• Abstract

    The objective of this meta-analysis was to analyze the effect of feeding live yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) on feed intake (FI), lactation performance (LP), rumen fermentation (RF), and rumen microbiota (RM) in dairy cattle. We performed a literature search using the Boolean search approach with MeSH keywords, including live yeast, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, S. cerevisiae, feed intake, lactation, performance traits, rumen, fermentation, microbiota, and cattle. Twenty-five (25) articles published contained at least data on feed intake, lactation performance or milk production parameters, rumen fermentation or digestibility, and rumen microbiota measured for experiments involving dairy animals have been selected. Microsoft Excel performed data extraction and organization, and statistical analysis was performed using SPSS. Few studies have observed a negative impact of the LY on the FI (8%), LP (12%), RF (4%), and RM (8%), but the majority of the selected studies reported a positive impact of adding LY (FI: 36%, LP: 52%, RF: 52% and RM: 40%). Cows supplemented with LY showed a marginal decrease in feeding rate; min/d (0.13 vs. 0.14; P = 0.65), interval between meals; min (142.1 vs. 1603, P = 0.09), meal size; kg of DM/meal (3.4 vs. 3.8, P = 0.09), meal duration; min/meal (32.5 vs.35.3, P = 0.39), lying boots; no/d (9.5 vs. 9.6, P = 0.83), eating boot; bout/day (80.7 vs. 8.26, P = 0.24), and lying time; min/d (671.1 vs. 697.5, P = 0.51). However, LY increases feeding duration; min/d (232.0 vs. 226.6, P = 0.65), meal frequency; meal/d (9.0 vs. 7.8, P = 0.07), rumination; min/d (570.3 vs. 344.9, P = 0.08), and meal criterion with significance; min (20.0 vs. 25.8, P = 0.04). Meta-regression of the covariate effect shows that using live yeast products in the cattle diet significantly increased the Lactation Performance (P = 0.001) and Feed Intake (P = 0.001). However, it enabled a higher average ruminal Fermentation (P = 0.005) and microbiota (P = 0.003). Furthermore, the timing of live yeast culture before calving could influence the performance and ruminal parameters, especially the microbiomes (P = 0.006). A little increase in milk yield (1.4kg/day) and lower SCS(somatic cells score (2.76) were observed in LY. This meta-analysis indicated feeding live yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) could improve feeding behaviour, animal performance, and herd productivity (milk and rumen health). However, further research is required to study its effect on feed intake and rumen microbiota in dairy cattle.

  • References

    1. Abd El-Ghani AA (2004) Influence of diet supplementation with yeast culture (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) on performance of Zaraibi goats. Small Ruminant Research 52:223–229.
    2. AlIbrahim RM, Crowe MA, Duffy P, O'Grady L, Beltman ME and Mulligan FJ (2010) The effect of body condition at calving and supplementation with Saccharomyces cerevisiae on energy status and some reproductive parameters in early lactation dairy cows. Animal Reproduction Science 121:63–71. doi: 10.1016/j.anireprosci.2010.04.183.
    3. Anee IJ, Alam S, Begum RA, Shahjahan RM and Khandaker AM (2021) The role of probiotics on animal health and nutrition. The Journal of Basic and Applied Zoology 82:1-16. doi:10.1186/s41936-021-00250-x.
    4. Bach A, Iglesias C and Devant M (2007) Daily rumen pH pattern of loose-housed dairy cattle as affected by feeding pattern and live yeast supplementation Animal Feed Science and Technology 136:146–153. doi: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2006.09.011.
    5. Bruno RGS, Rutigliano H, Cerri RL, Robinson PH and Santos JEP (2009) Effect of feeding yeast culture on reproduction and lameness in dairy cows under heat stress. Animal Reproduction Science 113:11–21. doi: 10.1016/j.anireprosci.2008.06.007.
    6. Callaway ES and Martin SA (1997) Effects of a Saccharomyces cerevisiae culture on ruminal bacteria that utilize lactate and digest cellulose. Journal of dairy science 80:2035–2044. doi:10.3168/JDS.S0022-0302(97)76148-4.
    7. Dann HM, Drackley JK, McCoy GC, Hutjens MF and Garrett JE (2000) Effects of yeast culture (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) on prepartum intake and post-partum intake and milk production of Jersey cows. Journal of dairy science 83:123–127. doi:10.3168/JDS.S0022-0302(00)74863-6.
    8. Desnoyers M, Giger-Reverdin S, Bertin G, Duvaux-Ponter C and Sauvant D (2009) Meta-analysis of the influence of Saccharomyces cerevisiae supplementation on ruminal parameters and milk production of ruminants. Journal of Dairy Science 92:1620–1632. doi:10.3168/jds.2008-1414.
    9. DeVries TJ and Chevaux E (2014) Modification of the feeding behavior of dairy cows through live yeast supplementation. Journal of Dairy Science 97:6499–6510. doi:10.3168/jds.2014-8226.
    10. Dias ALG, Freitas JA, Micai B, Azevedo RA, Greco LF and Santos JEP (2018) Effect of supplemental yeast culture and dietary starch content on rumen fermentation and digestion in dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 101:201–221. doi:10.3168/jds.2017-13241.
    11. Elghandour MMM, Abu Hafsa SH, Cone JW, Salem AZM, Anele UY and Alcala-Canto Y (2022) Prospect of yeast probiotic inclusion enhances livestock feeds utilization and performance: an overview. Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery. doi:10.1007/s13399-022-02562-6.
    12. Freiman JA, Chalmers TC, Smith HA and Kuebler RR (2019) The Importance of Beta, the Type II Error, and Sample Size in the Design and Interpretation of the Randomized Controlled Trial: Survey of Two Sets of "Negative". In Trials Medical Uses of Statistics 2nd Edition 357–389. doi:10.1201/9780429187445-19.
    13. Guedes CM, Gonçalves D, Rodrigues MAM and Dias-da-Silva A (2008) Effects of a Saccharomyces cerevisiae yeast on ruminal fermentation and fibre degradation of maize silages in cows. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 145:27–40. doi: 10.1016/J.ANIFEEDSCI.2007.06.037.
    14. Horst EA, Kvidera SK and Baumgard LH (2021) Invited review: The influence of immune activation on transition cow health and performance—A critical evaluation of traditional dogmas. Journal of Dairy Science 104:8380–8410. doi:10.3168/jds.2021-20330.
    15. Lean IJ and Rabiee AR (2011) Effect of feeding biotin on milk production and hoof health in lactating dairy cows: A quantitative assessment. Journal of Dairy Science 94: 1465–1476, doi:10.3168/JDS.2010-3682.
    16. Li Z, Fan Y, Bai H, Zhang J, Mao S, and Jin W (2023) Live yeast supplementation altered the bacterial community's composition and function in rumen and hindgut and alleviated the detrimental effects of heat stress on dairy cows. Journal of Animal Science 101. doi:10.1093/jas/skac410.
    17. Marden JP, Julien C, Monteils V, Auclair E, Moncoulon R and Bayourthe C (2008) How does live yeast differ from sodium bicarbonate to stabilize ruminal pH in high-yielding dairy cows? Journal of Dairy Science 91:3528–3535. doi:10.3168/jds.2007-0889.
    18. Moallem U, Lehrer H, Livshitz L, Zachut M and Yakoby S (2009) The effects of live yeast supplementation to dairy cows during the hot season on production, feed efficiency, and digestibility. Journal of Dairy Science 92:343–351. doi:10.3168/jds.2007-0839.
    19. Mosoni P, Chaucheyras-Durand F, Béra-Maillet C and Forano E (2007) Quantification by real-time PCR of cellulolytic bacteria in the rumen of sheep after supplementation of a forage diet with readily fermentable carbohydrates: effect of a yeast additive. Journal of applied microbiology 103:2676–2685. doi:10.1111/J.1365-2672.2007.03517.X.
    20. Moya D, Calsamiglia S, Ferret A, Blanch M, Fandiño JI, Castillejos L and Yoon I (2009) Effects of dietary changes and yeast culture (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) on rumen microbial fermentation of Holstein heifers. Journal of Animal Science 87:2874–2881. doi:10.2527/jas.2008-1446.
    21. Nasiri AH, Towhidi A, Shakeri M, Zhandi M, Dehghan-Banadaky M and Colazo MG (2018) Effects of live yeast dietary supplementation on hormonal profile, ovarian follicular dynamics, and reproductive performance in dairy cows exposed to high ambient temperature. Theriogenology 122:41–46. doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2018.08.013.
    22. Ogunade IM, Lay J, Andries K, McManus CJ, and Bebe F (2019) Effects of live yeast on differential genetic and functional attributes of rumen microbiota in beef cattle. Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology 10:68. doi:10.1186/s40104-019-0378-x.
    23. Oliveira AP, Romanzini EP, Leite RG, Delevatti LM, Fernandes LB, D'Aurea AP and Reis RA (2019) Feeding behavior during adaptation phase of beef cattle in feedlot reducing the use of conventional growth promoters. EAAP Scientific Series 138:209–210. doi:10.3920/978-90-8686-891-9_41.
    24. de Ondarza MB, Sniffen CJ, Dussert L, Chevaux E, Sullivan J and Walker N (2010) CASE STUDY: Multiple-Study Analysis of the Effect of Live Yeast on Milk Yield, Milk Component Content and Yield, and Feed Efficiency. The Professional Animal Scientist 26:661–666. doi:10.15232/S1080-7446(15)30664-1.
    25. Perdomo MC, Staples CR and Santos JEP (2020) Effects of feeding live yeast at 2 dosages on performance and feeding behavior of dairy cows under heat stress. Journal of Dairy Science 103:325–339. doi:10.3168/jds.2019-17303.
    26. Putnam DE, Schwab CG, Socha MT, Whitehouse NL, Kierstead NA and Garthwaite BD (1997) Effect of yeast culture in the diets of early lactation dairy cows on ruminal fermentation and passage of nitrogen fractions and amino acids to the small intestine. Journal of dairy science 80:374–384. doi:10.3168/JDS.S0022-0302(97)75947-2.
    27. Rossow HA, Riordan T and Riordan A (2018) Effects of addition of a live yeast product on dairy cattle performance. Journal of Applied Animal Research 46:159–163. doi:10.1080/09712119.2017.1281810.
    28. Salah Hamed E (2022) Yeast as a feed supplement for dairy cows - Dairy Global, https://www.dairyglobal.net/health-and-nutrition/nutrition/yeast-as-a-feed-supplement-for-cattle/ Accessed: 2023-06-29.
    29. Sanchez NCB, Broadway PR and Carroll JA (2021) Influence of yeast products on modulating metabolism and immunity in cattle and swine. Animals 11:1–14. doi:10.3390/ani11020371.
    30. Sartori ED, Eugênia M, Canozzi A, Zago D, Prates ÊR, Velho JP, Otávio J and Barcellos J (2017) The Effect of Live Yeast Supplementation on Beef Cattle Performance: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Journal of Agricultural Science 9:21. doi:10.5539/JAS.V9N4P21.
    31. Schingoethe DJ, Linke KN, Kalscheur KF, Hippen AR, Rennich DR and Yoon I (2004) Feed efficiency of mid-lactation dairy cows fed yeast culture during summer Journal of dairy science 87:4178–4181. doi:10.3168/JDS.S0022-0302(04)73561-4.
    32. Sousa DO, Oliveira CA, Velasquez A V., Souza JM, Chevaux E, Mari LJ and Silva LFP (2018) Live yeast supplementation improves rumen fibre degradation in cattle grazing tropical pastures throughout the year. Animal Feed Science and Technology 236:149–158. doi: 10.1016/J.ANIFEEDSCI.2017.12.015.
    33. Stella A V., Paratte R, Valnegri L, Cigalino G, Soncini G, Chevaux E, Dell'Orto V and Savoini G (2007) Effect of administration of live Saccharomyces cerevisiae on milk production, milk composition, blood metabolites, and faecal flora in early lactating dairy goats. Small Ruminant Research 67:7–13. doi: 10.1016/J.SMALLRUMRES.2005.08.024.
    34. Wang Z, Eastridge ML and Qiu X (2001) Effects of forage neutral detergent fiber and yeast culture on performance of cows during early lactation. Journal of dairy science 84:204–212. doi:10.3168/JDS.S0022-0302(01)74470-0.
    35. Yuan K, Liang T, Muckey MB, Mendonça LGD, Hulbert LE, Elrod CC and Bradford BJ (2015) Yeast product supplementation modulated feeding behavior and metabolism in transition dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 98:532–540. doi:10.3168/jds.2014-8468.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2023 Malque Publishing

How to cite

Nzeyimana, J. B., Fan, C., Tan, L., Butore, J., Zhuo, Z., & Cheng, J. (2023). Meta-analysis of the effect of feeding live yeast (<em>Saccharomyces cerevisiae</em>) on feeding behaviour and lactation performance, rumen fermentation, and rumen microbiota in dairy cattle. Journal of Animal Behaviour and Biometeorology, 11(4), 2023028. https://doi.org/10.31893/jabb.23028
  • Article viewed - 261
  • PDF downloaded - 72