Keywords:
animal welfare
Skin Lesions
animal transportation
trailer vibration

  • Abstract

    Transport is a relevant process during pigs’ lives because of its impact on animal welfare. Considering commercial conditions, several factors vary between journeys; therefore, it is important to establish the influence of transport distance on skin lesion scores in finishing pigs, considering weather and vibration conditions. Skin lesion score was assessed in 649 finishing pigs at the farms before loading, with a five-point scale (0= none to 4 = ≥ 16 superficial lesions or > 10 deep lesions), and at the slaughterhouse after unloading. Three transport distances were evaluated (short, intermediate and long), in which microclimatic and vibration conditions were monitored from the vehicle’s compartments. Intermediate distances showed higher proportions of worst score (4) at the front part, whereas long distances presented worst score at the middle and hind quarters. Short distances displayed higher proportions of worst score at ears. Temperatures inside the vehicle were above the thermal comfort limit for pigs, providing a heat stress condition. Vibrations were higher sideways than in the vertical and longitudinal directions. Transport under tropical conditions negatively affected the skin injuries score, indicating a higher incidence of skin wounds at the slaughterhouse than in the farms. Body parts can be affected differently by distance, considering skin lesion scores.

  • References

    1. Barton Gade, P., 2008a. Effect of rearing system and mixing at loading on transport and lairage behaviour and meat quality: Comparison of free range and conventionally raised pigs. Animal 2, 1238–1246. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731108002565
    2. Barton Gade, P., 2008b. Effect of rearing system and mixing at loading on transport and lairage behaviour and meat quality: Comparison of outdoor and conventionally raised pigs. Animal 2, 902–911. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731108002000
    3. Barton Gade, P., Warris, P.D., Brown, S.N., Lambooij, E., 1996. Methods of improving pig welfare and meat quality by reducing stress and discomfort before slaughter methods of accessing meat quality. Proceedings European Seminary “New information on welfare and meat quality of pigs as related to handling transport and lairage conditions”. Braunschweig-Voelkenrode, Germany, 23-34.
    4. Bottacini, M., Scollo, A., Edwards, S.A., Contiero, B., Veloci, M., Pace, V., Gottardo, F., 2018. Skin lesion monitoring at slaughter on heavy pigs (170 kg): Welfare indicators and ham defects. PLoS One 13, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0207115
    5. Bozzo, G., Padalino, B., Bonerba, E., Barrasso, R., Tufarelli, V., Zappaterra, M., Ceci, E., 2020. Pilot study of the relationship between deck level and journey duration on plasma cortisol, epinephrine and norepinephrine levels in italian heavy pigs. Animals 10, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10091578
    6. Bracke, M. B. M., Herskin, M. S., Marahrens, M., Gerritzen, M. A., Spoolder, H. A. M., 2020. Review of climate control and space allowance during transport of pigs. EURCAW-Pigs, January, v.1.0.
    7. Brandt, P., Aaslyng, M.D., 2015. Welfare measurements of finishing pigs on the day of slaughter: A review. Meat Sci. 103, 13–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2014.12.004
    8. BRASIL, 2000. Instrução Normativa Nº 3, de 17 de janeiro de 2000. Aprova o regulamento técnico de métodos de insensibilização para o abate humanitário de animais de açougue. Diário Oficial [da] República Federativa, Brasília, DF, 24 de janeiro de 2000.
    9. BRASIL, 2014. Portaria MTE Nº 1297, de 13 de agosto 2014. Aprova o Anexo 1- Vibração – da Norma Regulamentadora nº 9 – Programas de Prevenção de Riscos Ambientais (PPRA), altera o Anexo 8 – Vibração – da Norma Regulamentadora nº 15 – Atividades e Operações Insalubres, e dá outras providências.
    10. BRASIL, 1995. Portaria Nº 711, de 1º de novembro de 1995. Aprova as normas técnicas de instalações e equipamentos para abate e industrialização de suínos. Diário Oficial [da] República Federativa, Brasília, DF, 03 de novembro de 1995.
    11. Carroll, G.A., Boyle, L.A., Teixeira, D.L., Van Staaveren, N., Hanlon, A., O’Connell, N.E., 2015. Effects of scalding and dehairing of pig carcasses at abattoirs on the visibility of welfare- related lesions. Animal 10, 460–467. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731115002037
    12. Castro, A.C. De, 2016. Comportamento e desempenho sexual de suínos reprodutores criados em ambientes enriquecidos 153.
    13. Cervantes, M., Antoine, D., Valle, J.A., Vásquez, N., Camacho, R.L., Bernal, H., Morales, A., 2018. Effect of feed intake level on the body temperature of pigs exposed to heat stress conditions. J. Therm. Biol. 76, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtherbio.2018.06.010
    14. Christensen, L., Blaabjerg, L., Hartung, J., 2007. Investigation of pig transports for more than 8 hours in cold and warm weather conditions and of the requirements for ventilation during the transport.
    15. Chulayo, A.Y., Muchenje, V., 2015. A balanced perspective on animal welfare for improved meat and meat products. South African J. Anim. Sci. 45, 452–469. https://doi.org/10.4314/sajas.v45i5.2
    16. Čobanović, N., Bošković, M., Vasilev, D., Dimitrijević, M., Parunović, N., Djordjević, J., Karabasil, N., 2016. Effects of various pre-slaughter conditions on pig carcasses and meat quality in a low-input slaughter facility. South African J. Anim. Sci. 46, 380–390. https://doi.org/10.4314/sajas.v46i4.6
    17. Correa, J.A., Gonyou, H.W., Torrey, S., Widowski, T., Bergeron, R., Crowe, T.G., Laforest, J.P., Faucitano, L., 2013. Welfare and carcass and meat quality of pigs being transported for two hours using two vehicle types during two seasons of the year. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 93, 43–55. https://doi.org/10.4141/CJAS2012-088
    18. Dalla Costa, F.A., Lopes, L.S., Dalla Costa, O.A., 2017. Effects of the truck suspension system on animal welfare, carcass and meat quality traits in pigs. Animals 7, 4–6. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani7010005
    19. Dalla Costa, O.A., Dalla Costa, F.A., Feddern, V., Lopes, L. dos S., Coldebella, A., Gregory, N.G., de Lima, G.J.M.M., 2019. Risk factors associated with pig pre-slaughtering losses. Meat Sci. 155, 61–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2019.04.020
    20. dalla Costa, O.A., Faucitano, L., Coldebella, A., Ludke, J. V., Peloso, J. V., dalla Roza, D., Paranhos da Costa, M.J.R., 2007. Effects of the season of the year, truck type and location on truck on skin bruises and meat quality in pigs. Livest. Sci. 107, 29–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2006.08.015
    21. Dalla Costa, O.A., Ludke, J.V., Costa, M.J.R.P. da, Faucitano, L., Peloso, J.V., Dalla Roza, D., 2007. Modelo de carroceria e seu impacto sobre o bem-estar e a qualidade da carne dos suínos. Ciência Rural 37, 1418–1422. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0103-84782007000500031
    22. De Jong, I.C., Prelle, I.T., Van De Burgwal, J.A., Lambooij, E., Korte, S.M., Blokhuis, H.J., Koolhaas, J.M., 2000. Effects of rearing conditions on behavioural and physiological responses of pigs to preslaughter handling and mixing at transport. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 80, 451–458. https://doi.org/10.4141/a99-130
    23. Dos Reis, J.G.M., Machado, S.T., Santos, R.C., Nääs, I.D.A., Oliveira, R. V., 2015. Financial losses in pork supply chain: A study of the pre-slaughter handling impacts. Eng. Agric. 35, 163– 170. https://doi.org/10.1590/1809-4430-Eng.Agric.v35n1p163-170/2015
    24. Driessen, B., Van Beirendonck, S., Buyse, J., 2020. Effects of transport and lairage on the skin damage of pig carcasses. Animals 10, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10040575
    25. EC, 2002. Council Directive (2002/44/EC) of 25 june 2002 on the minimum health and safety requirements regarding the exposure of workers to the risks arising from physical agents (vibration) (sixteenth individual Directive within the meaning of Article 61(1) of Directive 89/391/EEC).
    26. Faucitano, L., 2018. Preslaughter handling practices and their effects on animal welfare and pork quality. J. Anim. Sci. 96, 728–738. https://doi.org/10.1093/jas/skx064
    27. Faucitano, L., 2001. Causes of skin damage to pig carcasses. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 81, 39–45. https://doi.org/10.4141/A00-031
    28. Faucitano, L., Goumon, S., 2018. Transport of pigs to slaughter and associated handling, Advances in Pig Welfare. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-101012-9.00009-5
    29. Fox, J., Widowski, T., Torrey, S., Nannoni, E., Bergeron, R., Gonyou, H.W., Brown, J.A., Crowe, T., Mainau, E., Faucitano, L., 2014. Water sprinkling market pigs in a stationary trailer. 1. Effects on pig behaviour, gastrointestinal tract temperature and trailer micro-climate. Livest. Sci. 160, 113–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2013.12.019
    30. Gade, P.B., Christensen, L., 1998. Effect of different stocking densities during transport on welfare and meat quality in Danish slaughter pigs. Meat Sci. 48, 237–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0309-1740(97)00098-3
    31. Garcia, A., Johnson, A. K., Ritter, M. J., Calvo-Lorenzo, M. S., McGlone, J. J., 2019. Transporto f market pigs: Improvements in welfare and economics. Livestock Handling and Transport, 5th edition, 328-346.
    32. Garcia, D.B., Silva, I.J.O., Barbosa Filho, J.A.D., Vieira, F.M.C., Dias, C.T.S., 2008. Evaluation of the effect of vibration in simulated condition of transport of broiler chickens. Livest. Environ. VIII - Proc. 8th Int. Symp. 644–650. https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.25564
    33. Gebresenbet, G., Aradom, S., Bulitta, F.S., Hjerpe, E., 2011. Vibration levels and frequencies on vehicle and animals during transport. Biosyst. Eng. 110, 10–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2011.05.007
    34. Gerritzen, M.A., Hindle, V.A., Steinkamp, K., Reimert, H.G.M., Van Der Werf, J.T.N., Marahrens, M., 2013. The effect of reduced loading density on pig welfare during long distance transport. Animal 7, 1849–1857. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731113001523
    35. Gosálvez, L.F., Averós, X., Valdelvira, J.J., Herranz, A., 2006. Influence of season, distance and mixed loads on the physical and carcass integrity of pigs transported to slaughter. Meat Sci. 73, 553–558. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2006.02.007
    36. Grandin, T., 2017. On-farm conditions that compromise animal welfare that can be monitored at the slaughter plant. Meat Sci. 132, 52–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2017.05.004
    37. Griffin, M. J., 1990. Handbook of human vibration. London: Academic Press, 350p.
    38. Guàrdia, M.D., Estany, J., Balasch, S., Oliver, M.A., Gispert, M., Diestre, A., 2009. Risk assessment of skin damage due to pre-slaughter conditions and RYR1 gene in pigs. Meat Sci. 81, 745–751. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2008.11.020
    39. Guàrdia, M.D., Estany, J., Balasch, S., Oliver, M.A., Gispert, M., Diestre, A., 2004. Risk assessment of PSE condition due to pre-slaughter conditions and RYR1 gene in pigs. Meat Sci. 67, 471–478. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2003.11.020
    40. Kephart, K.B., Harper, M.T., Raines, C.R., 2010. Observations of market pigs following transport to a packing plant. J. Anim. Sci. 88, 2199–2203. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2009-2440
    41. Lammens, V., Peeters, E., Maere, H. De, Mey, E. De, Paelinck, H., Leyten, J., Geers, R., 2007. A survey of pork quality in relation to pre-slaughter conditions, slaughterhouse facilities, and quality assurance. Meat Sci. 75, 381–387. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2006.08.001
    42. Ludtke, C.B., Antonio, O., Costa, D., Tadeu, E., Silveira, F., 2012. S0103-84782012000300024 532–537.
    43. Machado, N.A.F., Martin, J.E., Barbosa-Filho, J.A.D., Dias, C.T.S., Pinheiro, D.G., Oliveira, K.P.L., Souza-Junior, J.B.F., 2021. Identification of trailer heat zones and associated heat stress in weaner pigs transported by road in tropical climates. Journal of Thermal Biology, In press. https://doi.org/10.1016/jtherbio.2021.102882
    44. Mkwanazi, M.V., Ncobela, C.N., Kanengoni, A.T., Chimonyo, M., 2019. Effects of environmental enrichment on behaviour, physiology and performance of pigs - A review. Asian-Australas. J. Anim. Sci. 32(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.17.0138
    45. McGlone, J., Johnson, A., Sapkota, A., Kephart, R., 2014. Temperature and relative humidity inside trailers during finishing pig loading and transport in cold and mild weather. Animals 4, 583–598. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani4040583
    46. Melotti, L., Oostindjer, M., Bolhuis, J.E., Held, S., Mendl, M., 2011. Coping personality type and environmental enrichment affect aggression at weaning in pigs. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 133, 144–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2011.05.018
    47. Mota-Rojas, D., Becerril, M., Lemus, C., Sánchez, P., González, M., Olmos, S.A., Ramírez, R., Alonso-Spilsbury, M., 2006. Effects of mid-summer transport duration on pre- and post- slaughter performance and pork quality in Mexico. Meat Sci. 73, 404–412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2005.11.012
    48. Nanni Costa, L., Lo Fiego, D.P., Dall’Olio, S., Davoli, R., Russo, V., 1999. Influence of loading method and stocking density during transport on meat and dry-cured ham quality in pigs with different halothane genotypes. Meat Sci. 51, 391–399. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0309-1740(98)00160-0
    49. Nannoni, E., Widowski, T., Torrey, S., Fox, J., Rocha, L.M., Gonyou, H., Weschenfelder, A. V., Crowe, T., Martelli, G., Faucitano, L., 2014. Water sprinkling market pigs in a stationary trailer. 2. Effects on selected exsanguination blood parameters and carcass and meat quality variation. Livest. Sci. 160, 124–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2013.11.022
    50. National Pork Board, 2019. Common swine industry audit: instructions, standards and audit tool. Des Moines, IA, USA.
    51. Pérez, M.P., Palacio, J., Santolaria, M.P., Aceña, M.C., Chacón, G., Gascón, M., Calvo, J.H., Zaragoza, P., Beltran, J.A., García-Belenguer, S., 2002. Effect of transport time on welfare and meat quality in pigs. Meat Sci. 61, 425–433. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0309- 1740(01)00216-9
    52. Pilcher, C.M., Ellis, M., Rojo-Gómez, A., Curtis, S.E., Wolter, B.F., Peterson, C.M., Peterson, B.A., Ritter, M.J., Brinkmann, J., 2011. Effects of floor space during transport and journey time on indicators of stress and transport losses of market-weight pigs. J. Anim. Sci. 89, 3809–3818. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2010-3143
    53. Randall, J.M., 1992. Human subjective response to lorry vibration: Implications for farm animal transport. J. Agric. Eng. Res. 52, 295–307. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-8634(92)80068- 4
    54. Ritter, M.J., Ellis, M., Berry, N.L., Curtis, S.E., Anil, L., Berg, E., Benjamin, M., Butler, D., Dewey,
    55. C., Driessen, B., DuBois, P., Hill, J.D., Marchant-Forde, J.N., Matzat, P., McGlone, J., Mormede, P., Moyer, T., Pfalzgraf, K., Salak-Johnson, J., Siemens, M., Sterle, J., Stull, C., Whiting, T., Wolter, B., Niekamp, S.R., Johnson, A.K., 2009. Review: Transport Losses in Market Weight Pigs: I. A Review of Definitions, Incidence, and Economic Impact. Prof. Anim. Sci. 25, 404–414. https://doi.org/10.15232/S1080-7446(15)30735-X
    56. Ritter, M.J., Ellis, M., Brinkmann, J., DeDecker, J.M., Keffaber, K.K., Kocher, M.E., Peterson, B.A., Schlipf, J.M., Wolter, B.F., 2006. Effect of floor space during transport of market- weight pigs on the incidence of transport losses at the packing plant and the relationships between transport conditions and losses. J. Anim. Sci. 84, 2856–2864. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2005-577
    57. Scheeren, M.B., Gonyou, H.W., Brown, J., Weschenfelder, A. V., Faucitano, L., 2014. Effects of transport time and location within truck on skin bruises and meat quality of market weight pigs in two seasons. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 94, 71–78. https://doi.org/10.4141/CJAS2013-136
    58. Schwartzkopf-Genswein, K.S., Faucitano, L., Dadgar, S., Shand, P., González, L.A., Crowe, T.G., 2012. Road transport of cattle, swine and poultry in North America and its impact on animal welfare, carcass and meat quality: A review. Meat Sci. 92, 227–243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2012.04.010
    59. Silva, B.A.N., Noblet, J., Donzele, J.L., Oliveira, R.F.M., Primot, Y., Gourdine, J.L., Renaudeau, D., 2009. Effects of dietary protein level and amino acid supplementation on performance of mixed-parity lactating sows in a tropical humid climate. J. Anim. Sci. 87, 4003–4012. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2008-1176
    60. Soleimani, B., Ahmadi, E., 2014. Measurement and analysis of truck vibration levels as a function of packages locations in truck bed and suspension. Comput. Electron. Agric. 109, 141–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2014.09.009
    61. Stajković, S., Teodorović, V., Baltić, M., Karabasil, N., 2017. Pre-slaughter stress and pork quality. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 85. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755- 1315/85/1/012034
    62. Stephens, D.B., Sharman, D.F., Ingram, D.L., Bailey, K.J., 1985. an Analysis of Some Behavioural Effects of the Vibration and Noise Components of Transport in Pigs. Q. J. Exp. Physiol. 70, 211–217. https://doi.org/10.1113/expphysiol.1985.sp002904
    63. Sutherland, M.A., McDonald, A., McGlone, J.J., 2009. Effects of variations in the environment, length of journey and type of trailer on the mortality and morbidity of pigs being transported to slaughter. Vet. Rec. 165, 13–18. https://doi.org/10.1136/vetrec.165.1.13 Tönepöhl, B., Appel, A.K., Welp, S., Voß, B., König von Borstel, U., Gauly, M., 2012. Effect of marginal environmental and social enrichment during rearing on pigs’ reactions to novelty, conspecifics and handling. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 140, 137 145.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2012.05.002
    64. Turner, S.P., Farnworth, M.J., White, I.M.S., Brotherstone, S., Mendl, M., Knap, P., Penny, P., Lawrence, A.B., 2006. The accumulation of skin lesions and their use as a predictor of individual aggressiveness in pigs. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 96, 245–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2005.06.009
    65. Van de Weerd, H., Ison, A., 2019. Providing effective environmental enrichment to pigs: How far have we come? Animals, 9, 254. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani9050254
    66. Warriss, P.D., 1998. Choosing appropriate space allowances for slaughter pigs transported by road: A review. Vet. Rec. 142, 449–454. https://doi.org/10.1136/vr.142.17.449
    67. Warriss, P.D., Brown, S.N., Knowles, T.G., Edwards, J.E., Kettlewell, P.J., Guise, H.J., 1998. The effect of stocking density in transit on the carcass quality and welfare of slaughter pigs:
    68. Results from the analysis of blood and meat samples. Meat Sci. 50, 447–456. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0309-1740(98)00057-6
    69. Welfare Quality®, 2009. Welfare Quality® assessment protocol for pigs (sows and piglets, growing and finishing pigs). Welfare Quality® Consortium, Lelystad, Netherlands.
    70. Xiong, Y., Green, A., Gates, R.S., 2015. Characteristics of trailer thermal environment during commercial swine transport managed under U.S. industry guidelines. Animals 5, 226– 244. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani5020226
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2023 Journal of Animal Behaviour and Biometeorology

How to cite

Sobral, V. S., Silveira, R. M. F., Guesine, G. D., Arno, A., Lobos, C. M. V., & Silva, I. J. de O. (2023). Transport distance influenced the proportion of skin lesions in finishing pigs and negatively affected animal welfare. Journal of Animal Behaviour and Biometeorology, (| Accepted Articles). Retrieved from https://malque.pub/ojs/index.php/jabb/article/view/1071
  • Article viewed - 74