• Abstract

    In tropical developing regions, such as Brazil, animal welfare (AW) has been gaining increasing attention, while stockperson job satisfaction, which is intimately related to AW, is often neglected. This research evaluated the effects of AW training on stockpersons’ attitudes and behaviour towards dairy cows and the impact on cows' fear of humans. Ten dairy farms with pasture-based systems where animal handlers are farm owners or employees were selected from three regions of Sao Paulo, Brazil. The experiment consisted of four stages: 1) Selection of pasture-based dairy farms; 2) First assessment of attitudes, human behaviour, and cows’ flight distance (day one – D1); 3) Pre-assessment of owners' and employees’ AW knowledge, and training (day two – D2); and 4) Final assessment of attitudes, human behaviour, cows’ flight distance, and owners' and employees’ AW knowledge (day three – D3), focusing on the training’s effects on human attitudes and behaviour, and cows’ fear of humans. Among owners and employees, positive attitudes were more often expressed, and negative attitudes were less frequent on day three (D3) after training. Nevertheless, the expression of positive attitudes by farm owners was less common compared to employees. Stockpersons manifested positive behaviour more frequently at D3 than on day one (D1), before training, in contrast to negative behaviour at D1. Taking all cow handling observations together, including those before and after training, the greatest percentage of negative behaviour was at the time of moving the cows from the holding area to the milking stalls (18% of all observed human behaviour), followed by moving cows out of the milking parlour (17%), positioning cows for milking (15%) and placing/removing the milking suction devices (1%). Positive human behaviour usually occurred when moving cows from the holding area to the milking stalls (21%) and during the positioning of cows for milking (19%). After training, cows’ flight distances decreased. In conclusion, the training may have promoted positive human behaviour and reduced the number of fearful cows. Therefore, AW training may positively influence human behaviour, technical expertise, the reduction of fear in cows, and stockpersons' attitudes.

  • References

    1. Ajzen I, Fishbein M (1997) Attitude-behaviour relations: a theoretical analysis and review of empirical research. Psychological Bulletin 84:888-918.
    2. Ajzen I, Fishbein M (1980) Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behaviour. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
    3. Albuquerque AS, Tróccoli BT (2004) Desenvolvimento de uma escala de bem-estar subjetivo. Psicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa 20:153-164.
    4. Breuer K, Hemsworth PH, Barnett JL, Matthews LR, Coleman GJ (2000) Behavioural response to humans and the productivity of commercial dairy cows. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 66:273–288.
    5. Breuer K, Hemsworth PH, Coleman GJ (2003) The influence of handling on the behaviour and productivity of lactating heifers. Proc. 31st Intern. Soc. Appl. Ethology, Research Institute of Animal Production, Prague, Czech Republic and the Institute of Animal Biochemistry and Genetics, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Slovakia.
    6. Boivin X, Marcantognini L, Boulesteix P, Godet J, Brulé A, Veissier I (2007) Attitudes of farmers towards Limousin cattle and their handling. Animal Welfare 16:147-151.
    7. Boivin X, Lensink J, Tallet C, Veissier I (2003) Stockmanship and farm animal welfare. Animal Welfare 12:479-492.
    8. Burton RJF, Peoples S, Cooper MH (2012) Building ‘cowshed cultures’: A cultural perspective on the promotion of stockmanship and animal welfare on dairy farms. Journal of Rural Studies 28:174–187.
    9. Coleman GC, Hemsworth PH, Hay M, Cox M (1998) Predicting stockperson behaviour towards pigs from attitudinal and job-related variables and empathy. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 58: 63–75.
    10. Coleman GJ, Hemsworth PH, Hay M, Cox M (2000) Modifying stockperson attitudes and behaviour towards pigs at a large commercial farm. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 66:11-20.
    11. Eagly A, Chaiken S (2007) The advantages of an inclusive definition of attitude. Social Cognition 25:582-602.
    12. Ellingsen K, Coleman GJ, Lund V, Mejdell CM (2014) Using qualitative behaviour assessment to explore the link between stockperson behaviour and dairy calf behaviour. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 153:10-17.
    13. English P, Burgess G, Segundo R, Dunne J (1992) Stockmanship: improving the care of the pig and other livestock. Ipswich, UK: Farming Press Books, p. 10.
    14. Hanna D, Sneddon IA, Beattie VE (2009) The relationship between the stockperson’s personality and attitudes and the productivity of dairy cows. Animal 3:737-743.
    15. Hemsworth PH (2003) Human-animal interactions in livestock production. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 81:185-189.
    16. Hemsworth PH, Barnett JL (1991) The effects of aversively handling pigs either individually or in groups on their behaviour, growth and corticosteroids. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 30:61-72.
    17. Hemsworth PH, Barnett JL, Coleman GJ, Hansen C (1989) A study of the relationships between the attitudinal and behavioural profiles of stockpeople and the level of fear of humans and the reproductive performance of commercial pigs. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 23:301–314.
    18. Hemsworth PH, Brand A, Willems PJ (1981) The behavioural response of sows to the presence of human beings and their productivity. Livestock Production Science 8:67–74.
    19. Hemsworth PH, Coleman GJ (1998) Human-livestock interactions: the stockperson and the productivity and welfare of intensively farmed animals. London: CAB International, p.91-106.
    20. Hemsworth PH, Coleman GJ (2011) Human-Livestock Interactions: The Stockperson and the Productivity and Welfare of Intensively Farmed Animals, 2nd ed. Wallingford: CAB International, p. 84-152.
    21. Hemsworth PH, Coleman GJ, Barnett JL (1994) Improving the attitude and behaviour of stockpersons towards pigs and the consequences on the behaviour and reproductive performance of commercial pigs. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 39:349-362.
    22. Hemsworth PH, Coleman GJ, Barnett JL, Borg S (2000) Relationships between human-animal interactions and productivity of commercial dairy cows. Journal of Animal Science 78:2821-2831.
    23. Hemsworth PH, Coleman GJ, Barnett JL, Borg S, Dowling S (2002) The effects of the cognitive behavioral intervention on the attitude and behavior of stockpersons and the behavior and productivity of commercial dairy cows. Journal of Animal Science 80:68-78.
    24. Honorato LA, Hötzel MJ, Gomes CCM, Silveira IDB, Filho CPM (2012) Particularities of the human-animal interactions relevant to the welfare and productivity of dairy cows. Ciência Rural 42:332-339.
    25. Jansen J, Van den Borne BH, Renes RJ, Van Schaik G, Lam TJ, Leeuwis (2009) Explaining mastitis incidence in Dutch dairy farming: the influence of farmers' attitudes and behaviour. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 92:210-223.
    26. Magalhães Silva LC, Madureira AP, Paranhos da Costa MJR (2007) Mais carinho no manejo de bezerros leiteiros: uma experiência bem sucedida. In: REUNIÃO ANUAL DA SOCIEDADE BRASILEIRA DE ZOOTECNIA, 44 Anais... Jaboticabal.
    27. Panamá-Arias JL, Spinka M (2005) Associations of stockperson’s personalities and attitudes with the performance of dairy cattle herds. Czech Journal of Animal Science 50:226-234.
    28. Parker M, Rodgers J, Ludtke C, Kolesar R (2009) Abate Humanitário de Bovinos (Steps. Melhorando o Bem-estar Animal no Abate). [s.1.]: World Animal Protection.
    29. Paz TC (2012) Avaliação de bem-estar em vacas em lactação, Dissertação (Mestrado em Ciência) - Universidade Federal dos Vales do Jequitinhonha e Mucuri.
    30. Rosa MS, Paranhos da Costa MJR (2001) Interações entre retireiros e vacas leiteiras no momento da ordenha. In CONGRESSO BRASILEIRO DE ETOLOGIA, 2001, Juiz de Fora - MG Anais..., v. 01, n. 01, p. 217.
    31. Ruis M, Coleman GJ, Waiblinger S, Winschnurer I, Boivin X (2010) A multimedia-based cognitive behavioural intervention program improves attitudes and handling behaviours of stockpeople in livestock farming. Advances in Animal Biosciences 1:175.
    32. Sant’anna AC, Paranhos da Costa MJR (2007) A noção de ordenhadores sobre suas interações com as vacas leiteiras. In: REUNIÃO ANUAL DA SOCIEDADE BRASILEIRA DE ZOOTECNIA, 44, Jaboticabal. Anais... Jaboticabal.
    33. Telezhenko E, Lidfors L, Bergsten C (2007) Dairy Cow Preferences for Soft or Hard Flooring when Standing or Walking. Journal of Dairy Science 90:3716-3724.
    34. Waiblinger S, Menke C, Coleman G (2002) The relationship between attitudes, personal characteristics and behaviour of stockpeople and subsequent behaviour and production of dairy cows. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 79:195-219.
    35. Welfare uality®, 2009. Welfare Quality assessment protocol for cattle. Welfare Qality Consortium, 60-111.
    36. Windschrer I, Barth K, Waiblinger S (2009) Can stroking during milking decrease avoidance distances of cows towards humans? Animal Welfare 18:507-513.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2023 Malque Publishing

How to cite

Vieira, F. V. R., Silveira, R. M. F., Franchi, G. A., & da Silva, I. J. O. (2023). The impact of training on stockpersons’ behaviour and cows’ fear response. Journal of Animal Behaviour and Biometeorology, 11(2). https://doi.org/10.31893/jabb.23017
  • Article viewed - 113
  • PDF downloaded - 55