Neurophysiology, Behavior and Animal Welfare Assessment, DPAA. Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana (UAM), Mexico City, Mexico.
Animal Welfare Area, Faculty of Veterinary Sciences (FCV). Universidad Nacional del Centro de la Provincia de Buenos Aires (UNCPBA), Argentina.
Scuola di Scienze Agrarie, Forestali, Alimentari ed Ambientali, Università degli Studi della Basilicata, Potenza, Italy.
Department of Public Health, Faculty of Veterinary Science, National University of Litoral, Esperanza, Argentina.
Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana (UAM) Iztapalapa Campus, Department of Biotechnology, Mexico City, Mexico.
Graduate and Research Department, Facultad de Medicina Veterinaria y Zootecnia, Universidad Autónoma de Tamaulipas, Victoria City, Tamaulipas, Mexico.
Neurophysiology, Behavior and Animal Welfare Assessment, DPAA, Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana (UAM), Mexico City, Mexico.
Clinical Pharmacology and Veterinary Anaesthesia. Department of Biological Science. FESC. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM), Mexico.
Comissão de Bem-Estar Animal da Associação Brasileira de Proteína Animal (ABPA), São Paulo, Brazil.
Animal Welfare and Food Safety, F&S Consulting, Dublin, Ireland.
Department of Livestock Sciences. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM), FESC. Mexico.
Clinical Pharmacology and Veterinary Anaesthesia. Department of Biological Science. FESC. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM), Mexico.
Results on appropriate, inappropriate, and painful slaughtering methods of river buffalo (Bubalus bubalis) are discussed. Undesirable consequences of poor desensitization and/or slaughtering procedures, causing pain and suffering to animals, are also approached. These considerations are relevant as unsuitable methods can reduce consumer acceptance and commercial value of the meat obtained from animals undergoing deficient slaughtering procedures due to a lack of concern regarding their welfare. Relevant databases –Scopus, Science Direct, and PubMed– were searched for this review, including keywords such as pain, slaughter, stunning, Bubalus bubalis, and animal welfare. A detailed description of river buffalo's encephalic anatomy was compared to cattle concerning correct stunning and slaughter methods. The neurobiological processes of pain felt by animals when inadequately desensitized was also examined. Finally, recent findings on stunning methods for buffaloes were discussed, including encephalography. It was concluded that different animal species may require different stunning methods; at the same, time the optimal anatomical site also varies between species. Therefore, it is of the utmost importance to train the personnel performing these procedures (transport, stunning, slaughtering) to avoid mishandling that jeopardizes animal welfare by generating stimuli that trigger neurophysiological responses and, in turn, translate into pain during slaughter and reduced meat quality.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2021 Malque Publishing