in a post-pandemic world. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 31(1), 108–123. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504509.2023.2237933
    46. Li, Y., Wang, K., Xiao, Y., & Froyd, J. E. (2020). Research and trends in STEM education: A systematic review of journal publications. International Journal of STEM Education, 7(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-020-00207-6
    47. Martin, S. N. (2019). Science education in Indonesia: Past, present, and future. Asia-Pacific Science Education, 5(1), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41029-019-0032-0
    48. Martins, J., Gonçalves, R., & Branco, F. (2024). A bibliometric analysis and visualization of e-learning adoption using VOSviewer. Universal Access in the Information Society, 23(3), 1177–1191. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-022-00953-0
    49. Maryanti, R., Rahayu, N. I., Muktiarni, M., Al Husaeni, D. F., Hufad, A., Sunardi, S., & Nandiyanto, A. B. D. (2022). Sustainable development goals (SDGs) in science education: Definition, literature review, and bibliometric analysis. Journal of Engineering Science and Technology, 17, 161–181.
    50. Matthews, K. R. W., Yang, E., Lewis, S. W., Vaidyanathan, B. R., & Gorman, M. (2020). International scientific collaborative activities and barriers to them in eight societies. Accountability in Research, 27(8), 477–495. https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2020.1774373
    51. Momani, M. A. K. Al, Alharahasheh, K. A., & Alqudah, M. (2023). Digital learning in sciences education: A literature review. Cogent Education, 10(2), 2277007. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2023.2277007
    52. Muchson, M., Cobern, W. W., & Saefi, M. (2024). The science education research trends (SERT) in Indonesian secondary schools: A systematic review and bibliometrics study. Cogent Education, 11(1), 2308407. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2024.2308407
    53. Munir, F., Yani, Y. M., Nizmi, Y. E., & Suyastri, C. (2022). State of the art para-diplomacy: A systematic mapping studies and a bibliometric analysis VOSviewer in Scopus database. Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 11(2), 129–141. https://doi.org/10.36941/ajis-2022-0040
    54. Paiva, J. C., Leal, J. P., & Figueira, Á. (2022). Automated assessment in computer science education: A state-of-the-art review. ACM Transactions on Computing Education (TOCE), 22(3), 1–40. https://doi.org/10.1145/3513140
    55. Peterson, L., Scharber, C., Thuesen, A., & Baskin, K. (2020). A rapid response to COVID-19: One district’s pivot from technology integration to distance learning. Information and Learning Sciences, 121(5–6), 461–469. https://doi.org/10.1108/ILS-04-2020-0131
    56. Potkonjak, V., Gardner, M., Callaghan, V., Mattila, P., Guetl, C., Petrović, V. M., & Jovanović, K. (2016). Virtual laboratories for education in science, technology, and engineering: A review. Computers & Education, 95, 309–327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.02.002
    57. Prahani, B. K., Amiruddin, M. Z. Bin, Suprapto, N., Deta, U. A., & Cheng, T. H. (2022). The trend of physics education research during COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Educational Methodology, 8(3), 517–533. https://doi.org/10.12973/ijem.8.3.517
    58. Radhamani, R., Kumar, D., Nizar, N., Achuthan, K., Nair, B., & Diwakar, S. (2021). What virtual laboratory usage tells us about laboratory skill education pre-and post-COVID-19: Focus on usage, behavior, intention and adoption. Education and Information Technologies, 26(6), 7477–7495. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10583-3
    59. Shatri, Z. G. (2020). Advantages and disadvantages of using information technology in learning process of students. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 17(3), 420–428. https://doi.org/10.36681/tused.2020.36
    60. Singh, V. K., Singh, P., Karmakar, M., Leta, J., & Mayr, P. (2021). The journal coverage of Web of Science, Scopus and Dimensions: A comparative analysis. Scientometrics, 126, 5113–5142. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-021-03948-5
    61. Sırakaya, M., & Alsancak Sırakaya, D. (2022). Augmented reality in STEM education: A systematic review. Interactive Learning Environments, 30(8), 1556–1569. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1722713
    62. Solehuddin, M., Muktiarni, M., Rahayu, N. I., & Maryanti, R. (2023). Counseling guidance in science education: Definition, literature review, and bibliometric analysis. Journal of Engineering Science and Technology, 18, 1–13.
    63. Stoet, G., & Geary, D. C. (2018). The gender-equality paradox in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics education. Psychological Science, 29(4), 581–593. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797617741719
    64. Sukendro, S., Habibi, A., Khaeruddin, K., Indrayana, B., Syahruddin, S., Makadada, F. A., & Hakim, H. (2020). Using an extended technology acceptance model to understand students’ use of e-learning during COVID-19: Indonesian sport science education context. Heliyon, 6(11), e05410. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05410
    65. Sulistiawati, S., Kusumah, Y. S., Dahlan, J. A., Juandi, D., & Vos, H. (2023). A bibliometric analysis: Trend of studies in self-regulated learning over the past three decades. Indonesian Journal on Learning and Advanced Education (IJOLAE), 5(2), 178–197. https://doi.org/10.23917/ijolae.v5i2.21381
    66. Susilawati, A. (2023). A bibliometric analysis of global trends in science education research (1842–2022). Indonesian Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 3(2), 269–276. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijomr.v3i2.83283
    67. Susilayati, M., Hardyanto, W., Supriyadi, & Widiyatmoko, A. (2024). The research trends and contributions of science education during the COVID-19 pandemic: A narrative systematic literature review of publications in selected journals. Review of Education, 12(1), e3464. https://doi.org/10.1002/rev3.3464
    68. Taber, K. S. (2018). The use of Cronbach’s alpha when developing and reporting research instruments in science education. Research in Science Education, 48, 1273–1296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9602-2
    69. Tamala, J. K., Maramag, E. I., Simeon, K. A., & Ignacio, J. J. (2022). A bibliometric analysis of sustainable oil and gas production research using VOSviewer. Cleaner Engineering and Technology, 7, 100437. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clet.2022.100437
    70. Thohir, M. A., Ahdhianto, E., Mas’ula, S., April Yanti, F., & Sukarelawan, M. I. (2023). The effects of TPACK and facility condition on preservice teachers’ acceptance of virtual reality in science education course. Contemporary Educational Technology, 15(2). https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/12918
    71. Wang, J., Frietsch, R., Neuhäusler, P., & Hooi, R. (2024). International collaboration leading to high citations: Global impact or home country effect? Journal of Informetrics, 18(4), 101565. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2024.101565
    72. Xie, X., Siau, K., & Nah, F. F.-H. (2020). COVID-19 pandemic–online education in the new normal and the next normal. Journal of Information Technology Case and Application Research, 22(3), 175–187. https://doi.org/10.1080/15228053.2020.1824884
    73. Zhang, L., Carter Jr, R. A., Qian, X., Yang, S., Rujimora, J., & Wen, S. (2022). Academia’s responses to crisis: A bibliometric analysis of literature on online learning in higher education during COVID‐19. British Journal of Educational Technology, 53(3), 620–646. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13191
    74. Zhao, Y., & Watterston, J. (2021). The changes we need: Education post COVID-19. Journal of Educational Change, 22(1), 3–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-021-09417-3
    75. Zidny, R., Sjöström, J., & Eilks, I. (2020). A multi-perspective reflection on how indigenous knowledge and related ideas can improve science education for sustainability. Science & Education, 29(1), 145–185. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-019-00100-x
    76. Zourmpakis, A.-I., Papadakis, S., & Kalogiannakis, M. (2022). Education of preschool and elementary teachers on the use of adaptive gamification in science education. International Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning, 14(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTEL.2022.120556
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2025 The Authors

How to cite

Fatkhurrohman, M. A., Hamidah, I., Suhandi, A., & Samsudin, A. (2025). The trend of science education research post-COVID-19 pandemic. Multidisciplinary Reviews, 9(6), 2026305. https://doi.org/10.31893/multirev.2026305
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC
  • Article viewed - 411
  • PDF downloaded - 192